[google-appengine] Billing for Incoming Bandwith
Hi all, I'm seeing different docs about billing for incoming bandwith: Incoming bandwith is not present in the pricing table: http://code.google.com/intl/nl-NL/appengine/docs/billing.html However, http://code.google.com/intl/nl-NL/appengine/docs/quotas.html mentions that Incoming bandwith is billable. Jaap -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/gNIR6ZO7JN8J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Different behavior static_dir dev vs live
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2203 Jaap On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi jaap, Can you please file a bug for this in the issue tracker? -Nick Johnson On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:32 PM, j...@q42.nl j...@q42.nl wrote: I've found a difference in the behavior of static_dir directives in app.yaml. My app.yaml: handlers: - url: /js/y.js script: js_templ.py - url: /js static_dir: js All goes well in dev server, because the devserver uses the js directory. On the live server all statics are handled differently, so the live server scans the app.yaml and it matches all the files against the static_dir declarations. On the live server the file js_templ.py is interpreted as a static file, because the static_dir: js matches it. I think the development server should work exactly like the live server on this point. The difference is only noticed on the live server so it's hard to find it and the warnings aren't clear. -- Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: 368047 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Is there any open source project/ticket management app that can be deployed on App Engine?
Use google code. Jaap On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 4:38 PM, arpit mathur.ar...@gmail.com wrote: I have just started with GAE and one of the things I'd like to do is deploy something like Trac or RedMine to track the project we are working on. Unfortunately Trac doesnt work on GAE since it needs MySQL or similar relational database. Is there any app for tracking projects/ ticket management for GAE? thanks -arpit --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Can't Update SDK?
The update check is a little bit behind, I've noticed that with the previous release too. Jaap On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Mr. Rajiv Bakulesh Shah brai...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, guys. I'm running the App Engine SDK version 1.2.4 on OS X Snow Leopard. I just saw on Twitter that version 1.2.5 has been released. However, when I click on Help - Check for Updates..., it pops up a window that says, Check successful. No updates needed, or none chosen for install. What gives? Thanks, Raj --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Is there any open source project/ticket management app that can be deployed on App Engine?
Seriously, don't wast time on building/porting/hacking/slashing a trac-like thing on GAE, use google code... Jaap On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Brandon N. Wirtz drak...@digerat.comwrote: Anything off the shelf will use flat files or SQL… neither of these technologies will work on GAE. Porting the SQL calls to GQL is not an overwhelming task… but you would then be on your own branch so you’d be on yoru own for updates. In these situations it is generally best to deploy the app on a supported platform, and start off loading the bits that are easiest to do to GAE first, until eventually the whole app runs on GAE. I have done this with several of my installs… and find even getting 75% running on GAE can help my scalability. *From:* google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto: google-appeng...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Jaap Taal *Sent:* Friday, September 04, 2009 12:48 AM *To:* google-appengine@googlegroups.com *Subject:* [google-appengine] Re: Is there any open source project/ticket management app that can be deployed on App Engine? Use google code. Jaap On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 4:38 PM, arpit mathur.ar...@gmail.com wrote: I have just started with GAE and one of the things I'd like to do is deploy something like Trac or RedMine to track the project we are working on. Unfortunately Trac doesnt work on GAE since it needs MySQL or similar relational database. Is there any app for tracking projects/ ticket management for GAE? thanks -arpit --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Google Apps Dashboard
You should post your question on: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google+Apps On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Dickster dick.guer...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure if Google Apps Dashboard is covered by the Google Apps Engine discussion group, but since I couldn't find a separate group for it, I'm posting my question here. If there is a better group, please move this to the appropriate group. My question has to do with the symbol displayed for each day in the columns labeled with the mm/dd. There were problems on 9/1/09 with Google Mail, and during that day the wrench symbol has displayed. Today, it still shows that wrench symbol, but when the details are displayed, the last-dated symbol is the blue information symbol. For other applications, like Google Calendar or Google Sites, if information was the last symbol for that day, that's what's displayed on the Dashboard. Why doesn't Google Mail show information for 9/1/09 ?? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Merge-Join Performance?
I think the app engine engineers should write a detailed book about app engine, or is there a good book about app engine's details on the market? Jaap On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Devel63 danstic...@gmail.com wrote: I've watched this video, so I watched again. At first he says he thinks filter order might matter, but then corrects himself based on input from the author of the code to say that filter order has a very small effect. On Sep 2, 5:52 am, Paul Kinlan paul.kin...@gmail.com wrote: There is a video about building scalable apps by Brett Slatkin onhttp:// code.google.com/io At the end of the video it is hinted (I believe - I could be wrong) that the order of your filters matters, so that means that you should choose key with the highest entropy first (my terminology might be incorrect) but if your data is not very unique it should be used later in the merge join query. Paul 2009/9/2 Jai sharma...@gmail.com Also does it use the keyword histogram to optimize the set- intersection performance(AND queries) in merge-join? Regards, Jai On Sep 1, 12:07 pm, Devel63 danstic...@gmail.com wrote: I'm seeing very slow times on some merge-join (zig zag) queries, and just want to confirm that App Engine is smart about these things. In particular, if I have a poperty for which most records have an identical value, does GAE does have to scan the related entire index linearly, or, if I'm in the middle of a merge join, does it intelligently find a good starting point based on the desired __key__ value? Imagine 1M records with a db.BooleanProperty set to False... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Request Slow Down
Hi Nick, You say: The same Python runtime environment can be used by multiple handlers - in which case they will share the same loaded modules. Is this always the case? Or do you need to programmatically do this? If so, how do you achieve that? Jaap On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Andy Freeman ana...@earthlink.netwrote: Is there any reason to prefer multiple app.yaml entries over few? That is, one can match /pages/.*, /users/.*, /tasks/.*, /foo/.*, etc with separate app.yaml entries, followed by a catch-all app.yaml entry, each with its own handler file, each file with its own wsgi application, or with a single app.yaml entry (/.*) and a handler file with a wsgi application that has a clause for each of those cases. (Assume that each handler file defines main() so it will be cached.) Is there any difference between these two approachs wrt reuse or other implementation issues? If your handlers are mostly distinct - that is, they have large codebases that they don't share in common with each other - using separate app.yaml handlers can reduce initial startup time by only loading the modules the particular request handler requires. If, like most apps, your handlers need to load most of the app in order to serve a request, however, this effect is minimal. For example, if an instance is created for one handler, will it be used for another? (The documentation says that handler files can be cached like any other module, but doesn't say how that interacts with instance reuse.) The same Python runtime environment can be used by multiple handlers - in which case they will share the same loaded modules. -Nick Johnson Thanks, -andy On Aug 26, 4:31 am, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi PubliusX, On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:38 PM, PubliusX arjun.va...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, thanks.. but I figured out the problem. Apparently if there are too many requesthandlers (referenced in the handler script), then appengine doesn't cache the handler script.. At least thats what I think.. because I reduced the number by removing an arbitrary 5-6 classes and its back to the old time. That's definitely not the case. App Engine doesn't even know how many RequestHandlers you're using, or even check what framework you're using. You were probably just getting a new instance on each request. -Nick Johnson -- Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine -- Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: GQL IS NOT NULL and LIKE queries
Guys, If you want to have prefix searches, you might want to google for: whoosh app engine. Whoosh is a lucene like indexer in pure python. Someone has created a app engine component. Haven't done a lot with it, but it works quite OK. Jaap On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Wooble geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: On Aug 7, 12:56 pm, Hrishi bakshi.hrishik...@gmail.com wrote: If you are thinking of using the LIKE statement of MySQL, you should not be having a huge table. If you have entries in 1s, it works great. I've never been able to fetch anywhere close to 10,000 entities in a single request. YMMV. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine]
Every time dev_appserver starts up it checks for a new version of the SDK Checking for updates to the SDK Yesterday the SDK was updated to 1.2.4 There's no --version flag to either dev_appserver or appcfg and the VERSION file still mentions 1.2.3 I think dev_appserver should output SDK version if checking is enabled, this way you can see whether update is working... Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: GQL query failed to return a qualifying entity
Hi phtq, I've only had this problem once, and after deleting that record it never occured again... The only reason I mentioned it, is because you started this thread! Jaap On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:28 PM, phtq pher...@typequick.com.au wrote: Hello Jaap, Sounds like this problem is not all that rare, although we have never hit it before in over a year of development on the app engine. I can't relate the problem to anything we have done recently. I don't think we have introduced any new indexes for a while for example. I take it Google have not come up with any explanation in your case so far either? On Aug 5, 11:18 pm, Jaap Taal j...@q42.nl wrote: Same here, just good old ASCII chars in that record. On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:55 AM, phtq pher...@typequick.com.au wrote: The fact that the record can be retrieved with any 2 of the 3 filters indicates that there are no hidden characters. On Aug 5, 8:41 am, Wooble geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: Are you sure there isn't a space or other non-printable character in your data in the datastore? It's certainly possible your index is corrupt, but I'd check for more likely causes first. On Aug 4, 12:01 am, phtq pher...@typequick.com.au wrote: In our application (kbdlessons version 1-01) we have just had a case where a query in our application failed to return a record which definitely exists. We were able to reproduce this problem using the Dataviewer page off the app engine dashboard. We put in this query using the Dataviewer: SELECT * FROM StudentSubscriptions where StudentKey = 'REBECCA' and ProductKey = 'Typequick Professional' and AccountKey = 'SIVF' and got no results. However, if we use just 2 out of the 3 tests (any 2!) the record we want appears amongst the results. Also, other valid values for StudentKey when used in this 3 part query do return a record in the Dataviewer page, just not this particular set of 3 values. We had to build a new record (under another name) to get the student going, but have left the troubled record in the database so you can look at it. Please let me know how to avoid this rather worrying problem. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: How can I detect the development server?
Nick,
If I'm not mistaken:
AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'contains'Should be:
os.environ['SERVER_SOFTWARE'].find('Development') = 0
your comment was helpful, though
Jaap
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Mark Jones mark0...@gmail.com wrote:
I also discovered this today:
http://code.google.com/p/app-engine-patch/wiki/RagendjaOther
On Jul 22, 11:49 am, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com
wrote:
Hi Mark,
Just check if os.environ['SERVER_SOFTWARE'].contains('Development')
-Nick Johnson
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Mark Jonesmark0...@gmail.com wrote:
I need code to behave one way on mydevserverand another on the real
GAE. How can I detect thedevserver.
Specifically I need to NOT replace imp.find_module so that WingIDE
debugging will work, but I need it to be replaced when the code is
pushed to GAE
--
Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer
Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration
Number: 368047
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: GQL query failed to return a qualifying entity
Same here, just good old ASCII chars in that record. On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:55 AM, phtq pher...@typequick.com.au wrote: The fact that the record can be retrieved with any 2 of the 3 filters indicates that there are no hidden characters. On Aug 5, 8:41 am, Wooble geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: Are you sure there isn't a space or other non-printable character in your data in the datastore? It's certainly possible your index is corrupt, but I'd check for more likely causes first. On Aug 4, 12:01 am, phtq pher...@typequick.com.au wrote: In our application (kbdlessons version 1-01) we have just had a case where a query in our application failed to return a record which definitely exists. We were able to reproduce this problem using the Dataviewer page off the app engine dashboard. We put in this query using the Dataviewer: SELECT * FROM StudentSubscriptions where StudentKey = 'REBECCA' and ProductKey = 'Typequick Professional' and AccountKey = 'SIVF' and got no results. However, if we use just 2 out of the 3 tests (any 2!) the record we want appears amongst the results. Also, other valid values for StudentKey when used in this 3 part query do return a record in the Dataviewer page, just not this particular set of 3 values. We had to build a new record (under another name) to get the student going, but have left the troubled record in the database so you can look at it. Please let me know how to avoid this rather worrying problem. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: GQL query failed to return a qualifying entity
I've experienced a similar problem running on the SDK.aplying two filter()s result in 0 records found. Aplying either one of the filter()s and comparing the resultsets found a record that matches both filter()s. Jaap Taal [ Q42 BV | tel 070 44523 42 | direct 070 44523 65 | http://q42.nl | Waldorpstraat 17F, Den Haag | KvK 30164662 ] On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:01 AM, phtq pher...@typequick.com.au wrote: In our application (kbdlessons version 1-01) we have just had a case where a query in our application failed to return a record which definitely exists. We were able to reproduce this problem using the Dataviewer page off the app engine dashboard. We put in this query using the Dataviewer: SELECT * FROM StudentSubscriptions where StudentKey = 'REBECCA' and ProductKey = 'Typequick Professional' and AccountKey = 'SIVF' and got no results. However, if we use just 2 out of the 3 tests (any 2!) the record we want appears amongst the results. Also, other valid values for StudentKey when used in this 3 part query do return a record in the Dataviewer page, just not this particular set of 3 values. We had to build a new record (under another name) to get the student going, but have left the troubled record in the database so you can look at it. Please let me know how to avoid this rather worrying problem. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: new version of django
Hi Rodrigo, You'll have to install django 1.0 your self. This is quit easy if you use easy_install. Jaap On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Rodrigo rali...@gmail.com wrote: When do you guys are going to add to the SDK the new version of Django?. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: No SMS support for my country
+1 On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:00 AM, someone1 someo...@gmail.com wrote: hahahaha, i laughed so hard after reading how Nick repeatedly gave the same reply to everyone. I think Nick will no longer be activating accounts as there is a online form which he has linked to many times above. :D On Jul 30, 4:01 am, dhr dima.hris...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Nick, I'd appreciate if you activate my account too. My country, Moldova, is not on the list. tia On Jul 30, 10:49 am, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi, If you are having trouble with SMS verification, or want an additional account activated, please fill out the following form: http://appengine.google.com/waitlist/sms_issues (This is from the following FAQhttp://code.google.com/appengine/kb/sms .html#error ) Once you fill out this form, you should receive access within a day or two. Happy coding, Nick Johnson On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:07 AM, G.Jara jajaramil...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Nick, Same issue as other people from Colombia: there is not any Colombian mobile operator listed yet. Could you please activate my account? Thank you. On Jul 29, 3:38 pm, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi, If you are having trouble with SMS verification, or want an additional account activated, please fill out the following form: http://appengine.google.com/waitlist/sms_issues (This is from the following FAQhttp:// code.google.com/appengine/kb/sms .html#error ) Once you fill out this form, you should receive access within a day or two. Happy coding, Nick Johnson On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:56 PM, G.Jara jajaramil...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Nick, I'd appreciate if you can activate my account. Thank you in advance. Best regards. On Jul 22, 7:51 am, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi Pilar, I've activated your account. -Nick Johnson On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Pilar Posada Saldarriagapilpos...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having the same problem, I'm from Colombia. Can you help me please, Nick? Thank you very much. On Jul 16, 9:17 am, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: I've activated your account. -Nick Johnson On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Munkhbaatar gmunkhbaata...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am from Mongolia, I have a problem with Verify Your Account bySMS page. NoSMS support for mycountry. Is there any other way of verifying my account? Thanks. -- Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: 368047 -- Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: 368047 -- Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine -- Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Help on limiation of Authorization header in fetchurl function
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1924 On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Millton easywo...@gmail.com wrote: the issue has been tracked with ID 1924, thanks On 7月30日, 下午5时08分, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi Millton, Can you please file a bug in the issue tracker for this? -Nick Johnson On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Millton easywo...@gmail.com wrote: hi Nick I was setup a authetication transfer server so user can use both windows live id and google account to visit my site the process is simillar as google authsub, user goto login.live.com and get a ticket, so I get the ticket and goto live contact server to get the real user id and stuff the request was sent to https://livecontacts.services.live.com/ users/@l...@3b7beba24ed0d0a4/rest/livecontacts/owner https://livecontacts.services.live.com/%0Ausers/@l...@3b7beba24ed0d0a4/r.. ., which worked correclty locally also I setup a fake site to act as livecontacts.services.live.com to receive the fetchurl request from appengine, and I found the Authorization header was missing . the size of the header is 700 bytes, urlencoded, I try decode the header (600 bytes) but still not working, so I guess there should be a limitation on this type of header thanks Michael On 7月30日, 上午12时11分, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi Millton, Are you able to give more details? What is the service, and what authentication method does it use? How did you determine that App Engine was not forwarding the Authorization header? -Nick Johnson On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Millton easywo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all I've been using the GAE for a while and there is one feature which fetch a https page from live contact portal , and need a Authorization header, the problem is that the header has a long token as the value, such asAuthoization: Delegated Tokeb dt=xxx..., which was always blocked by GAE environment, so I always got 401 Error. is there any solution for this or workarround? Thanks! Michael- 隐藏被引用文字 - - 显示引用的文字 - -- Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Multiple app versions - only one datastore?
I'd also like to know whether different versions of apps share the same memcache ** Does app engine prefix memcache keys? Or does app engine provide an other means of key-separation? Basicly what I would like to know: Do you have to include a versionnumber in your own memcached keys or does app engine take care of this... ** Jaap Taal [ Q42 BV | tel 070 44523 42 | direct 070 44523 65 | http://q42.nl | Waldorpstraat 17F, Den Haag | KvK 30164662 ] On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:52 PM, bFlood bflood...@gmail.com wrote: hey nick is there any optimized way to have a python app call a java app in the same GAE application? my guess is no, except through UrlFetch but I figured I would ask anyway also, do Python/Java versions in same GAE app share teh same memcache as well? thecheers brian On Jul 31, 8:47 am, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi radaczynski, Java and Python apps run in the same environment (eg, you can have one major version be Python, and another Java), so yes, the same applies to Python. We don't currently have plans to change this, as alternate major versions using the same datastore is essential for most people deploying and rolling out new versions. -Nick Johnson On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:49 PM, radaczynskiradaczyn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I have found info in the Javadocs that although there can be multple versions of the app, there is only one datastore for all of them. Is it the same for python? Are there any plans to version the datastore as well? Or should the apps just roll their own versioning scheme and data migration? -- Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Consuming OAuth requests in app engine
Terry, Thanks, I've found some other resources, but this is a usefull one! Jaap On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 1:13 AM, nolybab thardin...@gmail.com wrote: Jaap, See if this link has what you need: http://wiki.opensocial.org/index.php?title=Building_an_OpenSocial_App_with_Google_App_Engine#Sending_and_verifying_signed_requests That should help. Good luck... Terry On Jul 24, 9:20 am, j...@q42.nl j...@q42.nl wrote: Hi all, I'm creating an opensocial widget on hyves.nl (a dutch social networking site). I'm calling a makeRequest with RequestParamters.AUTHORIZATION set to SIGNED. The GET call is enriched with several query string parameters like: * opensocial_owner_id * opensocial_viewer_id * opensocial_app_id * oauth_consumer_key * oauth_token (empty) * xoauth_signature_publickey * oauth_signature_method * oauth_nonce * oauth_timestamp * oauth_signature How do I verify that this request is coming from the hyves.nl opensocial container? I've found that GData does some oauth stuff, but that Api needs to fetch an oauth token, while I just want to verify that the SIGNED request is indeed coming from the container... Anyone any pointers to the right direction? Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Consuming OAuth requests in app engine
Hi Terry, As you suggested I'm adding the resources that I allready found (including yours to be complete) http://wiki.opensocial.org/index.php?title=Building_an_OpenSocial_App_with_Google_App_Engine#Sending_and_verifying_signed_requests http://wiki.opensocial.org/index.php?title=Validating_Signed_Requests http://wiki.opensocial.org/index.php?title=Introduction_To_Signed_Requests Resource on Hyves.nl developer wiki (specific to hyves.nl): http://trac.hyves-api.nl/wiki/OpensocialSpecs#Signedrequests Jaap On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:31 PM, nolybab thardin...@gmail.com wrote: Jaap, If you don't mind, please share any other resources you may have that might be useful on this topic :) Thanks, Terry On Jul 27, 10:07 am, Jaap Taal j...@q42.nl wrote: Terry, Thanks, I've found some other resources, but this is a usefull one! Jaap On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 1:13 AM, nolybab thardin...@gmail.com wrote: Jaap, See if this link has what you need: http://wiki.opensocial.org/index.php?title=Building_an_OpenSocial_App. .. That should help. Good luck... Terry On Jul 24, 9:20 am, j...@q42.nl j...@q42.nl wrote: Hi all, I'm creating an opensocial widget on hyves.nl (a dutch social networking site). I'm calling a makeRequest with RequestParamters.AUTHORIZATION set to SIGNED. The GET call is enriched with several query string parameters like: * opensocial_owner_id * opensocial_viewer_id * opensocial_app_id * oauth_consumer_key * oauth_token (empty) * xoauth_signature_publickey * oauth_signature_method * oauth_nonce * oauth_timestamp * oauth_signature How do I verify that this request is coming from the hyves.nl opensocial container? I've found that GData does some oauth stuff, but that Api needs to fetch an oauth token, while I just want to verify that the SIGNED request is indeed coming from the container... Anyone any pointers to the right direction? Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Have to verify AGAIN
Hi Nick, I'm using the url you've specified. It shows my two applications I allready registered. When I click Create an Application, I'm being redirected to http://appengine.google.com/permissions/smssend. Jaap On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi jaap, Have you tried logging in at http://appengine.google.com/a/q42.nl ? If you verified your Apps account using an Apps login, that is where you will need to log in via. -Nick Johnson On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:14 PM, j...@q42.nl j...@q42.nl wrote: Hi, I have to verify my google app account again, even though I all ready registered. I also created some applications all ready! Since I've used my mobile number allready in the first verification, app engine complains about it being used all ready... Can someone from google please activate my account? Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Have to verify AGAIN
Hi, I have to verify my google app account again, even though I all ready registered. I also created some applications allready! Can someone from google please activate my account? Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
