[google-appengine] Re: SSL Release

[Peter McKenzie]

+1 to what Cayden said.  We're working hard on getting SSL ready to launch.

cheers,
Peter

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/reA63BnD4OwJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] Re: SEARCH API: Problem in Adding Documents To An Index

[Peter McKenzie]

Looking like a problem on our side.  We're working on it.

On Friday, May 18, 2012 7:24:59 PM UTC+10, Santosh Ravindranath wrote:
>
>
> I am facing this issue too. 
>
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 
> com.google.appengine.api.search.Index.add([Lcom/google/appengine/api/search/Document;)Lcom/google/appengine/api/search/AddDocumentsResponse;
>
>
> Unable to update the index. 
>
> Otherwise I am lovin the Search API!
>
> I know Search is still experimental. But can anyone provide a solution for 
> this?
>
> Thanks
>
> Santosh
>
>
> On Friday, May 18, 2012 11:47:03 AM UTC+5:30, Ananthakrishnan 
> Venkatasubramanian wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> When will this issue be fixed and ready to use.
>>
>> Waiting for the reply.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> On Friday, May 18, 2012 9:42:35 AM UTC+5:30, Jeff Dutton wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm seeing this as well.  It seems to have started for me at 2012-05-17 
>>> 16:28:25.705 EST.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:51:33 PM UTC-4, Ananthakrishnan 
>>> Venkatasubramanian wrote:

 Hi,

 I have been using Search API for my application so far successfully. I 
 was able to add documents to index successfully yesterday.

 But when I tried to execute the same today, it gave me this exception.

 *Exception:*

 Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 
 com.google.appengine.api.search.Index.add(Ljava/lang/Iterable;)Lcom/google/appengine/api/search/AddDocumentsResponse;


 I am trying to add only one document to an index and that its not working.

 Please give me the solution to solve this problem.

 Thanks.


> On Friday, May 18, 2012 11:47:03 AM UTC+5:30, Ananthakrishnan 
> Venkatasubramanian wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> When will this issue be fixed and ready to use.
>>
>> Waiting for the reply.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> On Friday, May 18, 2012 9:42:35 AM UTC+5:30, Jeff Dutton wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm seeing this as well.  It seems to have started for me at 2012-05-17 
>>> 16:28:25.705 EST.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:51:33 PM UTC-4, Ananthakrishnan 
>>> Venkatasubramanian wrote:

 Hi,

 I have been using Search API for my application so far successfully. I 
 was able to add documents to index successfully yesterday.

 But when I tried to execute the same today, it gave me this exception.

 *Exception:*

 Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 
 com.google.appengine.api.search.Index.add(Ljava/lang/Iterable;)Lcom/google/appengine/api/search/AddDocumentsResponse;


 I am trying to add only one document to an index and that its not working.

 Please give me the solution to solve this problem.

 Thanks.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/_BJzGkt9ONgJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] Re: SEARCH API: Problem in Adding Documents To An Index

[Peter McKenzie]

The issue here is that the Index.add() signature has changed between
1.6.5 and 1.6.6.  The impact is that Index.add() will stop working as
1.6.6 rolls out (but other Search functionality is unaffected).  We
try to avoid breakages like this, and expect them to be rare, but they
are part of an API being in an experimental state.

The Fix

All Java Apps using Search will need to be re-compiled with the 1.6.6
SDK.  Additionally, if your code gets the response of the Index.add()
method, then you will need to change from,

for example,

 AddDocumentsResponse response = getIndex().add(documents);
 for (String id : response.getDocumentIds()) {
 }

to

 AddResponse response = getIndex().add(documents);
 for (String id : response.getIds()) {
 }


If you're hitting the problem now, you may want to try the pre-release SDK. 
 There are of course risks associated with using a pre-release SDK, so you 
may prefer to wait for the released 1.6.6 SDK.

Pre-release SDK link:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/downloads/detail?name=appengine-java-sdk-1.6.6_prerelease.zip#makechanges

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/rppkWE2BiAkJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] Re: The Schedule Format of cron.xml

[Peter McKenzie]

Please create an issue on the issue tracker for this feature request.

On Thursday, May 17, 2012 6:15:38 PM UTC+10, Ian Marshall wrote:
>
> Thank you 
> - 
> You're welcome. 
>
>
> In option 1: Do you mean using *etaMillis of **TaskOptions *using  to 
> specify the execute time? 
> ---
>  
>
> Yes. 
>
>
> We can trigger a TaskInit by cron and create 48 tasks in queue(every 
> 30 minutes) to avoid chain task. 
> -
>  
>
> Good idea: I didn't think of that. 
>
>
> I just wish a simple syntax to support such requirement 
> --- 
> Me too. 
>
>
> On May 17, 3:13 am, Larry  wrote: 
> > Hi Lan, 
> > Thank you. 
> > In option 1: 
> > Do you mean using *etaMillis of **TaskOptions *using  to specify the 
> > execute time? 
> > This could be a solution. We can trigger a TaskInit by cron and create 
> 48 
> > tasks in queue(every 30 minutes) 
> > to avoid chain task. 
> > 
> > In option 2: 
> > This is my first thought about cron.xml . I just wish a simple 
> syntax 
> > to support such requirement. 
> > If I change the schedule from 30 minutes to 2 minutes, the cron.xml will 
> be 
> > 1800 entries. 
> > 
> > Ian Marshall於 2012年5月16日星期三UTC+8下午5時15分11秒寫道： 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > Your syntax problem may lie within your "schedule" tag (mix of month 
> > > and every, and unwanted final comma): 
> > 
> > >   1,15, of month every 2 hours 
> > 
> > > Your "description" tag and posting text do not match the every 2 hours 
> > > in your "schedule" tag. Assuming that you want to run every 30 
> > > minutes... 
> > 
> > > Option 1: try 
> > 
> > >   1,15 of month 00:00 
> > 
> > > and at the end of your scheduled task enqueue a task to execute 30 
> > > minutes later, if this would be within the same day. 
> > 
> > > Option 2: try 
> > 
> > >   1,15 of month 00:00 
> > >   1,15 of month 00:30 
> > >   1,15 of month 01:00 
> > >   1,15 of month 01:30 
> > >   ... 
> > >   1,15 of month 23:30 
> > 
> > > This is more robust than chaining enqueued tasks kicked off by a 
> > > scheduled task, but would be more cumbersome to code, since you will 
> > > need a cron entry for each schedule. 
> > 
> > > Is this any help? 
> > 
> > > On May 15, 12:20 pm, Larry  wrote: 
> > > > Hello All, 
> > > >  Is it possible to execute my job as following: 
> > 
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > > /mytask 
> > > > Execute my task, every 30 minutes of first and15th 
> of 
> > > > month   
> > > > 1,15, of month every 2 hours 
> > > > America/New_York 
> > > >
> > > >  
> > 
> > > > This syntax is wrong and fail to deploy to GAE. 
> > > > I tested another solution. Execute mytask every 30 minutes. Execute 
> the 
> > > > real task only the date is 1 and 15. 
> > > > I check the dashboard. The Frontend Instance Hours increase 
> > > dramatically. 
> > 
> > > > Any thoughts? 
> > > > Larry

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/QMCRPOibj2wJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] Re: google, FT Search quota API calls 20,000, cuts me off after 499

[Peter McKenzie]

You're probably running into a burst quota (per minute quota) which limits 
you to adding ~100 documents/minute.  More discussion here:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10567267/quotas-on-appengine-search-api-for-java/

We'll likely remove this burst quota fairly soon.

On Thursday, June 21, 2012 8:14:00 AM UTC+10, Savaş L. wrote:
>
> same here.. 
> com.google.apphosting.api.ApiProxy$OverQuotaException: The API call 
> search.IndexDocument() required more quota than is available. 
>
> appid: pnfmunju 
>
> On Jun 20, 8:05 pm, Christina Ilvento  wrote: 
> > Hi, 
> > 
> > Can you provide the app-id for the app that's having the problem? Feel 
> free 
> > to send it to me directly (cilvento@). 
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > Christina 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:33 PM, maxie  wrote: 
> > > Getting "The API call search.IndexDocument() required more quota than 
> is 
> > > available." 
> > 
> > > Quota page: 
> > 
> > > SearchSearch API Calls 
> > > [image: 2%] 
> > > 2%499 of 20,000OkaySearch Stored Data 
> > > [image: 0%] 
> > > 0%0.00 of 0.25 GBytes Okay 
> > 
> > >  [image: 2%] 
> > 
> > > aparently this is not ok, hope this is bug, 499 api search calls 
> sounds 
> > > like a joke. 
> > 
> > >  -- 
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups 
> > > "Google App Engine" group. 
> > > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> > >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/46pcgfVh4RcJ. 
> > > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. 
>
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. 
> > > For more options, visit this group at 
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/CB72Zx6Qb7kJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] Re: URLFetch Quota Is Stupid

[Peter McKenzie]

Hi Brandon,

I agree it may make sense to special case intra-App URLFetches.  Please 
file a bug on the issue tracker.

thanks,
Peter

On Friday, August 31, 2012 4:29:35 AM UTC+10, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
>
> Ok, so I get that you don’t want me to build a DDoS platform with GAE.
>
>  
>
> But why the frak is there a limit on how many times a Backend can hit its 
> own front end? (and Vice Versa)
>
>  
>
> Yes I hit these limits. Yes it makes me sad. Yes it limits my App. 
>
>  
>
> We also tried and failed to make ProtoRPC replace URLFetch thinking this 
> might mitigate the issue. That Failed.
>
> We considered Google EndPoints. Doesn’t solve the issues that URLFetch is 
> a limitation in the App.
>
> We considered Channels, thinking we could move data via Messages, that 
> doesn’t work servers can’t talk to each other.
>
>  
>
> This may be a deal breaker for us.
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/EsrWRzLOWDQJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] Re: Datastore Viewer broken - URGENT.

[Peter McKenzie]

Please create a bug on the issue tracker.

On Friday, September 21, 2012 11:43:49 PM UTC+10, aswath wrote:
>
> Further narrowing down on the issue.
> If there are fewer namespaces in the app-id, then a dropdown is shown to 
> select the namespace.  Then everything is fine for the app-id.
>
> However, if there are large number of namespaces in the app-id, then the 
> suggest box is shown.  While select the namespace here and browsing, then 
> we are not able to view the entities in the namespace.
>
> -Aswath
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Aswath Satrasala 
> 
> > wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>> In the admin console, click on the datastore viewer.
>> * Start typing the namespace name
>> * Select the namespace name
>> The KINDS are shown in the dropdown.  
>> After doing this, earlier, the namespace text field was shown above. 
>>  Now, this is missing.
>> I select the KIND from the dropdown, then it says there are no entities 
>> in the empty namespace.
>>
>> Anyone facing this issue?  I cannot seen any entities in any namespace
>>
>> -Aswath
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/s5G_ygJQHyYJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Re: [google-appengine] Using SMTP on GAE

[Peter McKenzie]

FYI: the Sockets API lets you use SMTP (authenticated SMTP only).  If 
you're interested in trying it out, please sign up for the trusted tester 
program:
https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dF9QR3pnQ2pNa0dqalViSTZoenVkcHc6MQ

On Thursday, September 20, 2012 4:55:40 AM UTC+10, barryhunter wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Barry Hunter  wrote:
>
>> To send mail use the Mail API - that is the only supported way to do it. 
>
>
> PErhaps should qualify that: The only way to do it running directly in 
> AppEngine. 
>
> Can use other third party services/servers, as long as they have HTTP 
> Interface/API (to be used by URLFetch API) or a number of other protocols 
> that AppEngine supports (email! and XMPP) . 
>
> So if you really need to send via SMTP, could find a server that has a 
> HTTP interface, which then dispatches off via SMTP
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/Hu0F0Kvwxf8J.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] Re: Error number of requests display for Top 25 visitor IP address in Console

[Peter McKenzie]

Please create a bug on the issue tracker.

On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 8:58:54 PM UTC+11, Cymun wrote:
>
> I'm having the the same problem,
> Since 2-3 weeks my blacklist is full of 1000k entries,
> I don't see anything suspicious neither in the dashboard nor in the logs
> but Google Bot started reporting http error code 503 (Service unavailable) 
> on my web pages
>
> I really don't know how to deal with this,
> is there any Google representative that could give us some suggestion 
> about this?
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[google-appengine] Re: Wordpress + AppEngine = PressEngine

[Peter McKenzie]

Also, we'll be updating this blog on a fairly frequent basis until PHP goes 
GA:

https://gaeforphp-blog.appspot.com/

There are already some tips related to WordPress there.  And of course the 
blog itself runs on WordPress (btw, I believe the WordPress folks are quite 
particular about using a capital 'P').

cheers,
Peter


On Thursday, June 6, 2013 3:22:05 AM UTC+10, @Mlaynes wrote:
>
>
> more details about running Wordpress directly on GAE platform :
>
> https://developers.google.com/appengine/articles/wordpress
>
> best and happy coding..
> @Mlaynes
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[google-appengine] Re: Finding all the locations in a given radius with GQL

[Peter McKenzie]

Another option is to use the Search 
API: 
https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/search/query_strings#Python_Queries_on_geopoint_fields

On Friday, August 30, 2013 5:07:48 AM UTC+10, Jason Collins wrote:
>
> In this past, we've used a repeated property to encode a Quadtree (
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadtree) at varying levels of granularity. 
> Then you can leverage an IN query against the repeated property to get a 
> good approximation to the radius query.
>
> j
>
> On Thursday, 29 August 2013 10:23:16 UTC-6, Jim wrote:
>>
>> Ranjeet,
>>
>> I don't think you can do a radius search with GQL, unless they've added 
>> functionality since I was building code for doing spatial queries a couple 
>> of years ago. I wound up using the Geo Hash technique which doesn't provide 
>> a radius search but does let you search in bounding rectangles.  It reduces 
>> a lat/lon down to a hash value, and you can strip bytes off the right side 
>> of the hash to search by increasingly larger bounding rectangles.  It was 
>> the best solution I could find that works with the limitations of the GAE 
>> database.
>>
>> Another option that might be available for you to use soon is the new 
>> Cloud SQL service.  It currently uses MySQL 5.5, but as soon as they 
>> upgrade to 5.6.x you'll be able to use the ST_CONTAINS functions (and other 
>> ST_ geo functions) in your queries which will do proper spatial queries. 
>>  Until then the CONTAINS function just does a bounding box search.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 7:26:19 AM UTC-5, Ranjeet sengar wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Im developing my first application on app engine and first post here, so 
>>> please be gentle :)
>>>
>>> Im developing an application where I store location information in the 
>>> datastore.Im trying to fetch all the points (lat,long) within a specified 
>>> radius of a given point.
>>> Similar to this 
>>> stackoverflow
>>>  question 
>>> on SQL. I would like to know if the same can be achieved with gql. (similar 
>>> to http://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong-db.html)
>>>
>>> Looking forward to your suggestions,
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: [google-appengine] Is it possible to run tidy at google app engine PHP

[Peter McKenzie]

Also, feel free to create an issue on the Issue Tracker to request the tidy 
extension (or any other extension you need).  No guarantees, but we do 
listen.

On Monday, October 21, 2013 7:00:15 PM UTC-7, Vinny P wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:40 AM, William 
> > wrote:
>
>> It seems like google app engine php doesn't have tidy extension, my 
>> question is , is there any way to use tidy on google app engine php?
>>
>>
>
> While the GAE PHP runtime doesn't have the Tidy extension, App Engine 
> offers a service called PageSpeed which performs a similar role to Tidy. 
> PageSpeed can optimize your pages for quick serving, and can perform a 
> number of other optimizations. Here's some documentation on it:
>
>
> https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/adminconsole/performancesettings#pagespeed
> https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/service/faq
>  
>
> If you're using Tidy for its DOM parser, there are other HTML parsers for 
> PHP that you can include within your application.
>
>
> -
> -Vinny P
> Technology & Media Advisor
> Chicago, IL
>
> App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com
>   
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[google-appengine] Re: OpenID Connect support

[Peter McKenzie]

Please create a feature request on the issue tracker.

On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 12:22:45 PM UTC-7, Ronoaldo José de Lana Pereira 
wrote:
>
> +1 for this feature.
>
> Em terça-feira, 27 de maio de 2014 14h32min19s UTC-3, Diego Duclos 
> escreveu:
>>
>> With registrations for using the old OpenID 2.0 endpoints now closed, and 
>> the appengine users API not supporting openID connect at all,
>> Would it be possible to get a timeline for openID connect support in the 
>> users API (In my case, with Go, but I assume this is largely language 
>> agnostic)
>>  
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[google-appengine] Re: Announcing PHP 5.5 with improved performance, ImageMagick and cURL support

[Peter McKenzie]

Just a reminder to upgrade those PHP 5.4 Apps to PHP 5.5.

On Wednesday, February 25, 2015 at 8:11:04 PM UTC-8, Josselin Cornou wrote:
>
> Dear App Engine developers,
>
> You are receiving this important update because you are an owner or 
> developer of an App Engine project that uses PHP.
>
> In response to developer feedback, we have introduced a significant 
> upgrade of PHP in the latest release of App Engine 
> 
>  
> with more features and improved performance.
>
> The updates include:
>
>
>- 
>
>Support for the PHP 5.5 runtime, alongside the current PHP 5.4 runtime.
>- 
>
>The cURL extension is now available, meaning curl_*() functions can 
>now be used from within your application (read more about how to enable 
>cURL support in our documentation 
>
> 
>).
>- 
>
>The tempnam() and sys_get_temp_dir() functions are now available 
>
> 
>.
>- 
>
>Support for direct file uploads.
>- 
>
>Support for concurrent requests 
>
> ,
>  
>which allows the PHP interpreter to run an efficient multi-threaded mode 
>when serving HTTP requests. This must be enabled in your app.yaml file.
>- 
>
>Support for the ImageMagick extension (which allows powerful image 
>manipulation) and MongoDB extension (which allows you to connect to an 
>existing MongoDB installation). 
>
>
> While we expect most users will enjoy the benefits of this upgrade without 
> any problems, in some cases it may cause unexpected behavior in running 
> applications. We are providing an 8 week window (starting today) for 
> developers to self-upgrade and test their applications with this new 
> functionality before we upgrade all applications automatically, starting 
> after 16th April, 2015. 
>
> To take advantage of these new features, find your ‘app.yaml’ file and 
> change the line that reads
>
> runtime: php
>
> to
>
> runtime: php55
>
> The new functionality will automatically be enabled in the local 
> development server, and in production once your application is deployed. 
> You will be able to switch back to the old runtime at any time for the next 
> two months by reverting the configuration in your app.yaml file. Some 
> features such as cURL support 
>  
> may require additional configuration in order to be enabled.
>
> After 16th April, 2015 we will begin automatically migrating all 
> applications to the php55 runtime. 
>
> If you are experiencing difficulties in migrating your application, you 
> can find help on the Google App Engine Stack Overflow Tag 
> , or if you 
> have a support package you may open a support ticket 
> . If you’ve found an an issue with App 
> Engine itself you may also file a bug 
>  on our public 
> issue tracker.
>
> We hope you enjoy these latest improvements to PHP on App Engine. Keep on 
> coding!
>
> - The PHP for App Engine Team
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/fa004875-8a50-43a8-9b14-65704bdac4aa%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [google-appengine] task repeats itself

[Peter McKenzie]

We expect to reduce the frequency of these repeat executions.  There is a 
existing issue for this, which we'll update when it rolls out:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1789

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.