[Goanet] cedric prakash

2009-07-21 Thread Rajiv Desai
i have observed with keen interest the back and forth on the activities of 
cedric prakash. nothing i have read so far convinces me that he stands for a 
positive cause. all his platitudes about human rights and social justice are 
planks in a long discredited platform, especially in the age of genuine 
liberalism (which prakash and his leftist and jholewala supporters call 
'neo-liberalism'). as leaders of the world's two largest democracies, sonia 
gandhi and barack obama have revived the liberal cause that prakash and his ilk 
had expropriated. 

like medha patkar's, his is an oppositional mentality: he opposes modi and the 
bjp (and so do we all), he opposes the congress; he opposed the indo-us nuclear 
deal; he opposes all forms of development. his ideology seems to a confused mix 
between the left that stands for very little but knee jerk diatribes against 
capitalism (especially the usa) and the hind swaraj mindset that excoriates 
modernity (seen as something that is not indian). as such cedric prakash has no 
appreciation for the two most transformative forces of the 20th century: 
capitalism and modernization.

he can get the 'alternate nobel' for what it's worth. but he remains today a 
destructive force in gujarat and indeed in the rest of india; especially among 
us liberals.


Re: [Goanet] cedric prakash

2009-07-17 Thread Santosh Helekar

The following is a very interesting perspective. It reinforces my sense of 
disillusionment towards activists who claim to be fighting for various 
left-wing and right-wing causes. The following excerpt is particularly 
illuminating in this regard:

"Prakash and his band somehow seemed to convey that Gujaratis, as a people, 
were communal and that their work was a missionary crusade to help save Gujarat 
from the Gujaratis. They have become hate objects much like Medha Patkar over 
the Narmada Dam issue."
Rajiv Desai

Cheers,

Santosh

--- On Thu, 7/16/09, Rajiv Desai  wrote:
> 
>       I'm afraid I would have to disagree
> with the suggestion that Fr Cedric Prakash 
> has rendered "yeoman service" in Gujarat. In 2002, when I
> was the chief publicist 
> for the Congress Party during the state elections, I had
> the opportunity to meet Fr 
> Prakash. I arranged as meeting for the Congress campaign
> team with him and his band 
> of activists, mostly left-wing ideologues and jholewalas
> from outside Gujarat. Their 
> behavior was boorish to say the least; they lambasted the
> Congress "culture" and 
> told the Congress team that they were constrained to
> support it for the lack of 
> options. My colleagues were shocked and speechless,
> wondering if the Congress needed 
> their support or just how much of a difference Prakash and
> his band of "activists" 
> would make to the outcome of the election.
>






Re: [Goanet] cedric prakash

2009-07-17 Thread Frederick [FN] Noronha * फ्रेडरिक न ोरोन्या
Are you suggesting that the Congress should be taking a "soft
Hindutva" line, as it has been doing sometimes in the past (1984,
Babri Masjid locks, anti-Sikh riots, Ramayana-induced religiosity via
nationalised television, and on a number of other issues including
under the Digambar Kamat "secular" regime in Goa)?

While the secular lobby has been sometimes blamed for alienating
religious Hindus with their strong campaigning, it is also true that
the Congress itself has allowed itself to become a vehicle of
promoting a softer form of communalism (sometimes, multiple
communalism, as see in the North East, or the Bhindranwala phenomenon)
while cloaking itself in "secular" clothes. This can be lethal too.

There has been some study (if I recall right) of how the logic of
upper-caste dominated Gandhianism in the Gujarat of yesterday has lent
itself to grow into the blatant communalism of today.

I think there is space for the stands that a Cedric Prakash takes,
which to me seems to come more from a commitment to a sense of justice
and human rights than mere I-have-to-protect-my-coreligionists kind of
approach.

Right livelihood or nothing, Prakash has made his mark. Btw, I'm
curious to know if Prakash has a Goan expat connection (we started
talking about Bandra, etc when we once met, but didn't have the time
to complete the conversation!) FN

2009/7/17 Rajiv Desai 
>      I'm afraid I would have to disagree with
> the suggestion that Fr Cedric Prakash
> has rendered "yeoman service" in Gujarat.
> In 2002, when I was the chief publicist
> for the Congress Party during the state
> elections, I had the opportunity to meet Fr
> Prakash. I arranged as meeting for the
> Congress campaign team with him and his band
> of activists, mostly left-wing ideologues
> and jholewalas from outside Gujarat. Their
> behavior was boorish to say the least; they
> lambasted the Congress "culture" and
> told the Congress team that they were
>constrained to support it for the lack of
> options. My colleagues were shocked
> and speechless, wondering if the Congress needed
> their support or just how much of a
> difference Prakash and his band of "activists"
> would make to the outcome of the election


[Goanet] cedric prakash

2009-07-17 Thread Rajiv Desai

  I'm afraid I would have to disagree with the suggestion that Fr Cedric 
Prakash 
has rendered "yeoman service" in Gujarat. In 2002, when I was the chief 
publicist 
for the Congress Party during the state elections, I had the opportunity to 
meet Fr 
Prakash. I arranged as meeting for the Congress campaign team with him and his 
band 
of activists, mostly left-wing ideologues and jholewalas from outside Gujarat. 
Their 
behavior was boorish to say the least; they lambasted the Congress "culture" 
and 
told the Congress team that they were constrained to support it for the lack of 
options. My colleagues were shocked and speechless, wondering if the Congress 
needed 
their support or just how much of a difference Prakash and his band of 
"activists" 
would make to the outcome of the election.

  Later, in talking to other groups opposed to Narendra Modi and the BJP 
including the small community of Catholics in Ahmedabad, we learned that the 
activities of Prakash and his group were in fact a disservice, helping to 
consolidate support for Modi.  From several such groups, we heard that the 
activists 
aroused such ire that even those who supported the Congress were put off.

  Prakash and his band somehow seemed to convey that Gujaratis, as a 
people, 
were communal and that their work was a missionary crusade to help save Gujarat 
from 
the Gujaratis. They have become hate objects much like Medha Patkar over the 
Narmada 
Dam issue.

  I have a special concern for Gujarat in that I was born there as was my 
Goan 
Catholic wife. Fr Prakash and his group are seen as outsiders and their 
activities 
only served to facilitate Modi's clever switch from Hindutva to Gujarati pride.

  In view of the recommendation made in your digest of July 9, 2009 that 
Cedric 
Prakash be nominated for the "Alternate Nobel" award, I thought I'd share this 
information with your readers.



  comma
  Communications Management

  Comma Consulting
  A1/288 Safdarjung Enclave
  New Delhi 110 029
  India

  Phone +91 11 4135 4400
  Fax +91 11 2616 1578










[Goanet] Cedric Prakash

2008-12-11 Thread Frederick "FN" Noronha
I've known Cedric Prakash sj and his work for some time now. We have
met briefly, apart from reading him often online. It is interesting to
see the attempt to discredit his campaigns, coming from that shrill
voice which otherwise defends the indefensible.

If I'm not mistaken, he's a Bandra 'boy', who has made Gujarat his
field of work (though I might be wrong on this, we only had a short
time to exchange views when we met at Benaulim ... and this is an
aside, it is not particularly related to the discussion). But, what is
more relevant is that, to me, Cedric's work is admirable, and
represents all that is admirable in these 'Clash of Civilization'
times, when religious infighting is replacing the Cold War, in the
global need to quickly find The Enemy and get into conflict mode.

Cedric Prakash has been consistently taking the side of the underdog,
articulating the cause of the voiceless (even if 'we' don't have any
direct reason to feel 'their' hurt) and speaking out boldly. It is no
surprise that he comes in for criticism from those who critique him
now. When I encounter his work, I believe those years we spent in
liberal and pro-underdog groups like the All India Catholic
Universities' Federation might just have been worth it. In my view, we
definitely need more Cedric Prakashs. --FN
-- 
FN * Independent Journalist http://fn.goa-india.org
M: +91-9822122436 P: +91-832-2409490