Re: GWT UI Library: which one?

[Frank]

We started our project in Angular with bootstrap.
But after about 4 months we dropped in and re-started in GWT with Bootstrap 
3. The UI looks identical, but we are much better in programming in Java 
(this may be a personnal preference).

But don't use that GWT bootstrap link you posted. That is for bootstrap 2. 
There is also a bootstrap 3 wrapper 
--> https://github.com/gwtbootstrap3/gwtbootstrap3 (and a 
demo http://gwtbootstrap3.github.io/gwtbootstrap3-demo/snapshot/)
Also the bootstrap 2 wrapper isn't as good, used it in a project a few 
years back and it had quite a lot of problems. Bootstrap 3 wrapper is much 
better.



Op vrijdag 25 november 2016 08:26:31 UTC+1 schreef coderwurst:
>
> A screen shot showing how the modern UI looks like is my task, but the 
> examples that have been talked about so far look as if they are based on 
> Bootstrap - my idea is to mock something using GWT-Bootstrap (
> http://gwtbootstrap.github.io/) and compare this to a version with 
> Angular2 and Bootstrap-UI (https://angular-ui.github.io/bootstrap/)
>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: GWT UI Library: which one?

[coderwurst]

thanks for the tip Rodolfo! 

On Thursday, 24 November 2016 20:49:45 UTC+1, Rodolfo Raya wrote:
>
> GWT-Material gives GWT apps a very nice modern look. I don't know if it 
> qualifies as "wow".
>
> Regards,
> Rodolfo
>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: GWT UI Library: which one?

[coderwurst]

A screen shot showing how the modern UI looks like is my task, but the 
examples that have been talked about so far look as if they are based on 
Bootstrap - my idea is to mock something using GWT-Bootstrap 
(http://gwtbootstrap.github.io/) and compare this to a version with 
Angular2 and Bootstrap-UI (https://angular-ui.github.io/bootstrap/)

On Thursday, 24 November 2016 18:39:04 UTC+1, Kirill Prazdnikov wrote:
>
> Can you show screen how modern UI should look like ?
> Is there a Js library that renders a nice looking UI ?
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: GWT 2.8 generates code 14% bigger than GWT 2.7

[Jens]

> And why don't keep it experimental too in 2.8 instead of removing it?
>

Why keeping it if it's only half baked into GWT and you can run it 
externally as well? 

But I guess part of the reason to delete it is because GWT is in the 
process of cleaning itself up to move forward to GWT 3.0. Given that it is 
very likely that GWT 3.0 will be based on the upcoming J2CL compiler, you 
will probably need to run Closure Compiler manually as part of your build 
process (Gradle, Maven, whatever) anyways if you switch to GWT 3.0.

-- J.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: GWT UI Library: which one?

[Rodolfo Raya]

GWT-Material gives GWT apps a very nice modern look. I don't know if it
qualifies as "wow".

Regards,
Rodolfo

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:32 PM coderwurst  wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
>
> I am working on a research task to compare pros and cons of using GWT or
> Angular2 for the UI on our project; we currently have a GWT app and use
> standard GWT Widgits (
> http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/RefWidgetGallery.html) to make up
> the user interface. Ideally we want to avoid leaving GWT if possible, but
> the client wants a UI with more of a 'wow' factor.
>
> Can anyone tell me when the last time the GWT widgits were updated? Or is
> the best way to create a modern looking UI with GWT simply to use some of
> the libraries everyone has outlined here?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "GWT Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: GWT UI Library: which one?

[Kirill Prazdnikov]

Can you show screen how modern UI should look like ?
Is there a Js library that renders a nice looking UI ?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: GWT UI Library: which one?

[coderwurst]

> Hello,
>

I am working on a research task to compare pros and cons of using GWT or 
Angular2 for the UI on our project; we currently have a GWT app and use 
standard GWT Widgits 
(http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/RefWidgetGallery.html) to make up the 
user interface. Ideally we want to avoid leaving GWT if possible, but the 
client wants a UI with more of a 'wow' factor.

Can anyone tell me when the last time the GWT widgits were updated? Or is 
the best way to create a modern looking UI with GWT simply to use some of 
the libraries everyone has outlined here?

Thanks!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Announcing Dikalo

[Alain Ekambi]

We have a fork and a wrapper on top of Titanium mobile (
http://www.appcelerator.com/mobile-app-development-products/) that help us
write native mobile apps using GWT. With this approach we share most of the
code across platform.

Hopefully we get the chance to open source the pieces soon.



On 24 November 2016 at 17:24, Kirill Prazdnikov  wrote:

>
>
> and the native mobile clients. All GWT.
>>
>
> This sounds very good.
>
> How do you compile a GWT app to native app ?
> As far as I know GWT is Java -> JS compiler.
> How do you that translate JS to native ?
> Or do you execute Js in a native app ?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "GWT Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 

Alain Ekambi

Co-Founder

Ahomé Innovation Technologies

http://www.ahome-it.com/ 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Announcing Dikalo

[Kirill Prazdnikov]

and the native mobile clients. All GWT.
>

This sounds very good. 

How do you compile a GWT app to native app ?  
As far as I know GWT is Java -> JS compiler. 
How do you that translate JS to native ? 
Or do you execute Js in a native app ? 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: GWT 2.8 generates code 14% bigger than GWT 2.7

[Kirill Prazdnikov]

Hi,

I think you can
  - enable single permutation, single script linker
  - run the tool from maven build: apply gwt maven plugin, and then apply
required version of Closure Compiler



On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Óscar Frías Barranco 
wrote:
>
>
>> Do you plan to bring Closure Compiler (-XenableClosureCompiler option)
>>> back to GWT? It was very useful for us.
>>>
>>
>> No. It was experimental and had some rough edges that haven't been fully
>> implemented.
>>
>
>
> And why don't keep it experimental too in 2.8 instead of removing it?
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Announcing Dikalo

[Alain Ekambi]

yes. all of it is GWT. from the web client to the mobile web client, the
desktop clients  and the native mobile clients. All GWT.

Am 24.11.2016 3:52 PM schrieb "maticpetek" :

> Hi,
>   Have you use any of GWT?
> Regards,
>   Matic
>
> On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 11:41:06 PM UTC+1, Alain wrote:
>>
>> Hello folks
>>
>> Like some of you know  we ve been working on a messaging app and  I would
>> love to share with you what we have in mind.
>>
>> A messaging app ? Yet another one ? Knowing all the big names in the area
>> ?  may you think.
>>
>> We believe yes.
>>
>> Please read the motivation behind Dikalo and let us know what you think.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Alain
>>
>>
>> https://medium.com/@Ekambos/announcing-dikalo-acac835ec281#.1d6rc51xl
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "GWT Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Announcing Dikalo

[maticpetek]

Hi,
  Have you use any of GWT?
Regards,
  Matic

On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 11:41:06 PM UTC+1, Alain wrote:
>
> Hello folks
>
> Like some of you know  we ve been working on a messaging app and  I would 
> love to share with you what we have in mind.
>
> A messaging app ? Yet another one ? Knowing all the big names in the area 
> ?  may you think.
>
> We believe yes.
>
> Please read the motivation behind Dikalo and let us know what you think.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alain
>
>
> https://medium.com/@Ekambos/announcing-dikalo-acac835ec281#.1d6rc51xl
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: GWT 2.8 generates code 14% bigger than GWT 2.7

[Óscar Frías Barranco]

> Do you plan to bring Closure Compiler (-XenableClosureCompiler option)
>> back to GWT? It was very useful for us.
>>
>
> No. It was experimental and had some rough edges that haven't been fully
> implemented.
>


And why don't keep it experimental too in 2.8 instead of removing it?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: GwtMaterialDesign vs gwt-polymer-elements

[Kirill Prazdnikov]

>
>
> 4. Future-proofing regarding GWT 3.0, using only JS-Interop with no widgets
>

And no JSNI ? 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: GWT 2.8 generates code 14% bigger than GWT 2.7

[Kirill Prazdnikov]

Do you have performance measurements ? 
Did the performance better for 2.7 ?  
Did you measured real transfer traffic (web server supports real-time GZ 
compression over HTTP) ?

Thanks

On Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 3:46:49 PM UTC+3, Óscar Frías Barranco 
wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> We are trying to move our website from GWT 2.7 to 2.8 but we have found 
> that GWT 2.8 generates code which is significantly heavier.
>
> For example, these are the sizes for one of the permutations:
> GWT 2.7 + Closure Compiler:  590 KB
> GWT 2.7 without Closure Compiler:  664 KB
> GWT 2.8 (no Closure Compiler available):  674 KB
>
> So the difference between 2.7 and 2.8 is +14% code size.
>
> We would like to keep our site up to date with the last version of GWT but 
> we don't like increasing our website code in this manner because it means 
> higher downloads, higher waiting times, worse user experience, etc.
>
> Do you plan to bring Closure Compiler (-XenableClosureCompiler option) 
> back to GWT? It was very useful for us.
>
> Kind regards,
> Oscar
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: GWT 2.8.0 compile warnings

[Kirill Prazdnikov]

On Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 12:13:23 AM UTC+3, Jens wrote:
>
>  Also try deleting your gwt-unitCache. 
>

This helps for our case many times per day. 
Even more we have a special single-button-task in IDEA that clears all 
gwt-unitCache(es) and this really helps in compilation and debugging.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: GWT 2.8 generates code 14% bigger than GWT 2.7

[Jens]

> Do you plan to bring Closure Compiler (-XenableClosureCompiler option) 
> back to GWT? It was very useful for us.
>

No. It was experimental and had some rough edges that haven't been fully 
implemented.

You would need to execute it manually using the GWT output as input to 
Closure Compiler (and provide an extern file to protect special GWT 
variables). Alternatively try build your own GWT SDK and rollback the 
commit that removed closure compiler from GWT.

-- J.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

GWT 2.8 generates code 14% bigger than GWT 2.7

[Óscar Frías Barranco]

Hi.

We are trying to move our website from GWT 2.7 to 2.8 but we have found 
that GWT 2.8 generates code which is significantly heavier.

For example, these are the sizes for one of the permutations:
GWT 2.7 + Closure Compiler:  590 KB
GWT 2.7 without Closure Compiler:  664 KB
GWT 2.8 (no Closure Compiler available):  674 KB

So the difference between 2.7 and 2.8 is +14% code size.

We would like to keep our site up to date with the last version of GWT but 
we don't like increasing our website code in this manner because it means 
higher downloads, higher waiting times, worse user experience, etc.

Do you plan to bring Closure Compiler (-XenableClosureCompiler option) back 
to GWT? It was very useful for us.

Kind regards,
Oscar

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.