thanks, that make sense. On Feb 15, 5:10 pm, John Patterson <jdpatter...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes you need to put it in memcache again. All instances returned from > memcache are deserialized copies of the original. > > On 15 Feb 2010, at 16:04, opok wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > I created a bean to be cached in the memcache, when I retrieved it > > from the memecache and called some methods on it to update its status, > > do I need to re-cache it into memcache? > > > I guess that memcache used its reference, so I should not need to do > > it. But things turn out that I am not correct. I am a little confused. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. > > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com > > . > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > . > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en > > .
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
