Re: [Goanet] Desecration of the Portuguese language in Goa post 61

2006-05-24 Thread Mario Goveia 
I don't have to ask anyone to know that Portuguese was
an inconsequential language in India, before and after
1961, other than for those who spoke it.
>
--- Bernado Colaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> Ask Imelda and she will tell ya, what the miniscule
> langauge meant to people in Goa before 61.
> 
> BC
> 


_
Do not post admin requests to the list.
Goanet mailing list  (Goanet@goanet.org)

Re: [Goanet] Desecration of the Portuguese language in Goa post 61

2006-05-24 Thread Bernado Colaco 

Ask Imelda and she will tell ya, what the miniscule
langauge meant to people in Goa before 61.

BC

===
> >
> "bharat" has so many REAL languages that it would
> make
> absolutely no sense for anyone to claim that it was
> "desecrating" the Portuguese language, which was
> limited to a miniscule number of people in Bharat.
> >
> 
> 
> _
> Do not post admin requests to the list.
> Goanet mailing list  (Goanet@goanet.org)
> 


Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 

_
Do not post admin requests to the list.
Goanet mailing list  (Goanet@goanet.org)

Re: [Goanet] Desecration of the Portuguese language in Goa post 61

2006-05-23 Thread Mario Goveia 
--- Bernado Colaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Thanks to the fortnightly program Contacto Goa we
> now
> have the truth as to how the Portuguese langauge was
> desecrated by bharat post 61.
> 
Mario observes:
>
The only ones who can "desecrate" a language are those
who speak it.
>
"bharat" has so many REAL languages that it would make
absolutely no sense for anyone to claim that it was
"desecrating" the Portuguese language, which was
limited to a miniscule number of people in Bharat.
>


_
Do not post admin requests to the list.
Goanet mailing list  (Goanet@goanet.org)