I was of the same opinion and tried to program in Java. But you know I was
fighting the language instead of language helping me.
Well let me try today. I hope to qualify to think about future options.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Hawston LLH haws...@gmail.com wrote:
in fact, i dont think the raw coding speed will be significantly different,
if you use any of the high level languages. The key issue is whether u can
figure it out how to solve the problem in your brain first, i think that
will take much of the coding time, than the raw typing time.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Douglas Drumond drumond.doug...@gmail.com
wrote:
But for big input files, 8 minutes might not be enough, I don't know.
I'll try some examples today, before qualification round begins to see if
it's feasible.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:03 AM, malugu satyajit
malugu.satya...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess it should be ok.. 4 minutes is a long long time ;)
Development speed is what gives us points here.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Douglas Drumond
drumond.doug...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be nice. I'm thinking in doing it so, but I'm a little afraid
of running speed.
Douglas
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:35 AM, malugu satyajit
malugu.satya...@gmail.com wrote:
For this contest, is anyone coding in Ruby. I thought it would be a
good choice because of its brevity and coding speed.
--
Satyajit
--
Satyajit
--
Satyajit
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-codejam group.
To post to this group, send email to google-code@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
