Re: [Google Maps API v3] Re: 2011/8/17 - New Release (3.6)
Would it be possible for you to create a sample test page with some markers that illustrates the problem please? Thanks. Enoch -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/gN0-ZRODZqoJ. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] google.maps.places.PlacesService - transit request types ...
Hello, I have been testing the Places Library with the Maps Javascript API v3 - so far everything seems to be working well. However, I have yet to receive any results for the following place types: taxi_stand train_station bus_station subway_station Using http://maps.google.ca interface, these transit points show up on google maps. However, calling the maps API for the same locations returns ZERO_RESULTS -- is this a bug or is transit information fetched from a private source? Thanks in advance. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/LocyOQXKAJQJ. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] Re: Load Map to floating div
> Is there somewhere I can upload all my files? maybe I could tar it up > somewhere? I'm not sure. http://www.google.com/search?q=free+web+hosting > I think its a bit unfair for the forum host to make this rule and not > provide a scratchpad area. Google Maps API terms of use (free version) requires your finished application to be publicly accessible, so you will need hosting anyway. Licensed users may have private maps, but they also have paid for support. Other excuses dealt with here http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api/web/why-including-a-link-is-critical Bear in mind it is your problem ; you want free help, it will pay you to make it easy for people to help you ; you want fast help, it will pay you to make it quick for other people to help you ; you want accurate help, it will pay you to make the whole problem accessible to other people to help you. I wasted my time having a guess about your map initialising code not being triggered; but more importantly for you, you wasted your own time responding to that. All that would be avoided. > >Map height and width are 100% of 'content', which is unspecified/ > >indeterminate in what you have shown us. > > The 'base' page is 4 divs floating in the container wrapper.. That's nice, but my point was that I can't see any kind of sizing applied to your 'content' div, and your extra description still doesn't include any. 100% of undefined is undefined, it is a common problem for other people posting here, but I'm still only guessing at what your problem is. There is no reason why you shouldn't define size in percentages, but you do need to ensure a complete chain of inheritance from some defined size - up to the tag if necessary. > i'm thinking that this must be a fairly regular thing menu sidebar + content > area load a map into > the content area. Are there any simple tutorials for this? Examples, anyway http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3/search?group=google-maps-js-api-v3&q=sidebar+example -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] Re: New 3.6 Introduces Scale Which is Too Small for iPhone 4
This appears to be resolved but no formal announcement of that from Google. On Aug 29, 12:05 am, Chris C <1952m...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nothing to report on this yet? The maps are unusable on higher > resolution mobile platforms. > > We all have to revert to version 3.5 in order to see the street > labels. > > On Aug 20, 10:21 am, Enoch Lau wrote: > > > > > Thanks for reporting this - we'll take a look. > > > Enoch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] Re: move marker on zoom
> Is there anyway to automatically move the marker so that it always stays > within > view when the user zooms in to a location? I see there is a bounds_changed event listed for the map object I assume that one possible way would be to add a listener for when the bounds have changed that sets the marker's position to the new map center. (which would do the same for if the map was dragged or moved in any other way - possibly the zoom_changed event would be more useful...) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] Re: Load Map to floating div
Hi, Is there somewhere I can upload all my files? maybe I could tar it up somewhere? I'm not sure. I think its a bit unfair for the forum host to make this rule and not provide a scratchpad area. Anyway thanks for your comments... >Map height and width are 100% of 'content', which is unspecified/ >indeterminate in what you have shown us. The 'base' page is 4 divs floating in the container wrapper (itself specified as 100%x100%) they are specified as percentages kinda like a 2x2 quad row1 20% overall height row2 80% overall height column1 is 25% width column2 is 75% width im loading content into the bottom right div. I'd rather not have to specify widths and heights in pixels and let the browser/html work that stuff out for itself. I figure somewhere its converting my % into pixels anyway as a property >> jquery load is intended to load page fragments... It is working remarkably well so far. I'll switch to iframes when it doesnt >Something that might be going wrong for you is that the map-making... I inserted a jquery alert box in front of the map instantiation and when I did a load from the 'base' page into the div an alert box displayed i'm thinking that this must be a fairly regular thing menu sidebar + content area load a map into the content area. Are there any simple tutorials for this? Thx, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/89j7QuBF7RsJ. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] Display only certain KML features by attributes
Is there a way to display only certain features of a KML by attributes in Google Maps? I know this is possible using Fusion Tables, but I would rather not use Fusion tables because: a) I would have to make my KML data public so that anybody could use it. b) Because my KML data has description balloons loaded with HTML and I am not sure that Fusion tables allow the display of HTML balloons. c) I want to be able to dynamically update KML files stored on my website when users input information and I am not sure if there is a way to dynamically upload a KML file as a Fusion table. So is there any other way to do this in the Google Maps API without Fusion tables? What I want to do is mimic the "time aware" functionality of Google Earth so that I can display KML data by time. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/6Nhkg9IvxbsJ. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] Re: How to convert "world coordinates" given by fromLatLngToPoint() to metrуs
> Hello. I have two points(x,y) with "world coordinates" given by > fromLatLngToPoint(). How could I find out how many metres it is: (X2 - X1) There are well-known algorithms for finding distance between two points of lat/long. scripted example at http://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong.html A method is also included in the API 'geometry' extension http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/javascript/geometry.html#Distance -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] Re: using div tag inside asp.net form not working
So the real problem is the form tag doesn't carry any height value by default. So when google api goes to set the map height it fails as the form container doesn't have a height. adding height to the form via style or CSS resolves the problem -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/lyhoiaPoGQAJ. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] Re: using div tag inside asp.net form not working
> Any thoughts? See 'READ THIS FIRST', it would help a lot if we could see what is actually delivered to the browser http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3/t/2b3f101fd509919e or of course you could look yourself. The Maps API javascript doesn't care what you do at the server, its the browser end that counts. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
Re: [Google Maps API v3] Exporting as a KML file
Kalyan, How are you accessing the data in the first place? You could look into loading it to Fusion Tables, which allows data export in KML: https://www.google.com/fusiontables -Andres On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Kalyan Sannedhi wrote: > Hi guys, > > We use maps APIs to place our company's wireless radios on a map. Is there > a way to download this "overlayed" MAP as a KML file? > If I need to send our radio locations to someone that has Google Earth I > can send this file and be done. > > Thanks for any ideas. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/VUKMLTWQdOcJ. > To post to this group, send email to > google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] Re: Load Map to floating div
>
>
Map height and width are 100% of 'content', which is unspecified/
indeterminate in what you have shown us.
However ...
> I loading the map html file like
> $("#ldmap").click(function() {
> $("#map_canvas").load('gmap-helloworld.html');
jqeury 'load' is intended to load page fragments, not to try to insert
a complete HTML page inside another page.
http://api.jquery.com/load/
Something that might be going wrong for you is that the map-making
script never gets triggered, as the base page is already loaded before
you execute the jquery stuff.
But it's all guesses, as you haven't followed the posting guidelines
to give a link to your problem page. See "READ THIS FIRST"
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3/t/2b3f101fd509919e
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] Load Map to floating div
Hi,
I have an html/jquery menu in a sidebar and a main content area set up as
floating divs in a container div. I use jquery to load the
content area with html from various other files.
I have a html/javscript basic "hello world" google map which works fine if i
just load it into a browser but when I try to load it from
my menu into the main content area nothing happens
my menu/content divs are set up
.container { position:absolute, properties... }
.menu { position:relative, properties... }
.status1 { position:relative, properties... }
.status2 { position:relative, properties... }
...menu code...
I loading the map html file like
$("#ldmap").click(function() {
$("#map_canvas").load('gmap-helloworld.html');
});
gmap-helloworld.html never renders into the div, if I just load it into the
browser like file:///gmap-helloworld.html the map
displays as expected. If I load some different html into the div it displays
as expected , so I dont know why the map
wont load into the div
Any ideas?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/Hza1XJQMx44J.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] Re: places API JS V3 -- html_attributions (ex : Listings by yellow pages)
Hi Francis, this is happening probably because you are creating a new google.maps.places.PlacesService for each search. Try creating a PlacesService and store it somewhere to use it for further searchs. I hope it helps. Cheers, Jr. Hames On Jul 21, 9:06 pm, Chris Broadfoot wrote: > Could you post a link? The Places API itself doesn't add anything to your > page. You probably have code that looks like this... > > attributionDiv.innerHTML += placesResult.attribution; > > --http://twitter.com/broady > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Francis Carriere > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello! > > > I'm using the places API. I have to make multiple calls, and every time I > > make a call it adds to the maps (on the bottom right) "Listings by yellow > > pages". > > > So if I make multiple call, eventually it just fills up the whole right > > side of the screen with tens of "Listings by yellow pages". > > > Anyone know a way to clear these? On the documentation it says > > html_attributions must be displayed to the user...is there a way to handle > > it ourselves instead of it being added automatically on the map? > > > Thank you! > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/yyHZY5Fxgf4J. > > To post to this group, send email to > > google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] InfoBox Marker Issues
Hi, I wonder whether someone may be able to help me please with an issue I have around the InfoBox code. I've incorporated the Info Box code into one of my web pages at:http:// www.mapmyfinds.co.uk/infobox. The problem I'm having is around the 'click' event listener. I've added the event listener to the code, but the InfoBox only appears when I click on the last marker at the very top of the map. What I would like to be able to do is have the Info Box work like the InfoWindow example I've created here: http://www.mapmyfinds.co.uk/alllocations.html. I've tried add all sorts of combinations of code and I just can't seem to get it to work, perhaps because this is all fairly new to me. I just wondered whether someone could perhaps please show me what I need to do to get this to work. Many thanks and kind regards Chris. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
Re: [Google Maps API v3] alternative zoom and map type buttons
K, You should be able to use the methods listed here: http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/javascript/reference.html#Map Take a look at the examples here, which have relevant info: http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/javascript/examples/index.html Cheers, Andres On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:51 PM, 24/7 <2...@gmx.net> wrote: > Hi list, > > I'm trying to use custom buttons in a div outside the map to zoom in/out > and change the map type. So far I haven't been able to acchieve this - I > haven't even got a starting point. Does anybody know how I can trigger these > events? > > Thanks in advance! > K. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/d903ELlgzRsJ. > To post to this group, send email to > google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
Re: [Google Maps API v3] Re: Remove hotels from overlay
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Pil wrote: > Ok, I repeat the reasons why it's no good idea to include it in the > mentioned context: > > 1. It's intented for hiding the 'labels' of elementType category I dont understand what yo mean there. As I see it, its for affecting the label "element"s, of what ever featureType you (or dont) specify. > > 2. It is redudant. Actully further to what I said before, seems I was wrong. Specifying elementType: "labels" is acutlly different to "all" (or missing) If you specify "labels", then you just hide labels. If you leave elementType off altogether (or explictly say "all"() then you hiding "geometry" too. There arent many geometries attached to poi.business. But they do exist. Look at new york city for example. there are a few. Use the style wizard to toggle geometry on and off to see :) (enter "loc: 40.734099,-73.945977" into the 'enter a location' box top right) So leaving it off, has changed the meaning. > > 3. It leads to confusion. Cant disagree there, given this conversation :) > > 4. It complicates things more than necessary. Given the fact that it actully changes what is displayed, can only now disagree. So my answer would be "needed" - yes. > > > > > On Sep 1, 5:29 pm, Barry Hunter wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Pil wrote: >> >> > So when all examples are behaving identical it remains your secret why >> > it's "good to include anyway". Sorry, I cannot understand this >> > 'logic'. >> >> Not a secret. I guess just to me makes more sense (to me). >> >> As much as anything its about predictablity. >> >> Being as specific as posible - ie that just want to turn the >> poi.business labels off. Is better than turning the whole of >> poi.business. turning off the whole of poi.business off, might have >> unpredictable results. We dont know. >> >> Specifiy "exacly what want to do", rather than a broader "do all this" >> just becauase it happens to do just that. >> >> Say you have a single file in the folder. And you want to delete it. >> >> * You could delete the folder. It would delete the file. And would >> work just fine. >> >> Now later, you add some more unrelated files to the folder (for what >> ever reason). >> >> Again you want to delete the single file, so you execute your "delete >> folder" procedure. Result: the file has been deleted - good. (But so >> have these other files - this is probably unintended. - bad) >> >> So to delete the file, you delete the file - its safer. It more >> robust. It jsut does what is intended. >> >> >> >> > Look at my example above to see the difference when the 'labels' are >> > hidden and when the 'pois' are hidden. >> >> Yes, because [elementType: "labels"] - without a featureType is the >> same as a [featureType: "all"] - ie it removes all labels from the map >> - affects every single feature. >> >> If you intending to remove all labels then fine. >> >> Same as [featureType: "poi.business"] - without a elementType is the >> same as a [elementType: "all"] - ie removes all business features - >> effects all elements. >> >> If you intending to all business data (ie the geometry too) then fine. >> But be sure that is what you want to do. >> >> >> >> > On Sep 1, 4:34 pm, Barry Hunter wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Pil wrote: >> >> > Barry, >> >> >> > be honest: Do you think that this line >> >> >> > elementType: "labels" >> >> >> > is needed when poi.business should be turned off? >> >> >> needed: no. >> >> >> good to include anyway: yes. >> >> >> > Should it really be used altough it's not only redundant but does >> >> > something completely different when executed >> >> >> Not to me it doesnt. Perhaps you using it wrong. >> >> >> With it:http://www.nearby.org.uk/google/temp/no-hotels2.php >> >> >> Without it:http://www.nearby.org.uk/google/temp/no-hotels22.php >> >> >> Set to allhttp://www.nearby.org.uk/google/temp/no-hotels23.php >> >> >> All behave identical. >> >> >> (You can test things like this easier using the styling wizard) >> >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> > "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to >> > google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> > For more options, visit this group >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. T
[Google Maps API v3] Re: Remove hotels from overlay
Ok, I repeat the reasons why it's no good idea to include it in the mentioned context: 1. It's intented for hiding the 'labels' of elementType category 2. It is redudant. 3. It leads to confusion. 4. It complicates things more than necessary. On Sep 1, 5:29 pm, Barry Hunter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Pil wrote: > > > So when all examples are behaving identical it remains your secret why > > it's "good to include anyway". Sorry, I cannot understand this > > 'logic'. > > Not a secret. I guess just to me makes more sense (to me). > > As much as anything its about predictablity. > > Being as specific as posible - ie that just want to turn the > poi.business labels off. Is better than turning the whole of > poi.business. turning off the whole of poi.business off, might have > unpredictable results. We dont know. > > Specifiy "exacly what want to do", rather than a broader "do all this" > just becauase it happens to do just that. > > Say you have a single file in the folder. And you want to delete it. > > * You could delete the folder. It would delete the file. And would > work just fine. > > Now later, you add some more unrelated files to the folder (for what > ever reason). > > Again you want to delete the single file, so you execute your "delete > folder" procedure. Result: the file has been deleted - good. (But so > have these other files - this is probably unintended. - bad) > > So to delete the file, you delete the file - its safer. It more > robust. It jsut does what is intended. > > > > > Look at my example above to see the difference when the 'labels' are > > hidden and when the 'pois' are hidden. > > Yes, because [elementType: "labels"] - without a featureType is the > same as a [featureType: "all"] - ie it removes all labels from the map > - affects every single feature. > > If you intending to remove all labels then fine. > > Same as [featureType: "poi.business"] - without a elementType is the > same as a [elementType: "all"] - ie removes all business features - > effects all elements. > > If you intending to all business data (ie the geometry too) then fine. > But be sure that is what you want to do. > > > > > On Sep 1, 4:34 pm, Barry Hunter wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Pil wrote: > >> > Barry, > > >> > be honest: Do you think that this line > > >> > elementType: "labels" > > >> > is needed when poi.business should be turned off? > > >> needed: no. > > >> good to include anyway: yes. > > >> > Should it really be used altough it's not only redundant but does > >> > something completely different when executed > > >> Not to me it doesnt. Perhaps you using it wrong. > > >> With it:http://www.nearby.org.uk/google/temp/no-hotels2.php > > >> Without it:http://www.nearby.org.uk/google/temp/no-hotels22.php > > >> Set to allhttp://www.nearby.org.uk/google/temp/no-hotels23.php > > >> All behave identical. > > >> (You can test things like this easier using the styling wizard) > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. > > To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
Re: [Google Maps API v3] Re: Remove hotels from overlay
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Pil wrote: > > So when all examples are behaving identical it remains your secret why > it's "good to include anyway". Sorry, I cannot understand this > 'logic'. Not a secret. I guess just to me makes more sense (to me). As much as anything its about predictablity. Being as specific as posible - ie that just want to turn the poi.business labels off. Is better than turning the whole of poi.business. turning off the whole of poi.business off, might have unpredictable results. We dont know. Specifiy "exacly what want to do", rather than a broader "do all this" just becauase it happens to do just that. Say you have a single file in the folder. And you want to delete it. * You could delete the folder. It would delete the file. And would work just fine. Now later, you add some more unrelated files to the folder (for what ever reason). Again you want to delete the single file, so you execute your "delete folder" procedure. Result: the file has been deleted - good. (But so have these other files - this is probably unintended. - bad) So to delete the file, you delete the file - its safer. It more robust. It jsut does what is intended. > > Look at my example above to see the difference when the 'labels' are > hidden and when the 'pois' are hidden. Yes, because [elementType: "labels"] - without a featureType is the same as a [featureType: "all"] - ie it removes all labels from the map - affects every single feature. If you intending to remove all labels then fine. Same as [featureType: "poi.business"] - without a elementType is the same as a [elementType: "all"] - ie removes all business features - effects all elements. If you intending to all business data (ie the geometry too) then fine. But be sure that is what you want to do. > > > On Sep 1, 4:34 pm, Barry Hunter wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Pil wrote: >> > Barry, >> >> > be honest: Do you think that this line >> >> > elementType: "labels" >> >> > is needed when poi.business should be turned off? >> >> needed: no. >> >> good to include anyway: yes. >> >> >> >> > Should it really be used altough it's not only redundant but does >> > something completely different when executed >> >> Not to me it doesnt. Perhaps you using it wrong. >> >> With it:http://www.nearby.org.uk/google/temp/no-hotels2.php >> >> Without it:http://www.nearby.org.uk/google/temp/no-hotels22.php >> >> Set to allhttp://www.nearby.org.uk/google/temp/no-hotels23.php >> >> All behave identical. >> >> (You can test things like this easier using the styling wizard) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] using div tag inside asp.net form not working
I have a pretty simple setup. with an asp.net page that has a form tag with
a few fields. when I do this my scripts work.
function loadpolygon() {
var doc = document.forms['form1'];
var ticketPoly = [
new google.maps.LatLng(Coordinates[0],Coordinates[1]),
new google.maps.LatLng(Coordinates[2], Coordinates[3]),
new google.maps.LatLng(Coordinates[4], Coordinates[5]),
new google.maps.LatLng(Coordinates[6], Coordinates[7]),
new google.maps.LatLng(Coordinates[8], Coordinates[9]),
new google.maps.LatLng(Coordinates[10], Coordinates[11])];
var ticketPolyPath = new google.maps.Polygon({
paths: ticketPoly,
strokeColor: "#FF",
strokeOpacity: 1.0,
strokeWeight: 2,
fillColor: "#FF",
fillOpacity: 0.35
});
var centerMap = new google.maps.LatLng(Centroid[0], Centroid[1]);
var polygonOptions = {
zoom: 17,
mapTypeId: google.maps.MapTypeId.HYBRID
};
mapPoly = new google.maps.Map(document.getElementById("map_poly"),
polygonOptions);
mapPoly.setCenter(centerMap);
ticketPolyPath.setMap(mapPoly);
google.maps.event.addListener(ticketPolyPath, 'click', showTicketInfo);
infowindow = new google.maps.InfoWindow();
}
with my html as.
fields etc
However if I try doing
fields etc
The map doesn't show.
Looks like it can't find the map_poly id.
Any thoughts?
Thank you
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/kYZ4AR2L4BEJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] Re: Remove hotels from overlay
So when all examples are behaving identical it remains your secret why it's "good to include anyway". Sorry, I cannot understand this 'logic'. Look at my example above to see the difference when the 'labels' are hidden and when the 'pois' are hidden. On Sep 1, 4:34 pm, Barry Hunter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Pil wrote: > > Barry, > > > be honest: Do you think that this line > > > elementType: "labels" > > > is needed when poi.business should be turned off? > > needed: no. > > good to include anyway: yes. > > > > > Should it really be used altough it's not only redundant but does > > something completely different when executed > > Not to me it doesnt. Perhaps you using it wrong. > > With it:http://www.nearby.org.uk/google/temp/no-hotels2.php > > Without it:http://www.nearby.org.uk/google/temp/no-hotels22.php > > Set to allhttp://www.nearby.org.uk/google/temp/no-hotels23.php > > All behave identical. > > (You can test things like this easier using the styling wizard) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] JS places library and results differents of Google Addresses results
Why my places results are differents from Google Addresses results ?
In fact when I search in 'google.fr' Addresses on Paris (french
database); I have results for 'caviste' ('wine shop' in english) which
are linked to shops names and to a shop category which is 'caviste' !
When I use google places library I have only a few results (6) for
caviste which are linked to the shop name but never ton the 'caviste'
category.
But caviste category never exists in the places library ?!
How to do to have coherent results ?
Thanks for all
Ben
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] How to convert "world coordinates" given by fromLatLngToPoint() to metrуs
Hello. I have two points(x,y) with "world coordinates" given by fromLatLngToPoint(). How could I find out how many metres it is: (X2 - X1) Thanks in advance -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/MLrmLN20Ok4J. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] move marker on zoom
Hi all, I have a draggable marker so the user can dynamically select lat / long values. However if the user zooms into a location, the marker usually ends up off to the side somewhere out of view, and is difficult to find. Is there anyway to automatically move the marker so that it always stays within view when the user zooms in to a location? Cheers, Damian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/OuloJANGUQUJ. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] alternative zoom and map type buttons
Hi list, I'm trying to use custom buttons in a div outside the map to zoom in/out and change the map type. So far I haven't been able to acchieve this - I haven't even got a starting point. Does anybody know how I can trigger these events? Thanks in advance! K. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/d903ELlgzRsJ. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] Exporting as a KML file
Hi guys, We use maps APIs to place our company's wireless radios on a map. Is there a way to download this "overlayed" MAP as a KML file? If I need to send our radio locations to someone that has Google Earth I can send this file and be done. Thanks for any ideas. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/VUKMLTWQdOcJ. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] Re: Examples of Maps with Checkboxes inside Map
this should help: http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/apis/maps/documentation/javascript/controls.html#CustomControls On 1 Sep., 09:48, Satpack Travel wrote: > Hi. > > I've got my map up and running. Checkboxes work (thanks all!). Only > problem is that they are outside the map, which causes problems when > viewing on a mobile because it messes with the formatting on a small > screen (the zoom function drops off the bottom). > > So does anyone know of exampes where checkboxes are within / over the > map? Have searched quite hard and looked at Maps API documentation but > can't seem to translate their examples of those dropboxes into my > checkboxes. > > My current version is AT: > > www.satpacktravel.com/API/api_14.html > > Thanks in advance for any help. > > Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
Re: [Google Maps API v3] Re: Remove hotels from overlay
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Pil wrote: > Barry, > > be honest: Do you think that this line > > elementType: "labels" > > is needed when poi.business should be turned off? needed: no. good to include anyway: yes. > > Should it really be used altough it's not only redundant but does > something completely different when executed Not to me it doesnt. Perhaps you using it wrong. With it: http://www.nearby.org.uk/google/temp/no-hotels2.php Without it: http://www.nearby.org.uk/google/temp/no-hotels22.php Set to all http://www.nearby.org.uk/google/temp/no-hotels23.php All behave identical. (You can test things like this easier using the styling wizard) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] Re: Remove hotels from overlay
Barry,
be honest: Do you think that this line
elementType: "labels"
is needed when poi.business should be turned off?
Should it really be used altough it's not only redundant but does
something completely different when executed and therefore can only be
confusing (as it confused me)?
On Sep 1, 2:04 pm, Barry Hunter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Pil wrote:
>
> > On Aug 31, 11:24 pm, Barry Hunter wrote:
> >> You close, just need to give it the proper variable names like in the docs.
>
> >> map.setOptions({styles: [
> >> {
> >> featureType: "poi.business",
> >> elementType: "labels",
> >> stylers: [
> >> { visibility: "off" }
> >> ]
> >> }
> >> ]});
>
> > Barry,
>
> > There is absolutly no need for complicating things more than
> > necessary.
>
> > The MapTypeStyleElementType specification 'labels' is no part or
> > subcategory of MapTypeStyleFeatureType specification 'poi'. So
> > 'labels' is absolutely redundant and should not appear when you only
> > want to change 'poi' (or a subcategory of 'poi') - unless your
> > intention is confusion.
>
> Interesting argument (meta: is this a argument for the sake of an
> argument?), but as we having this argument, often redundancy is used
> deliberately. To be clear and unabigious about ones intentions etc. A
> large percentage of semi-colons at the end of javascript lines are
> redundant - but most coders supply them anyway.
>
> Having elementType of labels just clarifies the intention, even
> though the default of 'all' would encompass it too.
>
> I didnt supply the actual style used anyway. bigfoot1 found it somewhere. :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
Re: [Google Maps API v3] Re: Remove hotels from overlay
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Pil wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 31, 11:24 pm, Barry Hunter wrote:
>> You close, just need to give it the proper variable names like in the docs.
>>
>> map.setOptions({styles: [
>> {
>> featureType: "poi.business",
>> elementType: "labels",
>> stylers: [
>> { visibility: "off" }
>> ]
>> }
>> ]});
>
> Barry,
>
> There is absolutly no need for complicating things more than
> necessary.
>
> The MapTypeStyleElementType specification 'labels' is no part or
> subcategory of MapTypeStyleFeatureType specification 'poi'. So
> 'labels' is absolutely redundant and should not appear when you only
> want to change 'poi' (or a subcategory of 'poi') - unless your
> intention is confusion.
Interesting argument (meta: is this a argument for the sake of an
argument?), but as we having this argument, often redundancy is used
deliberately. To be clear and unabigious about ones intentions etc. A
large percentage of semi-colons at the end of javascript lines are
redundant - but most coders supply them anyway.
Having elementType of labels just clarifies the intention, even
though the default of 'all' would encompass it too.
I didnt supply the actual style used anyway. bigfoot1 found it somewhere. :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
Re: [Google Maps API v3] Re: Remove hotels from overlay
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Pil wrote: > > > On Aug 31, 11:30 pm, Barry Hunter wrote: >> But even better is just to add it your already existing mapOptions >> >> http://www.nearby.org.uk/google/temp/no-hotels2.php > > Just to clarify: This example code turns off poi.business but it > doesn't turn off the labels. Who said anything about wanting to turn off labels anyway? Wasnt in bigfoot1's question. > The prolongation of my previous example is not just for fun. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] Examples of Maps with Checkboxes inside Map
Hi. I've got my map up and running. Checkboxes work (thanks all!). Only problem is that they are outside the map, which causes problems when viewing on a mobile because it messes with the formatting on a small screen (the zoom function drops off the bottom). So does anyone know of exampes where checkboxes are within / over the map? Have searched quite hard and looked at Maps API documentation but can't seem to translate their examples of those dropboxes into my checkboxes. My current version is AT: www.satpacktravel.com/API/api_14.html Thanks in advance for any help. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
[Google Maps API v3] Re: Remove hotels from overlay
On Aug 31, 11:24 pm, Barry Hunter wrote:
> You close, just need to give it the proper variable names like in the docs.
>
> map.setOptions({styles: [
> {
> featureType: "poi.business",
> elementType: "labels",
> stylers: [
> { visibility: "off" }
> ]
> }
> ]});
Barry,
There is absolutly no need for complicating things more than
necessary.
The MapTypeStyleElementType specification 'labels' is no part or
subcategory of MapTypeStyleFeatureType specification 'poi'. So
'labels' is absolutely redundant and should not appear when you only
want to change 'poi' (or a subcategory of 'poi') - unless your
intention is confusion.
To turn 'poi.business' off - without the 'labels' - this should be
sufficient (and in fact it is):
map.setOptions({styles: [
{
featureType: "poi.business",
stylers: [
{ visibility: "off" }
]
}
]});
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
