[appengine-java] Re: Index building issue

2010-12-30 Thread Didier Durand
Hi,

Time is very much depending on the number of entities you already have
in the DS for the index you have to build.

It may take hours if your table is already huge.

regards

didier

On Dec 30, 6:11 am, Vik vik@gmail.com wrote:
 Hie

 Today we deployed a new version of app which includes some newly added
 entity.

 Now, after deploying to app engine the app is throwing exception index
 building and not ready to serve (not exact words).

 So, in the datastore indexes section I can see the status as
 PocVacationSchedule
 pocId ▲ , endDate ▲
 *Building*
 Queued: 1 Running: 0 Completed: 1 Total: 2

 This is in the same status from last half an hour. Any idea how time will it
 take?  There is no data in the entity at this moment.

 Thankx and Regards

 Vik
 Founderwww.sakshum.comwww.sakshum.blogspot.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Lightweight Best performing MVC framework - Recommendation

2010-12-30 Thread Icarus
Stripes ?

Thanks,
Ic

On Dec 30, 12:02 am, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com
wrote:
 Um ... those are like the opposite of lightweight.

 Here are some I like:

 Play Framework: probably the most underrated Java framework I've ever 
 seehttp://www.playframework.org/

 Slim3: built for App Engine. Cons: kind of needs deep Eclipse 
 integrationhttp://sites.google.com/site/slim3appengine/

 There are more. I'll post in a bit. What are other frameworks everyone else
 here likes?

 --
 Ikai Lan
 Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
 Blogger:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
 Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
 Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engineOn Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Nasif 
 Noorudeen nas...@gmail.com wrote:
  spring  jsf

  On 12/29/10, Sree sreeju...@gmail.com wrote:
   Hello,

   I am new to Java and App Engine, and coming from ASP.NET C# and
   Windows Azure world. I am looking for a lightweight  best performing
   java based MVC framework.  I would like to migrate my ASP.NET MVC
   project to App Engine (Java).

   It would be great if you can share your experience.  I am open to
   Python as well, but learning Java is faster than Python, since I am
   good at C#.

   Thanks in Advance.

   Regards
   Sree

   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
   Google App Engine for Java group.
   To post to this group, send email to
  google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  .
   For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  Google App Engine for Java group.
  To post to this group, send email to
  google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  .
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] How to write JPA query that...

2010-12-30 Thread Mike Guo
@Entity
class A
{
 ListB bs;
}

@Entity
class B
{
 C c;
}

@Entity
class C
{
 int id;
}

A has a list of Bs.
i want to create a JPA query to fullfill below:
1. get all As, 
2. and the A has one or more B,
3. and the B must has a C
4. and the C's id == the appoint id.

public static ListA findAsByCid(int cid)
{
}

how to write the JPQL query?
thanks.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: How to write JPA query that...

2010-12-30 Thread Mike Guo
now i managed to get the answer. thx anyway

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Lightweight Best performing MVC framework - Recommendation

2010-12-30 Thread Davi Nogueira
I like, VRaptor, http://vraptor.caelum.com.br/en/


Icarus wrote:
 Stripes ?

 Thanks,
 Ic

 On Dec 30, 12:02 am, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com
 wrote:
  Um ... those are like the opposite of lightweight.
 
  Here are some I like:
 
  Play Framework: probably the most underrated Java framework I've ever 
  seehttp://www.playframework.org/
 
  Slim3: built for App Engine. Cons: kind of needs deep Eclipse 
  integrationhttp://sites.google.com/site/slim3appengine/
 
  There are more. I'll post in a bit. What are other frameworks everyone else
  here likes?
 
  --
  Ikai Lan
  Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
  Blogger:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
  Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
  Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engineOn Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM, 
  Nasif Noorudeen nas...@gmail.com wrote:
   spring  jsf
 
   On 12/29/10, Sree sreeju...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
 
I am new to Java and App Engine, and coming from ASP.NET C# and
Windows Azure world. I am looking for a lightweight  best performing
java based MVC framework.  I would like to migrate my ASP.NET MVC
project to App Engine (Java).
 
It would be great if you can share your experience.  I am open to
Python as well, but learning Java is faster than Python, since I am
good at C#.
 
Thanks in Advance.
 
Regards
Sree
 
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to
   google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
   .
For more options, visit this group at
   http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
 
   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
   Google App Engine for Java group.
   To post to this group, send email to
   google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
   .
   For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Understanding gwt-dispatch and Singletons/member variables

2010-12-30 Thread Sky
I switched to local variables and now it works perfectly.



On 23 Dez., 10:05, l.denardo lorenzo.dena...@gmail.com wrote:
 I don't fully understand your problem (maybe a few lines of code will
 help).

 Anyway:
 *Member variables in action handlers are usually created as they
 should, empty, for my experience
 *Memcache is shared across all application instances, so if you
 populate your map using the memcache value and then check for it, your
 map will always contain the same items once cache is populated.

 i.e. what is expected is something like

 private MapString, Serializable cacheMap = new HashMapString,
 Serializable();
 //map will be empty
 cacheMap.put( memcacheServiceInstance.get(key) );
 //cacheMap will be populated always with the same value, if provided
 key results in a memcache hit

 Regards
 Lorenzo

 On Dec 22, 12:55 pm, Sky skysoftwaredes...@googlemail.com wrote:

  Hi all,

  I use gwt-dispatch in a project and now I have a question concerning
  the gwt-dispatch framework and member variables in ActionHandlers.
  I use guice on server side and bind the ActionHandlers as follow:
  bindHandler(GetXYHandler.class);  - this is per definition no
  singleton!

  In GetXYHandler I have a member variable, which stores the data
  retrieved from Googles MemCacheService:
  private MapString, Serializable cacheMap = new HashMapString,
  Serializable();

  When making a server request in the execute method of GetXYHandler the
  cacheMap is filled with objects, when a cache hit in memcache occurs  -

   the cacheMap member variable is not empty anymore!

  My understanding of member variables (in example cacheMap) is, that
  they should be created new in each serverCall if they are not static.
  In my case the cacheMap should be empty each time when the execute
  method is called.
  In my local tests the behaviour is somewhat different. When I test it
  in debug modus locally (different user calls), the cacheMap stays
  always filled like a static variable. Is this the normal behaviour of
  member variables of Actionhandlers? My understanding would say this is
  very curious, because its not a singleton?
  If this is normal behaviour, no member variables could be used,
  because they would not be synchronized...

  Thanks for your help!



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] saving password option in deployer

2010-12-30 Thread Vik
Hie

Is it possible to have the option of saving password for the id used to
deploy app to the app engine via eclipse?

Thankx and Regards

Vik
Founder
www.sakshum.com
www.sakshum.blogspot.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: passing multiple parameters to JDOQL

2010-12-30 Thread Yegor
   query.declareParameters(Long bind_pocId, Date bind_startDate, Date
 bind_endDate);

This is correct. However, I personally prefer the shorter form, where
instead of using filter column == alias along with
query.declareParameters(Type alias) you just use filter column
== :alias (note the colon before the alias name). Your query can be
rewritten as follows:

Query query = pm.newQuery(PocVacationSchedule.class);
query.setFilter(pocId == :pi  startDate == :sd  endDate == :ed);
ListPocVacationSchedule rulesList = (ListPocVacationSchedule)
query.execute(pocId, startFrom, endFrom);

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Concurrency issue when dealing with datastore

2010-12-30 Thread Yegor
 I had to strongly synchronize my app using Java options (locka,
 synchrnized objects, and so on...).

I have to warn you that all this synchronization will be in vain once
your application grows beyond 1 JVM. Java keyword synchronized is
only effective within a single instance of JVM. That is not to say
that even with 1 JVM your application may lose a lot of performance if
you are synchronizing on static methods or singleton objects, e.g. the
datastore.

 I think it is quite unbelievable that a huge giant like BigTable is so
 weak in concurrency issues...

BigTable gives you a lot of well-documented options to deal with
simultaneous access to data. A good place to start is
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/transactions.html.
In your case, unless you really have to transact on all entities
processed by the servlet, I would recommend that you break your task
into several sub-tasks each limited to a single entity group.

 Perhaps my approach is geared from my experience in relational DBs,
 but I'm quite puzzeld...

Sounds like that might be the case. When working with BigTable, always
keep in mind that two entities (called table rows in RDBMS) do not
necessarily end up on the same server node. This is good, because it
allows BigTable to distribute the load across multiple hard drives.
However, when this happens you no longer are able to transact on these
entities. Entity groups tell BigTable that two or more related
entities must be stored in the database in such a way that a
transaction is possible. Unfortunately, you immediately lose
scalability within the entity group (thus the recommendation to keep
them small). Relational DBs always make that sacrifice by default and
put all table rows on the same hard drive. This makes it easy to
transact on arbitrary entities. However, you have to partition your
database manually to scale. Plus, you cannot transact across
partitions, so even with a RDBMS you still have the same limitation.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Lightweight Best performing MVC framework - Recommendation

2010-12-30 Thread Yegor
http://code.google.com/p/litemvc/

Before you read on, a disclaimer: I am biased as I am one of the
commiters to this project

- I have used litemvc with a fairly complex appengine application
- Really easy to integrate with Guice and Freemarker
- Follows Guice configuration philosophy, namely:
  * No XML
  * Java-based configuration, e.g.: map(/,
IndexHandler.class).templateResult(OK, /index.jsp);
- Follows convention-over-configuration for handlers:
  * Handlers are POJOs
  * No interfaces and no annotations
  * Handler method names == HTTP method names, e.g. get(), post()
  * URL regex groups are mapped to method parameters, e.g. map(/user/
(\\d+), ...) will pass group(1) to get(String userId)
  * Automatic injection of standard method parameters, such as
HttpServetRequest and HttpServletResponse

Cheers,

Yegor

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



Re: [appengine-java] Re: persistent and scalable global atomic counter: not possible with GAE?

2010-12-30 Thread Tatyana
MG,


Have you considered using Key.getId() method to implement global atomic
counter in your application?  GAE build in functionality for automatically
unique IDs Key.getId() method will return unique long value. Also Keys are
indexed, so if your application has to search within counters - indexed
search will be efficient.



On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Ikai Lan (Google)
ikai.l+gro...@google.comikai.l%2bgro...@google.com
 wrote:

 Sweet. Remember that Memcache's INCR operation IS atomic.

 Waiting to see your solution ... as well as what you are using it for =).


 --
 Ikai Lan
 Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
 Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
 Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine



 On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:38 PM, MG michael.glas...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ikai, you are right - I don't need a counter, a sequence of unique and
 growing numbers will do. And I think I can make a scalable numeric
 sequence by combining a sharded counter with a memcache counter (and
 an occasional transaction). I'll post my solution when it's done.

 MG

 On Dec 29, 1:48 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) 
 ikai.l+gro...@google.comikai.l%2bgro...@google.com
 
 wrote:
  What are you building? With distributed systems, it can be tricky to do
 some
  things. A single, scalable, atomic counter is an implementation for a
  solution, not a solution to a problem. There may be an alternate
  implementation that'll make your life easier but solve the problem at
 hand.
 
  --
  Ikai Lan

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine for Java group.
 To post to this group, send email to
 google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine for Java group.
 To post to this group, send email to
 google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



Re: [appengine-java] Re: How to completely erase the datastore of an app

2010-12-30 Thread Max
Hi CRI,

I ran into this as well, however, the Datastore viewer only allows someone to 
view a certain number of entries at a time.  If you're app has thousands of 
saved entities, it can be time consuming to delete them all.  I created a few 
simple tasks to do this for me.  I make these both POSTs and only invoke them 
manually from my computer using RESTClient.

NOTE: I'm using objectify.  
The first one loops through each class type and calls a servlet to delete each 
of that type:

Class[] clazzes = {Operator.class, 
DDMessage.class, Event.class, 
DailyStatus.class, DocumentGroup.class, Document.class,
StatusCapture.class};

for (Class clazz : clazzes) {

Queue queue = QueueFactory.getQueue(trashcan);
queue.add(withUrl(/deletealloftype)
.param(kind, clazz.getName())
.method(POST));
}


This servlet deletes each item one after another until it hits the deadline, 
and then it puts itself back in the task queue.

try {
DAO dao = new DAO();

Class clazz = 
Class.forName(request.getParameter(kind));

QueryObject query = dao.ofy().query(clazz);

QueryResultIteratorObject iterator = query.iterator();
while (iterator.hasNext()) {
Object o = iterator.next();
Objectify ofy = dao.fact().beginTransaction();
ofy.delete(o);
ofy.getTxn().commit();
}

} catch (DeadlineExceededException dee) {
Queue queue = QueueFactory.getQueue(trashcan);
queue.add(withUrl(/deletealloftype)
.param(kind, 
request.getParameter(kind))
.method(POST));
}

Hope this helps,
MG

On Dec 29, 2010, at 11:00 AM, Didier Durand wrote:

 Hi,
 
 You can very easily empty your datastore using the Datastore viewer of
 the admin console: you can select and delete all entities from the
 viewer screen.
 
 regards
 
 didier
 
 On Dec 29, 4:52 pm, cghersi cristiano.ghe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I've got an app on GAE with 4 versions, up to now.
 
 Until the 4th version I had an entity with an ancestor, so its keys
 were of the type (EntityID-AncestorID).
 In the 5th version I changed my design and now this entity hasn't got
 ancestor any more. Its keys are now simple long values.
 
 On my development server all is OK, given that my local datastore has
 been correctly updated.
 But with the online app I'm not able to remove the unused indexes and
 to create entities with the new long key.
 
 How may I completely erase my datastore online in order to rebuild it
 from scratch?
 
 Thank you very much!!!
 Bye
 CRI
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Google App Engine for Java group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Prevent filesystem writes in development mode?

2010-12-30 Thread Tobias
Hello,

I was wondering if it's somehow possible to make the development server 
forbid file writes as the AppEngine servers do and emulate the AppEngine 
environment more closely? I'd like to know if one of my libraries uses temp 
files before deploying it to AppEngine.

Thanks,
Tobias

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Processing large xml-files with JAXB in app engine

2010-12-30 Thread androidDeveloper
I forgot to say that the cause for the DeadlineExceededException was
log4j, which is unable to log very large strings (xml).
Nevertheless is JAXB in my opinion not the first choice when parsing
large xml files, because of the worse performance.

On 28 Dez., 23:06, androidDeveloper stepmas...@googlemail.com wrote:
 I switched to javax.xml.parsers.SAXParser. The problem is now solved
 and its obviously faster.
 Performance JAXB (very large XML) ~ 4sec
 SAXParser with specific optimizations ~ 0,35secs

 Thanks for your help!

 On 26 Dez., 21:03, dreamer venugopal.vasire...@gmail.com wrote:

  If the requirement is pure parsing and not the Marshalling and u-
  Marshalling from xml to objects, you may be better
  off using Stax or SAX parsers.

  On Dec 26, 4:29 am, Didier Durand durand.did...@gmail.com wrote:

   Hi,

   I don't need xsd and don't parse very large xml but the code is simple
   to implement: so, unless you have a huge code base already working on
   JAXB, you can probably write directly with the classes provided by GAE

   It's hard for me to compare with jaxb that I didn't use that much.

   The issue I see with JAXB and other external jars is that you need to
   check their requirements againt the JRE list that I provided im my
   previous post: you are never sure that the next version will require a
   class unsupported by GAE.

   regards

   didier

   On Dec 26, 11:44 am, androidDeveloper stepmas...@googlemail.com
   wrote:

Hi,

This approach would be my next choice. but implementing and testing
this should be more complex as with JAXB?

On 26 Dez., 08:54, Didier Durand durand.did...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 I use the xml parsing classes that are natively part of GAE JDK
 itself : javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilder,
 javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory, org.w3c.dom.Document, etc.

 See bottom 
 ofhttp://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/jrewhitelist.html

 Aren't those enough for what you want to achieve ?

 regards

 didier

 On Dec 23, 6:54 pm, crllvnc crll...@gmail.com wrote:

  I've been using JAXB for xml file unmarshalling in an upload 
  servlet.
  As far as I remember, the only size limit I have faced is related to
  the 30s timeout.

  Here are my imports :
  import javax.xml.bind.JAXBContext;
  import javax.xml.bind.JAXBElement;
  import javax.xml.bind.JAXBException;
  import javax.xml.bind.UnmarshalException;
  import javax.xml.bind.Unmarshaller;

  Maybe switching from JAXB2 to JAXB would solve (part of) your
  problems.
  Moreover, JAXB does not require any jar.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] spring openid

2010-12-30 Thread asianCoolz
in my log, i have this

/j_spring_openid_security_check 6653cpu ms 73api cpu ms
the request use high amount of cpu and may soon exceed it quota


any way to optimize this?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.