Re: [go-nuts] Why "strings" package exists ?
Thank you, Ian. 在 2018年8月15日星期三 UTC+8下午12:36:31，Ian Lance Taylor写道： > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 7:37 PM, > wrote: > > > > Why not define the methods on type "string" ? > > I look up the document, strings package handles string with UTF-8 > encoding. > > is it the reason ? > > if not, it's design decision or any other reasons ? > > 1. None of the types defined by the language have methods. > > 2. Some of the functions in the strings package, such as strings.Join, > don't make a lot of sense as methods. > > Ian > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [go-nuts] Why "strings" package exists ?
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 6:53 AM Kevin Malachowski wrote: > Well, the 'error' type has a method. But none of the other primitives do. The predeclared 'error' type is an interface. Interfaces do not have methods. Interfaces only declare method sets. -- -j -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [go-nuts] Why "strings" package exists ?
Well, the 'error' type has a method. But none of the other primitives do. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [go-nuts] Why "strings" package exists ?
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 7:37 PM, wrote: > > Why not define the methods on type "string" ? > I look up the document, strings package handles string with UTF-8 encoding. > is it the reason ? > if not, it's design decision or any other reasons ? 1. None of the types defined by the language have methods. 2. Some of the functions in the strings package, such as strings.Join, don't make a lot of sense as methods. Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[go-nuts] Why "strings" package exists ?
Why not define the methods on type "string" ? I look up the document, strings package handles string with UTF-8 encoding. is it the reason ? if not, it's design decision or any other reasons ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
