[google-appengine] free quota under the new billing
according to the current docs: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas.html#Resources and the FAQ: http://code.google.com/appengine/kb/billing.html#freecharges any billing-enabled app still has to deplete its free quota before incurring into additional charges, is this the same under the new billing system? the new billing table doen't mention anything about it: http://www.google.com/enterprise/cloud/appengine/pricing.html I'm aware that under the new system there will be a $9 minimum charge regardless of usage and that it counts as part of the used resources you're paying for, are these "used resources" measured after depleting the free quota as it is now or does the new plan eliminate free quotas entirely for billing-enabled apps? thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/4-rX9YzqwsAJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] free quota under the new billing
ah great I thought the first column was only for free apps not both, thank you. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/V4X6yxEB8kEJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: How is an entity key generated?
actually, the first thing that came to mind for this was to use it as part of a url to access specific entities since the reference says it's url-safe: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/keyclass.html#Key and also the same idea is shown on this example: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/creatinggettinganddeletingdata.html#Getting_an_Entity_Using_a_Key but of course if the encoding method is not guaranteed to remain the same then this is a bad idea (cool URIs don't change right?) good to know thanks. On Jun 17, 7:43 am, "Nick Johnson (Google)" wrote: > I would not rely on the encoding str(key) remaining the same, no. The only > guarantee is that it will be interconvertible - eg, db.Key(str(key)) == key. > I can't think of a practical reason why you should be relying on this in the > first place, though. > > -Nick Johnson > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:43 AM, gae123 wrote: > > > Nick, > > > can we consider what you write below to be part of the API or an > > internal implementation detail we whould not be relying on? > > > Thanks > > > > In the case of 'stringified' keys, what you are seeing is the base64 > > > encoding of the protocol buffer containing the key. You can verify this > > by > > > going to shell.appspot.com and entering: > > > > --- > > > from google.appengine.ext import db > > > db.Key(mystr) > > > --- > > -- > Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer > Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: > 368047 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: How is an entity key generated?
Hi Nick, thanks for your reply! yes indeed a numeric id would be more readable so, just to be clear and for future reference, your suggestion is to use entity.key().id() to construct the url and Model.get_by_id() to retireve the entity right? On Jul 3, 6:25 am, "Nick Johnson (Google)" wrote: > Hi Samus, > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Samus_ wrote: > > > actually, the first thing that came to mind for this was to use it as > > part of a url to access specific entities since the reference says > > it's > > url-safe:http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/keyclass.html#Key > > and also the same idea is shown on this example: > >http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/creatinggettin... > > but of course if the encoding method is not guaranteed to remain the > > same then this is a bad idea (cool URIs don't change right?) good to > > know thanks. > > Usingkeysin URLs is more or less an officially 'blessed' approach. > For that reason, I'd revise my earlier statement and say that while > it's not totally impossible for the key encoding format to change in > future, it's extremely unlikely. > > That said, you can provide much more user-friendly URLs if you use > just the fields you need from the key -www.mysite.com/123is much > more user friendly thanwww.mysite.com/somelongbase64string. > > -Nick Johnson > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 7:43 am, "Nick Johnson (Google)" > > wrote: > >> I would not rely on the encodingstr(key) remaining the same, no. The only > >> guarantee is that it will be interconvertible - eg, db.Key(str(key)) == > >> key. > >> I can't think of a practical reason why you should be relying on this in > >> the > >> first place, though. > > >> -Nick Johnson > > >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:43 AM, gae123 wrote: > > >> > Nick, > > >> > can we consider what you write below to be part of the API or an > >> > internal implementation detail we whould not be relying on? > > >> > Thanks > > >> > > In the case of 'stringified'keys, what you are seeing is the base64 > >> > > encoding of the protocol buffer containing the key. You can verify this > >> > by > >> > > going to shell.appspot.com and entering: > > >> > > --- > >> > > from google.appengine.ext import db > >> > > db.Key(mystr) > >> > > --- > > >> -- > >> Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer > >> Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: > >> 368047 > > -- > Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer > Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration > Number: 368047 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Verify Your Account by SMS from Uruguay
same here, I've used the format shown at this page: http://www.howtocallabroad.com/uruguay/ both "598 9? ??? ???" and "+598 9? ??? ???" none worked so please activate me manually, thank you. On Jun 10, 7:33 am, "Nick Johnson (Google)" wrote: > Hi, > > Your account should now be activated. > > -Nick Johnson > > 2009/6/9 ankha...@gmail.com > > > > > Does anyone know how to verify one's account if you are living in > > Mongolia? > > > I entered my number in the format required by the verificator but it > > always gives "Mobile Number or Username" error. > > > Mongolian phone numbers begin with +976 > > > On Apr 10, 7:30 pm, 风笑雪 wrote: > > > Maybe you forget your country number. > > > Ex: in China, the phone number should be this style: +8613012345678 > > (begin > > > with +86) > > > > 2009/4/10 Jeff S > > > > > Hello Héctor, > > > > > If you are unable to verify using SMS, you can request access by > > filling > > > > out the form linked in this FAQ: > > > > >http://code.google.com/appengine/kb/sms.html#error > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > Jeff > > > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Héctor Quartino > > wrote: > > > > >> Hi, > > > > >> Does anyone know how to verify one's account if you are living in > > > >> Uruguay? > > > > >> I entered my number in the format required by the verificator but it > > > >> always gives "Mobile Number or Username" error. > > > > >> Regards, > > > >> Héctor --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
