Re: Super dev mode - sourcemap not working anymore

[Martones]

Hi Thomas, thanks for your answer. 

Yes of course I did ! Tried this on several PCs even. I didnt install any 
new plugins to chrome either or what ever... Basicaly I didnt change 
anything since last time when Source maps worked. Now if I run my SDM I 
dont see any sources (even with CTRL+O shurtcut ). 

My chrome is in 26.0.1410.64 m and GWT 2.5.1. 

Thanks for your help

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

CSS

[Timothy Spear]

I am trying to understand the purpose and why GWT has made it so dam 
painful to implement CSS in GWT.

How is that for an opening line? :D

Based on the rather profuse rendered HTML, you are kinda directed down the 
path of UiBinder. Ok, I can kinda follow that. Docs not the best, but once 
you sorta figure it out, I can see how to apply it as a general set of 
rules. I can almost explain it to other developers.

Anyway, CSS files are a pain to maintain; as a result I and many others are 
used to splitting CSS files in many smaller files to facilitate 
maintenance. 
Further, the way the UiBinder works you have to replicate and repeat style 
elements to include them or use a complicated and obscure ClientBundle 
system which does not even work with the GWT Designer!
Not only is this tedious, but it replicates huge amounts of code, makes 
things harder to change.
As a last point, it overrides any generic styling I have applied across all 
elements. Body.

I have to be missing something. This seems like incredible overkill and 
there is no way I can explain all the linkages to junior developers who get 
to maintain code or assist on projects.

Tim

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: IE8 enormous memory consumption

[David]

Hi,

When you run IE8 in quirksmode GWT still reports that you are using ie6 and
as such overriding of ClippedImageImplIE6 still makes a difference.
(Assuming that your site is running in quirksmode and you use the Image
class). Otherwise you can indeed ignore this.

25% that is really terrible! I started at 10% and got down to 0% after
fiddling. I did not change the css directly, there is a method on the
Window classes available that allows you to remove the shadow. But ok, why
not :-)

Do you have some animated gifs in your application ?

David

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Borys Zibrov wrote:

> Thank you!
> We do not use IE6, so there was no point in overriding
> ClippedImageImplIE6. I switched off the shadows via overriding css file
> used by GXT Layer component appearance and memory went down like hundred
> megs or so (which is good, but not as good as can be), but the CPU usage is
> still constant and around 25% and everything renders not very fast at all :
> (
>
> вторник, 14 мая 2013 г., 16:17:55 UTC+3 пользователь stuckagain написал:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> IE8 consumes a lot of memory, especially in combination with GXT.
>>
>> GXT relies on opacity which is know to consume a lot of memory in IE8.
>> GWT uses of DXTransform to enable alpha blending for PNGs. In fact it
>> will even constantly consume CPU power when you use the Image class.
>> If you don't need IE6 support you could disable that trick. I know it
>> made a big difference in my application.
>>
>> If you write lots of recursive code then IE8 is also consuming a
>> ridiculous amount of memory. IE9 is a lot better, except that that one is
>> leaking in RPC due to a bug in JS eval, specifically to IE9 only.
>>
>> David
>>
>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Borys Zibrov wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, I now it is faster, I just wish there was something I could do
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 2:39:51 PM UTC+3, Jens wrote:

 IE8 is just a different beast than IE9. As IE9 is a lot faster than IE8
 I would guess they changed a lot internally and these changes also account
 for the memory difference you are seeing. IE9 is just more efficient than
 IE8.

 I think you cant really change anything about it but I would be happy
 if you can prove me wrong :-)

 -- J.

>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to google-web-toolkit+**unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To post to this group, send email to google-we...@**googlegroups.com.
>>>
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
>>> group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en
>>> **.
>>> For more options, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: IE8 enormous memory consumption

[Borys Zibrov]

Thank you!
We do not use IE6, so there was no point in overriding ClippedImageImplIE6. 
I switched off the shadows via overriding css file used by GXT Layer 
component appearance and memory went down like hundred megs or so (which is 
good, but not as good as can be), but the CPU usage is still constant and 
around 25% and everything renders not very fast at all : (

вторник, 14 мая 2013 г., 16:17:55 UTC+3 пользователь stuckagain написал:
>
> Hi,
>
> IE8 consumes a lot of memory, especially in combination with GXT. 
>
> GXT relies on opacity which is know to consume a lot of memory in IE8.
> GWT uses of DXTransform to enable alpha blending for PNGs. In fact it will 
> even constantly consume CPU power when you use the Image class.
> If you don't need IE6 support you could disable that trick. I know it made 
> a big difference in my application.
>
> If you write lots of recursive code then IE8 is also consuming a 
> ridiculous amount of memory. IE9 is a lot better, except that that one is 
> leaking in RPC due to a bug in JS eval, specifically to IE9 only.
>
> David
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Borys Zibrov 
> 
> > wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I now it is faster, I just wish there was something I could do
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 2:39:51 PM UTC+3, Jens wrote:
>>>
>>> IE8 is just a different beast than IE9. As IE9 is a lot faster than IE8 
>>> I would guess they changed a lot internally and these changes also account 
>>> for the memory difference you are seeing. IE9 is just more efficient than 
>>> IE8.
>>>
>>> I think you cant really change anything about it but I would be happy if 
>>> you can prove me wrong :-) 
>>>
>>> -- J.
>>>
>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com .
>> To post to this group, send email to 
>> google-we...@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> Visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Dom.setCapture(element) with mouse-over/out on other elements

[jandm]

Hello,

i am trying to improve panning support for our online map (see 
http://www.geomajas.org) by using the Dom.setCapture()/releaseCapture() 
methods. These methods allow to capture all mouse events while the panning 
is going on. This is good because it prevents unwanted behavior such as 
disruption of the panning when the mouse is moved outside the map area.
Unfortunately this also means that all other elements will no longer 
receive the events they have registered for. In my case, other controllers 
that do some useful activity, like showing the coordinates of the mouse 
pointer, will no longer receive the mouse-move events they have registered 
for. I could of course wrap all that functionality in my panning 
controller, but that would violate separation of concerns, especially since 
i have no way of knowing which controllers have registered at any time. The 
problem gets even worse with the more complex drag-and-drop like behavior 
that i need for online map editing. In this case i would like to register 
controllers to detect if the mouse is hovering over a certain element 
during the drag-and-drop cycle.

So my basic question is the following: is it possible to receive all events 
but still let those events propagate to their original sources ? I did 
examine the native preview method, but i don't know 1) if this approach is 
scalable and 2) how the native event can be forwarded to a normal handler 
without cloning it (i end up with a dead event) ?
Maybe be i missed some other obvious way of handling this, please let me 
know if this is the case.

Thanks,
Jan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Super dev mode - sourcemap not working anymore

[Thomas Broyer]

On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:24:15 AM UTC+2, Martones wrote:
>
> Hey again, any update on this please ? :)


Just to be sure: you enabled sourcemaps in Chrome, right?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: How can I integrate things like the twitter 'tweet button'?

[Thomas Broyer]

On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 11:18:48 AM UTC+2, Mohammad Al-Quraian wrote:
>
>  Hi Thomas,
>
> The ScriptInjector only works 1% of the times, however this:
>
> Document doc = Document.get();
>
> ScriptElement script = doc.createScriptElement();
>
> script.setSrc("http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";);
>
> script.setType("text/javascript");
>
> script.setLang("javascript");
>
> doc.getBody().appendChild(script);
>
> works 100%, do you have any idea why?
>

You mean

```java
ScriptInjector.fromUrl("http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";)
.setWindow(ScriptInjector.TOP_WINDOW)
.inject();
```

? or the one I gave earlier in this thread?
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: How to clear the tokens saved in history

[saida dhanavath]

Hello,

I think your problem is not really clear to me.  Activates and Places
enables you to track history with the help browser's native events.  You
can control, track and assign the things to tokens, I would say this
completely how you control the things programmatically in your application
code.


May be you can give some more details saying what are you trying to do and
home button




On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:55 PM, shray rawat  wrote:

> Hi Guys,
> In my application i am storing the history tokens when moving backward or
> forward .Activities and places have been used.
> There is a kind of form that need to be filled and when user clicks on
> submit the token is created and we navigate to a new place.
> The problem is when i am clicking on home button which takes me to the
> page from where i can enter into two different use-cases , the history
> tokens are not cleared.
> So my requirement is that when i click on home button and re-enter into my
> form page view then the tokens should be cleared , so that my current
> submit button press are able to form new tokens and back and forward button
> pick these new tokens and not the old ones.
>
>
> Regards.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>



-- 
Regards,
Saida Dhanavath

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

hash fragment gets dropped when some special characters are present (period, slash...)

[milan]

I'm getting some weird behavior with Activities&Places (GWT 2.4.0 and 
2.5.1), in FF 20/21/Chrome/Safari 6, both prod and dev mode. 

Here's an example:

with @Prefix("!contact") these two urls work just fine ('contact' place, 
token first empty then 'department'): 

http://127.0.0.1:/?gwt.codesvr=127.0.0.1:9997#!contact:

http://127.0.0.1:/?gwt.codesvr=127.0.0.1:9997#!contact:department 


but when I try to open: 


http://127.0.0.1:/?gwt.codesvr=127.0.0.1:9997#!contact:department/1


the url gets rewritten to:

http://127.0.0.1:/!contact:department/1


and the app goes to the default place (historyToken is empty) and there's a 
404 because !contact doesn't exist. Debugging this I get to 
c.g.g.user.client.impl.HistoryImpl.java#133 newItem() that is called with 
an empty historyToken so this happens before any tokenizers get called. The 
same happens when token contains period/dot (.) or question mark. Anyone 
seen this before? 

It's been known this can happen because of 3xx 
redirects,
 
but this is not the case here (then all fragments would be dropped). To be 
sure this is not the case, I tried this with a redirect: a simple filter to 
remove "index.html" so that 
127.0.0.1:/index.html?gwt.codesvr=127.0.0.1:9997#!downloads: 
gets redirected to 127.0.0.1:/?gwt.codesvr=127.0.0.1:9997#!downloads: and 
it works correctly. Inspecting HTTP requests under the hood also doesn't 
show any 3xx responses when hash gets dropped. 

Could this be a bug? 

regards,
Milan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: How can I integrate things like the twitter 'tweet button'?

[Mohammad Al Quraian]

 Hi Thomas,

The ScriptInjector only works 1% of the times, however this:

Document doc = Document.get();
ScriptElement script = doc.createScriptElement();
script.setSrc("http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";);
script.setType("text/javascript");
script.setLang("javascript");
doc.getBody().appendChild(script);

works 100%, do you have any idea why?


On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Thomas Broyer  wrote:

> On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 5:11:26 PM UTC+2, Mohammad Al-Quraian wrote:
>
> Wow that was easier than I expected. One question though, should I inject
>> the script at the beginning of the app or when I instantiate the presenter?
>> I'm expecting the code of the sharing provider to be accessed quite often.
>>
>> The script should be injected each time you add a new Anchor (attached to
> the doc!) so I'd say you should add it to your view's onAttach.
> If it works as well as the one for embedded tweets (which I've used on my
> blog a few times), and there's no reason it wouldn't, injecting the script
> multiple times shouldn't cause conflicts: it'll detect Anchors that have
> already been processed and will only process the others.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit/TjN9oGZlLag/unsubscribe?hl=en
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

How to clear the tokens saved in history

[shray rawat]

Hi Guys,
In my application i am storing the history tokens when moving backward or 
forward .Activities and places have been used.
There is a kind of form that need to be filled and when user clicks on 
submit the token is created and we navigate to a new place.
The problem is when i am clicking on home button which takes me to the page 
from where i can enter into two different use-cases , the history tokens 
are not cleared.
So my requirement is that when i click on home button and re-enter into my 
form page view then the tokens should be cleared , so that my current 
submit button press are able to form new tokens and back and forward button 
pick these new tokens and not the old ones.


Regards.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

How can we apply CSS3 style to a image in GWT 2.5

[VINEET MINJ]

Hi,
 I have posted my question in 
stackoverflow.
 
Please click on the hyperlink for the details.

Thanks in Adavance.
Vineet

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: why is my class not serializable?

[Dennis Haupt]

found the problem: one of the members of the class was implementing an
interface which extended serializable, but was not public. it was package
local. once i made it public, the compiler gave me useful errors again.


2013/5/15 Dennis Haupt 

> the problem is, the server side decides that the class is simply not
> serializable. it's not in the "serializables whitelist". where is this list
> created? maybe i can see why my class is skipped.
>
>
> 2013/5/15 Dennis Haupt 
>
>> i have created dummy methods in my remote interface that use them (both
>> parameter and return type) to make sure the compiler knows they have to be
>> serialized. this helped in another case, but not here.
>>
>>
>> 2013/5/14 Boris Lenzinger 
>>
>>> And you have already used them in rpc calls ? Sorry for those basic
>>> questions but it is to be sure that, before searching for complex things,
>>> simple one have been discarded.
>>> Le 14 mai 2013 17:59, "Dennis Haupt"  a écrit :
>>>
>>> yes, they are all serializable


 2013/5/14 Boris Lenzinger 

> Are they serializable ? Or is their implementation serialiazable ? Try
> to replace for test purpose with a string for instance to identify faulty
> fields.
> Le 14 mai 2013 17:54, "Dennis Haupt"  a écrit :
>
> does it matter if the fields are interfaces?
>>
>>
>> 2013/5/14 Dennis Haupt 
>>
>>> yes, the compiler can access them. i use the classes in an rpc call
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/5/14 Boris Lenzinger 
>>>
 Are the type of your fields available on the client side ?
 Le 14 mai 2013 17:40, "Dennis Haupt"  a
 écrit :

 the package the problematic class is in cannot access the gwt
> classes, so it must use serializable. but i have done this several 
> times
> now, it always worked. removing all fields fixed the problem.
> why doesn't the gwt complain about the fields at all, if they are
> the problem?
>
>
> 2013/5/14 Boris Lenzinger 
>
>> Consider also the interface other than serializable. It must be
>> somerhung around those things...
>> Le 14 mai 2013 17:31, "Dennis Haupt"  a
>> écrit :
>>
>> i'm removing fields step by step now (since it has only 3)
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/5/14 Boris Lenzinger 
>>>
 Did you try by just including step by step the class ? I mean
 just add an empty class and check if it is working. I know you 
 made a lot
 of classes so you are skilled. So I guess this is a silly problem. 
 Perhaps
 restarting from scratch may highlight the issue.
 Le 14 mai 2013 17:24, "Dennis Haupt"  a
 écrit :

 can i debug *why* the class is not included?
>
>
> 2013/5/14 Dennis Haupt 
>
>> please assume that i have already checked the dumb errors. i
>> have about 200 serializable classes here, so i know how it works
>> (usually...)
>> the error message is the one that says "not included in the
>> list of serializable types". i don't see how posting the code 
>> would help
>> without providing access to the complete project. it's just a 
>> class
>> implementing an interface which extends serializable with fields 
>> that are
>> all not final and all serializable.
>> can an interface prevent the class from being serializable?
>>
>>
>> 2013/5/14 Juan Pablo Gardella 
>>
>>> It does implement Serializable?
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/5/14 Dennis Haupt 
>>>
 i deactivated the rpc blacklist
 the class has a default contructor and no final fields
 is it directly used in an rpc method
 there is no error message during compilation

 i have no idea what the reason could be. any ideas?

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the
 Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
 from it, send an email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
 For more options, visit
 https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



>>>
>>>  --
>>> Yo

Re: Super dev mode - sourcemap not working anymore

[Martones]

Hey again, any update on this please ? :)

Many thanks,

Ludovit

Le lundi 6 mai 2013 15:37:26 UTC+2, Martones a écrit :
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm using 2.5.1 GA now and the problem still persists for me in Chrome. Is 
> there something else I missed ? :)
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Ludovit
>
> Le jeudi 17 janvier 2013 15:25:56 UTC+1, Guus Bloemsma a écrit :
>>
>> Until the new version is available:
>>
>> Make your own copy of com.google.gwt.core.linker.CrossSiteIframeLinker and 
>> uncomment this line:
>>  
>> //out.print("\n//@ sourceURL=0.js\n");
>> The sourceURL comment is there for a good reason but it screws up the 
>> latest chrome.
>>
>> Good luck, Guus
>>
>>
>>
>> Op donderdag 17 januari 2013 15:01:43 UTC+1 schreef Martones het volgende:
>>>
>>> Hi guys ! 
>>> My source maps doesn't seem to appear once I compile in SDM - Chrome. 
>>> Did chrome do some update that changed something ?
>>> It worked fine yesterday but now I cant see the sources in the Chrome 
>>> debug panel anymore. 
>>>
>>> Any ideas ? 
>>>
>>> Many thanks ! ;)
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.