Re: [Goanet] More on Maqbool Fida Hussain's Hypocrisy

2010-03-11 Thread Alfred de Tavares

Often alluded to as the last-of-the-great painters, even the dissolute
Francisco de Goya, hid his, reputedly, greatest masterworl, the reclining
nude Duquesa da Alba, superimposed by her, equally fascinating clad image.

He feared her cuckolded Duke...Fuda Hussain, apparently, fears none...

Alfred de Tavares



 Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 21:39:54 -0800
 From: chimbel...@yahoo.com
 To: goanet@lists.goanet.org
 Subject: Re: [Goanet] More on Maqbool Fida Hussain's Hypocrisy
 
 Dear Vasant,
 
 Good to hear from you. My point is limited to the fact that her letter 
 contains misinformation, and that many charges made against Husain are 
 unfounded, especially the ones that ascribe sexual and communal meanings to 
 his art. Those who are offended by the three or four verified nude paintings 
 of Hindu deities that he has painted have the right to peacefully protest 
 against him and criticize him. The right to free expression cuts both ways.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Santosh
 
 --- On Tue, 3/9/10, Vasant Baliga vabal...@yahoo.com wrote:
  
  Dear Santosh,
  You have suggested that whatever Dr.Raja has stated is
  false.
   
  You may wish to clarify-
   
  1.Has Hussain not painted Hindu deities in an obscene
  manner and thereby offended Hindu sensibilities?Has he
  painted any other religious figures or for that matter any
  other figures like his favourite Madhuri Dixit in the
  nude?
   
  2.Did he or did he not support the emergency?
   
  3.Does Qatar offer greater democratic freedoms than India?
   
  Secularists may defend Hussain and his paintings until
  the cows come home,but the fact of the matter is that
  secularism is not a ticket to offending religious
  sensibilities on a selective basis in the name of creative
  art.
   
  This is what Sri Sri Ravi Shankar has stated-
  
  Ravi Shankar flays Husain for nude painting  
  
  
  BANGALORE: Spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar Monday
  expressed surprise over the hue and cry over painter M.F.
  Husain's move to give up Indian citizenship and chided him
  for painting Indian gods in the nude.
  While India has a policy of free expression, one cannot
  accept blatant insult to the heroes of its land. It is the
  intention behind a man's creativity which is questionable,
  Ravi Shankar said in a statement.
  In one of Husain's paintings of Mahatma Gandhi, Karl Marx,
  Albert Einstein and Hitler, he painted only Hitler nude and
  said that his way of humiliating a person is to paint him
  nude.
  No one has ever sculpted Rama and Sita as nude. Creative
  expression is always welcome. No country has been as liberal
  as India... Any nude woman could have been painted by him
  but calling the women Sita, Lakshmi (and) Saraswati shows
  his perversion and hatred.
  Will M.F. Husain show the same creativity and the same
  spirit with Islamic heroes and would he, then, be able
  retain his Qatari citizenship?
  Double standards, 
   
  Regards
   
  Vasant Baliga
   
 
 
   
  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969

Re: [Goanet] More on Maqbool Fida Hussain's Hypocrisy

2010-03-09 Thread Santosh Helekar
The letter by Hilda Raja spreads falsehoods and smears. For example, Husain has 
never painted Saraswati copulating with a lion, which Raja claims he has. I 
urge people not to trust everything they read and see in this age of photoshop.

It has been pointed out that many of the paintings displayed on the trashy 
fringe websites such as that created by the Hindu Janajagruti Samiti have not 
been confirmed as authentic copies of Husain originals. Please note that they 
do not have Husain's signature on them, which other Husain paintings displayed 
by internet art galleries do. Please see the following, for example:

http://www.cyberadsstudio.com/SPEAR/hussain/tour2.htm

One endlessly repeated specious charge of bestiality is a transparent 
fabrication. The unconfirmed Durga painting in question appears simply as a 
nude figure riding a tiger with a Durga caption, with no sign of any sexual 
suggestibility at all. Bestiality is completely fantasized by the partisan 
Hindu extremists. I submit to you that most of the other charges are similarly 
exaggerated or fabricated.

Cheers,

Santosh

--- On Mon, 3/8/10, Vasant Baliga vabal...@yahoo.com wrote:
  
  
 More on Maqbool Fida Hussain's Hypocrisy
 
 
 This is a Letter  to the Editor of The Hindu, from a
 practising Christian lady,Dr.Hilda Raja, who was Professor
 in Stella Maris College, Chennai till recently; now settled
 at Baroda, regarding an Editorial in The Hindu in favour of
 bringing back MF Hussain to India.It exposes Hussain's
 hypocrisy and self serving attitude.
  
 http://hildaraja.wordpress.com/
  






[Goanet] More on Maqbool Fida Hussain's Hypocrisy

2010-03-09 Thread Vasant Baliga


Dear Santosh,
You have suggested that whatever Dr.Raja has stated is false.
 
You may wish to clarify-
 
1.Has Hussain not painted Hindu deities in an obscene manner and thereby 
offended Hindu sensibilities?Has he painted any other religious figures or for 
that matter any other figures like his favourite Madhuri Dixit in the nude?
 
2.Did he or did he not support the emergency?
 
3.Does Qatar offer greater democratic freedoms than India?
 
Secularists may defend Hussain and his paintings until the cows come home,but 
the fact of the matter is that secularism is not a ticket to offending 
religious sensibilities on a selective basis in the name of creative art.
 
This is what Sri Sri Ravi Shankar has stated-

Ravi Shankar flays Husain for nude painting  


BANGALORE: Spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar Monday expressed surprise over 
the hue and cry over painter M.F. Husain's move to give up Indian citizenship 
and chided him for painting Indian gods in the nude.
While India has a policy of free expression, one cannot accept blatant insult 
to the heroes of its land. It is the intention behind a man's creativity which 
is questionable, Ravi Shankar said in a statement.
In one of Husain's paintings of Mahatma Gandhi, Karl Marx, Albert Einstein and 
Hitler, he painted only Hitler nude and said that his way of humiliating a 
person is to paint him nude.
No one has ever sculpted Rama and Sita as nude. Creative expression is always 
welcome. No country has been as liberal as India... Any nude woman could have 
been painted by him but calling the women Sita, Lakshmi (and) Saraswati shows 
his perversion and hatred.
Will M.F. Husain show the same creativity and the same spirit with Islamic 
heroes and would he, then, be able retain his Qatari citizenship?
Double standards, 
 
Regards
 
Vasant Baliga
 
The letter by Hilda Raja spreads falsehoods and smears. For example, Husain has 
never painted Saraswati copulating with a lion, which Raja claims he has. I 
urge people not to trust everything they read and see in this age of photoshop.

It has been pointed out that many of the paintings displayed on the trashy 
fringe websites such as that created by the Hindu Janajagruti Samiti have not 
been confirmed as authentic copies of Husain originals. Please note that they 
do not have Husain's signature on them, which other Husain paintings displayed 
by internet art galleries do. Please see the following, for example:

http://www.cyberadsstudio.com/SPEAR/hussain/tour2.htm

One endlessly repeated specious charge of bestiality is a transparent 
fabrication. The unconfirmed Durga painting in question appears simply as a 
nude figure riding a tiger with a Durga caption, with no sign of any sexual 
suggestibility at all. Bestiality is completely fantasized by the partisan 
Hindu extremists. I submit to you that most of the other charges are similarly 
exaggerated or fabricated.

Cheers,

Santosh

--- On Mon, 3/8/10, Vasant Baliga vabal...@yahoo.com wrote:
 ?
 ?
 More on Maqbool Fida Hussain's Hypocrisy
 
 
 This is a Letter? to the Editor of The Hindu, from a
 practising Christian lady,Dr.Hilda Raja,?who was Professor
 in Stella Maris College, Chennai till recently; now settled
 at Baroda, regarding an Editorial in The Hindu in favour of
 bringing back MF Hussain to India.It exposes Hussain's
 hypocrisy and self serving attitude.
 ?
 http://hildaraja.wordpress.com/
 ?







Re: [Goanet] More on Maqbool Fida Hussain's Hypocrisy

2010-03-09 Thread Santosh Helekar
Dear Vasant,

Good to hear from you. My point is limited to the fact that her letter contains 
misinformation, and that many charges made against Husain are unfounded, 
especially the ones that ascribe sexual and communal meanings to his art. Those 
who are offended by the three or four verified nude paintings of Hindu deities 
that he has painted have the right to peacefully protest against him and 
criticize him. The right to free expression cuts both ways.

Cheers,

Santosh

--- On Tue, 3/9/10, Vasant Baliga vabal...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
 Dear Santosh,
 You have suggested that whatever Dr.Raja has stated is
 false.
  
 You may wish to clarify-
  
 1.Has Hussain not painted Hindu deities in an obscene
 manner and thereby offended Hindu sensibilities?Has he
 painted any other religious figures or for that matter any
 other figures like his favourite Madhuri Dixit in the
 nude?
  
 2.Did he or did he not support the emergency?
  
 3.Does Qatar offer greater democratic freedoms than India?
  
 Secularists may defend Hussain and his paintings until
 the cows come home,but the fact of the matter is that
 secularism is not a ticket to offending religious
 sensibilities on a selective basis in the name of creative
 art.
  
 This is what Sri Sri Ravi Shankar has stated-
 
 Ravi Shankar flays Husain for nude painting  
 
 
 BANGALORE: Spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar Monday
 expressed surprise over the hue and cry over painter M.F.
 Husain's move to give up Indian citizenship and chided him
 for painting Indian gods in the nude.
 While India has a policy of free expression, one cannot
 accept blatant insult to the heroes of its land. It is the
 intention behind a man's creativity which is questionable,
 Ravi Shankar said in a statement.
 In one of Husain's paintings of Mahatma Gandhi, Karl Marx,
 Albert Einstein and Hitler, he painted only Hitler nude and
 said that his way of humiliating a person is to paint him
 nude.
 No one has ever sculpted Rama and Sita as nude. Creative
 expression is always welcome. No country has been as liberal
 as India... Any nude woman could have been painted by him
 but calling the women Sita, Lakshmi (and) Saraswati shows
 his perversion and hatred.
 Will M.F. Husain show the same creativity and the same
 spirit with Islamic heroes and would he, then, be able
 retain his Qatari citizenship?
 Double standards, 
  
 Regards
  
 Vasant Baliga
  





[Goanet] More on Maqbool Fida Hussain's Hypocrisy

2010-03-08 Thread Vasant Baliga
 
 
More on Maqbool Fida Hussain's Hypocrisy


















This is a Letter  to the Editor of The Hindu, from a practising Christian 
lady,Dr.Hilda Raja, who was Professor in Stella Maris College, Chennai till 
recently; now settled at Baroda, regarding an Editorial in The Hindu in favour 
of bringing back MF Hussain to India.It exposes Hussain's hypocrisy and self 
serving attitude.
 
 
 
http://hildaraja.wordpress.com/
 
Regards
 
Vasant Baliga