[appengine-java] Re: 1.3.8 Console Logging Issue

2010-10-25 Thread Rud
I am seeing the same problem but thought is was due to new GWT 2.1RC1
logging capability.

See thread at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_frm/thread/c5afa6655edec800#

I just tested my app with 1.3.7 and .8. With .7 it works and not with .
8. I am only testing on the desktop, not live on the web.

Another GWT developer reports that reverting GWT addresses the
problem. I don't know if that changes GAE or Jetty, either of which
may be part of the problem.

Rud
http://www.mysticlakesoftware.com


On Oct 25, 1:32 am, andrew aute...@gmail.com wrote:
 Similar here.

 Now only logs WARNING and ERROR.

 Logging properties set to INFO and prior to 1.3.8 upgrade INFO logged
 fine.

 Have configuration procedures been changed or something?

 Window 7 32bit
 Eclipse 3.5 and 3.6

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Size of Nearly Empty Entity

2010-10-17 Thread Rud
My app has a UserProfile class (entity) with many fields. These are
your typical user demographics - age, marital status, etc. Over time
users will change the fields, i.e. get married or divorced.

I need to keep a history of changes. I am wondering if creating
another entity of the entire class containing only the data in the
changed field would be efficient. Ignore the mechanics of tracking how
the new entity relates to the old since I think that is just detail
chasing.

The question is whether the new entity with only a single field
populated is only the size of that field, or nearly so. Or is the
stored entity have a default field for every field in the entity,
basically making it as large as the original entity.

The other approach would be to keep a name-value pair containing the
change in a 'delta' entity.

Which would be more efficient in the datastore?

Rud
http://www.mysticlakesoftware.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.