[appengine-java] Re: [google-appengine] Re: CMS for GAE

2011-07-25 Thread Michel Schroeder
Thanks for your explications.

PS
I don't want to start a discussion but my excerpt is clear, with the
package:
package com.claymus.site.module.page;

and the definition of the class:

@PersistenceCapable(detachable = true)
public class Page extends PersistentCapable {

This page is clearly a Data Access Object (not a servlet) and one off
it's method 'serve' output html.


On Jul 22, 8:18 pm, Prashant antsh...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello Michel,

 Thanks for checking out the code and the query :)

 On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Michel Schroeder michels...@gmail.comwrote:

  Hello,

  Thanks for your contributions for a GAE-Java CMS.

  I had a look at the code of claymus. It seems that you use the
  combination of gae and gwt, this is a very interesting point.

  But on the client side, some architectural questions come to my
  mind...

  I don't understand your separation of code responsability?

 Code separation is done considering mainly, modularity and pluggability of
 modules. All the classes related to a module are placed in a package (and
 sub-packages) meant for that module. Modules are designed such that it won't
 affect the functioning of App or other modules if a new module is added or
 an old one (which is not a core module) is removed from the App.

 Up to now, I don't see something like MVC or MVP or UI Builder ... It

  seems that your write the html output directly from java (and that in
  the same file that the DAO definition if I am not wrong)...

 Yes, I didn't try to follow MVC or MVP strictly because I don't think that
 is a strict requirement. I din't use UI Builder because none of the GWT
 modules have very big and/or complex UI. If you are worried about supporting
 mobile devices, that can supported just by creating a mobile theme (which
 will include layout and look  feel) and few tweeks in Content and Block
 types.

 I think you are thinking of following methods as Data-Access methods. They
 are not Data-Access methods, they are just converting Data Object to Data
 Transfer Object. PageData class, in the same package, is the DAO for page
 module.

 public PageDTO getDTO() {
 PageDTO pageDTO = new PageDTO();
  pageDTO.setUri(getUri());
 pageDTO.setTitle(getTitle());
 pageDTO.setLayout(getLayout().getClass().getSimpleName());
  return pageDTO;

 }

 public void update(PageDTO pageDTO) {
  setTitle(pageDTO.getTitle());
 setLayout(pageDTO.getLayout());

 }

 And, I don't see any thing wrong in outputting html from a java servlet.

 Could you explain a bit the advantages of your strategy?



 I am not following popular design architectures, like MVP and MVC, that may
 have some disadvantages that I am not aware about now.

 I am trying to support maximum modularity and plaggability like any other
 CMS. e.g. if you have to add a new Content or Block type, you just need to
 write 2 small classes, one for backend and one for front-end (see
 com/claymus/site/module/block/types/RichText.java and
 com/claymus/site/module/block/types/gwt/RichText.java) and drop them in to
 Content/Block Types package. Same for a theme.







  A lot of people could think that a bad separation of responsibilities
  will lead to a lot of difficulties in code maintenance and
  evolution...

  But it must be subtilities in your approach that I don't catch up to
  now...?

  Thanks in advance for your explanations,

  Michel

  PS:
  I look for example in:
  package com.claymus.site.module.page;
  (...)
  @PersistenceCapable(detachable = true)
  public class Page extends PersistentCapable {
  (...)
         public void serve(ListListContent contents, ListListBlock
  blocks, Theme theme) throws ServletException, IOException {

                 PrintWriter out = ClaymusMain.getResponse().getWriter();

                 // DOC TYPE
                 out.print(getDocType());

                 out.print(html);
  (...)

  On Jul 18, 5:50 pm, Prashant antsh...@gmail.com wrote:
   Yes, you are right. Picking an opensource project and making it work for
  you
   is very easy, but making something from scratch has its own fun :) . I
   stared building Claymus because I felt need of Java based CMS which is
  made
   for GAE, considering what GAE is, how it is different from other hosting
   services, services/apis GAE is providing to developers, etc. etc. etc.

   Claymus is designed to give you maximum flexibility and support to build
   your app on top of Claymus. Along with all the GAE features you can take
   advantage of Servlet Level caching to minimize delay and cpu usage,
  plugable
   modules and themes, etc ... (complete list will be put on updated Claymus
   Website :) ).

   Regards,
   Prashant

   On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Niklas Rosencrantz nikla...@gmail.com
  wrote:

Having something like a CMS eg like wordpress, joomla or mediawiki
compatible then we won't have to start every project from scratch and
project would become more configuration than programming which
  naturally is
an 

[appengine-java] Re: [google-appengine] Re: CMS for GAE

2011-07-22 Thread Michel Schroeder
Hello,

Thanks for your contributions for a GAE-Java CMS.

I had a look at the code of claymus. It seems that you use the
combination of gae and gwt, this is a very interesting point.

But on the client side, some architectural questions come to my
mind...

I don't understand your separation of code responsability?

Up to now, I don't see something like MVC or MVP or UI Builder ... It
seems that your write the html output directly from java (and that in
the same file that the DAO definition if I am not wrong)...

Could you explain a bit the advantages of your strategy?

A lot of people could think that a bad separation of responsibilities
will lead to a lot of difficulties in code maintenance and
evolution...

But it must be subtilities in your approach that I don't catch up to
now...?

Thanks in advance for your explanations,

Michel

PS:
I look for example in:
package com.claymus.site.module.page;
(...)
@PersistenceCapable(detachable = true)
public class Page extends PersistentCapable {
(...)
public void serve(ListListContent contents, ListListBlock
blocks, Theme theme) throws ServletException, IOException {

PrintWriter out = ClaymusMain.getResponse().getWriter();

// DOC TYPE
out.print(getDocType());

out.print(html);
(...)

On Jul 18, 5:50 pm, Prashant antsh...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yes, you are right. Picking an opensource project and making it work for you
 is very easy, but making something from scratch has its own fun :) . I
 stared building Claymus because I felt need of Java based CMS which is made
 for GAE, considering what GAE is, how it is different from other hosting
 services, services/apis GAE is providing to developers, etc. etc. etc.

 Claymus is designed to give you maximum flexibility and support to build
 your app on top of Claymus. Along with all the GAE features you can take
 advantage of Servlet Level caching to minimize delay and cpu usage, plugable
 modules and themes, etc ... (complete list will be put on updated Claymus
 Website :) ).

 Regards,
 Prashant

 On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Niklas Rosencrantz nikla...@gmail.comwrote:







  Having something like a CMS eg like wordpress, joomla or mediawiki
  compatible then we won't have to start every project from scratch and
  project would become more configuration than programming which naturally is
  an advantage since programming takes more time than just configuring a new
  CMS deployment. I used web2py for a project when a friend wanted a quick
  website started and naturally to change pages we'd prefer a web-based editor
  instead of changing templates and redeploying. I'm glad to see some CMS are
  coming to app engine. Some frameworks offer features that are getting close
  to that of a CMS, for instance GAE Framework (www.gaeframework.com) comes
  with a blog engine and when you have a blog you are getting close the the
  functions of a CMS. Do you agree?

  On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Maneesh Arora mane...@gmail.com wrote:

  What's the unique advantage of having a CMS in GAE?

  thanks,

  Maneesh
 http://mightytext.net

  On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Prashant antsh...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi All,

  Claymus is close to its (first) preview release. Only few bug fixes and
  minor modifications are remaining. Check out the live demo at
 http://demo.claymus.com.

  --
  Prashant
  claymus.googlecode.com

  On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Jeff Schnitzer 
  j...@infohazard.orgwrote:

  On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com
  wrote:
   That's more deployed, not spoken.  Every Blogger and IT guy on the
  planet
   can hack together a PHP Plugin for their CMS.  Very Few can do that in
   Python or Java.

  ...and even fewer can do it in Ruby or C#.

  Truly, PHP is in a class by itself.

  Jeff

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
  Groups Google App Engine group.
  To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

   --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  Google App Engine for Java group.
  To post to this group, send email to
  google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.

   --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  Google App Engine group.
  To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group at
 

Re: [appengine-java] Re: [google-appengine] Re: CMS for GAE

2011-07-22 Thread Prashant
Hello Michel,

Thanks for checking out the code and the query :)

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Michel Schroeder michels...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hello,

 Thanks for your contributions for a GAE-Java CMS.

 I had a look at the code of claymus. It seems that you use the
 combination of gae and gwt, this is a very interesting point.

 But on the client side, some architectural questions come to my
 mind...

 I don't understand your separation of code responsability?


Code separation is done considering mainly, modularity and pluggability of
modules. All the classes related to a module are placed in a package (and
sub-packages) meant for that module. Modules are designed such that it won't
affect the functioning of App or other modules if a new module is added or
an old one (which is not a core module) is removed from the App.

Up to now, I don't see something like MVC or MVP or UI Builder ... It
 seems that your write the html output directly from java (and that in
 the same file that the DAO definition if I am not wrong)...


Yes, I didn't try to follow MVC or MVP strictly because I don't think that
is a strict requirement. I din't use UI Builder because none of the GWT
modules have very big and/or complex UI. If you are worried about supporting
mobile devices, that can supported just by creating a mobile theme (which
will include layout and look  feel) and few tweeks in Content and Block
types.

I think you are thinking of following methods as Data-Access methods. They
are not Data-Access methods, they are just converting Data Object to Data
Transfer Object. PageData class, in the same package, is the DAO for page
module.

public PageDTO getDTO() {
PageDTO pageDTO = new PageDTO();
 pageDTO.setUri(getUri());
pageDTO.setTitle(getTitle());
pageDTO.setLayout(getLayout().getClass().getSimpleName());
 return pageDTO;
}

public void update(PageDTO pageDTO) {
 setTitle(pageDTO.getTitle());
setLayout(pageDTO.getLayout());
}

And, I don't see any thing wrong in outputting html from a java servlet.

Could you explain a bit the advantages of your strategy?


I am not following popular design architectures, like MVP and MVC, that may
have some disadvantages that I am not aware about now.

I am trying to support maximum modularity and plaggability like any other
CMS. e.g. if you have to add a new Content or Block type, you just need to
write 2 small classes, one for backend and one for front-end (see
com/claymus/site/module/block/types/RichText.java and
com/claymus/site/module/block/types/gwt/RichText.java) and drop them in to
Content/Block Types package. Same for a theme.


 A lot of people could think that a bad separation of responsibilities
 will lead to a lot of difficulties in code maintenance and
 evolution...

 But it must be subtilities in your approach that I don't catch up to
 now...?

 Thanks in advance for your explanations,

 Michel

 PS:
 I look for example in:
 package com.claymus.site.module.page;
 (...)
 @PersistenceCapable(detachable = true)
 public class Page extends PersistentCapable {
 (...)
public void serve(ListListContent contents, ListListBlock
 blocks, Theme theme) throws ServletException, IOException {

PrintWriter out = ClaymusMain.getResponse().getWriter();

// DOC TYPE
out.print(getDocType());

out.print(html);
 (...)

 On Jul 18, 5:50 pm, Prashant antsh...@gmail.com wrote:
  Yes, you are right. Picking an opensource project and making it work for
 you
  is very easy, but making something from scratch has its own fun :) . I
  stared building Claymus because I felt need of Java based CMS which is
 made
  for GAE, considering what GAE is, how it is different from other hosting
  services, services/apis GAE is providing to developers, etc. etc. etc.
 
  Claymus is designed to give you maximum flexibility and support to build
  your app on top of Claymus. Along with all the GAE features you can take
  advantage of Servlet Level caching to minimize delay and cpu usage,
 plugable
  modules and themes, etc ... (complete list will be put on updated Claymus
  Website :) ).
 
  Regards,
  Prashant
 
  On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Niklas Rosencrantz nikla...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Having something like a CMS eg like wordpress, joomla or mediawiki
   compatible then we won't have to start every project from scratch and
   project would become more configuration than programming which
 naturally is
   an advantage since programming takes more time than just configuring a
 new
   CMS deployment. I used web2py for a project when a friend wanted a
 quick
   website started and naturally to change pages we'd prefer a web-based
 editor
   instead of changing templates and redeploying. I'm glad to see some CMS
 are
   coming to app engine. Some frameworks offer features that are getting
 close
   to that of a CMS, for instance GAE Framework (www.gaeframework.com)
 comes
   with a blog engine and when you have a blog you 

Re: [appengine-java] Re: [google-appengine] Re: CMS for GAE

2011-07-18 Thread Prashant
Hi,

Claymus is not yet ready for preview but still you can get project snapshot
from https://code.google.com/p/claymus/downloads/list .

You should be able to import downloaded code as eclipse project. You may
need to do minor changes in project settings, sdk paths, etc. on eclipse,
before you can run or deploy it.

--
Prashant

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Cyrille Vincey cvin...@qunb.com wrote:

 Hi,

 Is Claymus already available for download and testing?
 Thanks in advance,
 Cyrille

 On Jul 17, 5:48 am, Maneesh Arora mane...@gmail.com wrote:
  What's the unique advantage of having a CMS in GAE?
 
  thanks,
 
  Maneeshhttp://mightytext.net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Prashant antsh...@gmail.com wrote:
   Hi All,
 
   Claymus is close to its (first) preview release. Only few bug fixes and
   minor modifications are remaining. Check out the live demo at
  http://demo.claymus.com.
 
   --
   Prashant
   claymus.googlecode.com
 
   On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org
 wrote:
 
   On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com
   wrote:
That's more deployed, not spoken.  Every Blogger and IT guy on the
   planet
can hack together a PHP Plugin for their CMS.  Very Few can do that
 in
Python or Java.
 
   ...and even fewer can do it in Ruby or C#.
 
   Truly, PHP is in a class by itself.
 
   Jeff
 
   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
   Google App Engine group.
   To post to this group, send email to
 google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
 
--
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
   Google App Engine for Java group.
   To post to this group, send email to
   google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine for Java group.
 To post to this group, send email to
 google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



Re: [appengine-java] Re: [google-appengine] Re: CMS for GAE

2011-07-18 Thread Prashant
Yes, you are right. Picking an opensource project and making it work for you
is very easy, but making something from scratch has its own fun :) . I
stared building Claymus because I felt need of Java based CMS which is made
for GAE, considering what GAE is, how it is different from other hosting
services, services/apis GAE is providing to developers, etc. etc. etc.

Claymus is designed to give you maximum flexibility and support to build
your app on top of Claymus. Along with all the GAE features you can take
advantage of Servlet Level caching to minimize delay and cpu usage, plugable
modules and themes, etc ... (complete list will be put on updated Claymus
Website :) ).


Regards,
Prashant


On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Niklas Rosencrantz nikla...@gmail.comwrote:

 Having something like a CMS eg like wordpress, joomla or mediawiki
 compatible then we won't have to start every project from scratch and
 project would become more configuration than programming which naturally is
 an advantage since programming takes more time than just configuring a new
 CMS deployment. I used web2py for a project when a friend wanted a quick
 website started and naturally to change pages we'd prefer a web-based editor
 instead of changing templates and redeploying. I'm glad to see some CMS are
 coming to app engine. Some frameworks offer features that are getting close
 to that of a CMS, for instance GAE Framework (www.gaeframework.com) comes
 with a blog engine and when you have a blog you are getting close the the
 functions of a CMS. Do you agree?


 On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Maneesh Arora mane...@gmail.com wrote:

 What's the unique advantage of having a CMS in GAE?

 thanks,

 Maneesh
 http://mightytext.net

 On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Prashant antsh...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All,

 Claymus is close to its (first) preview release. Only few bug fixes and
 minor modifications are remaining. Check out the live demo at
 http://demo.claymus.com .

 --
 Prashant
 claymus.googlecode.com


 On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.orgwrote:

 On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com
 wrote:
  That's more deployed, not spoken.  Every Blogger and IT guy on the
 planet
  can hack together a PHP Plugin for their CMS.  Very Few can do that in
  Python or Java.

 ...and even fewer can do it in Ruby or C#.

 Truly, PHP is in a class by itself.

 Jeff

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Google App Engine group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine for Java group.
 To post to this group, send email to
 google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: [google-appengine] Re: CMS for GAE

2011-07-16 Thread Prashant
Hi All,

Claymus is close to its (first) preview release. Only few bug fixes and
minor modifications are remaining. Check out the live demo at
http://demo.claymus.com .

--
Prashant
claymus.googlecode.com


On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.orgwrote:

 On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com
 wrote:
  That's more deployed, not spoken.  Every Blogger and IT guy on the
 planet
  can hack together a PHP Plugin for their CMS.  Very Few can do that in
  Python or Java.

 ...and even fewer can do it in Ruby or C#.

 Truly, PHP is in a class by itself.

 Jeff

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



Re: [appengine-java] Re: [google-appengine] Re: CMS for GAE

2011-07-16 Thread Maneesh Arora
What's the unique advantage of having a CMS in GAE?

thanks,

Maneesh
http://mightytext.net

On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Prashant antsh...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All,

 Claymus is close to its (first) preview release. Only few bug fixes and
 minor modifications are remaining. Check out the live demo at
 http://demo.claymus.com .

 --
 Prashant
 claymus.googlecode.com


 On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.orgwrote:

 On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com
 wrote:
  That's more deployed, not spoken.  Every Blogger and IT guy on the
 planet
  can hack together a PHP Plugin for their CMS.  Very Few can do that in
  Python or Java.

 ...and even fewer can do it in Ruby or C#.

 Truly, PHP is in a class by itself.

 Jeff

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine for Java group.
 To post to this group, send email to
 google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



Re: [appengine-java] Re: [google-appengine] Re: CMS for GAE

2011-07-16 Thread Maneesh Arora
What's the unique advantage of having a CMS in GAE?

thanks,

Maneesh
http://mightytext.net

On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Prashant antsh...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All,

 Claymus is close to its (first) preview release. Only few bug fixes and
 minor modifications are remaining. Check out the live demo at
 http://demo.claymus.com .

 --
 Prashant
 claymus.googlecode.com


 On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.orgwrote:

 On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com
 wrote:
  That's more deployed, not spoken.  Every Blogger and IT guy on the
 planet
  can hack together a PHP Plugin for their CMS.  Very Few can do that in
  Python or Java.

 ...and even fewer can do it in Ruby or C#.

 Truly, PHP is in a class by itself.

 Jeff

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine for Java group.
 To post to this group, send email to
 google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.