Re: [Goanet]RE: All Colin Powell's fault!
--- Mario Goveia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > TO: Tariq Siddiqui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Tariq, > > You are wrong on every detail on Iraq, which is why > you cannot confront and answer a single question > directly. All of your supposed "questions" were answered long ago. Whether it was on WMDs or democracy. You behave like the child who cannot take "no" for answer and keeps asking "Are we there yet?' > But, it doesn't matter anymore. The Sunni > Baathists you support, were brutalizing 80% of Iraq's > population from a 20% minority position, and their > 35-year domination is OVER. The Iraqis are going to > get their freedom and democracy, and you are left to > squawk with Santosh the other "Chicken-littles". > > You and the other "Chicken-littles" can continue to > insult me and the decisionmakers by calling us > "Chicken-hawks", but over 80% of the real warriors > voted for the "Chicken-hawks" to continue to lead > them, so you are wrong on this issue as well. > > Wrong, and now irrelevent. > Apparently it is not irrelevant since you continue to peddle lies. That too, almost two years after the fact. In any case, I can hardly be wrong since time and again, you are the one who has been exposed for lies. By the way, do you notice now how you stopped talking about Nuclear WMDs, then went on parroting about the Chemical WMDs and then Biological WMDs. Now you don't talk about that at all? Why, because you know you have been caught lying, so now you talk about the dreams of democracy. We all share those dreams of yours, but we prefer not to lie about the reasons and kill thousands of people in the process. -Tariq __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Re: [Goanet]RE: All Colin Powell's fault!
TO: Tariq Siddiqui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tariq, You are wrong on every detail on Iraq, which is why you cannot confront and answer a single question directly. But, it doesn't matter anymore. The Sunni Baathists you support, were brutalizing 80% of Iraq's population from a 20% minority position, and their 35-year domination is OVER. The Iraqis are going to get their freedom and democracy, and you are left to squawk with Santosh the other "Chicken-littles". You and the other "Chicken-littles" can continue to insult me and the decisionmakers by calling us "Chicken-hawks", but over 80% of the real warriors voted for the "Chicken-hawks" to continue to lead them, so you are wrong on this issue as well. Wrong, and now irrelevent.
Re: [Goanet]RE: All Colin Powell's fault!
--- Mario Goveia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tariq, > > Because you have run out of ideas, you have now fallen > back on demanding that an old and ill person like > myself go to Iraq, which is what I called stupid (I > apologize for using this word) and insensitive (which > is a word I stand by). Let me turn that around. > Since you are far younger and healthier than I am, why > aren't you in the middle-east to defend the Muslim > radicals you seem to sympathize with from the > Americans and Israelis? You obviously know how to get > there. Your response is one that is expected from the Chickenhawks. They will try every trick in the book to avoid fighting a war they so much believe in simply because they want other people to die for their assumptions. And when those assumptions are proved wrong, they do not even have the heart in them to apologize. Instead, they start parroting lies about democracy. The fact is quite clear here, if your support the war so much, you have a choice to go and fight it instead of sending a young 20 year old to his death and asking him/her to give up on his dreams and ambitions. As far as I am concerned, it seems that you still are yet to learn that opposing one point of view does not mean an endorsement of the opposite point of view. That is not unexpected from you. You have consistently displayed a tendency not to even fathom a thought other than the lies of the neocons. I fail to understand why that is the case. The only logical conclusion I can come up with is that the neocons have got some dirty pictures of you in compromising positions, that is why you feel it necessary to peddle these lies and defend the liars. > Let's say you all are hypothetically correct about all > your assertions. Let us not talk hypothetically here. You know that I am right, but for perhaps the reason noted above, refuse to acknowlege the truth. -Tariq __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
[Goanet]RE: All Colin Powell's fault!
Tariq, Because you have run out of ideas, you have now fallen back on demanding that an old and ill person like myself go to Iraq, which is what I called stupid (I apologize for using this word) and insensitive (which is a word I stand by). Let me turn that around. Since you are far younger and healthier than I am, why aren't you in the middle-east to defend the Muslim radicals you seem to sympathize with from the Americans and Israelis? You obviously know how to get there. I cannot understand how anyone who comes from India can oppose the liberations of Afghanistan and Iraq, when over 50,000 innocent Kashmiris have been killed since 1947 by the same jihadi mentality we are seeing in the middle-east, trying to get their way by force. Believe me, I can understand why some people may disagree with one or another US policy or action, but some of you seem to be having such a hard time accepting the fact that some of the details you want so hard to be right about are now moot. Let's say you all are hypothetically correct about all your assertions. Are you suggesting that we Afghanistan back to the Taliban, and Iraq to Saddam and the Baathists? What amazes me is that none of you seem to express any concern for the plight of Muslims who were being brutalized in Afghanistan and Iraq by Muslim tyrants all these years. Don't you acknowledge the difference between most Muslims who are peace-loving as the Quran teaches, and the radicals who want to control events by force, and have now added Saudi Arabia to their list? A local Imam tries so hard to convince us that Islam is a peaceful religion. I told him that we were convinced about the religion, now how about trying to convince the jihadis, the only ones who don't seem to have gotten the message?
