Re: Report Abuse: Cheat Malware Hack Site

2012-12-16 Thread Lennard de Rijk
Thanks for the report, this project has been dealt with.

Lennard

On Friday, December 14, 2012 10:50:02 AM UTC-5, Neosankyo wrote:

 http://cftool.googlecode.com/

 The page referring downloads to this site is: 
 http://www.cfpro.biz/p/cfpro-download.html

 Download link:
 http://cftool.googlecode.com/files/CFPRO.rar

 The website using your service is providing third party programs/cheat for 
 an online game CrossFire. The cheat is widely spread and provided by these 
 sites and is affecting all game versions/ servers of the game, namely 
 Philippines, Vietnam, North America and more.

 The application also includes a malware detected by AVG/ AVIRA. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Project Hosting on Google Code group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-code-hosting/-/fdeCAOn03J4J.
To post to this group, send email to google-code-hosting@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-code-hosting+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en.



[gcj] Re: SPOJ buying apples ,Knapsack

2012-12-16 Thread Neolithic

Test cases of the problem are not testing this condition:

he will not buy more than n packets of apples.

I got a success without putting check for this condition. 

On Saturday, 15 December 2012 19:39:34 UTC+5:30, Marti wrote:

 I am having trouble figuring out the reccurrence for the following on SPOJ 
 which I believe is a Knapsack DP problem.Please help me.
 http://www.spoj.com/problems/ABA12C/


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Code Jam group.
To post to this group, send email to google-code@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-code/-/9SX_6gBpceEJ.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




[gcj] SPOJ - ONEZERO - WA :(

2012-12-16 Thread thefourtheye dIVi
I am trying to solve http://www.spoj.com/problems/ONEZERO/

I referred so many internet posts about this, and they all talk about
storing reminders and building a tree. I am running a simple BFS, nothing
else... But this gets me WA :(

http://ideone.com/SZDn5T

Dont know whats wrong with this code. Please help me fix it.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Code Jam group.
To post to this group, send email to google-code@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [gcj] SPOJ - ONEZERO - WA :(

2012-12-16 Thread ZHANG Xiongqi, Parker

Hi thefourtheye dIVi,

Basically your idea is correct and this problem can be solved using BFS.

However, it is not sufficient to use unsigned long long to solve this 
problem because the answer to 19998 is 
0 which is much larger than the 
maximum number that could be represented using unsigned long long.


One more thing to note, you can keep track of all the possible remainder 
and no need to process the remainder that has appeared before. The 
reason for that is left for your exercise. :)


Here is the accepted code which I adapted from yours.

http://ideone.com/7ziUxy

If you have any more questions, fell free to ask.

Parker

On 2012/12/16 22:42, thefourtheye dIVi wrote:

I am trying to solve http://www.spoj.com/problems/ONEZERO/

I referred so many internet posts about this, and they all talk about 
storing reminders and building a tree. I am running a simple BFS, 
nothing else... But this gets me WA :(


http://ideone.com/SZDn5T

Dont know whats wrong with this code. Please help me fix it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups Google Code Jam group.

To post to this group, send email to google-code@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google 
Code Jam group.
To post to this group, send email to google-code@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




[gcj] optimized algo for LCS0

2012-12-16 Thread anupsingh
hey can any one tell me the optimized method of solving LCS problem. I hv 
optimized still it show TLE...
here is the link
www.spoj.com/problems/LCS0/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Code Jam group.
To post to this group, send email to google-code@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-code/-/v4Fmk_-athsJ.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [gcj] optimized algo for LCS0

2012-12-16 Thread Faisal Dirie
Check the links below.

http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~ninamf/Algos11/lectures/lect0311.pdf

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Algorithm_implementation/Strings/Longest_common_subsequence

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Code Jam group.
To post to this group, send email to google-code@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [gcj] optimized algo for LCS0

2012-12-16 Thread Faisal Dirie
Use brute-force methods to devise an algorithm, then and then, use dynamic
programming techniques to tweak your code to achieve an optimized one,
depending on what you want to do.

On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Faisal Dirie vranz...@gmail.com wrote:

 Check the links below.

 http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~ninamf/Algos11/lectures/lect0311.pdf


 http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Algorithm_implementation/Strings/Longest_common_subsequence


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Code Jam group.
To post to this group, send email to google-code@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [gcj] optimized algo for LCS0

2012-12-16 Thread ZHANG Xiongqi, Parker
The concatenating of list(si) would have a size of O(mn) at worst case 
and even the O(n logn) algorithm for solving the longest increasing 
subsequence will not be fast enough.


Please tell me I am wrong. =w=

Parker

On 2012/12/17 9:28, Luís Fernando Dorelli de Abreu wrote:

Given the limits, those ideas are going to TLE I guess.
You can get an idea of a reduction that might work here : 
http://www.cs.ucf.edu/courses/cap5510/fall2009/SeqAlign/LCS.efficient.pdf



2012/12/16 Faisal Dirie vranz...@gmail.com mailto:vranz...@gmail.com

Use brute-force methods to devise an algorithm, then and then,
use dynamic programming techniques to tweak your code to achieve
an optimized one, depending on what you want to do.


On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Faisal Dirie vranz...@gmail.com
mailto:vranz...@gmail.com wrote:

Check the links below.

http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~ninamf/Algos11/lectures/lect0311.pdf
http://www.cc.gatech.edu/%7Eninamf/Algos11/lectures/lect0311.pdf



http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Algorithm_implementation/Strings/Longest_common_subsequence


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Groups Google Code Jam group.
To post to this group, send email to google-code@googlegroups.com
mailto:google-code@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
mailto:google-code%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups Google Code Jam group.

To post to this group, send email to google-code@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google 
Code Jam group.
To post to this group, send email to google-code@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.