[google-appengine] Re: Release 1.8.2 issue - RuntimeError: internal error in regular expression engine
Google had automatically migrated My Apps GAE SDK version to 1.8.2 from 1.8.1... And now getting the same issue after migrating from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2... Is there any option, by which I can specify my app's GAE SDK version ??? On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:03:39 AM UTC+5:30, Kinesh Patel wrote: Getting exceptions on the instances that have the new SDK (1.8.2) in Python 2.7 nightloop/mailbot/parser.py, line 23, in _strip_suffix result = re.findall(regex, body, re.S|re.I) File /base/data/home/runtimes/python27/python27_dist/lib/python2.7/re.py, line 177, in findall return _compile(pattern, flags).findall(string) RuntimeError: internal error in regular expression engine App is currently broken because of it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Simple Registration Application
I made up a demo at https://gaeshiro.appspot.com which includes a simple login/registration system, in order to learn the tools involved. The demo has a link to the code on GitHub. It uses the Shiro authentication/authorization framework and Guice on top of the servlet API, as well as login via Google and Facebook, so may a bit over-complicated for you. It should be straightforward to extract just the registration-with-email functionality though and drop Guice, Shiro and OAuth. Tim On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 12:09:02 UTC+1, aswath wrote: Currently, I dont want to introduce another framework into the application. I am looking at simple servlet/jsp code with out additional dependencies on the frameworks. -Aswath On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Barry Hunter barryb...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Aswath Satrasala aswath.s...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: I am looking for java code. Currently, using playframework is not an option for me. It my help to specify WHY the play framework isnt an option. Otherwise, there is a fair chance any other suggestion will not be an option either. (because it breaks what ever rule you havent told us) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengi...@googlegroups.com javascript:. To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.comjavascript: . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Running App Engine Instance 1.8.2
@Mike We noticed something similar last week. ImportError: cannot import name expression_parser when you use from google.appengine.api import search Saludos. Moisés Belchín. 2013/7/10 Vinny P vinny...@gmail.com On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Nikhil Jain nikhil.jaint...@gmail.comwrote: Hi GAE fellow, Few of my appengine application instance running on 1.8.1 and others are on 1.8.2. Is 1.8.2 been released or its pre-released version? +1. Also noticing this beginning today morning. - -Vinny P Technology Media Advisor Chicago, IL App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: Error if I set required=False for a StringListProperty
And here is some example code for getting and putting raw entities - ie no
model involved
from google.appengine.api import datastorefrom google.appengine.api import
datastore_errorsdef get_entities(keys):rpc = datastore.GetRpcFromKwargs({})
keys, multiple = datastore.NormalizeAndTypeCheckKeys(keys)entities =
Nonetry:entities = datastore.Get(keys, rpc=rpc)except
datastore_errors.EntityNotFoundError:assert not multiple
return entitiesdef put_entities(entities):rpc =
datastore.GetRpcFromKwargs({})keys = datastore.Put(entities, rpc=rpc)
return keys
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:09:56 PM UTC+8, timh wrote:
Alternately make the property not required (required=False), load the
entities set the value of the list to a [] and then rewrite, once you have
migrated all the entities you can then
set the property to be required.
You do need to think about model migration when changing classes
adding/removing or changing the types of properties.
T
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:07:25 PM UTC+8, timh wrote:
Have you tried setting the default value to [] as per that error ?
If your model is blowing up you can always fetch the underlying data
without a model, fix the data up and write it back.
T
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:56:50 AM UTC+8, Luca de Alfaro wrote:
This is pretty bad!
As pointed out in
https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=8962 , if
you add a StringListProperty to a model with existing entities in the
datastore, then you cannot read those entities any more!
Furthermore, in Java it is apparently possible to write entities with
null StringListProperty fields. Those entities cannot then be read from
Python!
These are pretty big problems -- is there any solution?
Luca
On Tuesday, March 23, 2010 5:57:17 AM UTC-7, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mar 22, 11:09 pm, dhruvbird dhruvb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have a model with a single attribute that is a StringListProperty.
I get an error if I define it as such:
class Test(db.Expando):
people = db.StringListProperty(required=False, indexed=True)
However, on changing it to:
class Test(db.Expando):
people = db.StringListProperty(required=True, indexed=True,
default=[])
It starts working. Any ideas why this is happening??
ListPropertys are always required; you can't set their value to None.
If a particular entity has no values for the ListProperty, you need to
set it to the empty list. (Note that you can still set a default
value of 'None', which magically uses an empty list, not None, as the
default value.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Some questions about get_serving_url.
- Does it cost anything at all to create a *get_serving_url* image? - Is the cost to store an image created through *get_serving_url* to the Image API storage just the same as Blobstore ($0.13/GB/month)? - Is the cost to serve an image created through *get_serving_url* the same as GAE's Outgoing Bandwidth ($0.12/GB)? - Is there any expiration time for URL created through *get_serving_url*? I'm wondering whether I can delete original image data stored on Blobstore or not. I'd greatly appreciate if you could point me to related documents, if there are any. Thanks ! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Some questions about get_serving_url.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:00 AM, dd noug...@gmail.com wrote: - Does it cost anything at all to create a *get_serving_url* image? No AFAIK - Is the cost to store an image created through *get_serving_url* to the Image API storage just the same as Blobstore ($0.13/GB/month)? No. There is no 'storage' as such. You are just creating a URL to make accessing the file stored in the blobstore possible. (or GCS!) - Is the cost to serve an image created through *get_serving_url* the same as GAE's Outgoing Bandwidth ($0.12/GB)? Yes - Is there any expiration time for URL created through *get_serving_url * ? The image should get a future expires date, so the browser will cache the image. - I'm wondering whether I can delete original image data stored on Blobstore or not. not really no. The url is just link to the data, not a 'copy'. I'd greatly appreciate if you could point me to related documents, if there are any. Most of the above, is inferred from https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/images/ Thanks ! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] 403 accessing AppEngine from OVH network.
What went wrong? Accessing every gae app (ex. http://www.securempresa.com) via OVH's IPv6 network block reports a HTTP 403 error, with the specific message We're sorry, but this service is not available in your country. It has been working well during months. If it's of any help, the IP I'm trying to access stuff with is located in 2001:41d0:1:a037::1 Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Google Apps Free One User
No. See https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-appengine/jC_K-YlmXhM/discussion how it works now. On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:13 AM, James Gilliam jimgill...@gmail.com wrote: Question -- Can GAE people still create a Google Apps Free Account for one user? Many clients don't want google apps, but we need google apps to use it to launch their custom domain. We look forward to being able to launch a GAE site without google apps at all. Somebody please tell me the 1 user free account is still available. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: Release 1.8.2 issue - RuntimeError: internal error in regular expression engine
This appears to be a Python bug that was introduced in Python version 2.7.5. I am guessing that when google upgraded to 1.8.1, it also upgraded Python which broke this behavior. This is causing failures in my production code. Google -- please revert to 1.8.1 ASAP! On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:32:43 AM UTC-4, Mitul Golakiya wrote: Google had automatically migrated My Apps GAE SDK version to 1.8.2 from 1.8.1... And now getting the same issue after migrating from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2... Is there any option, by which I can specify my app's GAE SDK version ??? On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:03:39 AM UTC+5:30, Kinesh Patel wrote: Getting exceptions on the instances that have the new SDK (1.8.2) in Python 2.7 nightloop/mailbot/parser.py, line 23, in _strip_suffix result = re.findall(regex, body, re.S|re.I) File /base/data/home/runtimes/python27/python27_dist/lib/python2.7/re.py, line 177, in findall return _compile(pattern, flags).findall(string) RuntimeError: internal error in regular expression engine App is currently broken because of it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: Google Apps Free One User
Thank you for the response Barry. I read the forums all the time but I missed this June 15th announcement. How about putting something like this in the GAE blog or even sending an email to GAE admins? Again, thanks for the response. On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 9:13:12 PM UTC-7, James Gilliam wrote: Question -- Can GAE people still create a Google Apps Free Account for one user? Many clients don't want google apps, but we need google apps to use it to launch their custom domain. We look forward to being able to launch a GAE site without google apps at all. Somebody please tell me the 1 user free account is still available. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: Google Apps Free One User
Another issue ... This link says that a google developer can only request three credits ... I launch lots of sites with my GAE account https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1lSDA5Jol0Bosaop3RKZ9YqlSyzVLsCtAv8gYupBheR4/viewform Horrible jumping over these artificial Google hoops ... I don't even want the fracking google apps accounts and now I have to pay for then too On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 9:13:12 PM UTC-7, James Gilliam wrote: Question -- Can GAE people still create a Google Apps Free Account for one user? Many clients don't want google apps, but we need google apps to use it to launch their custom domain. We look forward to being able to launch a GAE site without google apps at all. Somebody please tell me the 1 user free account is still available. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Google App Engine datastore supports only 200 indexes..
Will that mean, an application can not have complex queries more than 200? I have a situation where I am searching on 7 different parameters (search filter of 8 different parameters) and then need to sort the results in 80 different columns in the table (by one at a time). That shall mean 7 + 1 indexes for a sort per field (Ascending, and 8 more for descending) X 80. which is a huge number. Is there a way out or I need to sort the list programatically? Thanks Aadhaar On Saturday, February 26, 2011 6:19:56 PM UTC+5:30, Ian Lewis wrote: Hi, The number if indexes isn't affected by the number of properties on an entity. It only has to do with the number of indexes for complex queries that are needed in your application (i.e. Those in index.yaml). So the number of indexes created automatically (by properties on indexes) are probably only limited by your available storage and doesn't limit the number of entities or properties on entities. See: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/config/indexconfig.html http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/propertyclass.html On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 7:19 PM, piplayan nayak pipl...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: I am a newbie to app engine datastore. I am currently evaluating migrate my existing webapp to app engine. I found that the hard limit for indexes is 200 for an application. So, i am really confused whether this constraint forces many limitations on the app engine datastore design.[ for eg. no of entity kinds, no of properties in an entity] etc. Please advice me on this -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.comjavascript: . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengi...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Ian http://www.ianlewis.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Moving application to European datacenter?
In the app engine documentation, I saw this point: *For developers that do not have a Premier account, you will need to enable billinghttps://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/billing#Enabling_Paid_Appsfor applications that should reside in the European Union. * (taken from https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/java/gettingstarted/uploading) That is my exact position; I do not have a premier account and I have enabled billing. How would I go about residing my applications in the EU? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: how to *not* use _ah/queue/deferred?
Did you ever find any way to stop the tasks ? On Thursday, November 11, 2010 6:21:07 PM UTC+5:30, Ivan Uemlianin wrote: Dear All app id: bigmarch2010 We are running a very simple app on the appengine. We're using django- nonrel, but the app is not very complicated. In particular, there seems to be no need to use the task queue, so I have commented out the relevant line in our app.yaml: # - url: /_ah/queue/deferred # script: djangoappengine/deferred/handler.py # login: admin However, the logs show that the task queue is still active --- or rather, it exists, but in a broken state: tasks pile up in the queue, and 404s pile up in the logs, e.g.: 11-11 04:42AM 26.081 /_ah/queue/deferred 404 313ms 0cpu_ms 0kb AppEngine-Google; (+http://code.google.com/appengine) Please could somebody help with the following questions: - I am not sending any task queue requests, so where can they be coming from? - The deferred system doesn't seem to be doing anything useful (or at all): how can I switch it off properly? With thanks and best wishes Ivan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Error if I set required=False for a StringListProperty
I tried to use both default=[] (which did not stop the error from occurring), and required=False (which generated a new error, as the only value allowed for required is True). So it appears that the old solutions for this bug are not viable. A mapreduce would cost a lot of money given the large amount of data involved. This is quite a serious bug in my opinion, as it prevents interoperability between Python and Java, as well as updating the structure of entities. I wonder if there is any hope that the AppEngine team take it up and fix it? Luca On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 12:13:55 AM UTC-7, Moises Belchin wrote: Consider using required=False and default=None or default=[] to avoid these problems. Other way is to use GenericProperty, use MapReduce to convert data from one type to another then change the property type, required, defaults, etc. Good luck ! Saludos. Moisés Belchín. 2013/7/10 timh zute...@gmail.com javascript: Alternately make the property not required (required=False), load the entities set the value of the list to a [] and then rewrite, once you have migrated all the entities you can then set the property to be required. You do need to think about model migration when changing classes adding/removing or changing the types of properties. T On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:07:25 PM UTC+8, timh wrote: Have you tried setting the default value to [] as per that error ? If your model is blowing up you can always fetch the underlying data without a model, fix the data up and write it back. T On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:56:50 AM UTC+8, Luca de Alfaro wrote: This is pretty bad! As pointed out in https://code.google.com/p/** googleappengine/issues/detail?**id=8962https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=8962, if you add a StringListProperty to a model with existing entities in the datastore, then you cannot read those entities any more! Furthermore, in Java it is apparently possible to write entities with null StringListProperty fields. Those entities cannot then be read from Python! These are pretty big problems -- is there any solution? Luca On Tuesday, March 23, 2010 5:57:17 AM UTC-7, Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Mar 22, 11:09 pm, dhruvbird dhruvb...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have a model with a single attribute that is a StringListProperty. I get an error if I define it as such: class Test(db.Expando): people = db.StringListProperty(**required=False, indexed=True) However, on changing it to: class Test(db.Expando): people = db.StringListProperty(**required=True, indexed=True, default=[]) It starts working. Any ideas why this is happening?? ListPropertys are always required; you can't set their value to None. If a particular entity has no values for the ListProperty, you need to set it to the empty list. (Note that you can still set a default value of 'None', which magically uses an empty list, not None, as the default value.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengi...@googlegroups.com javascript:. To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.comjavascript: . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: Error if I set required=False for a StringListProperty
Yes, and it did not work. I cannot fix all the data, as the cost would be quite large. This leaves giving up doing what I wanted to do in Python, or fetching the underlying data without a model. Luca On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 12:07:25 AM UTC-7, timh wrote: Have you tried setting the default value to [] as per that error ? If your model is blowing up you can always fetch the underlying data without a model, fix the data up and write it back. T On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:56:50 AM UTC+8, Luca de Alfaro wrote: This is pretty bad! As pointed out in https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=8962 , if you add a StringListProperty to a model with existing entities in the datastore, then you cannot read those entities any more! Furthermore, in Java it is apparently possible to write entities with null StringListProperty fields. Those entities cannot then be read from Python! These are pretty big problems -- is there any solution? Luca On Tuesday, March 23, 2010 5:57:17 AM UTC-7, Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Mar 22, 11:09 pm, dhruvbird dhruvb...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have a model with a single attribute that is a StringListProperty. I get an error if I define it as such: class Test(db.Expando): people = db.StringListProperty(required=False, indexed=True) However, on changing it to: class Test(db.Expando): people = db.StringListProperty(required=True, indexed=True, default=[]) It starts working. Any ideas why this is happening?? ListPropertys are always required; you can't set their value to None. If a particular entity has no values for the ListProperty, you need to set it to the empty list. (Note that you can still set a default value of 'None', which magically uses an empty list, not None, as the default value.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: Error if I set required=False for a StringListProperty
required=False generates a new error, stating that the only value for required is True. Luca On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 12:09:56 AM UTC-7, timh wrote: Alternately make the property not required (required=False), load the entities set the value of the list to a [] and then rewrite, once you have migrated all the entities you can then set the property to be required. You do need to think about model migration when changing classes adding/removing or changing the types of properties. T On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:07:25 PM UTC+8, timh wrote: Have you tried setting the default value to [] as per that error ? If your model is blowing up you can always fetch the underlying data without a model, fix the data up and write it back. T On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:56:50 AM UTC+8, Luca de Alfaro wrote: This is pretty bad! As pointed out in https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=8962 , if you add a StringListProperty to a model with existing entities in the datastore, then you cannot read those entities any more! Furthermore, in Java it is apparently possible to write entities with null StringListProperty fields. Those entities cannot then be read from Python! These are pretty big problems -- is there any solution? Luca On Tuesday, March 23, 2010 5:57:17 AM UTC-7, Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Mar 22, 11:09 pm, dhruvbird dhruvb...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have a model with a single attribute that is a StringListProperty. I get an error if I define it as such: class Test(db.Expando): people = db.StringListProperty(required=False, indexed=True) However, on changing it to: class Test(db.Expando): people = db.StringListProperty(required=True, indexed=True, default=[]) It starts working. Any ideas why this is happening?? ListPropertys are always required; you can't set their value to None. If a particular entity has no values for the ListProperty, you need to set it to the empty list. (Note that you can still set a default value of 'None', which magically uses an empty list, not None, as the default value.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: Error if I set required=False for a StringListProperty
Thanks! This is a great suggestion; it might be the only one that works
(short of giving up doing what I wanted to do in Python).
The interesting thing is that the Java side has no trouble at all reading
those entities.
Luca
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 12:11:51 AM UTC-7, timh wrote:
And here is some example code for getting and putting raw entities - ie no
model involved
from google.appengine.api import datastorefrom google.appengine.api import
datastore_errorsdef get_entities(keys):rpc =
datastore.GetRpcFromKwargs({})keys, multiple =
datastore.NormalizeAndTypeCheckKeys(keys)entities = Nonetry:
entities = datastore.Get(keys, rpc=rpc)except
datastore_errors.EntityNotFoundError:assert not multiple
return entitiesdef put_entities(entities):rpc =
datastore.GetRpcFromKwargs({})keys = datastore.Put(entities, rpc=rpc)
return keys
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:09:56 PM UTC+8, timh wrote:
Alternately make the property not required (required=False), load the
entities set the value of the list to a [] and then rewrite, once you have
migrated all the entities you can then
set the property to be required.
You do need to think about model migration when changing classes
adding/removing or changing the types of properties.
T
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:07:25 PM UTC+8, timh wrote:
Have you tried setting the default value to [] as per that error ?
If your model is blowing up you can always fetch the underlying data
without a model, fix the data up and write it back.
T
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:56:50 AM UTC+8, Luca de Alfaro wrote:
This is pretty bad!
As pointed out in
https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=8962 , if
you add a StringListProperty to a model with existing entities in the
datastore, then you cannot read those entities any more!
Furthermore, in Java it is apparently possible to write entities with
null StringListProperty fields. Those entities cannot then be read from
Python!
These are pretty big problems -- is there any solution?
Luca
On Tuesday, March 23, 2010 5:57:17 AM UTC-7, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mar 22, 11:09 pm, dhruvbird dhruvb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have a model with a single attribute that is a
StringListProperty.
I get an error if I define it as such:
class Test(db.Expando):
people = db.StringListProperty(required=False, indexed=True)
However, on changing it to:
class Test(db.Expando):
people = db.StringListProperty(required=True, indexed=True,
default=[])
It starts working. Any ideas why this is happening??
ListPropertys are always required; you can't set their value to None.
If a particular entity has no values for the ListProperty, you need to
set it to the empty list. (Note that you can still set a default
value of 'None', which magically uses an empty list, not None, as the
default value.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Widespread transaction failures under 1.8.2
We are seeing a significant uptick in datastore transaction failures under 1.8.2. Is anyone else seeing the same in their logs? j -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Group housekeeping: most of those pinned posts are really out of date
Whoever manages this group, There are 6 or 7 pinned posts at the top of this board that are really out of date: broken links, old team members, etc. Can they just be unpinned? Thanks, j -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: Google Apps Free One User
Three credits? Well that's not going to work well for our business model Everyone should star this so that we can get rid of this silly Google Apps dependency: https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=8528 j On Wednesday, 10 July 2013 08:46:31 UTC-6, James Gilliam wrote: Another issue ... This link says that a google developer can only request three credits ... I launch lots of sites with my GAE account https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1lSDA5Jol0Bosaop3RKZ9YqlSyzVLsCtAv8gYupBheR4/viewform Horrible jumping over these artificial Google hoops ... I don't even want the fracking google apps accounts and now I have to pay for then too On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 9:13:12 PM UTC-7, James Gilliam wrote: Question -- Can GAE people still create a Google Apps Free Account for one user? Many clients don't want google apps, but we need google apps to use it to launch their custom domain. We look forward to being able to launch a GAE site without google apps at all. Somebody please tell me the 1 user free account is still available. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: Release 1.8.2 issue - RuntimeError: internal error in regular expression engine
Or perhaps use a version of python that doesn't have a release critical bug. I believe this has been patched already by the python community. On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:57:32 AM UTC-4, Michael Sander wrote: This appears to be a Python bug that was introduced in Python version 2.7.5. I am guessing that when google upgraded to 1.8.1, it also upgraded Python which broke this behavior. This is causing failures in my production code. Google -- please revert to 1.8.1 ASAP! On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:32:43 AM UTC-4, Mitul Golakiya wrote: Google had automatically migrated My Apps GAE SDK version to 1.8.2 from 1.8.1... And now getting the same issue after migrating from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2... Is there any option, by which I can specify my app's GAE SDK version ??? On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:03:39 AM UTC+5:30, Kinesh Patel wrote: Getting exceptions on the instances that have the new SDK (1.8.2) in Python 2.7 nightloop/mailbot/parser.py, line 23, in _strip_suffix result = re.findall(regex, body, re.S|re.I) File /base/data/home/runtimes/python27/python27_dist/lib/python2.7/re.py, line 177, in findall return _compile(pattern, flags).findall(string) RuntimeError: internal error in regular expression engine App is currently broken because of it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: Release 1.8.2 issue - RuntimeError: internal error in regular expression engine
It appears this problem is fixed on 64 bit builds, but broken on 32 bit builds. http://bugs.python.org/issue17998 On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 12:17:42 PM UTC-4, Kinesh Patel wrote: Or perhaps use a version of python that doesn't have a release critical bug. I believe this has been patched already by the python community. On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:57:32 AM UTC-4, Michael Sander wrote: This appears to be a Python bug that was introduced in Python version 2.7.5. I am guessing that when google upgraded to 1.8.1, it also upgraded Python which broke this behavior. This is causing failures in my production code. Google -- please revert to 1.8.1 ASAP! On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:32:43 AM UTC-4, Mitul Golakiya wrote: Google had automatically migrated My Apps GAE SDK version to 1.8.2 from 1.8.1... And now getting the same issue after migrating from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2... Is there any option, by which I can specify my app's GAE SDK version ??? On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:03:39 AM UTC+5:30, Kinesh Patel wrote: Getting exceptions on the instances that have the new SDK (1.8.2) in Python 2.7 nightloop/mailbot/parser.py, line 23, in _strip_suffix result = re.findall(regex, body, re.S|re.I) File /base/data/home/runtimes/python27/python27_dist/lib/python2.7/re.py, line 177, in findall return _compile(pattern, flags).findall(string) RuntimeError: internal error in regular expression engine App is currently broken because of it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Some questions about get_serving_url.
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 6:17:54 AM UTC-4, barryhunter wrote: The image should get a future expires date, so the browser will cache the image. FYI, the expiration time is 24 hours, and there doesn't seem to be a way to change this. https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-appengine/2fPDYoJbjR4/discussion - I'm wondering whether I can delete original image data stored on Blobstore or not. not really no. The url is just link to the data, not a 'copy'. If you delete the original image from blobstore, then the url will return 404 within 24 hours. --Alex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: Release 1.8.2 issue - RuntimeError: internal error in regular expression engine
FYI to others - a workaround for this issue is to not use r.DOTALL or r.S. You have to change your regexes wherever you have a . match to be (.|\n|\r). This is not a 100% foolproof workaround, as there are other newline-esque characters that are rarely used, but it should hold you over until there is an upgraded python runtime on google's servers. On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 12:21:03 PM UTC-4, Kinesh Patel wrote: It appears this problem is fixed on 64 bit builds, but broken on 32 bit builds. http://bugs.python.org/issue17998 On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 12:17:42 PM UTC-4, Kinesh Patel wrote: Or perhaps use a version of python that doesn't have a release critical bug. I believe this has been patched already by the python community. On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:57:32 AM UTC-4, Michael Sander wrote: This appears to be a Python bug that was introduced in Python version 2.7.5. I am guessing that when google upgraded to 1.8.1, it also upgraded Python which broke this behavior. This is causing failures in my production code. Google -- please revert to 1.8.1 ASAP! On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:32:43 AM UTC-4, Mitul Golakiya wrote: Google had automatically migrated My Apps GAE SDK version to 1.8.2 from 1.8.1... And now getting the same issue after migrating from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2... Is there any option, by which I can specify my app's GAE SDK version ??? On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:03:39 AM UTC+5:30, Kinesh Patel wrote: Getting exceptions on the instances that have the new SDK (1.8.2) in Python 2.7 nightloop/mailbot/parser.py, line 23, in _strip_suffix result = re.findall(regex, body, re.S|re.I) File /base/data/home/runtimes/python27/python27_dist/lib/python2.7/re.py, line 177, in findall return _compile(pattern, flags).findall(string) RuntimeError: internal error in regular expression engine App is currently broken because of it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google Apps No Longer Free
This page still states that a new app should get one Google Apps Standard Edition for free: https://developers.google.com/appengine/articles/domains Just created a new app. But, the links take you to the paid (not free) Google Apps for Business page. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Moving application to European datacenter?
Hello Peter, On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Peter D deaks...@gmail.com wrote: In the app engine documentation, I saw this point: *For developers that do not have a Premier account, you will need to enable billinghttps://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/billing#Enabling_Paid_Appsfor applications that should reside in the European Union. * (taken from https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/ java/gettingstarted/uploading) That is my exact position; I do not have a premier account and I have enabled billing. How would I go about residing my applications in the EU? You need to contact the Google App Engine staff to have your application moved to European datacenters. See https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/google-appengine/Oon8Ds3dlO4/gStzRiwCrhcJ You can also open a ticket at https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list - -Vinny P Technology Media Advisor Chicago, IL App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Locked out of my app for not having owner
Hello, The account that used to be owner and creator of the application was deleted from Google Apps and now the only account with permissions is mine with only developer privilegies. I wonder how to get the owner role back to my app. App ID: www-endpoints Thanks, David Cifuentes -- *Eforcers S.A.* www.eforcers.com Cra. 12 No 90-20 Of. 301, 303, 306 Bogotá, Colombia PBX [+571] 622 8320 FAX [+571] 622 8275 i...@eforcers.com https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-TagOBY1o2z4/UJLn6n91fxI/BiI/gBO6aLNbt_A/s1600/ISO-9001-2008-GoogleAppsDeployment.jpg La información aquí contenida es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Está estrictamente prohibida su utilización, copia, descarga, distribución, modificación y/o reproducción total o parcial, sin el permiso expreso de Eforcers S.A., pues su contenido puede ser de carácter confidencial y/o contener material privilegiado. Si usted recibió esta información por error, por favor contacte en forma inmediata a quien la envió y borre este material de su computador. Eforcers S.A. no es responsable por la información contenida en esta comunicación, el directo responsable es quien la firma o el autor de la misma. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: need help on refreshToken null issue
anyone on this plz? Thankx and Regards Vik Founder http://www.sakshum.org http://blog.sakshum.org On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Vik vik@gmail.com wrote: Hi Please advise on http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17333726/refreshtoken-is-null Thankx and Regards Vik Founder http://www.sakshum.org http://blog.sakshum.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: how to *not* use _ah/queue/deferred?
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Jitender Bhatia jitender.bha...@metacube.com wrote: Did you ever find any way to stop the tasks ? On Thursday, November 11, 2010 6:21:07 PM UTC+5:30, Ivan Uemlianin wrote: We are running a very simple app on the appengine. We're using django- nonrel, but the app is not very complicated. In particular, there seems to be no need to use the task queue, so I have commented out the relevant line in our app.yaml However, the logs show that the task queue is still active --- or rather, it exists, but in a broken state: tasks pile up in the queue, and 404s pile up in the logs Hello Jitender, Do you need to stop the task queue in general, or stop the task generation by django-nonrel? If you need to stop the task queue, you can use the Pause Queue button in the Task Queue screen: http://imgur.com/7pHUWeO If you need to stop task generation by django-nonrel, you should know that django and miscellaneous plugins need to create tasks for their background work. If you need to figure out what parts of django are generating tasks, you can inspect the task's information by going to the queue information screen and clicking on an individual task. For example, here's a picture of one of my tasks: http://imgur.com/dFvpB1Y - -Vinny P Technology Media Advisor Chicago, IL App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Error if I set required=False for a StringListProperty
What about just dropping the required parameter from the property have you tried that. On Thursday, July 11, 2013 12:00:17 AM UTC+8, Luca de Alfaro wrote: I tried to use both default=[] (which did not stop the error from occurring), and required=False (which generated a new error, as the only value allowed for required is True). So it appears that the old solutions for this bug are not viable. A mapreduce would cost a lot of money given the large amount of data involved. This is quite a serious bug in my opinion, as it prevents interoperability between Python and Java, as well as updating the structure of entities. I wonder if there is any hope that the AppEngine team take it up and fix it? Luca On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 12:13:55 AM UTC-7, Moises Belchin wrote: Consider using required=False and default=None or default=[] to avoid these problems. Other way is to use GenericProperty, use MapReduce to convert data from one type to another then change the property type, required, defaults, etc. Good luck ! Saludos. Moisés Belchín. 2013/7/10 timh zute...@gmail.com Alternately make the property not required (required=False), load the entities set the value of the list to a [] and then rewrite, once you have migrated all the entities you can then set the property to be required. You do need to think about model migration when changing classes adding/removing or changing the types of properties. T On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:07:25 PM UTC+8, timh wrote: Have you tried setting the default value to [] as per that error ? If your model is blowing up you can always fetch the underlying data without a model, fix the data up and write it back. T On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:56:50 AM UTC+8, Luca de Alfaro wrote: This is pretty bad! As pointed out in https://code.google.com/p/** googleappengine/issues/detail?**id=8962https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=8962, if you add a StringListProperty to a model with existing entities in the datastore, then you cannot read those entities any more! Furthermore, in Java it is apparently possible to write entities with null StringListProperty fields. Those entities cannot then be read from Python! These are pretty big problems -- is there any solution? Luca On Tuesday, March 23, 2010 5:57:17 AM UTC-7, Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Mar 22, 11:09 pm, dhruvbird dhruvb...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have a model with a single attribute that is a StringListProperty. I get an error if I define it as such: class Test(db.Expando): people = db.StringListProperty(**required=False, indexed=True) However, on changing it to: class Test(db.Expando): people = db.StringListProperty(**required=True, indexed=True, default=[]) It starts working. Any ideas why this is happening?? ListPropertys are always required; you can't set their value to None. If a particular entity has no values for the ListProperty, you need to set it to the empty list. (Note that you can still set a default value of 'None', which magically uses an empty list, not None, as the default value.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengi...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
