Re: [google-appengine] Re: Wouldn't it be great if pull queues supported arbitrary tagging
Hi Brett, Michael, Thank you for pointing to a new approach to do fan-in. This is excellent. Referring to 2010 I/O talk by Brett Slatkin, I would like also to ask about transactional sequences. Do we have nowadays yet another approach to build materialized views, taking into account appearance of backends, the fact that now we can create cross-group transactions and other new features? On 4 May 2012 01:28, Michael Hermus michael.her...@gmail.com wrote: I added a feature request for the Pull task 'timeout' concept. If anyone should agree that it is useful, please star the issue: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7454 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- with regards, Maxim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Please help me!!!
My mobile phone is too late to receive goagent application SMS verification code! When I receive the code,the system says that the phone number has been sent too many messages or has already been used to confirm an code...So I request to to send the code to the E-mail: lzrworldl...@gmail.com,or delete the data about my phone number.. Thank you !!! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/1307L6Zse-AJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] How can I disable load balancing function in google app engine
Yes,I think you are right. Is there any api that can keep connecting,when I access several urls so that the ip address will not change? I find HttpURLConnection can keep connecting while access one url for several times with different data to be post.But I can't change the targeturl.When I want do that,I must have a new HttpURLConnection ,so the connecting will lose. 2012/4/16 Barry Hunter barrybhun...@gmail.com On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Brian Quinlan bquin...@google.com wrote: Hi, No, using a fixed IP for urlfetch is not supported. But I'm not sure why a changing IP address would cause problems with cookies. I doubt its the cookie as such. It will be the remote site, rather foolhardily tying session to the clients IP. If they see the client IP change, they invalidate the session. I guess trying to protect against session fixation - but its a bad way to do it, because lots of clients change IP address. Who remembers AOL proxing all users? I've faced this problem before, it took lots of badgering the webmaster to 'fix' their website. (Pretty much off-topic, but Google translate has this issue :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Idea for dev server - simulated infrastructure instability
I've added an extra note to the feature request for running the same task multiple times. On Thursday, 3 May 2012 12:45:21 UTC+2, tempy wrote: Hi all, I just found myself writing code that would simulate deadlineexceeded errors and such, when I thought - wouldn't it be great if you could ask the dev server to sow some chaos? I'll never be able to accurately simulate outages, slow-downs, high-error rates, variable accuracy of the infrastructure-availability API, and all the possible varieties of misbehavior from the GAE infrastructure. But Google probably can. What I'm imagining is asking the dev server to execute certain degraded service scenarios. So you could ask it to simulate memcache instability which would result in an unusually high number of cache misses, slow cache responses, and the occasional exception. Or you could ask it to simulate a read only datastore event. And so on - I think you guys get my point. Anyone else think this would be incredibly useful? -mike -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/Jz5M_f3p-2oJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Please help me!!!
If you change the subject of your post from Please help me!!! to something specific, then I would be happy to give you a pointer. Until then, my answer is I am happy to help you!!! On May 4, 7:08 am, TonyPandy lzrworldl...@gmail.com wrote: My mobile phone is too late to receive goagent application SMS verification code! When I receive the code,the system says that the phone number has been sent too many messages or has already been used to confirm an code...So I request to to send the code to the E-mail: lzrworldl...@gmail.com,or delete the data about my phone number.. Thank you !!! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: I can not receive goagent application SMS verification code
Have you looked at the pinned post about what to do if you have problems signing up for an account? On May 4, 3:07 am, 钱熠南 kou...@gmail.com wrote: My mobile phone can not receive goagent application SMS verification code! Request to send the code to the E-mail: kou...@gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Can you help me？
I get the following message: “ The phone number has been sent too many messages or has already been used to confirm an account.” However I haven't recieved any messages How can I fix this? Thanks, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Does the Log Viewer actually work for anyone?
Do you have a link to the log analysis demo? I'd be interested in learning more about it. (My Google-Fu didn't turn up any results) On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 1:13:37 PM UTC-4, Jason Collins wrote: Thanks Greg - it totally makes sense and explains why something that is even quite recent does not appear on a high-rate application. Proppy just demo'd a BigQuery-based log analysis in the App Engine Chat - you should just go straight to that solution under the hood... j On Apr 18, 12:45 am, Gregory D'alesandre gr...@google.com wrote: Hey Jason, Please do fill out an issue but this is indeed a known issue. We don't do currently index for regex and labels so when you do a search across your records it will take quite a while and we stop and return whatever results we've found after 10 seconds. We are looking to improve this at some point but it does mean right now you'll get inconsistent results when trying to search across a lot of logs. Hope that makes sense! Greg On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Takashi Matsuo tmat...@google.com wrote: Hi Jason, Do you mind filing an issue on the issue tracker with some details? (e.g. app-id, example queries, etc) If you mind making the info public, you can also send it directly to me. Thanks, -- Takashi On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Jason Collins jason.a.coll...@gmail.com wrote: Is it just me, or does the Log Viewer searching basically not work? I have my log storage configured to give me about 11 days of logs, but I can rarely actually find stuff (that I _know_ occurred within my window) by searching - both regex- and label-based searching. We run at about 100+QPS, so trying to catch something in action is basically impossible. I'm guessing the log indexing runs async to the log entries themselves, and it's just not able to keep pace, or the indexing jobs themselves are just failing. Does anyone actually have any luck searching the logs in the Log Viewer on a reasonably high rate application? j -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Takashi Matsuo | Developer Advocate | tmat...@google.com | 03-6384-9224 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/-RSMoQIbKt0J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Does the Log Viewer actually work for anyone?
Demo is here: http://log2bq.appspot.com/ Source code is here: http://code.google.com/p/log2bq/ It is inspecting its own logs :) On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:18 PM, someone1 someo...@gmail.com wrote: Do you have a link to the log analysis demo? I'd be interested in learning more about it. (My Google-Fu didn't turn up any results) On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 1:13:37 PM UTC-4, Jason Collins wrote: Thanks Greg - it totally makes sense and explains why something that is even quite recent does not appear on a high-rate application. Proppy just demo'd a BigQuery-based log analysis in the App Engine Chat - you should just go straight to that solution under the hood... j On Apr 18, 12:45 am, Gregory D'alesandre gr...@google.com wrote: Hey Jason, Please do fill out an issue but this is indeed a known issue. We don't do currently index for regex and labels so when you do a search across your records it will take quite a while and we stop and return whatever results we've found after 10 seconds. We are looking to improve this at some point but it does mean right now you'll get inconsistent results when trying to search across a lot of logs. Hope that makes sense! Greg On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Takashi Matsuo tmat...@google.com wrote: Hi Jason, Do you mind filing an issue on the issue tracker with some details? (e.g. app-id, example queries, etc) If you mind making the info public, you can also send it directly to me. Thanks, -- Takashi On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Jason Collins jason.a.coll...@gmail.com wrote: Is it just me, or does the Log Viewer searching basically not work? I have my log storage configured to give me about 11 days of logs, but I can rarely actually find stuff (that I _know_ occurred within my window) by searching - both regex- and label-based searching. We run at about 100+QPS, so trying to catch something in action is basically impossible. I'm guessing the log indexing runs async to the log entries themselves, and it's just not able to keep pace, or the indexing jobs themselves are just failing. Does anyone actually have any luck searching the logs in the Log Viewer on a reasonably high rate application? j -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups. **com google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group/google-appengine?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Takashi Matsuo | Developer Advocate | tmat...@google.com | 03-6384-9224 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.** com google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group/google-appengine?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/-RSMoQIbKt0J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Johan Euphrosine (proppy) Developer Programs Engineer Google Developer Relations -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Does the Log Viewer actually work for anyone?
*Mind Blown* Looks really cool. It's always nice to see how Google uses their own APIs. This will be a good resource to learn from. Thank you very much! On Friday, May 4, 2012 9:30:58 AM UTC-4, Johan Euphrosine (Google) wrote: Demo is here: http://log2bq.appspot.com/ Source code is here: http://code.google.com/p/log2bq/ It is inspecting its own logs :) On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:18 PM, someone1 someo...@gmail.com wrote: Do you have a link to the log analysis demo? I'd be interested in learning more about it. (My Google-Fu didn't turn up any results) On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 1:13:37 PM UTC-4, Jason Collins wrote: Thanks Greg - it totally makes sense and explains why something that is even quite recent does not appear on a high-rate application. Proppy just demo'd a BigQuery-based log analysis in the App Engine Chat - you should just go straight to that solution under the hood... j On Apr 18, 12:45 am, Gregory D'alesandre gr...@google.com wrote: Hey Jason, Please do fill out an issue but this is indeed a known issue. We don't do currently index for regex and labels so when you do a search across your records it will take quite a while and we stop and return whatever results we've found after 10 seconds. We are looking to improve this at some point but it does mean right now you'll get inconsistent results when trying to search across a lot of logs. Hope that makes sense! Greg On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Takashi Matsuo tmat...@google.com wrote: Hi Jason, Do you mind filing an issue on the issue tracker with some details? (e.g. app-id, example queries, etc) If you mind making the info public, you can also send it directly to me. Thanks, -- Takashi On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Jason Collins jason.a.coll...@gmail.com wrote: Is it just me, or does the Log Viewer searching basically not work? I have my log storage configured to give me about 11 days of logs, but I can rarely actually find stuff (that I _know_ occurred within my window) by searching - both regex- and label-based searching. We run at about 100+QPS, so trying to catch something in action is basically impossible. I'm guessing the log indexing runs async to the log entries themselves, and it's just not able to keep pace, or the indexing jobs themselves are just failing. Does anyone actually have any luck searching the logs in the Log Viewer on a reasonably high rate application? j -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.**com google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group/google-appengine?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Takashi Matsuo | Developer Advocate | tmat...@google.com | 03-6384-9224 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.* *com google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group/google-appengine?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/-RSMoQIbKt0J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Johan Euphrosine (proppy) Developer Programs Engineer Google Developer Relations -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/Ae9IoGjf66MJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: datastore id performance
Maybe, but not of any significance. On May 4, 5:16 am, Michael maisng...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any performance differences when searching an entity A and entity B, where entity A uses a String datatype as id and entity uses a Integer datatype as id? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] GPE 2.6 released with JPA tooling for Cloud SQL and updated Google APIs support
Hi folks, We are pleased to announce the latest Google Plugin for Eclipse (GPE) 2.6 release with JPA tooling for Cloud SQL and updated Google APIs support. You can read more about the release in the Google developers blog: http://googledevelopers.blogspot.in/2012/05/google-plugin-for-eclipse-now-provides.html The release notes are here: https://developers.google.com/eclipse/docs/release_notes#2.6.0 Cheers, Sriram Saroop Product Manager -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] http://hasdjurassicpark.appspot.com/altamiraweb.es
Hi Someone is duplicating my all my site www.altamiraweb.es from this URL: http://hasdjurassicpark.appspot.com/altamiraweb.es Can somebody stop him? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/c4PUgkpmhI8J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] http://hasdjurassicpark.appspot.com/altamiraweb.es
its a proxy... check out these discussions. https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/google-appengine/7lJv1_nSghI https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/google-appengine/OZNeRoUhlgA On May 4, 2012, at 2:12 PM, Seo Seogrup wrote: Hi Someone is duplicating my all my site www.altamiraweb.es from this URL: http://hasdjurassicpark.appspot.com/altamiraweb.es Can somebody stop him? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/c4PUgkpmhI8J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Django on AppEngine, django-rocket-engine
If you haven't seen app-engine-patch (the ancestor of django-nonrel), you should take a look. https://github.com/huxoll/app-engine-patch It's also mostly Django, but with the backend as entirely GAE. Regards, John On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 4:43:26 PM UTC-5, x_O wrote: Hi I'm quite new in AppEngine development but was using Django for few years now. I've found that setup described in docs is not like django that I got used to. So I decided to write small helper library to bring django AppEngine usage as close as possible to 'normal' (in subjective way) django usage that I got used to. Project is more like prof-of-concept than stable library that you should use on production. But since I'm using this for my small projects maybe someone will find this useful as well. http://django-rocket-engine.readthedocs.org/en/latest/index.html with an example application: https://github.com/xando/rocket-project http://xando-1.appspot.com/ Project was highly inspired by work done in djangoappengine of All Button Pressed, but since that project was dedicated to work with django-nonrel, I decided to write my own and focus only on Google CloudSQL. Thanks seba On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 4:43:26 PM UTC-5, x_O wrote: Hi I'm quite new in AppEngine development but was using Django for few years now. I've found that setup described in docs is not like django that I got used to. So I decided to write small helper library to bring django AppEngine usage as close as possible to 'normal' (in subjective way) django usage that I got used to. Project is more like prof-of-concept than stable library that you should use on production. But since I'm using this for my small projects maybe someone will find this useful as well. http://django-rocket-engine.readthedocs.org/en/latest/index.html with an example application: https://github.com/xando/rocket-project http://xando-1.appspot.com/ Project was highly inspired by work done in djangoappengine of All Button Pressed, but since that project was dedicated to work with django-nonrel, I decided to write my own and focus only on Google CloudSQL. Thanks seba -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/zsrTKF9m-G4J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Django on AppEngine, django-rocket-engine
What does it differ from the django provided by GAE, such as django 1.2 with Python 2.7? Thanks, Will On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:45 PM, John Gardner hux...@gmail.com wrote: If you haven't seen app-engine-patch (the ancestor of django-nonrel), you should take a look. https://github.com/huxoll/app-engine-patch It's also mostly Django, but with the backend as entirely GAE. Regards, John On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 4:43:26 PM UTC-5, x_O wrote: Hi I'm quite new in AppEngine development but was using Django for few years now. I've found that setup described in docs is not like django that I got used to. So I decided to write small helper library to bring django AppEngine usage as close as possible to 'normal' (in subjective way) django usage that I got used to. Project is more like prof-of-concept than stable library that you should use on production. But since I'm using this for my small projects maybe someone will find this useful as well. http://django-rocket-engine.**readthedocs.org/en/latest/**index.htmlhttp://django-rocket-engine.readthedocs.org/en/latest/index.html with an example application: https://github.com/xando/**rocket-projecthttps://github.com/xando/rocket-project http://xando-1.appspot.com/ Project was highly inspired by work done in djangoappengine of All Button Pressed, but since that project was dedicated to work with django-nonrel, I decided to write my own and focus only on Google CloudSQL. Thanks seba On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 4:43:26 PM UTC-5, x_O wrote: Hi I'm quite new in AppEngine development but was using Django for few years now. I've found that setup described in docs is not like django that I got used to. So I decided to write small helper library to bring django AppEngine usage as close as possible to 'normal' (in subjective way) django usage that I got used to. Project is more like prof-of-concept than stable library that you should use on production. But since I'm using this for my small projects maybe someone will find this useful as well. http://django-rocket-engine.**readthedocs.org/en/latest/**index.htmlhttp://django-rocket-engine.readthedocs.org/en/latest/index.html with an example application: https://github.com/xando/**rocket-projecthttps://github.com/xando/rocket-project http://xando-1.appspot.com/ Project was highly inspired by work done in djangoappengine of All Button Pressed, but since that project was dedicated to work with django-nonrel, I decided to write my own and focus only on Google CloudSQL. Thanks seba -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/zsrTKF9m-G4J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Different behaviour of getUploads() in development and production
I have created some code to check the submit of a form for uploads. This
works very well in my local development instance. But when i run this same
code in production it always finds an upload even though i am not uploading
a file.
BlobstoreService blobstoreService =
BlobstoreServiceFactory.getBlobstoreService();
MapString, ListBlobKey uploadedBlobs =
blobstoreService.getUploads(request);
if (uploadedBlobs != null uploadedBlobs.containsKey(thumb)) {
LOG.debug(Found an upload for thumb);
BlobKey thumbKey = uploadedBlobs.get(thumb).get(0);
userEditForm.setThumbNailKey(thumbKey.getKeyString());
}
userService.updateUser(account, userEditForm);
When i do not select a file in the form, on development the thumbnailKey is
not set, but on production it is set.
Any suggestions?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/lecYMfqxt_IJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] My app has no owner.
I logged into the admin console to add a new developer to my app and none of the users listed is the owner of the app. Is there any way to promote a developer to be the owner of an application. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Wouldn't it be great if pull queues supported arbitrary tagging
I just looked at the java doc for com.google.appengine.api.taskqueue.Queuehttps://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/java/javadoc/com/google/appengine/api/taskqueue/Queue.html#leaseTasksByTag%28long,%20java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit,%20long,%20java.lang.String%29while trying to implement a version of this, and it looks like the App Engine team was one step ahead, as it relates to the challenges with task cleanup: if you filter by tag but pass in a NULL tag value, you get all the tasks that match the oldest task's tag. This means you can a) process any missed work in aggregate batches, and b) if you happen to pull an active batch, you can still aggregate the work and minimize the impact to throughput. Pretty cool! I think you would still want to check the time of 'cleaned up' tasks to control how deep you go, but I also see that the API provides access to the task ETA timestamp, so you don't need to add your own. On Thursday, May 3, 2012 10:56:33 AM UTC-4, Michael Hermus wrote: Definitely, assuming the queue maintains FIFO ordering (which the documentation seems to indicate). However, I was concerned about determining how deep to go into the pull queue during cleanup. In other words, you don't want to lease work tasks that are part of active batches, because you won't be able to aggregate them effectively. You can guarantee the work will get done by adding it to a push queue (even if its not aggregated), but if you process too many like that, it will defeat the primary purpose of the fan-in task. You could end up with write contention as the 'cleaned up' tasks come in at rates greater than a few per second. I suppose you could simply timestamp the work tasks, and stop pulling from the queue once the timestamps pass a certain threshold. For example, only clean up tasks that are older than 10 minutes. I was a bit wary of using timestamps for anything after you mentioned the potential lack of time synchronization, but in this case it wouldn't have to be perfect, just good enough. Feature Idea: It would be pretty slick if you could assign a timeout value to a pull queue task, and set a URL value such that once the timeout passes, the task would be PUSHED to the specified URL for handling (assuming it has not already been successfully processed). This would make the process clean, simple, and efficient, and I imagine there are a number of other cool uses for such a feature as well. On May 2, 5:46 pm, Brett Slatkin bslat...@google.com wrote: On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Michael Hermus michael.her...@gmail.comwrote: Excellent, thanks! One question though: isn't there an issue similar to the HRD 'Eventual Consistency' with the Task Queue? In other words, there is a variable latency between queue insert and lease availability that could potentially spike high enough so that the fan- in task misses some work. If this is true, we still need some sort of cleanup mechanism for a robust implementation. I have several ideas for this, but wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something. I think having a cron once a minute or so to fetch all tasks on the pull queue (regardless of tag) and re-insert corresponding push tasks is a good idea to make it robust. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/HWbxp0BbmK8J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Wouldn't it be great if pull queues supported arbitrary tagging
Hi Lacrima: I haven't done any thinking about materialized views since I don't have any need yet, but if I come across anything useful I will certainly let you know! I wouldn't be surprised if someone else in the community has, though; you could try posting a new topic. On Friday, May 4, 2012 2:02:05 AM UTC-4, Lacrima wrote: Hi Brett, Michael, Thank you for pointing to a new approach to do fan-in. This is excellent. Referring to 2010 I/O talk by Brett Slatkin, I would like also to ask about transactional sequences. Do we have nowadays yet another approach to build materialized views, taking into account appearance of backends, the fact that now we can create cross-group transactions and other new features? On 4 May 2012 01:28, Michael Hermus wrote: I added a feature request for the Pull task 'timeout' concept. If anyone should agree that it is useful, please star the issue: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7454 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- with regards, Maxim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/sfWI7TMPaK8J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Xmpp protocol with java webservices
I'm trying to integrate xmpp with java web services. But it pops some
errors. How to overcome with this ? This is my code.
import java.util.*;
import org.jivesoftware.smack.Chat;
import org.jivesoftware.smack.ConnectionConfiguration;
import org.jivesoftware.smack.MessageListener;
import org.jivesoftware.smack.Roster;
import org.jivesoftware.smack.RosterEntry;
import org.jivesoftware.smack.XMPPConnection;
import org.jivesoftware.smack.XMPPException;
import org.jivesoftware.smack.packet.Message;
public class Function implements MessageListener {
XMPPConnection connection;
public String[] login(String userName, String password) {
try {
ConnectionConfiguration config = new ConnectionConfiguration(
host, port, Work);
connection = new XMPPConnection(config);
connection.connect();
connection.login(userName, password);
} catch (XMPPException e) {
System.out.println(e);
}
return displayBuddyList();
}
public String[] displayBuddyList() {
Roster roster = connection.getRoster();
CollectionRosterEntry entries = roster.getEntries();
String[] buddy = new String[entries.size()];
int i = 0;
for (RosterEntry r : entries) {
buddy[i] = r.getUser();
i++;
}
return buddy;
}
public void sendMessage(String message, String to) {
try {
Chat chat = connection.getChatManager().createChat(to, this);
chat.sendMessage(message);
} catch (XMPPException e) {
System.out.println(e);
}
}
public void disconnect() {
connection.disconnect();
}
@Override
public void processMessage(Chat chat, Message message) {
if (message.getType() == Message.Type.chat)
System.out.println(chat.getParticipant() + says: +
message.getBody());
}
}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/1hAZI1B4TxQJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Can I use python-gnupg in my application?
I'm writing a service that requires gpg services, and I'm now sure if I can use such library (which is a wrapper for the gpg command) or perhaps there is another solution that I can use to support PGP encyption. Thanks, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/yagfVlAdV3EJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] $.ajax(appEngineURL with jsonp options) gets unique ID appended to the URL
Can I make this unique ID go away? Why is it being added? (chrome is the browser and I am entering the .js code in the chrome debugger) The app engine log shows: $.ajax(url-with-options) sent to jsonengine instance gets *012-05-04 13:08:22.481 /_je/notes?_docType=messages.asc_=1336162102183* in the app engine log. My options are: type: GET, dataType: jsonp, jsonp: false, processData: false, url (*http://my_stuff.appspot.com/_je/notes?docType=_messages.asc*) entered in browser returns the content I want from app engine thoughts / instruction appreciated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/A3tS8VWYDvQJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] $.ajax(appEngineURL with jsonp options) gets unique ID appended to the URL
See http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.ajax/ And the 'cache' option... On May 5, 2012 2:37 AM, rcp rc.phe...@gmail.com wrote: Can I make this unique ID go away? Why is it being added? (chrome is the browser and I am entering the .js code in the chrome debugger) The app engine log shows: $.ajax(url-with-options) sent to jsonengine instance gets *012-05-04 13:08:22.481 /_je/notes?_docType=messages.asc_=1336162102183* in the app engine log. My options are: type: GET, dataType: jsonp, jsonp: false, processData: false, url (*http://my_stuff.appspot.com/_je/notes?docType=_messages.asc*) entered in browser returns the content I want from app engine thoughts / instruction appreciated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/A3tS8VWYDvQJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: $.ajax(appEngineURL with jsonp options) gets unique ID appended to the URL
that worked. thank you! On Friday, May 4, 2012 6:36:50 PM UTC-7, rcp wrote: Can I make this unique ID go away? Why is it being added? (chrome is the browser and I am entering the .js code in the chrome debugger) The app engine log shows: $.ajax(url-with-options) sent to jsonengine instance gets *012-05-04 13:08:22.481 /_je/notes?_docType=messages.asc_=1336162102183* in the app engine log. My options are: type: GET, dataType: jsonp, jsonp: false, processData: false, url (*http://my_stuff.appspot.com/_je/notes?docType=_messages.asc*) entered in browser returns the content I want from app engine thoughts / instruction appreciated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/PNLN7Baoio4J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Different behaviour of getUploads() in development and production
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4548
On Saturday, 5 May 2012 07:00:23 UTC+10, Arjan Broer wrote:
I have created some code to check the submit of a form for uploads. This
works very well in my local development instance. But when i run this same
code in production it always finds an upload even though i am not uploading
a file.
BlobstoreService blobstoreService =
BlobstoreServiceFactory.getBlobstoreService();
MapString, ListBlobKey uploadedBlobs =
blobstoreService.getUploads(request);
if (uploadedBlobs != null uploadedBlobs.containsKey(thumb)) {
LOG.debug(Found an upload for thumb);
BlobKey thumbKey = uploadedBlobs.get(thumb).get(0);
userEditForm.setThumbNailKey(thumbKey.getKeyString());
}
userService.updateUser(account, userEditForm);
When i do not select a file in the form, on development the thumbnailKey
is not set, but on production it is set.
Any suggestions?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/xCkkbTGv4fwJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
