[google-appengine] Re: Google setting a precedent for unstable cloud-compute billing

2011-09-01 Thread Anders
The inflation rate is over the long run insignificant compared to the 
doubling of cost-performance each year. In 10 years that means 1000 times 
cheaper computing power, storage and communication! So with a fixed price 
Google (and other cloud providers) can within a few years reach astronomical 
profit margins and hope that their customers doesn't understand exponential 
progress.

Here is some hard data about this: 
http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/rQ0QGq7KnGQJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: Google setting a precedent for unstable cloud-compute billing

2011-09-01 Thread Anders
The inflation rate is over the long run insignificant compared to the
doubling of cost-performance each year. In 10 years that means 1000
times
cheaper computing power, storage and communication! So with a fixed
price
Google (and other cloud providers) can within a few years reach
astronomical
profit margins and hope that their customers don't understand
exponential
progress.

Here is some hard data about this:
http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns

On 1 Sep, 04:03, John Wheeler j...@highvolumeseller.com wrote:
 I find it hard to believe you guys actually went though the data and saw the
 500% jumps on the comparison reports and decided to release the pricing plan
 changes with such gusto. No one who signed up for App Engine ever saw that
 e-mail coming a mile away, and it hurts.

 Here's a plain and simple idea that makes sense: Why not just keep the
 pricing the same and announce you're going to charge 2% increases each year
 to match for inflation?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: Google setting a precedent for unstable cloud-compute billing

2011-08-31 Thread John Wheeler
Also, bums me out that I saw you guys offering to help a customer with 
$27000 of resource usage or whatever. 

Since then I saw you've edited the post where you said to this customer, 
We'll work through this with you

What about your other customers like your $60 customers?


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/w-JCJDcqfH0J.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google setting a precedent for unstable cloud-compute billing

2011-08-31 Thread Srirangan
If I read correctly, moving from Python 2.5 - 2.7 will reduce billing
charges for everybody.

Hey Google, Why not introduce the new billing after introducing 2.7?

On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:44 AM, John Wheeler j...@highvolumeseller.comwrote:

 Also, bums me out that I saw you guys offering to help a customer with
 $27000 of resource usage or whatever.

 Since then I saw you've edited the post where you said to this customer,
 We'll work through this with you

 What about your other customers like your $60 customers?


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/w-JCJDcqfH0J.

 To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.




-- 
Srirangan  |  About http://srirangan.net/about  Bloghttp://srirangan.net
  GitHub https://github.com/Srirangan
LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/srirangan
  Twitter http://twitter.com/srirangan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



[google-appengine] Re: Google setting a precedent for unstable cloud-compute billing

2011-08-31 Thread Angke
Wow they really did this? Now I'm burnt. I won't deploy future apps on
App Engine and will slowly migrate the current ones away. This whole
thing is ridiculous. They could totally offer BestBuy $1 monthly
bills while charging us $60s.

On Aug 31, 7:14 pm, John Wheeler j...@highvolumeseller.com wrote:
 Also, bums me out that I saw you guys offering to help a customer with
 $27000 of resource usage or whatever.

 Since then I saw you've edited the post where you said to this customer,
 We'll work through this with you

 What about your other customers like your $60 customers?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.