Re: BBC cites a preprint from arXiv
No it's not unique. The BBC Science News website has over the years reported on many arXiv papers as well as preprints/papers submitted to/conference abstracts. regards, David Whitehouse. _ From: American Scientist Open Access Forum [mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org] On Behalf Of Leslie Carr Sent: 24 May 2005 15:36 To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org Subject: Re: BBC cites a preprint from arXiv Usually it's New Scientist that picks these stories up (they have grown-up physicists working for them), and indeed the BBC ran a story based on an arxiv preprint (hep-th/0501068) in March 2005(http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4357613.stm) . So it's not the first, but I can't find any other examples. Paul Rincon, the journalist who produced this story, has about 22 stories based on Nature articles and 10 based on Science (if you take the results of a Google search for site:news.bbc.co.uk Paul-Rincon journal-Nature). --- Les Carr On 23 May 2005, at 22:03, Eric F. Van de Velde wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4564477.stm Is this a first? I.e., a major news organization uses unrefereed self-archived preprint as the basis of a news story. Although not a major hard-news story, it was posted on the main page of the BBC news web site. Does this point to the growing acceptance of Open Archives and/or of arXiv? Does it point to a growing disregard for peer review (at least, outside of the academy)? --Eric Van de Velde, Caltech. http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this.
BBC cites a preprint from arXiv
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4564477.stm Is this a first? I.e., a major news organization uses unrefereed self-archived preprint as the basis of a news story. Although not a major hard-news story, it was posted on the main page of the BBC news web site. Does this point to the growing acceptance of Open Archives and/or of arXiv? Does it point to a growing disregard for peer review (at least, outside of the academy)? --Eric Van de Velde, Caltech.
Re: BBC cites a preprint from arXiv
Eric F. Van de Velde wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4564477.stm Is this a first? I.e., a major news organization uses unrefereed self-archived preprint as the basis of a news story. Although not a major hard-news story, it was posted on the main page of the BBC news web site. Does this point to the growing acceptance of Open Archives and/or of arXiv? Does it point to a growing disregard for peer review (at least, outside of the academy)? There's this previous occasion (New Scientist, but citing arXiv 'publication'): http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4357613.stm The paper in question is http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0504003. I would cynically suggest the story has more to do with promoting Doctor Who than it does a breakthrough in theoretical wormhole physics (or peer review). All the best, Tim.
Re: BBC cites a preprint from arXiv
Usually it's New Scientist that picks these stories up (they have grown-up physicists working for them), and indeed the BBC ran a story based on an arxiv preprint (hep-th/0501068) in March 2005(http:// news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4357613.stm) . So it's not the first, but I can't find any other examples. Paul Rincon, the journalist who produced this story, has about 22 stories based on Nature articles and 10 based on Science (if you take the results of a Google search for site:news.bbc.co.uk Paul-Rincon journal-Nature). --- Les Carr On 23 May 2005, at 22:03, Eric F. Van de Velde wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4564477.stm Is this a first? I.e., a major news organization uses unrefereed self-archived preprint as the basis of a news story. Although not a major hard-news story, it was posted on the main page of the BBC news web site. Does this point to the growing acceptance of Open Archives and/or of arXiv? Does it point to a growing disregard for peer review (at least, outside of the academy)? --Eric Van de Velde, Caltech.
