Re: What's a good graph/chart library
I would suggest using JFreeChart serverside. It's pretty straight forward and as far as I know there is no JS-based charting component that has the same range of capabilities. But then again, if you are only looking to do dual y axis and multiple types then there might be something out there that does exactly that. n. On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:30 PM, darkling wrote: > I'm looking to build charts for my current application. These charts > aren't incredibly complex but they do have 2 Y axises and require me > to do a mix of bar and line graphs on a single chart. Basically the > left Y axis should represent the line graph while the right y axis > should present the bar graph. CAn anyone recommend a good library or > subsytem that will do this for GWT? > Thanks > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > > -- --- Ave bossa nova, similis bossa seneca -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Google Chrome Frame & GWT
Yep. Thanks. On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:39 AM, PhillipB wrote: > > Using Chrome Frame with GWT is discussed on the GWT blog... > > http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/2009/09/delivering-faster-richer-gwt.html > > I think it will answer your question. > > /PhillipB > > > -- --- Ave bossa nova, similis bossa seneca --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Google Chrome Frame & GWT
So here comes Google Chrome Frame. A brilliant idea and sorely needed by IE.(if you don't know what it is then: http://code.google.com/chrome/chromeframe/ ) Ok. So IE will be running content as if it was chrome based on a tag in the page. How do we deal with that? I am sure there are multiple strategies but someone has probably thought of some very smart way of doing this and I am too lazy to come up with one. BR Niklas Derouche -- --- Ave bossa nova, similis bossa seneca --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Flash with GWT
wmode = opaque does the trick in some situations. you need to add it both as a param and in the embed though. n. On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:28 PM, ping2ravi wrote: > > Hi All, > I have a web page where i am using Flash and GWT both, i am using > GWT's popup thing. > Non flash screen part of the page shows the popup correctly but the > screen part where flash is, it hides the popup under it. I can see > that the potion of popup which should be on the top of Flash part is > hidden and the otehr part is visible as there is no flash on that > part. > > I remember that in JS/CSS we used to use z-index kind of this to make > such ordering of JS object, but how to do that with flash. > > Any comments/Suggestion? > > > -- --- Ave bossa nova, similis bossa seneca --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: about GWT compiler performance
Well, for me it only generates the IE version and the time is down to about 40 percent. clean out the www folder before the compile perhaps? n. On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Pham Tran Quoc Viet < phamtranquocv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi,Great. That went through without error. How do you verify if only ie6 > version is created? I looked at the www folder and saw a bunch of html files > whose names are some_random_number.html > > The time it took to compile did not seem to improve either. Thanks. > > Viet Pham > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Niklas Derouche wrote: > >> Hi, >> try: >> >> >> >> >> >> if you see what I mean. >> >> n. >> >> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Pham Tran Quoc Viet < >> phamtranquocv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I followed the advise in this thread and added the following to my >>> module.gwt.xml: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ... >>> >>> ... >>> >>> ... >>> >>> >>> I got this error: >>> [ERROR] Property 'user.agent' not found >>> [ERROR] Failure while parsing XML >>> >>> Any ideas? Thanks. >>> Viet Pham >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 12:10 AM, surfer wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> many many thanks >>>> using >>>> the time of compilation fell down from 3':10" to 1':37" >>>> >>>> Lorenzo >>>> >>>> On 8 Nov, 02:13, "Ian Petersen" wrote: >>>> > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 6:06 PM, surfer >>>> wrote: >>>> > > since often the main development of an application is viewed and >>>> > > debugged with one single type of browser and only sometimes verified >>>> > > on the others, does anybody know if it's possible to force GWT >>>> > > compiler to build javascript code for just one single target >>>> browser, >>>> > > in order to increase compiling phase performance ? >>>> > >>>> > Yes it's possible. The answer lies behind this link: >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/search?group=Google. >>>> .. >>>> > >>>> > Ian >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> --- >> Ave bossa nova, similis bossa seneca >> >> >> > > > > -- --- Ave bossa nova, similis bossa seneca --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: about GWT compiler performance
Hi, try: if you see what I mean. n. On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Pham Tran Quoc Viet < phamtranquocv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I followed the advise in this thread and added the following to my > module.gwt.xml: > > > > > > ... > > ... > > ... > > > I got this error: > [ERROR] Property 'user.agent' not found > [ERROR] Failure while parsing XML > > Any ideas? Thanks. > Viet Pham > > > > On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 12:10 AM, surfer wrote: > >> >> many many thanks >> using >> the time of compilation fell down from 3':10" to 1':37" >> >> Lorenzo >> >> On 8 Nov, 02:13, "Ian Petersen" wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 6:06 PM, surfer >> wrote: >> > > since often the main development of an application is viewed and >> > > debugged with one single type of browser and only sometimes verified >> > > on the others, does anybody know if it's possible to force GWT >> > > compiler to build javascript code for just one single target browser, >> > > in order to increase compiling phase performance ? >> > >> > Yes it's possible. The answer lies behind this link: >> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/search?group=Google... >> > >> > Ian >> >> > > > > -- --- Ave bossa nova, similis bossa seneca --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT-ext or ext-GWT?
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Arthur Kalmenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > I disagree, you don't need any exotic graphic needs to use GWT. If you > want a good, functional and quick web application, you use GWT. If you > want a hard to maintain, buggy and poorly (if at all) tested, slow as > a snail but a nice shiny turd of a web application, you use Ext GWT. > So let me see if I understod you correctly; you don't like Ext GWT? Seriously, not liking stuff is fine. It's more than fine as far as I am concerned. I wish you all the best in your future endeavours and sometime down the line when you have spent more than a year or two in the workplace post your degree you may find that you start making choices based on pragmatic weighing of pros and cons and where your design ideals may take the backseat to cost and time-to-market factors. Your mileage will vary. n. -- I've had a wonderful time but this wasn't it. Groucho Marx --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Ext GWT
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Michi_de <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I wanted to add a clickListener to the button and then start a method.
> Symple as it is in GWT. In Ext GWT i just cant do anything.
>
createButton.addListener(new ButtonListenerAdapter(){
public void onClick(Button button, EventObject eventObject){
//do your stuff
}
});
That's it.
n
--
I've had a wonderful time but
this wasn't it.
Groucho Marx
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Who are using jcifs for NTLM authentication
Ok, I know a lot of people here are doing some form of authentication and some are doingNTLM because they reside within an enterprise framework that requires them to do so. After getting a bit tired of dealing with jcifs (and the reasonably large amounts of configuration one had to do to be able to get it working properly) I constructed a simpler (although less portable) solution. Right now I am trying to figure out whether it's worth the time to actually clean it up to the point where someone else can use it or if I should let it rest in piece inside my own codebase. Let me know. And if you want to build your own - look to JNA and the secur32.dll in newer (i.e. Windows 2000 and later) Windows versions. AcceptSecurityContext is your friend. It's not exactly hard, the most complex part is getting the Structs mapped out properly. n. -- I've had a wonderful time but this wasn't it. Groucho Marx --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: File write not working
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks Lothar, > > I am talking about server side code here, because the client would > anyway not support writing files. > Problem is how do I view this stack trace of the error . > Where can I view the stack trace. > Any pointers to how to view the stack trace. > WAG: the user running the application/service does not have the appropriate permissions. I run into this every once in a while in deployments. I n. -- I've had a wonderful time but this wasn't it. Groucho Marx --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
