Re: JUnit 4 possible?
Please, review the following thread: http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/8f6f8fc47738b720?pli=1 On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 5:20 AM, Sekhar wrote: > Is it possible to use JUnit 4 in GWT 2? > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
NetBeans to eclipse
Dear All: i have created a GWT Project in NetBeans and now i need to move it to eclipse when i open it using eclipse it does not recognize it as a GWT project any help please ASAP -- ~~~With Regards~~~ Muhannad Dar-Nasser ~~Computer Systems Engineering~~ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
GWT-RPC iGoogle timing out requests
Dear all, I know there is an issue with using GWT-RPC with iGoogle sandbox as described in the issue http://code.google.com/p/gwt-google-apis/issues/detail?id=292 However using the workarounds suggested, I am using the 'makeRequest' method to POST to iGoogle. The problem I am facing is that iGoogle does not allow a long time for a response to be received. It sends a 504 Gateway Timeout response after like 5 seconds. How can i Handle this problem? Is this a security policy iGoogle is using? Should I send many small requests instead of a big one? Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Correct GWT 2.0 way to replace calls to deprecated StyleInjector.injectStylesheet and StyleInjector.setContents
try MyCssResource css = GWT.create(MyCssResource.class); css.ensureInjected(); http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/2.0/index.html?com/google/gwt/resources/client/CssResource.html On Dec 20, 8:33 pm, Dazza wrote: > I have an existing GWT project that uses > StyleInjector.injectStylesheet and StyleInjector.setContents from the > GWT Incubator. I have upgraded to GWT 2.0 and see that StyleInjector > is now an official GWT class. Unfortunately the two methods I am > using (injectStylesheet and setContents) are now deprecated and I am > not sure how best to replace their usage. > > On initial display of the page I call StyleInjector.injectStylesheet > to inject some CSS styles with values specific to the data displayed. > At a later point when I refresh the data I need to change the CSS > style values, so I call StyleInjector.setContents which replaces the > styles I originally created. I may end up replacing the CSS styles > thousands of times in the course of a user session. > > The none deprecated methods inject, injectAtStart and injectAtEnd do > not seem to do a replace. Is that correct? What am I supposed to do? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
UIBinder with dynamically created xml
Hi guys. I need to know that if I am generating xml string programmatically then how can I use UIBinder. Please help me with some source code. Regards Anees-ur-Rehman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Multiple domains from a single servlet container
I currently have a GWT app available to about 2 dozen clients. Each client has their own version of the app. That is to say they each have their own database running on their own tomcat context accessible by virtual domain. The codebase (both servlets and GWT front-end) are all the same. Though not strictly a GWT question, I would like to run all these domains on a single context/cluster for the sake of efficiency. However, each user would need to get to their data and their data only (perhaps filtered by domain name?). For instance, when I access my Google Apps domain I get only data from my domain and I'm quite sure google isn't running a separate servlet container for each domain. Can anyone point me in the right direction as far as book and/or web resources detailing best practices or how other companies are handling this? Thanks in advance. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT 2.0.0 module eval performance with IE6
I've looked at this in more detail and it is the clustering of the JavaScript to try to improve compression that is causing the problem. If I disable clustering the module eval step is 1.7 seconds faster. In addition the unclustered file compresses better than the clustered one. I've looked at other pages in the app and for the smaller pages (~500k) the clustered output compresses better and evaluates in about the same amount of time. For the largest page (~1.3M) the clustered output compresses worse and evaluates more slowly. More info if interested at http://development.lombardi.com/?p=1152 On Dec 20, 9:40 am, Alex wrote: > I don't think it's a big deal either, we get back the time with some > other improvements and have hopes for the direct eval GWT RPC changes. > I would like to understand what's going on though, the new compiler is > emitting something that's slower to parse, by quite a large amount, > than the new compiler. Thanks for pointing to reordering post, > interesting stuff. > > On Dec 20, 5:21 am, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > > > On Dec 20, 2:14 am, Alex wrote: > > > > I've noticed that the performance for the module eval (when the > > > javascript is initially parsed on page load) has decreased for IE6 > > > going from GWT 1.7.1 to GWT 2.0.0. I'm seeing about half a second > > > slowdown. > > > Seehttp://development.lombardi.com/?p=1150andhttp://development.lombardi...info. > > > Does anyone > > > have any information on why this might be before I go poking around to > > > try and find out? I've looked at the generated code and the order in > > > which items are defined has certainly changed. In GWT 1.7.1 all the > > > constants were defined first, in GWT 2.0.0 it looks like things are > > > defined in increasing size order. > > > The reordering is probably the side-effect > > of:http://timepedia.blogspot.com/2009/08/on-reducing-size-of-compressed > > Now, I don't know if it impacts eval time in IE6, and/or if that's the > > only thing that could explain the slowdown. > > > Despite targeting mostly IE6, I'm not too concerned about this > > slowdown, if that's the only slowdown happening in IE6 when moving to > > GWT 2.0. And runAsync might help in mitigating it by splitting the > > eval time. > > Thanks for the research and measures though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
DialogBox center broken in GWT 2.0
Hello, The Game Over dialog is not centered properly using the center method: http://dropzap.appspot.com Is there a workaround? Amir -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
How many calls to CreateAndBinUi() are possible?
Hi: In trying to work around issue 4374, I split one ui.xml into several pieces, each with its own class and ui.xml Now, I'm not getting logical events fired on widgets in those pieces. I get logical events fired on widgets in the "main" ui.xml Currently, the CreateAndBindUi gets called in the piece's constructor via gin. The widgets are instantiated and added to the DOM, but no checkbox or button click events get fired. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Correct GWT 2.0 way to replace calls to deprecated StyleInjector.injectStylesheet and StyleInjector.setContents
I have an existing GWT project that uses StyleInjector.injectStylesheet and StyleInjector.setContents from the GWT Incubator. I have upgraded to GWT 2.0 and see that StyleInjector is now an official GWT class. Unfortunately the two methods I am using (injectStylesheet and setContents) are now deprecated and I am not sure how best to replace their usage. On initial display of the page I call StyleInjector.injectStylesheet to inject some CSS styles with values specific to the data displayed. At a later point when I refresh the data I need to change the CSS style values, so I call StyleInjector.setContents which replaces the styles I originally created. I may end up replacing the CSS styles thousands of times in the course of a user session. The none deprecated methods inject, injectAtStart and injectAtEnd do not seem to do a replace. Is that correct? What am I supposed to do? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Problem of "Unable to determine my ip"
I had changed the hostname to localhost, and everything works fine now. Thank you again. By the war, my original hostname is something like this Xx.myDomain On Dec 19, 2:36 pm, darrell pfeifer wrote: > On Dec 16, 9:22 pm, Ji wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > I had problem on running GWT project. I use fedora 11 + > > eclipse3.5.1 ,when i run the GWT project, it throws a exception: > > "java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to determine myip", then Stopping > > AppEngine server. Could anybody help, thanks advance. > > I had the same problem. What are you using for a hostname? If it is > something specific, try changing the name to "localhost". > > Explanation: If you look at the GWT code in the stack trace when it > fails, the code is trying to resolve the hostname and failing. The > statement just before the failure does a specific check for localhost, > so you're just doing a workaround by changing the name to localhost. > > I haven't looked into why the specific hostname lookup fails. They > code is using standard Java library methods. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Any easy way to tell which file is for which permutation?
Alex's automated solution is probably the best solution, but you can also walk through a "Detailed"-compiled version of nocache.js and match it up to http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/UserAgent.gwt.xml (and any conditionals you've added) to see how each permutation is selected. Definitely not an "at-a-glance" process though. On Dec 20, 6:08 am, peterk wrote: > This looks really good Alex, I'll give it a try :) > > Thank you! > > On Dec 20, 1:04 am, Alex wrote: > > > > > I wrote a post about GWT linkers last year and that includes a linker > > that produces a manifest that shows which generated file goes with > > which set of properties, including user.agent. Take a look > > athttp://development.lombardi.com/?p=29tosee if it would help you out. > > > On Dec 19, 5:57 pm, peterk wrote: > > > > Actually...upon further testing I'm back to square one. > > > > Rather strangely it appears that the order listed in the compile > > > report is NOT the order in which the permutations are compiled. > > > > For example, the permutation for gecko 1_8 js is the 3rd file to be > > > created but is listed as permutation 7 in the compile report! > > > > Hmm. How confusing. It's like GWT is actively trying to prevent you > > > knowing which file is for which target :p Or is there some foolproof > > > way of finding which is which? > > > > Cheers! > > > > On Dec 19, 11:05 pm, peterk wrote: > > > > > Eep! Nevermind. > > > > > I found the -compileReport which shows which permutation number is for > > > > which client. Then sorting my files in create order reveals which > > > > relates to which permutation number...and thus which target. > > > > > A bit of a round-about way of doing it, and maybe there's an easier > > > > way, but this will do for now! > > > > > On Dec 19, 10:47 pm, peterk wrote: > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > Sorry if this is a silly question but.. > > > > > > ...as you all know, if you compile with a regular number of > > > > > permutations, you get a variety of javascript files for each of the > > > > > different target browers. They typically have very random names. > > > > > > I was just wondering is there any easy way to spot which file is for > > > > > which target? It'd be handy if each file had a comment at the top > > > > > telling you which target it's for, or if the target was in the > > > > > filename itself. > > > > > > For my app I need to do some hacking of the nocache.js file, which is > > > > > why knowing which permutations are for which targets would be helpful > > > > > to me... > > > > > > Thanks very much for any help! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT Gallery is down ? (for posting)
That's an issue with the gallery app that we've been meaning to fix. Your app was submitted, but the confirmation page is blank. We'll review and get back to you asap. On Dec 20, 2009 12:44 PM, "Keepeek-Force-1" wrote: Hi, We wanted our new product "Keepeek 360" on the GWT Gallery, but it doesn't work anymore (blank page when posting). Is there a new place to show success story based on GWT ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Possible to use GWT with Google Sites?
Hello, Is it possible to use GWT with Google Sites? It doesn't seem like it: http://groups.google.com/group/sites-help-suggestions/browse_thread/thread/5bc0fff5cd3ff4f8 Amir -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
GWT Gallery is down ? (for posting)
Hi, We wanted our new product "Keepeek 360" on the GWT Gallery, but it doesn't work anymore (blank page when posting). Is there a new place to show success story based on GWT ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Problem using rpc GWT2.0
Hi all
i just spent more than a whole day on this issue. Does somebody know why this
problem occurs?
I tried almost all solutions discussed on the internet. But nothing seems to
work.
here is my error message:
Type 'cm.bao.sms.ui.web.gwt.client.wrapper.BooleanWrapper' was not included in
the set of types which can be serialized by this SerializationPolicy or its
Class object could not be loaded. For security purposes, this type will not be
serialized.: instance = false
Since i used an instance of Boolean before, here the previous error message was
Type 'cm.bao.sms.ui.web.gwt.client.wrapper.Boolean' was not included in the set
of types which can be serialized by this SerializationPolicy or its Class
object could not be loaded. For security purposes, this type will not be
serialized.: instance = false
The Service method signature look like this;
public , V extends Serializable, D extends Serializable>
T execute(
Action action);
The Boolean Wrapper class definition:
public final class BooleanWrapper implements Serializable, IsSerializable {
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = -5103012029222801034L;
private boolean value;
public BooleanWrapper() {
super();
}
public BooleanWrapper(boolean v) {
this.value = v;
}
public boolean getValue() {
return value;
}
public String toString() {
return ""+ value;
}
}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT 2.0.0 module eval performance with IE6
I don't think it's a big deal either, we get back the time with some other improvements and have hopes for the direct eval GWT RPC changes. I would like to understand what's going on though, the new compiler is emitting something that's slower to parse, by quite a large amount, than the new compiler. Thanks for pointing to reordering post, interesting stuff. On Dec 20, 5:21 am, Thomas Broyer wrote: > On Dec 20, 2:14 am, Alex wrote: > > > I've noticed that the performance for the module eval (when the > > javascript is initially parsed on page load) has decreased for IE6 > > going from GWT 1.7.1 to GWT 2.0.0. I'm seeing about half a second > > slowdown. > > Seehttp://development.lombardi.com/?p=1150andhttp://development.lombardi...more > > info. Does anyone > > have any information on why this might be before I go poking around to > > try and find out? I've looked at the generated code and the order in > > which items are defined has certainly changed. In GWT 1.7.1 all the > > constants were defined first, in GWT 2.0.0 it looks like things are > > defined in increasing size order. > > The reordering is probably the side-effect > of:http://timepedia.blogspot.com/2009/08/on-reducing-size-of-compressed > Now, I don't know if it impacts eval time in IE6, and/or if that's the > only thing that could explain the slowdown. > > Despite targeting mostly IE6, I'm not too concerned about this > slowdown, if that's the only slowdown happening in IE6 when moving to > GWT 2.0. And runAsync might help in mitigating it by splitting the > eval time. > Thanks for the research and measures though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT 2.0 - com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.IsSerializable is mandatory again?
Hi all
i just spent more than a whole day on this issue. Do somebody why this
problem occurs?
I tried almost all solutions discussed on this thread. But nothing
seems to work.
here is my error message:
Type 'cm.bao.sms.ui.web.gwt.client.wrapper.BooleanWrapper' was not
included in the set of types which can be serialized by this
SerializationPolicy or its Class object could not be loaded. For
security purposes, this type will not be serialized.: instance = false
Since i used an instance of Boolean before, here the previous error
message was
Type 'cm.bao.sms.ui.web.gwt.client.wrapper.Boolean' was not included
in the set of types which can be serialized by this
SerializationPolicy or its Class object could not be loaded. For
security purposes, this type will not be serialized.: instance = false
The Service method signature look like this;
public , V extends Serializable, D extends
Serializable> T execute(
Action action);
The Boolean Wrapper class definition:
public final class BooleanWrapper implements Serializable,
IsSerializable {
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = -5103012029222801034L;
private boolean value;
public BooleanWrapper() {
super();
}
public BooleanWrapper(boolean v) {
this.value = v;
}
public boolean getValue() {
return value;
}
public String toString() {
return ""+ value;
}
}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: UIBinder @UiHandler does not work with Button
show your code nahum On 19 דצמבר, 17:47, Richard wrote: > Hi all, > > I've tried to create a simple GUI with a TextBox and a Button > inside a FlowPanel using UiBinder. I want to display an alert dialog > box when user clicks on the button. But nothing happen for both using > @UIHandler nor adding a ClickHandler directly on the button. Is it a > known bug or I'm wrong somewhere ? > > I use GWT 2.0 in development mode under eclipse with the GWT eclipse > plugin. > > Thanks, > Richard -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Use smartgwt or not
I haven't yet found the answer if I can use it or not. I think it's better to try using it and if I get any problem, I'll switch back to GWT only. On Dec 17, 2:15 pm, András Csányi wrote: > 2009/12/17azure: > > > Hi all, > > There are many gwt experienced developers in this group. I am starting > > a project and am in a dilemma where to use smartgwt or not. There are > > many advantages of using it (like filters/sorting in list grids etc). > > However I think there will be many problems later on (for example > > changing the design). Want to hear experienced people's voice. > > Unfortunately, I'm not a well experienced at gwt, yet. :) > Maybe you should take a look for ExtGwt (http://www.extjs.com/products/gxt/) > > -- > - - > -- Csanyi Andras --http://sayusi.hu-- Sayusi Ando > -- "Bízzál Istenben és tartsd szárazon a puskaport!".-- Cromwell -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
gwt and seam
hi i would like to start an application with seam and GWT(POJO in my business code and GWT instead of JSF in the web part) i used seam 2.2.0 and GWT 2.0 and eclipse (with GWT plugin) i start by creating the seam application and when i would like to see if i can compile it to a GWT application i couldn't ( MyGwtSeamis not a GWT project) i don't know how to start what should i do? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Use smartgwt or not
On Dec 4th keyboard_samurai wrote : "Hi, I am a newbie to GWT." http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/2d66440f4c6a59f/449f9401e2d4ddd4 To the original poster : Make sure you do your own research too. There are a lot of "newbies" on this board that love to give advise. Don't blindly follow it. We are using GWT alone but I know that Ext GWT is a real mess once you go beyond the samples and try to build a larger application. On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:02 PM, keyboard_samurai wrote: > I would agree on ext gwt .. Its faster and much better than smart gwt. > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: smart gwt help
how can u use the cache option u suggested ? On Dec 18, 2:53 pm, mariyan nenchev wrote: > In our host page specify what modules you want to use, unused images are not > loaded(just make your war(static content folder) bigger). The problem is > that smart gwt does not user spirtes and load every image every time(with > Not modified status, but this could be configured to be cached from the > browser?). > For better info look at the smart client's forum. There are many topics > about improvement and resource optimizing -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Any easy way to tell which file is for which permutation?
This looks really good Alex, I'll give it a try :) Thank you! On Dec 20, 1:04 am, Alex wrote: > I wrote a post about GWT linkers last year and that includes a linker > that produces a manifest that shows which generated file goes with > which set of properties, including user.agent. Take a look > athttp://development.lombardi.com/?p=29to see if it would help you out. > > On Dec 19, 5:57 pm, peterk wrote: > > > Actually...upon further testing I'm back to square one. > > > Rather strangely it appears that the order listed in the compile > > report is NOT the order in which the permutations are compiled. > > > For example, the permutation for gecko 1_8 js is the 3rd file to be > > created but is listed as permutation 7 in the compile report! > > > Hmm. How confusing. It's like GWT is actively trying to prevent you > > knowing which file is for which target :p Or is there some foolproof > > way of finding which is which? > > > Cheers! > > > On Dec 19, 11:05 pm, peterk wrote: > > > > Eep! Nevermind. > > > > I found the -compileReport which shows which permutation number is for > > > which client. Then sorting my files in create order reveals which > > > relates to which permutation number...and thus which target. > > > > A bit of a round-about way of doing it, and maybe there's an easier > > > way, but this will do for now! > > > > On Dec 19, 10:47 pm, peterk wrote: > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > Sorry if this is a silly question but.. > > > > > ...as you all know, if you compile with a regular number of > > > > permutations, you get a variety of javascript files for each of the > > > > different target browers. They typically have very random names. > > > > > I was just wondering is there any easy way to spot which file is for > > > > which target? It'd be handy if each file had a comment at the top > > > > telling you which target it's for, or if the target was in the > > > > filename itself. > > > > > For my app I need to do some hacking of the nocache.js file, which is > > > > why knowing which permutations are for which targets would be helpful > > > > to me... > > > > > Thanks very much for any help! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Non standard CSS in UiBinder
On Dec 20, 1:20 am, Alexander De Leon wrote: > If I use non standard css properties in UiBinder (e.g. > -moz-border-radius-bottomleft) , I get the following warnings : > > [WARN] Line 17 column 65: encountered "-". Was expecting one > of: "}" ";" > > and these properties are not compiled into the resulting CSS file. > > Is there a way around this? That's a known issue http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3595 with fortunately an easy workaround: use \-moz-border-radius- bottomleft. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT 2.0.0 module eval performance with IE6
On Dec 20, 2:14 am, Alex wrote: > I've noticed that the performance for the module eval (when the > javascript is initially parsed on page load) has decreased for IE6 > going from GWT 1.7.1 to GWT 2.0.0. I'm seeing about half a second > slowdown. > Seehttp://development.lombardi.com/?p=1150andhttp://development.lombardi.com/?p=1138for > more info. Does anyone > have any information on why this might be before I go poking around to > try and find out? I've looked at the generated code and the order in > which items are defined has certainly changed. In GWT 1.7.1 all the > constants were defined first, in GWT 2.0.0 it looks like things are > defined in increasing size order. The reordering is probably the side-effect of: http://timepedia.blogspot.com/2009/08/on-reducing-size-of-compressed.html Now, I don't know if it impacts eval time in IE6, and/or if that's the only thing that could explain the slowdown. Despite targeting mostly IE6, I'm not too concerned about this slowdown, if that's the only slowdown happening in IE6 when moving to GWT 2.0. And runAsync might help in mitigating it by splitting the eval time. Thanks for the research and measures though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: What does issue accepted means?
On Dec 20, 9:38 am, Ittai wrote: > Hi All, > I've recently run into a bug (Issue 2759 to be precise) and when I > found that it existed in the issue tracker I was very pleased only I > saw that it's status is accepted but the Milestone is 1_6_RC which > confused me. > Is it only a matter of workload which has this bug (and other bugs > which are just accpeptaed) delayed for 3 versions? (if so it is > understandable even if annoying) or is this bug just buried but not > rejected? http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/BugTriageProcess says: """Accepted, Started - for use by engineers per personal preference. No global meaning. Note that "Accepted" is not the same as being "Planned".""" The page is probably outdated but I don't think the overall process has changed much. > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2759 Re. this bug, I believe the resolution is just to document the behavior, not change it (see comment #2) I haven't checked but TabLayoutPanel might not have this issue, as it doesn't use a DeckPanel. And if you use a "raw" DeckPanel, well, its behaviour is so simple that you could re-implement it yourself. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Non GWT Project's Classes
Yes, you need to make the java source of you projects available at compile time. The easiest way is to create gwt.xml module in every non gwt project and add it in the gwt.xml in your gwt project. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
gwt-ckeditor V0.2
Hi, CKEditor's GWT wrapper gwt-ckeditor is released in 0.2 ; major changes : - Adding some options to configuration - Adding Save handling when the user click on the Save button - Fixing major issues on CKEditor and CKConfig classes Project : http://code.google.com/p/gwt-ckeditor/ Thank you in advance for every test / issue tracking. Damien -- Damien Picard Open Source BPM : http://code.google.com/p/osbpm -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
What does issue accepted means?
Hi All, I've recently run into a bug (Issue 2759 to be precise) and when I found that it existed in the issue tracker I was very pleased only I saw that it's status is accepted but the Milestone is 1_6_RC which confused me. Is it only a matter of workload which has this bug (and other bugs which are just accpeptaed) delayed for 3 versions? (if so it is understandable even if annoying) or is this bug just buried but not rejected? Thanks a lot Ittai http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2759&can=1&q=deckpanel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
