Re: Eclipse plugin for Eclipse 3.5 (Galileo)
Well done everybody!!! We can crack open the champaigne! 3.5 plugin is out!!! On 29 Jul, 17:05, petB wrote: > On Jul 28, 10:14 pm, Juraj Vitko wrote: > > > If you know anything about software development, then you know that > > any and all development time estimation is just a wild guess. > > It is still a good practice to provide release estimates, whatever > imprecise. > > I just finished one (not web oriented) project and would like to start > a new one with GWT. I need to decide if to instal Eclipse 3.5 and wait > for GWT plugin or go with Eclipse 3.4. As I want to read some > literature before, waiting a week or more is not a problem. Not > having this information, downgrading Eclipse to 3.4 and then upgrading > it again within few days would be annoying. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Eclipse plugin for Eclipse 3.5 (Galileo)
Just to clarify a few things: 1. I demand absolutely nothing and I have nothing but high regard for the coders at google who develop the gwt framework. 2. I have no project on hold for lack of the plugin. I was simply wanting to test it on Galileo, see how well it works. 3. My earlier comment was in regard to expectations of delivery that have been given. 4. I use the GWT framework, and I also promote it and help others around me use it. 5. Being branded by Mr. Isaac as someone who rudely seats back and yells is utterly offensive to me. I am sure those comments cannot come from someone who has any regard for the comunity of developers that help GWT grow. On 27 Jul, 16:31, Isaac Truett wrote: > None of the plugin developers has made an announcement or offered a > release date. They have responded to questions from anxious developers > eager to see the new version by offering their own hopes or > expectations for delivery. That's more then you get from many > projects, partially for the very reason we see here: when those > aspirations aren't met, people who interpreted them as official > commitments start complaining. > > I shouldn't have to haul out my soap box here. Have a little patience > and put this in perspective. You are not paying customers and no one > here is under any obligation to you. If you want hard delivery dates > and commitments, get out your checkbook and see if anyone bites. A > polite "how's that coming along" inquiry is, I would think, an > appreciated sign of community interest. But if you want to sit in the > back seat and yell "are we there yet" at the drivers, either accept > that "soon" is a valid answer or, if you're lucky enough to get > something more precise, understand that it's somebody sticking their > neck out trying to be helpful. > > Go back to enjoying your free lunches. When dessert arrives, it will > be announced. > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Gugas wrote: > > > Not to defend dependency on the plugin, but the fact is that gwt > > coders keep saying that it will be out very shortly and this has kept > > a good number of us hanging. > > I understand that the realease has been delayed because quality comes > > first, as it should, but it would show a bit more professionalism if > > gwt stopped making announcements for "the end of the week" and only > > come up with a date when they are sure of it. > > Best reagrds > > > On 26 Jul, 18:54, Isaac Truett wrote: > >> It certainly is unfortunate that you would be delaying your project > >> because of a single convenience plugin. I would recommend that you > >> strive for more self-sufficiency and less sense of entitlement. > > >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:57 PM, SuperEva wrote: > > >> > So...just curious...when will the plugin be ready. Some of us have > >> > been waiting over a month. It is very unfortunate the way this is > >> > delaying our project. Do you recommend we move back to 3.4 Eclipse or > >> > turn elsewhere for solutions? Or is the fix really gonna come within > >> > the next week? > > >> > Appreciate a quick response, > >> > Eva > > >> > On Jul 23, 10:35 am, Miguel Méndez wrote: > >> >> Don't worry. Release 1.1 of the plugin will support Eclipse 3.3, 3.4 > >> >> and > >> >> 3.5. However, we are considering deprecating support for Eclipse 3.3 > >> >> in the > >> >> 1.2 release of our plugin. > > >> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Yaakov > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > Hi Rajeev, > > >> >> > You guys are still going to support the version for Eclipse 3.4, > >> >> > right? > > >> >> > I am just hoping that you guys don't forget that not everyone can be > >> >> > Google Wave and code against a constantly (and very rapidly) moving > >> >> > platform. > > >> >> > Thanks, > >> >> > Yaakov. > > >> >> > On Jul 22, 11:46 am, Rajeev Dayal wrote: > >> >> > > Hi, > >> >> > > Yes, this has taken longer than expected, but we're now on the > >> >> > > finishing > >> >> > > touches. We should have something out there within the week. > > >> >> > > Thanks, > >> >> > > Rajeev > > >> >> > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Nik wrote: > > >> >> > > > We're now heading towards months, not
Re: Eclipse plugin for Eclipse 3.5 (Galileo)
Not to defend dependency on the plugin, but the fact is that gwt coders keep saying that it will be out very shortly and this has kept a good number of us hanging. I understand that the realease has been delayed because quality comes first, as it should, but it would show a bit more professionalism if gwt stopped making announcements for "the end of the week" and only come up with a date when they are sure of it. Best reagrds On 26 Jul, 18:54, Isaac Truett wrote: > It certainly is unfortunate that you would be delaying your project > because of a single convenience plugin. I would recommend that you > strive for more self-sufficiency and less sense of entitlement. > > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:57 PM, SuperEva wrote: > > > So...just curious...when will the plugin be ready. Some of us have > > been waiting over a month. It is very unfortunate the way this is > > delaying our project. Do you recommend we move back to 3.4 Eclipse or > > turn elsewhere for solutions? Or is the fix really gonna come within > > the next week? > > > Appreciate a quick response, > > Eva > > > On Jul 23, 10:35 am, Miguel Méndez wrote: > >> Don't worry. Release 1.1 of the plugin will support Eclipse 3.3, 3.4 and > >> 3.5. However, we are considering deprecating support for Eclipse 3.3 in > >> the > >> 1.2 release of our plugin. > > >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Yaakov wrote: > > >> > Hi Rajeev, > > >> > You guys are still going to support the version for Eclipse 3.4, > >> > right? > > >> > I am just hoping that you guys don't forget that not everyone can be > >> > Google Wave and code against a constantly (and very rapidly) moving > >> > platform. > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Yaakov. > > >> > On Jul 22, 11:46 am, Rajeev Dayal wrote: > >> > > Hi, > >> > > Yes, this has taken longer than expected, but we're now on the > >> > > finishing > >> > > touches. We should have something out there within the week. > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Rajeev > > >> > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Nik wrote: > > >> > > > We're now heading towards months, not weeks. > >> > > > Any progress? > > >> > > > On Jun 25, 10:17 pm, Alex Rudnick wrote: > >> > > > > If you enjoyed this thread, you may also like these: > >> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/threa.. > >> > .. > >> > > > .. > > >> > > > > We're working on it *right now*, rest assured! > > >> > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Rob Tanner > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > When will a version of the plugin be released for Eclipse 3.5 (or > >> > can > >> > > > > > I simply use the version for 3.4). I would like to use the new > >> > > > > > Eclipse, but GWT has become one of my main tools. > > >> > > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > > Rob > > >> > > > > -- > >> > > > > Alex Rudnick > >> > > > > swe, gwt, atl > > >> -- > >> Miguel- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
