Re: [google-appengine] Re: object = pm.detachCopy(object);
thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: object = pm.detachCopy(object);
The document mentioned of Object detachedObj = pm.detachCopy(obj); // Returns a copy of the persisted object, in detached state http://www.datanucleus.org/products/accessplatform_1_1/jdo/pm.html (assumed you're using JDO) On Mar 11, 1:53 am, Prashant Gupta wrote: > Just a simple question : > > is it sufficient to do > > pm.detachCopy(object); > > instead of > > object = pm.detachCopy(object); > > ? > > Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: object = pm.detachCopy(object);
anyone ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.