[google-appengine] Re: Ask GAE Devs: CloudFlare reviews?
Kaan you should try Incapsula ]http://www.incapsula.com/] Works like Cloudflare but offers much better security no false positive identification. Also, only 9$ for SSL support instead of 20$.. I switched after reading this review [http://www.ehackingnews.com/2012/11/incapsula-vs-cloudflare-security-review.html] and been very happy ever since. בתאריך יום שבת, 29 בדצמבר 2012 20:38:43 UTC, מאת Kaan Soral: Why I want to use CloudFlare: It can block non-search-engine scrappers, maybe malicious people trying to download content for malicious use. (I assume CF can do this) Why I'm afraid to use CloudFlare: I sometimes get identified as a false malicious user myself, there were 1-2 times in the past when I couldn't enter a site with CF on, maybe at that time someone from my country was attacking that site, who knows, but still this is unacceptable. Other features such as SSL etc are solvable otherwise, but blocking malicious behavior is an extreme challenge itself, so If I were to use CF, I would use it only for this feature. Any comments on these points? On Saturday, December 29, 2012 3:11:30 AM UTC+2, Johnson wrote: Looking at using CloudFlare, is the free plan worth the extra hops for your dynamic content? FYI: https://www.cloudflare.com/plans -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/dinB2GanqS8J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Ask GAE Devs: CloudFlare reviews?
Thanks *a lot* for the suggestion, It certainly is interesting, I will dive deeper into the article as soon as possible On Sunday, December 30, 2012 3:28:10 PM UTC+2, HaimS wrote: Kaan you should try Incapsula ]http://www.incapsula.com/] Works like Cloudflare but offers much better security no false positive identification. Also, only 9$ for SSL support instead of 20$.. I switched after reading this review [ http://www.ehackingnews.com/2012/11/incapsula-vs-cloudflare-security-review.html] and been very happy ever since. בתאריך יום שבת, 29 בדצמבר 2012 20:38:43 UTC, מאת Kaan Soral: Why I want to use CloudFlare: It can block non-search-engine scrappers, maybe malicious people trying to download content for malicious use. (I assume CF can do this) Why I'm afraid to use CloudFlare: I sometimes get identified as a false malicious user myself, there were 1-2 times in the past when I couldn't enter a site with CF on, maybe at that time someone from my country was attacking that site, who knows, but still this is unacceptable. Other features such as SSL etc are solvable otherwise, but blocking malicious behavior is an extreme challenge itself, so If I were to use CF, I would use it only for this feature. Any comments on these points? On Saturday, December 29, 2012 3:11:30 AM UTC+2, Johnson wrote: Looking at using CloudFlare, is the free plan worth the extra hops for your dynamic content? FYI: https://www.cloudflare.com/plans -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/4N1et6D9nFIJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] db to ndb migration ... issue with collection_name
In my previous GAE app, I had something like a blog (Post and related Comment) Posts and Comments where 2 different models such as class Post(db.Model): headline = db.StringProperty(required = True) content = db.TextProperty(required = True) class Comment(db.Model): Comment object with many-to-one relationship content = db.TextProperty(required = True) post = db.ReferenceProperty(Post, collection_name='comment_set') Now with db, thanks to the collection_name, I could easily find the comments referring to a post ( aka back reference) using post.comment_set How are now back references handled in ndb? Is there a preferred method? Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/_W5mhfhwqBEJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] db to ndb migration ... issue with collection_name
Hi, Guido explained very clearly how to do herehttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/11122846/whats-the-alternative-to-back-reference-property-in-ndb . Just add a property to the Post class @property def comments(self): return Comment.query(Comment.post == self.key) -- Gianni On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Toto emays...@gmail.com wrote: In my previous GAE app, I had something like a blog (Post and related Comment) Posts and Comments where 2 different models such as class Post(db.Model): headline = db.StringProperty(required = True) content = db.TextProperty(required = True) class Comment(db.Model): Comment object with many-to-one relationship content = db.TextProperty(required = True) post = db.ReferenceProperty(Post, collection_name='comment_set') Now with db, thanks to the collection_name, I could easily find the comments referring to a post ( aka back reference) using post.comment_set How are now back references handled in ndb? Is there a preferred method? Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/_W5mhfhwqBEJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
