[Google Wave APIs] Re: JSON from robot (python) to gadget the right way
hemm thanks agustin...
thats interesting, I havent tried that...
I do my work around of not passing big data to gadget by just
providing necessary data, the gadget then do an AJAX based on the data
passed by the robot and display it...
its seems faster this way... the gadget displayed faster and I don't
get HIGH CPU warning on my log...
On Oct 27, 6:31 pm, Agustin Horischnik agu...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure about the length. There's something about that in this
thread:http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api/browse_thread/thread/8...
But I can tell you that I tried sending a string of 20 '1's and it
didn't break the gadget. And it's not getting chopped (i.e. on the
gadget, it's javascript length property equals 20).
You can try this yourself:
cont = ''
for i in range(20):
cont += '1'
delta['cont'] = cont
gadget.SubmitDelta(delta)
What I did find playing with your code is this:
When I do:
delta = {}
delta['surahcontent'] = u'\u0628\u0644\u0651\u064e
\u0647\u0650\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0651\u064e\u062d\u0652\u0645\u064e'
gadget.SubmitDelta(delta)
I get no gadget and no error.
But if I encode the unicode string like so:
delta = {}
delta['surahcontent'] = u'\u0628\u0644\u0651\u064e
\u0647\u0650\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0651\u064e\u062d
\u0652\u0645\u064e'.encode('utf-8')
gadget.SubmitDelta(delta)
I get the gadget and the arabic caracters.
So I think what breaks the gadget is passing any thing other than a
string... If for instance I do:
delta['surahcontent'] = 1
it will fail. While doing:
delta['surahcontent'] = str(1)
will work.
Agustin.
On Oct 27, 4:59 am, Teddy Jasin jasin.te...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi agustin,
here's the sample of some json I send to the gadget:
delta = {'surahcontent': u'\u0628\u0650\u0633\u0652\u0645\u0650
\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0651\u064e\u0647\u0650
\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0651\u064e\u062d\u0652\u0645\u064e
\u0670\u0646\u0650 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0651\u064e\u062d\u0650\u064a
\u0645\u0650 \ufd3f \u0661\ufd3e\u0627\u0644\u0652\u062d\u064e
\u0645\u0652\u062f\u064f \u0644\u0650\u0644\u0651\u064e\u0647\u0650
\u0631\u064e\u0628\u0651\u0650 \u0627\u0644\u0652\u0639\u064e
\u0627\u0644\u064e\u0645\u0650\u064a\u0646\u064e \ufd3f \u0662\ufd3e',
'surahtitle': u'Al-Faatiha - The Opening (1-2)', 'translations':
u' (1) In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.\n (2)
Praise be to Allah, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the worlds;\n'}
gadget.SubmitDelta(delta)
as u see the JSON I sending containing a long unicode strings, the
json above can successfuly show the gadget and show the content.
However when the delta above gets extremely long then it won't show
the gadget though no error in log file...
So I believe there's limit in the length of the delta that you can
send to gadget.
Teddy
On Oct 27, 4:02 am, Agustin Horischnik agu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Teddy, can you paste a few lines from your outgoing json containing the
strings you think could be causing the problem and maybe the bit of code
you're using to submit the delta and encode it?
I ended up using Pamela's suggestion but I'll be happy to try your code
and
see if I find something.
Agustin.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Teddy Jasin jasin.te...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Agustin,
I think I'm also facing same issue with you.
in my case I'm sending data from the robot to the gadget also using
json, however my json data is arabic texts which is converted
unicode... so it become longer json strings.
the gadget will not show if the passed data is too long.
so I guess my json data is too big to be passed into the gadget.
anyone can help me in this?
On Oct 26, 7:17 pm, Agustin Horischnik agu...@gmail.com wrote:
Reporting back on serializing objects and submitting them as delta.
I tried again using simplejson and the result is what I described
earlier without explicitly encoding them: the gadget breaks (i.e. in
this case it doesn't get
appended to the blip) and yet I see no errors in the log.
Let me know if need more info.
Agustin.
On Oct 22, 2:14 am, Agustin Horischnik agu...@gmail.com wrote:
Gotcha. Yeah, I can see why is better for concurrency.
Thanks for your help.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 3:05 AM, pamela (Google Employee)
pamela...@gmail.com wrote:
For example, if you are storing the information about a shape
that a
participant just drew:
You could do:
delta = {'pamela.fox': {'color':'red','shape':'circle'}}
Or, you could do:
delta = {'pamela.fox-color': 'red'}
delta = {'pamela.fox-shape': 'circle'}
It may seem less elegant, but it is better in terms of
concurrency,
as it
means that I can independently change different properties.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Agustin Horischnik
agu
[Google Wave APIs] Re: How much data can I submit through submitDelta()?
ahhh I think what GH asked is what I wanted to know too...
my robot is sending data to gadget using submitdelta.
the data sending is unicode text like this way:
delta = {'surahcontent': u'\u0628\u0650\u0633\u0652\u0645\u0650
\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0651\u064e\u0647\u0650
\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0651\u064e\u062d\u0652\u0645\u064e
\u0670\u0646\u0650 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0651\u064e\u062d\u0650\u064a
\u0645\u0650 \ufd3f \u0661\ufd3e\u0627\u0644\u0652\u062d\u064e
\u0645\u0652\u062f\u064f \u0644\u0650\u0644\u0651\u064e\u0647\u0650
\u0631\u064e\u0628\u0651\u0650 \u0627\u0644\u0652\u0639\u064e
\u0627\u0644\u064e\u0645\u0650\u064a\u0646\u064e \ufd3f \u0662\ufd3e',
'surahtitle': u'Al-Faatiha - The Opening (1-2)', 'translations':
u' (1) In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.\n (2)
Praise be to Allah, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the worlds;\n'
most of the times the data is very long. This caused my gadget not
showing even though there's no error in the log.
On Oct 8, 6:11 am, Brian Kennish (Googler) byoo...@google.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:12 PM, GH gregjho...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to send a lot of data to a robot via a gadget through the
javascript api using the submitDelta() method (so through the gadget
state). What is the most data I can send through? Can I send more
data if I split it up into multiple key-value pairs?
Hey Greg, what I said during office hours was about right -- blip
contributors plus XML plus annotations can currently total 100K.
Gadget state doesn't have an independent limit, which makes it pretty
hard to predict whether your state pushes are going to succeed.
The total limit is something of an open question, though. If you have
a use case that suggests the limit is too low, submit a feature
request and help convince us.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Wave API group.
To post to this group, send email to google-wave-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-wave-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Google Wave APIs] Re: JSON from robot (python) to gadget the right way
Hi agustin,
here's the sample of some json I send to the gadget:
delta = {'surahcontent': u'\u0628\u0650\u0633\u0652\u0645\u0650
\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0651\u064e\u0647\u0650
\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0651\u064e\u062d\u0652\u0645\u064e
\u0670\u0646\u0650 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0651\u064e\u062d\u0650\u064a
\u0645\u0650 \ufd3f \u0661\ufd3e\u0627\u0644\u0652\u062d\u064e
\u0645\u0652\u062f\u064f \u0644\u0650\u0644\u0651\u064e\u0647\u0650
\u0631\u064e\u0628\u0651\u0650 \u0627\u0644\u0652\u0639\u064e
\u0627\u0644\u064e\u0645\u0650\u064a\u0646\u064e \ufd3f \u0662\ufd3e',
'surahtitle': u'Al-Faatiha - The Opening (1-2)', 'translations':
u' (1) In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.\n (2)
Praise be to Allah, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the worlds;\n'}
gadget.SubmitDelta(delta)
as u see the JSON I sending containing a long unicode strings, the
json above can successfuly show the gadget and show the content.
However when the delta above gets extremely long then it won't show
the gadget though no error in log file...
So I believe there's limit in the length of the delta that you can
send to gadget.
Teddy
On Oct 27, 4:02 am, Agustin Horischnik agu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Teddy, can you paste a few lines from your outgoing json containing the
strings you think could be causing the problem and maybe the bit of code
you're using to submit the delta and encode it?
I ended up using Pamela's suggestion but I'll be happy to try your code and
see if I find something.
Agustin.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Teddy Jasin jasin.te...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Agustin,
I think I'm also facing same issue with you.
in my case I'm sending data from the robot to the gadget also using
json, however my json data is arabic texts which is converted
unicode... so it become longer json strings.
the gadget will not show if the passed data is too long.
so I guess my json data is too big to be passed into the gadget.
anyone can help me in this?
On Oct 26, 7:17 pm, Agustin Horischnik agu...@gmail.com wrote:
Reporting back on serializing objects and submitting them as delta.
I tried again using simplejson and the result is what I described
earlier without explicitly encoding them: the gadget breaks (i.e. in
this case it doesn't get
appended to the blip) and yet I see no errors in the log.
Let me know if need more info.
Agustin.
On Oct 22, 2:14 am, Agustin Horischnik agu...@gmail.com wrote:
Gotcha. Yeah, I can see why is better for concurrency.
Thanks for your help.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 3:05 AM, pamela (Google Employee)
pamela...@gmail.com wrote:
For example, if you are storing the information about a shape that a
participant just drew:
You could do:
delta = {'pamela.fox': {'color':'red','shape':'circle'}}
Or, you could do:
delta = {'pamela.fox-color': 'red'}
delta = {'pamela.fox-shape': 'circle'}
It may seem less elegant, but it is better in terms of concurrency,
as it
means that I can independently change different properties.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Agustin Horischnik
agu...@gmail.comwrote:
Ah, got it. What was your experiencing with using simplejson? You
should
be
able to serialize that object and pass it through the delta. We
don't
have a
demo of that, but think it should work.
I don't remember but I'll re-try simplejson and report back.
You could also consider using more complex keys, like
viewerName-propertyName-subPropertyName, etc. That is a bit better
in
terms
of concurrency.
hmm... I'm not sure I get that... could you please give me an
example
whenever you have the time?
Agustin.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Wave API group.
To post to this group, send email to google-wave-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-wave-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Google Wave APIs] Re: JSON from robot (python) to gadget the right way
Hi Agustin,
I think I'm also facing same issue with you.
in my case I'm sending data from the robot to the gadget also using
json, however my json data is arabic texts which is converted
unicode... so it become longer json strings.
the gadget will not show if the passed data is too long.
so I guess my json data is too big to be passed into the gadget.
anyone can help me in this?
On Oct 26, 7:17 pm, Agustin Horischnik agu...@gmail.com wrote:
Reporting back on serializing objects and submitting them as delta.
I tried again using simplejson and the result is what I described
earlier without explicitly encoding them: the gadget breaks (i.e. in
this case it doesn't get
appended to the blip) and yet I see no errors in the log.
Let me know if need more info.
Agustin.
On Oct 22, 2:14 am, Agustin Horischnik agu...@gmail.com wrote:
Gotcha. Yeah, I can see why is better for concurrency.
Thanks for your help.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 3:05 AM, pamela (Google Employee)
pamela...@gmail.com wrote:
For example, if you are storing the information about a shape that a
participant just drew:
You could do:
delta = {'pamela.fox': {'color':'red','shape':'circle'}}
Or, you could do:
delta = {'pamela.fox-color': 'red'}
delta = {'pamela.fox-shape': 'circle'}
It may seem less elegant, but it is better in terms of concurrency, as it
means that I can independently change different properties.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Agustin Horischnik
agu...@gmail.comwrote:
Ah, got it. What was your experiencing with using simplejson? You
should
be
able to serialize that object and pass it through the delta. We don't
have a
demo of that, but think it should work.
I don't remember but I'll re-try simplejson and report back.
You could also consider using more complex keys, like
viewerName-propertyName-subPropertyName, etc. That is a bit better in
terms
of concurrency.
hmm... I'm not sure I get that... could you please give me an example
whenever you have the time?
Agustin.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Wave API group.
To post to this group, send email to google-wave-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-wave-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
