Re: [Goanet] Re: Re: Fred's bluff

2006-04-02 Thread Mario Goveia
--- Valmiki Faleiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Someone has at last put some of the larger issues in
 perspective.  And eloquently!
 
 Excellent analysis, Fred.
 
Mario suggests:

I would encourage Cecil Pinto and Fred Noronha to
consider running for political office in Goa.  How
about it?  How about asking V.M. de Malar to run?  How
about Ethel DaCosta?  There is no problem in Goa that
a few intelligent and honest politicians would not be
able to solve.





_
Do not post admin requests to the list.
Goanet mailing list  (Goanet@goanet.org)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
%(user_optionsurl)s

This email sent to %(user_address)s


Re: Re: [Goanet] Re: Re: Fred's bluff

2006-04-01 Thread Valmiki Faleiro

Yes, my dear Senhor Bernado, I would rather
reign in hell than serve in heaven.  You are
perfectly entitled to your bliss, about the
3rd world rut. How's Macau now under the 2nd world?
Just remember, even Rip van W. woke up a wee bit
late.  The day you do, you will want to reverse
migrate!

Rgds, Valmiki


On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 Bernado Colaco wrote :
Yes you prefer to live in a 3rd world rut with no Passage out 
except for the Portuguese citizenship?


BC

- Original Message 
From: Valmiki Faleiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Frederick Noronha(FN) [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sent: Friday, 
31 March, 2006 9:50:39 AM

Subject: Re: [Goanet] Re: Re: Fred's bluff


Someone has at last put some of the larger issues in
perspective.
And eloquently!

Some of us may not like the way India chased out Portugal from
Goa in 1961 (like how a lower Army rank was demeaningly told
to accept surrender from a higher-ranked Portuguese!)  But it's
time we realize the ground reality and move on.  The futile
debate -- except for academic purposes -- about Timoja in 1510
and India in 1961 must stop.

And those who still entertain doubts about the *motherland*
need to take a second -- perhaps closer -- look at the
geographical
map of India, for that matter of South East Asia.

Excellent analysis, Fred.

-VF






_
Do not post admin requests to the list.
Goanet mailing list  (Goanet@goanet.org)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
%(user_optionsurl)s

This email sent to %(user_address)s


Re: [Goanet] Re: Re: Fred's bluff

2006-03-31 Thread Bernado Colaco
Yes you prefer to live in a 3rd world rut with no Passage out except for the 
Portuguese citizenship?
 
BC

- Original Message 
From: Valmiki Faleiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Frederick Noronha(FN) [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sent: Friday, 31 March, 2006 
9:50:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Goanet] Re: Re: Fred's bluff


Someone has at last put some of the larger issues in 
perspective.
And eloquently!

Some of us may not like the way India chased out Portugal from
Goa in 1961 (like how a lower Army rank was demeaningly told
to accept surrender from a higher-ranked Portuguese!)  But it's
time we realize the ground reality and move on.  The futile
debate -- except for academic purposes -- about Timoja in 1510
and India in 1961 must stop.

And those who still entertain doubts about the *motherland*
need to take a second -- perhaps closer -- look at the 
geographical
map of India, for that matter of South East Asia.

Excellent analysis, Fred.

-VF




_
Do not post admin requests to the list.
Goanet mailing list  (Goanet@goanet.org)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
%(user_optionsurl)s

This email sent to %(user_address)s


Re: [Goanet] Re: Re: Fred's bluff

2006-03-30 Thread Valmiki Faleiro


Someone has at last put some of the larger issues in 
perspective.

And eloquently!

Some of us may not like the way India chased out Portugal from
Goa in 1961 (like how a lower Army rank was demeaningly told
to accept surrender from a higher-ranked Portuguese!)  But it's
time we realize the ground reality and move on.  The futile
debate -- except for academic purposes -- about Timoja in 1510
and India in 1961 must stop.

And those who still entertain doubts about the *motherland*
need to take a second -- perhaps closer -- look at the 
geographical

map of India, for that matter of South East Asia.

Excellent analysis, Fred.

-VF


On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 Frederick Noronha(FN) wrote :


Goanetters like Miguel Braganza, Soter D'Souza and myself have 
opted to
stay on in Goa, and have no regrets for that. There are many 
more; even
though Goa's Catholic society at the early 21st century is once 
again
showing signs of getting seized by a we-are-getting-finished 
paranoia

which took so many abroad in the 'sixties.


 With a
made-in-Goa education, many have gone ahead to do well for 
themselves
across the globe. And you thought that Ashank Desai didn't study 
at the
GEC-Farmagudi or that Romulus Pereira had no connection with 
Loyola's
Margao? While we cannot afford to get complacent, surely let's 
not get
obsessed with the negativism and we're-under-seige mentality that 
can

lead to a self-fulfilling kind of societal paralysis.)


In the 'sixties, the business community of Vasco da Gama came out 
with
a petition against the Navy taking up too much land in the area. 
My own
view is that in today's world the enemies of any country are its 
own
dissatisfied population and a malfunctioning economy, not threats 
from
beyond borders. In this context, my view too is that India, like 
a lot
of other 'developing' and 'developed' countries, spends too much 
money

on its military.


All I'm saying is, let's give up this obsession with 1961. 
Goa's
problems are largely generated and aggravated by tensions 
*within* Goan

society.


  The issue is simply this: does a system benefit a 
larger or
  smaller section of the population? How does the 
current

  system benefit the people of the region?

The questions we need to ask is: Is this sustainable over time? 
Are new
injustices being built within the system? How are old injustices 
being
addressed? Is our environment paying a heavy price? What is our 
vision
for the future? Does our society have checks and balances 
against
politicians or industry running amok and bartering the future 
for

short-term selfish gain? ...

Just a few thoughts... FN





_
Do not post admin requests to the list.
Goanet mailing list  (Goanet@goanet.org)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
%(user_optionsurl)s

This email sent to %(user_address)s


[Goanet] Re: Re: Fred's bluff

2006-03-30 Thread Frederick Noronha (FN)
 Forwarded Message 
From: Frederick Noronha (FN) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: goanet@goanet.org
Subject: Re: Re: Fred's bluff
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 02:28:43 +0530
Gabriel de Figueiredo gdefigueiredo at yahoo.com.au  wrote: 

 I am indeed guilty of changing the suject line (and
 that too inappropriately), but that was because I was
 addressing your PS. If that caused grief to you by any
 unintended insinuations, I truly apologise.  I neither

Not at all, Gabriel. I just commented on that to draw attention to some
who have made a fine art out of midway switching subjectlines. I do
appreciate your sincere debate and genuine way of putting across issues
you honestly believe in, while we all go about debating our differing
perspectives.

 simply draw your attention that there are more than just the Indian
 Supreme Court who do recognise that Goa was indeed invaded.

What you say is true. I was taking up one, very narrow issue, mainly to
challenge the trend of debating complex issues by raising an emotive
misleading shorthand-argument. For instance,
Goans-were-never-consulted-in-1961 or
you-know-who-brought-corruption-into-Goa or, in this case,
it-was-the-Supreme-Court-of-India-that-said-India-was-invaded.

My submission is that such emotive arguments try to push the argument
to one side, without even giving the chance to appreciate the subtle
nuances and complexities involved.

 Although we cannot [do] much about the invasion (as it is a
 fait acompli), one has to call a spade a spade. The

This isn't true or logical. If the situation is indeed atrocious, then
we *have* to do something about it. Nothing is a fait accompli. 

My point is that the end of European colonialism in Asia and Africa in
the 20th century was a development that actually benefitted far more
people than the few it adversely affected.

Those who take recourse to the we cannot do much about it argument
are simply hiding from the view that they have very little support for
their point of view which, in effect, is one about protecting
priviledges of a few. 

While saying this, let me also concede that Asian and African
post-colonial societies are still very complex places, with a number of
unsorted problems. Relations between different sections of the
population can sometimes be tough. Corruption (as the critics of our
afflicted societies never cease to point out, even if they got a hugely
subsidised education at the cost of this country ... and corruption
comes in different forms like Swiss bank accounts, or the colonial
appropriation of Third World resources) is a big concern here.
Illiteracy and poverty among large sections of the population are still
unvanquished enemies. Giving different regions, classes, and other
groupings a fair share of the benefits of 'development' is an issue
still to be sorted out 

All this, of course, doesn't mean that Portuguese colonialism was a
preferrable option, or even that Goa would have done better if it had
to be an independent country. Presumably lead by its own corrupt, very
local, authentic son-of-the-soil politicians (whose character flaws
ranging from an acute lack of vision to unimaginable selfishness are
more than visible, regardless of which party they are affiliated to).

To shift to a personal note: on December 19, 1961 my mother was a
patient at a maternity ward in Brazil. Your home is free, an Italian
doctor told her, in a part of the world where it was still December 18.

  My parents later came back to Goa of the 'sixties, kerosene
  lamps, underdevelopment and limited opportunities ... with a
  lot of optimism. They obviously had a tough time adjusting.
  (Their idea of Goa were 20 years old, and had changed
  substantially meanwhile.) But like many the vast majority of
  the migrants out of Bardez, they were part of a Catholic
  non-elite that had to scour the world for jobs ... even if
  they didn't quite eat grass in Goa.

Today, many of my contemporaries (specially, though not only, kids who
returned from Africa in the 'seventies) prefer to migrate overseas. The
recently-discovered love for the Portuguese passport has more to do
with the entry of Lisbon into the EU, and the sudden decline of the
rupee which makes it even more luring to migrate. But they do it with a
choice. They now too don't have to eat grass -- a query that has come
up repeatedly on Goanet. They're in Goa which is transforming fast; but
given our blinkered perspectives and negative approaches, we can see
only the negatives here. What's worse, our negativism disallows us
from spending time to see how our societies can better cope with the
future, and not miss the train yet again.

Goanetters like Miguel Braganza, Soter D'Souza and myself have opted to
stay on in Goa, and have no regrets for that. There are many more; even
though Goa's Catholic society at the early 21st century is once again
showing signs of