Santosh Helekar wrote: < The Shroud of Turin has been conclusively proven
to be a fake.>
Kevin Saldanha wrote: <The shroud of Turin has been proven to be a fake of
the image of Christ>
In support of his contention, Kevin quotes Freemasonry historians Chris
Knight and Robert Lomas and places the image as having been " inadvertently
created when a Templar Knight was tortured and crucified during the early
1300's "
jc response:
I don't know IF the Turin Shroud is or is not what it is purported to be.
I know that Santosh Helekar is a scientist who will apply critical
scientific reasoning to determine the veracity of reports, studies, etc
I don't know IF Kevin Saldanha is a scientist who will apply critical
scientific reasoning to determine the veracity of reports, studies, etc
I also do NOT know IF Chris Knight and Robert Lomas are scientists.
So, I ask ...those who might know for sure ....HOW do you KNOW that th
Shroud of Turn is a FAKE?
For those with general non-scientific minds like me, here is material for
primary reading:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4210369.stm
Turin shroud 'older than thought'
Tests in 1988 concluded the cloth was a medieval "hoax". The Shroud of Turin
is MUCH OLDER than suggested by radiocarbon dating carried out in the 1980s,
according to a new study in a PEER-REVIEWED journal.
good wishes
jc
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
