Re: [Goanet] ultrasonic sound waves/radio frequency electromagnetic waves.

2011-02-19 Thread Ivo


From: "Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão" 
Santosh Helekar wrote : <<< I am happy to scientifically educate 
Ferdinando and correct his mistakes even though

he keeps trying to insult me for some reason… These studies have led to the
conclusion that there is no reproducible and reliable evidence for any kind 
of
health hazard from these waves at the powers emitted by cell phones and 
towers,
to humans and other animals. So all of the claims made below by Ferdinando 
are

false.
**It is unfortunate that Santosh is trying to dump his "scientific" crap on 
the Goanetters, including scientifically literate people like Dr.Ferdinando 
dos Reis Falcao. All of us know about hazards due to mobile phone as well as 
to aspartame. I have spoken to experienced physicians on these topics. 
Nobody agrees with Santosh, nor are they ready to discuss with him on any 
matter... The thought that comes to my mind is as follows: Is Santosh 
proclaiming these "scientific truths" only on the Forum for the readers, or 
is he also telling the same truths at home, to his own wife, daughters and 
sons and grandchildren, if he has any? This will be a lithmus test for his 
sincerity (or ignorance).

Regards.
Fr.Ivo

-

RESPONSE:
Sorry Santosh, I do not need to be educated on falsehood. We already have 40
people in Goa who profess falsehood and give false assurances to Goans on a
daily basis. They, like you believe: “INNOCENT until proved guilty!”
Santosh, I regret I have to expose your ignorance on Goanet as you are 
incapable of
giving responsible advice to layman on a public forum. I would have 
preferred a
personal talk were it any other rational colleague. It must be remembered 
that
medical professionals are duty bound to advise for betterment of humanity 
and
not for their destruction. Whenever there are health risks, one needs to 
advise
accordingly. Medical ethics do not permit giving false assurances when 
health

risks are well documented.
Is WHO a irresponsible institution according to Santosh? Please read here. 
Mobile phones

increase risk of cancer, WHO study says :
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/3208416/Mobile-phones-increase-risk-of-cancer-study-says.html
"Interphone Study Reports on Mobile Phone Use and Brain Cancer Risk"
The real truth about the hazards, told by independent scientists. Physicians 
and

Scientists for Responsible Application of Science and Technology (PSRAST)
http://www.psrast.org/mobileng/mobilstarteng.htm
Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in 
subjects living near

mobile phone base stations. Occup Environ Med. 2006 May;63(5):307-13. U.S.
National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health :
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16621850?dopt=Abstract
AND LASTLY,
ALL GOANETTERS, PLEASE GO TO THIS SITE AND JUDGE FOR YOURSELF:
http://www.psrast.org/mobileng/mobilstarteng.htm#junk
Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão.





Re: [Goanet] ultrasonic sound waves/radio frequency electromagnetic waves.

2011-02-15 Thread Santosh Helekar
Most Goanetters should know this. But in case someone does not, let me state 
the obvious. Reliable medical knowledge cannot be sought from the random claims 
made by lay journalists in newspapers and political activist websites screaming 
all kinds of world-wide conspiracies. As I have mentioned in my earlier posts 
in this and related threads, WHO and other international health agencies state 
that there is no clear evidence for a link between mobile phone use and cancer 
(Please see my most recent Goanet post at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/goanet@lists.goanet.org/msg73334.html). Human and 
animal studies have predominantly discounted any such link. This is also true 
of the WHO study misreported in the newspaper link provided by Ferdinando 
below. Here is the entire original article describing that study, published in 
the International Journal of Epidemiology:

http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/39/3/675.long

I quote below the conclusion statement in this paper:

QUOTE
This is the largest study of the risk of brain tumours in relation to mobile 
phone use conducted to date and it included substantial numbers of subjects who 
had used mobile phones for ≥10 years. Overall, no increase in risk of either 
glioma or meningioma was observed in association with use of mobile phones. 
There were suggestions of an increased risk of glioma, and much less so 
meningioma, at the highest exposure levels, for ipsilateral exposures and, for 
glioma, for tumours in the temporal lobe. However, biases and errors limit the 
strength of the conclusions we can draw from these analyses and prevent a 
causal interpretation. 
UNQUOTE

Cheers,

Santosh


--- On Tue, 2/15/11, Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão  
wrote:
> 
> RESPONSE:
> Sorry Santosh, I do not need to be educated on falsehood.
> We already have 40
> people in Goa who profess falsehood and give false
> assurances to Goans on a
> daily basis. They, like you believe: “INNOCENT until
> proved guilty!”
> 
> Santosh, I
> regret I have to expose your ignorance on Goanet as you are
> incapable of
> giving responsible advice to layman on a public forum. I
> would have preferred a
> personal talk were it any other rational colleague. It must
> be remembered that
> medical professionals are duty bound to advise for
> betterment of humanity and
> not for their destruction. Whenever there are health risks,
> one needs to advise
> accordingly. Medical ethics do not permit giving false
> assurances when health
> risks are well documented.
> 
> Is WHO a
> irresponsible institution according to Santosh? Please read
> here. Mobile phones
> increase risk of cancer, WHO study says :
> 
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/3208416/Mobile-phones-increase-risk-of-cancer-study-says.html
> 
> "Interphone
> Study Reports on Mobile Phone Use and Brain Cancer Risk"
> 
>  
> 
> The real
> truth about the hazards, told by independent scientists.
> Physicians and
> Scientists for Responsible Application of Science and
> Technology (PSRAST)
> 
> http://www.psrast.org/mobileng/mobilstarteng.htm
> 
>  
> 
> Subjective
> symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in
> subjects living near
> mobile phone base stations. Occup Environ Med. 2006
> May;63(5):307-13. U.S.
> National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health
> :
> 
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16621850?dopt=Abstract
> 
>  
> 
> AND LASTLY,
> ALL GOANETTERS, PLEASE GO TO THIS SITE AND JUDGE FOR
> YOURSELF:
> 
> http://www.psrast.org/mobileng/mobilstarteng.htm#junk
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão.
> 
>     
> 
>       
>   


 

Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html


[Goanet] ultrasonic sound waves/radio frequency electromagnetic waves.

2011-02-14 Thread Dr . Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão









On Mon Feb 14 14:01:09 PST
2011, Santosh Helekar chimbelcho at yahoo.com wrote : <<< I am
happy to scientifically educate Ferdinando and correct his mistakes even though
he keeps trying to insult me for some reason……. These studies have led to the
conclusion that there is no reproducible and reliable evidence for any kind of
health hazard from these waves at the powers emitted by cell phones and towers,
to humans and other animals. So all of the claims made below by Ferdinando are
false. Cheers, Santosh>>>

 

RESPONSE:
Sorry Santosh, I do not need to be educated on falsehood. We already have 40
people in Goa who profess falsehood and give false assurances to Goans on a
daily basis. They, like you believe: “INNOCENT until proved guilty!”

Santosh, I
regret I have to expose your ignorance on Goanet as you are incapable of
giving responsible advice to layman on a public forum. I would have preferred a
personal talk were it any other rational colleague. It must be remembered that
medical professionals are duty bound to advise for betterment of humanity and
not for their destruction. Whenever there are health risks, one needs to advise
accordingly. Medical ethics do not permit giving false assurances when health
risks are well documented.

Is WHO a
irresponsible institution according to Santosh? Please read here. Mobile phones
increase risk of cancer, WHO study says :

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/3208416/Mobile-phones-increase-risk-of-cancer-study-says.html

"Interphone
Study Reports on Mobile Phone Use and Brain Cancer Risk"

 

The real
truth about the hazards, told by independent scientists. Physicians and
Scientists for Responsible Application of Science and Technology (PSRAST)

http://www.psrast.org/mobileng/mobilstarteng.htm

 

Subjective
symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near
mobile phone base stations. Occup Environ Med. 2006 May;63(5):307-13. U.S.
National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health :

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16621850?dopt=Abstract

 

AND LASTLY,
ALL GOANETTERS, PLEASE GO TO THIS SITE AND JUDGE FOR YOURSELF:

http://www.psrast.org/mobileng/mobilstarteng.htm#junk

 

 



















Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão.

  

Re: [Goanet] ultrasonic sound waves/radio frequency electromagnetic waves.

2011-02-14 Thread Santosh Helekar
I am happy to scientifically educate Ferdinando and correct his mistakes even 
though he keeps trying to insult me for some reason.

Most cell phones and cell phone towers emit radio waves just outside the range 
of what are regarded as microwaves. Microwaves is just a term generally used 
for radio frequencies greater than 1 GHz and less than 300 GHz. Most cell 
phones and towers transmit at frequencies below 1 GHz, more specifically in the 
range of 800 and 900 MHz. Some are still in the 450 MHz range. Only some 2G, 3G 
and 4G cell phones transmit in the low microwave range.

More importantly, there is nothing special or dangerous about microwaves. The 
entire universe is bathed in microwaves, what has been called the cosmic 
microwave background radiation. In fact, the cosmic microwaves are smack in the 
middle of the microwave range. Their peak is at 160 GHz. They have existed in 
the microwave range since much before the formation of the solar system.

In the peer-reviewed medical literature, scientific research on biological and 
health effects of microwaves and other radio frequency waves emitted by cell 
phones and towers, has been carried out on both humans and other animals. These 
studies have led to the conclusion that there is no reproducible and reliable 
evidence for any kind of health hazard from these waves at the powers emitted 
by cell phones and towers, to humans and other animals. So all of the claims 
made below by Ferdinando are false.

Cheers,

Santosh



--- On Sun, 2/13/11, Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão  
wrote:
>
> RESPONSE : 1-
> Why does Santosh omit stating that cell phones and towers
> emit microwaves? Is
> it out of ignorance or is it that his "reliable source"
> from peer-reviewed
> medical literature is not crap but ‘bullshit’?
>
> 2- Medical
> research which can cause damage to the living are not done
> on humans, but on
> laboratory animals; like the birds and rats Santosh is
> surrounded with. And microwave emitted by cell phones for a
> certain period
> of time has been found to cause damage in experimental
> animals (as seen from my previous post). It is precisely
> why
> experiments cannot be conducted on humans.
>
> 3- Being
> scientifically literate like exhibited in the above post,
> is liken to Indians
> being 90% literate. It is necessary to be knowledgeable and
> use the knowledge
> wisely, and not reproduce verbatim limited book
> knowledge  without any rational judgement of your
> own. A computer or a robot can do that.
>
>
> As I have
> said once before : “Knowledge without wisdom is like a
> load of books on the
> back of an ass.”
>
>
> Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão.
> 





[Goanet] ultrasonic sound waves/radio frequency electromagnetic waves.

2011-02-13 Thread Dr . Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão





On Sat Feb 12
10:11:30 PST 2011 Santosh Helekar chimbelcho at yahoo.com wrote :<<< 1- Here 
are the differences between the radio frequencies
emitted by a cell phone and a cell phone tower, and the microwaves generated by
a microwave oven.

2- Neither
cell phones/towers nor microwaves have been found to cause cancers or any other
diseases in humans in the peer-reviewed medical literature. 

3- I ask you
to try to be scientifically literate and refer only to reliable scientific
literature from responsible institutions and sources. Please ignore the crap
that is written in posts such as that appended below, and on unreliable
internet websites, such as some of those copied and pasted in it. Cheers,
Santosh

 

RESPONSE : 1-
Why does Santosh omit stating that cell phones and towers emit microwaves? Is
it out of ignorance or is it that his "reliable source" from peer-reviewed
medical literature is not crap but ‘bullshit’?

2- Medical
research which can cause damage to the living are not done on humans, but on
laboratory animals; like the birds and rats Santosh is surrounded with. And 
microwave emitted by cell phones for a certain period
of time has been found to cause damage in experimental animals (as seen from my 
previous post). It is precisely why
experiments cannot be conducted on humans.

3- Being
scientifically literate like exhibited in the above post, is liken to Indians
being 90% literate. It is necessary to be knowledgeable and use the knowledge
wisely, and not reproduce verbatim limited book knowledge  without any rational 
judgement of your
own. A computer or a robot can do that.


As I have
said once before : “Knowledge without wisdom is like a load of books on the
back of an ass.”


Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão.


  

Re: [Goanet] ultrasonic sound waves/radio frequency electromagnetic waves.

2011-02-12 Thread Santosh Helekar
I would like to correct the copied and pasted misconceptions and confusion 
spread in the post appended below. 

Here are the differences between the radio frequencies emitted by a cell phone 
and a cell phone tower, and the microwaves generated by a microwave oven.

Cell phone/tower radio frequencies are in the range of 806 and 2690 MHz. More 
importantly, they are emitted at a very low power. Their power of emission is 
set by regulations to have a maximum specific absorption rate of less than 2 
watts per kilogram of matter. At this range of frequencies and at this low 
power, electromagnetic waves do not interact with atoms and molecules of matter 
in any significant way. That is to say they cannot transfer energy to atoms and 
molecules of matter to any appreciable extent.  Also, because their frequencies 
are very low their photons carry very little energy (~1000,000 times less than 
the energy of a photon of blue light) to begin with.

The microwaves emitted by the microwave oven, on the other hand, are of 2.45 
GHz (i.e. 2450 MHz) frequency, and are emitted at a very high power of 500 - 
1000 watts. They are also concentrated by the reflective inner surface of the 
microwave oven. The precisely tuned 2.45 GHz frequency ensures that they cause 
small molecules such as those of water to rotate rapidly, which is reflected in 
the rise in temperature in matter containing these molecules. The high power 
and concentration (or focusing by reflective surfaces) ensures that a high 
amount of energy is transferred to these molecules. That is why food can be 
warmed or cooked in a microwave oven.

Neither cell phones/towers nor microwaves have been found to cause cancers or 
any other diseases in humans in the peer-reviewed medical literature. 

I ask you to try to be scientifically literate and refer only to reliable 
scientific literature from responsible institutions and sources. Please ignore 
the crap that is written in posts such as that appended below, and on 
unreliable internet websites, such as some of those copied and pasted in it.

Cheers,

Santosh




--- On Sat, 2/12/11, Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão  
wrote:
> 
> Another perfect
> example on Goanet of exposing one’s ignorance.
> 
> RF Radiation has frequencies between 3 kHz to 300 GHz, and
> it is used in radio communications, as well as
> communication devices. Microwave
> radiation is a type of non-communication RF Radiation, and
> is a subset of the
> RF frequencies. Both these are emitted by cellular phones,
> towers and base
> stations.
> 
> QUOTE:
> 
> 1- Mobile
> phones use electromagnetic radiation in the microwave
> range, which some believe
> may be harmful to human health. 
> 
> 2- Part of
> the radio waves emitted by a mobile telephone handset are
> absorbed by the human
> head.
> 
> 3- One
> well-understood effect of microwave radiation is dielectric
> heating, in which
> any dielectric material (such as living tissue) is heated
> by rotations of polar
> molecules induced by the electromagnetic field.
> 
> 4- Swedish
> researchers from Lund University …found a leakage of
> albumin into the brain via
> a permeated blood-brain barrier. UNQUOTE
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_radiation_and_health
> 
>  
> 
> QOUTE: Medical experts have confirmed that irradiation with
> microwaves and
> other radio frequencies can induce injury, illness and
> disease, from strokes
> and aneurysms to cataracts and cancer -- and death.
> UNQUOTE
> 
> Continue
> reading at NowPublic.com: U.S. SILENTLY TORTURES AMERICANS
> WITH CELL TOWER MICROWAVES
> | NowPublic News Coverage 
> http://www.nowpublic.com/world/u-s-silently-tortures-americans-cell-tower-microwaves#ixzz1DkofiNeJ
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão.
>     
> 
>       
>   


 


[Goanet] ultrasonic sound waves/radio frequency electromagnetic waves.

2011-02-12 Thread Dr . Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão

Another perfect
example on Goanet of exposing one’s ignorance.

RF Radiation has frequencies between 3 kHz to 300 GHz, and
it is used in radio communications, as well as communication devices. Microwave
radiation is a type of non-communication RF Radiation, and is a subset of the
RF frequencies. Both these are emitted by cellular phones, towers and base
stations.

QUOTE:

1- Mobile
phones use electromagnetic radiation in the microwave range, which some believe
may be harmful to human health. 

2- Part of
the radio waves emitted by a mobile telephone handset are absorbed by the human
head.

3- One
well-understood effect of microwave radiation is dielectric heating, in which
any dielectric material (such as living tissue) is heated by rotations of polar
molecules induced by the electromagnetic field.

4- Swedish
researchers from Lund University …found a leakage of albumin into the brain via
a permeated blood-brain barrier. UNQUOTE

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_radiation_and_health

 

QOUTE: Medical experts have confirmed that irradiation with microwaves and
other radio frequencies can induce injury, illness and disease, from strokes
and aneurysms to cataracts and cancer -- and death. UNQUOTE

Continue
reading at NowPublic.com: U.S. SILENTLY TORTURES AMERICANS WITH CELL TOWER 
MICROWAVES
| NowPublic News Coverage 
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/u-s-silently-tortures-americans-cell-tower-microwaves#ixzz1DkofiNeJ



 




Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão.
  

Re: [Goanet] ultrasonic sound waves/radio frequency electromagnetic waves. HELEKAR

2011-02-12 Thread Santosh Helekar
Ultrasonic waves are sound waves greater than 20 kHz in frequency. In other 
words, they are propagating pressure oscillations, or alternating compressions 
and rarefactions, occurring at a periodicity of more than 20,000 times per 
second in a medium such as air or water. Bats produce and sense ultrasound 
waves in the 40 - 100 kHz frequency range.

Radio frequency electromagnetic waves are propagating oscillations of the 
electromagnetic field of frequency less than 300 GHz (300,000,000,000 times per 
second). They belong to the lower energy end of the same spectrum to which 
visible light belongs. Visible light consists of electromagnetic waves that 
oscillate in the 400 - 790 THz (400,000,000,000,000 - 790,000,000,000,000 times 
per second) frequency range. Electromagnetic waves do not require any medium 
such as air or water to propagate.

Cheers,

Santosh

--- On Fri, 2/11/11, Charudatt Prabhudesai  wrote:

> 
> Me: I want to know.But please do not post links. Write 
> in a nut shell,in broad lines of comparison and contrast. 
>


  


Re: [Goanet] ultrasonic sound waves/radio frequency electromagnetic waves. HELEKAR

2011-02-11 Thread Charudatt Prabhudesai

Santosh:
Please note that 
bats produce and sense ultrasonic sound waves, not radio frequency 
electromagnetic waves. Please let me know if anyone likes to know the 
difference between the two. 

Me: I want to know.But please do not post links. Write 
in a nut shell,in broad lines of comparison and contrast. 
Charudatta Prabhudesai
Auroville .
South India.