Re: HTML5 innershiv
I very much appreciate this and apologies for going silent on the issue. I believe that I made all the changes indicated by steps #1, #2 and #3 above, my issue is how and where to include the innerShiv function. should the innerShiv function be included somewhere in the GWT source? I could not pick an appropriate place. should the innerShiv function be included as part of my project? should the GWT source reference it as $wnd.innerShiv()? my attempts were unsuccessful and frustrating, mainly due to IE throwing an exception and the debugging experience not being up to scratch. the major issue seemed to revolve around core/client/impl/ Impl.java and the entry0() function. my guess would be that GWT is unhappy with how innerShiv() is being defined and called. all in all, it looks like a great solution, I just can't get the implementation right. On Oct 22, 2:45 pm, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 oct, 20:15, davidroe roe.da...@gmail.com wrote: bump I guess a better way of phrasing the question is how should a GWT project render HTML5 tags for all browsers knowing that one of those browsers could be IE? this is achievable using html5shiv, but not when the HTML is dynamic this is also achievable using innerShiv, when you have control over the dynamic process any thoughts on how this could be used with UiBinder? One possibility (that would work with *and* without UiBinder) would be to: 1. change c.g.g.dom.client.Element so that setInnerHTML calls DOMImpl (similar to getInerHTML)http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/trunk/user/... 2. implement setInnerHTML in DOMImpl the same as it is today in Element 3. override setInnerHTML it in DOMImplTrident to use innerShiv. Steps #1 and #2 means patching GWT (classpath override is fortunately enough), but maybe the patch could be included in GWT proper in the next version, just to make #3 possible. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: HTML5 innershiv
bump I guess a better way of phrasing the question is how should a GWT project render HTML5 tags for all browsers knowing that one of those browsers could be IE? this is achievable using html5shiv, but not when the HTML is dynamic this is also achievable using innerShiv, when you have control over the dynamic process any thoughts on how this could be used with UiBinder? On Oct 14, 4:47 pm, davidroe roe.da...@gmail.com wrote: A problem: html5shiv allows you to use HTML5 markup in IE, but the approach does not work with dynamic content. Seehttp://code.google.com/p/html5shiv/ A solution: innerShiv is a function which takes your HTML string, adds it to a hidden document-appended element in IE, and returns an IE-safe document fragment or collection. Seehttp://jdbartlett.github.com/innershiv/ Can anyone comment on whether this can be used as part of a GWT project where HTML5 markup is defined using UiBinder? Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
HTML5 innershiv
A problem: html5shiv allows you to use HTML5 markup in IE, but the approach does not work with dynamic content. See http://code.google.com/p/html5shiv/ A solution: innerShiv is a function which takes your HTML string, adds it to a hidden document-appended element in IE, and returns an IE-safe document fragment or collection. See http://jdbartlett.github.com/innershiv/ Can anyone comment on whether this can be used as part of a GWT project where HTML5 markup is defined using UiBinder? Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: IE7,IE8 clicking #fragmented links does not call the history listener
I can remember a similar situation on a project where links like a
href=#topic1topic1/a misbehaved in IE and were substituted for
something like a href=# onclick=addHistory('token1'); return
falsetopic1/a
HTH,
/dave
On May 24, 10:39 pm, Rares rares@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have a burning problem and I am as always running out of time.
We are using GWT 2.0.3 to generate a page (/site.htm) that has links
inside like this /site.htm#/topic/1 or /site.htm/group/1 and so forth.
In IE7 and 8 only clicking one of those links only changes the URL of
the browser but does not actually do the navigation. (Again,
everything works fine in all the other browsers. Damn you MS$ !).
Has anyone encountered this problem? Could you please point me towards
a fix? I've searched the web for similar reports but found nothing.
Thank you in advance,
Rares
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: UIBinder and CSS resources obfuscation
there was a time when I was also looking for this and was unable to find the answer. pls report back to the group if you come across the solution. thanks. On Apr 14, 4:09 am, david.herv...@gmail.com david.herv...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the reply but I've already tried this solution but as I have mentionned in my first post, it prefix all css class with the package name in which the css is place. I will have a look in Resources.gwt.xml. On Apr 13, 11:16 pm, Sripathi Krishnan sripathikrish...@gmail.com wrote: See the file Resources.gwt.xml .. It has a bunch of properties that you can specify to control how CSS is generated.. I haven't tried it, but putting this in your module.gwt.xml should do the trick. set-configuration-property name=CssResource.style value=pretty / --Sri On 13 April 2010 13:32, david.herv...@gmail.com david.herv...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I'm currently searching around the web to found out how to tell UIBinder not to perform obfuscation (at-all) on css class. I've read codes samples in which it is tell to put inside the .gwt.xml the property CssResource.obfuscationPrefix to empty. But the css class name doesn't have any links with original name. I've tried to combined with the CssResource.style to pretty but the css class are still prefixed with the package name in which the css resources are located. Prefixing each class with @external in css is some kind of solution, but doing it for all class in all css I want to test is not a real solution. So, my question is : Is there any options for telling UIBinder not to obfuscate css class ? (like a global @external) Thanks in advance -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs cr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Scroll techniques for mobile phones
If you disable the zooming capabilities of the viewport, very tall panels should be scrolled by the OS. On Mar 24, 11:18 pm, Sekhar sek...@allurefx.com wrote: How are folks (or is anyone) doing page scrolls for GWT apps on mobile phones? I'm having a bad time getting things going on say Android. E.g., the scroll bar doesn't appear at all (either with ScrollPanel or with a overflow: scroll CSS setting). Similarly, the handlers are just not picking up mouse events like mouse-move consistently. Ideal would be to simulate the native app behavior like the page scrolls up/down with gestures or mouse drags, but anything similar would help too. Please share your experiences and workarounds. As web based apps become popular on Android/iPhone/etc., we have to make GWT work reliably on mobile. I'm building a web version of an Android with GWT, and it's working well otherwise, and I'm pretty excited. I'd appreciate any help/direction you can give to fix the scrolling issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: UI Binder and MVP
the examples of the mvp4g project seem to mix MVP and UiBinder well. http://code.google.com/p/mvp4g/ On Mar 24, 10:57 am, skippy a...@2lehmans.com wrote: I am using the UI Binder to build a site. I like the MVP design pattern shown in the contacts example. However, when I try to put the ui binder in a view and have the appControler construct the presenter I get a blank page when ask for asWidget. I think this is because both the MCP entry point and the UI Binder creates a RootPanel. An thoughts on this topic? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: UiBinder with background-image and ImageResource
yes, sorry, I missed that line.
StyleInjector.inject(Resources.INSTANCE.whateverCss().getText(),true);
On Mar 14, 4:04 pm, Michael michael.guy...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah... simply calling the .ensureInjected method from the EntryPoint is
enough - got it. Thanks!
Mike
On Mar 14, 10:46 pm, MH mhaligow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Found the solution. The problem is that the style is _not_ injected. I
solved this by adding the proper ensureInjected in the widget's class.
2010/3/14 Michael michael.guy...@gmail.com
I've also tried this approach and while the CSS is compiled and the
obfuscated selector-name is used in the generated HTML, the the
selector definition is not included in the page. You could access the
definition by calling the .getText() method of the generated
ClientBundle implementation - but surely GWT should do the inclusion
for you?
On Mar 11, 8:30 am, MH mhaligow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well, the problem does not seem to be the image.
The CssResource interface I wrote is compiled properly, the XML I made
for
thew widget works fine as well. It look like if the ui:with does not
throw
ensureInjected or something. The styles are applied, but they are empty.
Regards,
mh
2010/3/11 davidroe roe.da...@gmail.com
I forgot this part - does that help?
�...@source(com/whoever/client/resources/myImage.png)
public ImageResource myImage();
On Mar 10, 2:16 pm, MH mhaligow...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm afraid this one does not work for me.
I did exactly as mentioned, and my widget seems to be not using
style
at
all. Shall I also add anything to the class itself?
2010/3/10 davidroe roe.da...@gmail.com
this is how I did it.
in whatever.css:
@sprite .myClass {
gwt-image: myImage;
width: auto; height: auto;
background-repeat: repeat;
background-position: 0% 0%;
}
in Resources.java:
public interface Resources extends ClientBundle {
...
public interface WhateverCss extends CssResource {
String myClass();
}
�...@source(com/whoever/client/resources/whatever.css)
public WhateverCss whateverCss();
}
in WhateverClass.ui.xml:
ui:with field=res
type=com.whoever.client.resources.Resources
/
div class={res.whateverCss.myClass}
HTH,
/dave
On Mar 10, 8:52 am, Michael michael.guy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I'm having a go at using the declarative layout and was
wondering
if
there's a way of using an image declared in a ClientBundle as a
background-image in the ui:style section, thus:
ui:UiBinder
xmlns:ui=urn:ui:com.google.gwt.uibinder
xmlns:g=urn:import:com.google.gwt.user.client.ui
ui:with field=res
type=com.mycompany.MyClientBundle/
ui:style
.banner {
background-image:url('res.menuBackground');
}
/ui:style
/ui:UiBinder
If not, how are you supposed to do that?
Cheers
Mike
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
cr...@googlegroups.com
google-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%252Bu
nsubscr...@googlegroups.com
google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
cr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
cr...@googlegroups.com
google-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%252Bu
nsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
cr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
--
You received this message because
Re: UiBinder with background-image and ImageResource
this is how I did it.
in whatever.css:
@sprite .myClass {
gwt-image: myImage;
width: auto; height: auto;
background-repeat: repeat;
background-position: 0% 0%;
}
in Resources.java:
public interface Resources extends ClientBundle {
...
public interface WhateverCss extends CssResource {
String myClass();
}
@Source(com/whoever/client/resources/whatever.css)
public WhateverCss whateverCss();
}
in WhateverClass.ui.xml:
ui:with field=res type=com.whoever.client.resources.Resources /
div class={res.whateverCss.myClass}
HTH,
/dave
On Mar 10, 8:52 am, Michael michael.guy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I'm having a go at using the declarative layout and was wondering if
there's a way of using an image declared in a ClientBundle as a
background-image in the ui:style section, thus:
ui:UiBinder
xmlns:ui=urn:ui:com.google.gwt.uibinder
xmlns:g=urn:import:com.google.gwt.user.client.ui
ui:with field=res type=com.mycompany.MyClientBundle/
ui:style
.banner {
background-image:url('res.menuBackground');
}
/ui:style
/ui:UiBinder
If not, how are you supposed to do that?
Cheers
Mike
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: UiBinder with background-image and ImageResource
I forgot this part - does that help?
@Source(com/whoever/client/resources/myImage.png)
public ImageResource myImage();
On Mar 10, 2:16 pm, MH mhaligow...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm afraid this one does not work for me.
I did exactly as mentioned, and my widget seems to be not using style at
all. Shall I also add anything to the class itself?
2010/3/10 davidroe roe.da...@gmail.com
this is how I did it.
in whatever.css:
@sprite .myClass {
gwt-image: myImage;
width: auto; height: auto;
background-repeat: repeat;
background-position: 0% 0%;
}
in Resources.java:
public interface Resources extends ClientBundle {
...
public interface WhateverCss extends CssResource {
String myClass();
}
�...@source(com/whoever/client/resources/whatever.css)
public WhateverCss whateverCss();
}
in WhateverClass.ui.xml:
ui:with field=res type=com.whoever.client.resources.Resources /
div class={res.whateverCss.myClass}
HTH,
/dave
On Mar 10, 8:52 am, Michael michael.guy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I'm having a go at using the declarative layout and was wondering if
there's a way of using an image declared in a ClientBundle as a
background-image in the ui:style section, thus:
ui:UiBinder
xmlns:ui=urn:ui:com.google.gwt.uibinder
xmlns:g=urn:import:com.google.gwt.user.client.ui
ui:with field=res type=com.mycompany.MyClientBundle/
ui:style
.banner {
background-image:url('res.menuBackground');
}
/ui:style
/ui:UiBinder
If not, how are you supposed to do that?
Cheers
Mike
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
cr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: How to implement body onload=jsFunction()
perhaps something like this?
public void onModuleLoad() {
// put code here that constructs the widget and inserts it into
the
DOM
DeferredCommand.addCommand(new Command() {
public void execute() {
// put code here that checks the height of the
widget
}
});
}
On Feb 24, 7:33 am, Jim jim.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to get Widget.getOffsetHeight. In Widget.onload,
getOffsetHeight returns 0. I think once document is ready,
Widget.getOffsetHeight returns true height. Is there a way to
implement onload for html body element?
Regards,
Jim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: UiBinder exceptions
the code is not that interesting or special. I define a composite widget class and specify the .ui.xml and everything UiBinder would need, and then instantiate that class 20 times. 18 or 19 of them will attach to the DOM without a problem (and their element can therefore be found) but once or twice it will fail. I am looking at designing around the problem so that I can wrap it in try/catch and defer to another attempt when it fails. I already have a partial solution in place which seems to work. On Feb 13, 5:44 am, Tsukasa hara...@googlemail.com wrote: I think its worth a try to resolve your problem, but I think it would vastly increase efficiency if you could give a code example which produces the error. In fact i really had some similar exceptions in the beginning, which in most cases could be dereferenced to some bug, made by myself like wrong primary element referenced in uiBuilders generics ASO ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
UiBinder exceptions
I have recently started to use UiBinder as a way to define the UI. I have previously defined my UI using either just Java code to build panels and widgets or by (ab)using setInnerHTML. I have never come across runtime exceptions when creating widgets until using UiBinder. My UI will now throw exceptions regularly, although not consistently, nevertheless leading me to a situation where I have to wrap every widget creation code in try/catch to prevent the Javascript interpreter from falling over. The error I see is always this: (TypeError): Result of expression 'domId0Element' [null] is not an object. which is part of the generated Javascript that is used to represent createAndBindUi() Is this a bug? Should I resign myself to using try/catch? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT Caching in Internet Explorer
can you try option 4, but insert the date into the URL at the time it is clicked, not when the page is rendered? On Dec 15, 2:41 am, Salil salil.k...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Forum Members, I am facing a peculiar issue of Caching in internet explorer with my GWT Application. This issue does not occur in Firefox. However I need the issue fixed in IE as well since it is the primary browser of the users. My application has a main page which lists out different hyperlinks to the user. Each of these hyperlinks is a Get URL sending the request to the server which spawns in a new IE window. The problem occurs when the newly spawned IE window is closed prematurely (before the page loads completely). Once the window is closed prematurely, any new clicks on the main page (page with the GET URLs) fails to open the application page. A new page is opened which just waits indefinately for a response, when in fact there is no request coming in at the server side. I have already tried the following suspecting an IE caching issue without success. 1. Changed the GET query to a POST. Going by posts on other forums that the POST is never cached at the browser. 2. Put META tags in the html page as follows: META HTTP-EQUIV=CACHE-CONTROL CONTENT=NO-CACHE META HTTP-EQUIV=EXPIRES CONTENT=01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT META HTTP-EQUIV=PRAGMA CONTENT=NO-CACHE 3. Defined a ServletFilter to intercept all requests on server and insert the above META tags in the http response header. 4. Modified the GET URL to insert a dynamic parameter (sysdate) so that the GET URL is always new and is not cached. However this too does not work since the main page is not refreshed before the user clicks on the urls. Kindly advice on what could be the issue here. I am ready to supply any further information required in this regard. Thanks, Salil Kaul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Google Web Toolkit Gallery - submissions down?
I have tried to submit a project to the GWT gallery a number of times but I believe there is a problem with the interface - the form submission returns a completely blank page. there are no contact details on the GWT site for problem reporting. is there a better place to report this? thanks, /dave -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
com.google.gwt.i18n.client.Constants
in general, how should one go about segmenting and structuring methods and properties for i18n for a mid to large sized application? - should there be a single class and associated properties files (1 per language) that cover every requirement in all classes? or should constants be organised into different smaller groups? - should there be a single global instantiation of a class that is saved and re-used vs. calling GWT.create() each time a Constants class is required? - in a scenario where a piece of code is called frequently, is there a performance issue with GWT.create()'ing multiple different MyThisConstants and MyThatConstants classes vs. GWT.create() a single MyConstants class vs. passing in a global instantiated object? - does the compiler sort all of this out for you and there is little need to be concerned? thanks, /dave -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=.
Closure Compiler
I have not looked at this in any detail yet, but the first question I have is whether this functionality duplicates the work of the GWT compiler, given the following description: Closure Compiler is a JavaScript optimizer that compiles web apps down into compact, high-performance JavaScript code. The compiler removes dead code, then rewrites and minimizes what's left so that it will run fast on browsers' JavaScript engines. /dave --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: what are prerequisites for learning google window toolkit
which could also be phrased as you will gain Java skills. I came to GWT from JavaScript and found the transition from one language to another to be easy, you should find it to be a similar experience from Flex. on the down-side, Java can be pretty verbose at times, but at least you won't be using an Adobe product. On Sep 8, 3:12 am, Paul Robinson ukcue...@gmail.com wrote: You need java skills. HTML and CSS will help, but you can get started without that. The end user doesn't need any application installed in their browser (like flash does) because everything gets compiled to javascript. You do not need javascript skills, although you can mix in native javascript if you want to. Developers don't need any particular tools apart from java and any editor you like. Most people here seem to use Eclipse for their development environment. Paul hari wrote: Hi friends, I am working as a Flex developer. Recently i listen about GWT (Google window toolkit). I think it is also RIA tech. like Flex. Please provide some information about GWT. what are prerequisites for learning google window toolkit. which softwares are we use for developing GWT application. like for running flex applications we use flashplayer.like that which softwares we use for GWT. Thanks in advance. Regards, Harish.K --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: trying to track GWT timers
just to follow up, I was able to override setTimeout and perform some tracking, record timer IDs and track those that expire, which left me with a single timer that always seems to be present upon shutdown. I am now running code that should close that timer as soon as the app knows it is terminating. only time will tell whether it will have an impact - I'm still waiting to see whether I can reproduce the crash. and, by the way, I tried searching the GWT group for this thread and it returned nothing - the index seems broken. On Jun 30, 9:46 am, davidRoe roe.da...@gmail.com wrote: I had thought the same. I am running GWT code under MobileSafari on the iPhone and am seeing occasional program crashes on exit. the stack trace seems to indicate that a timer is being fired, and I believe that perhaps the UIWebView has disappeared by the time it runs code expecting it to be there. #0 0x312e5e60 in KJS::FunctionExecState::FunctionExecState () #1 0x312e5b98 in KJS::FunctionImp::callAsFunction () #2 0x312df0f4 in KJS::FunctionCallDotNode::evaluate () #3 0x312e5a78 in KJS::ExprStatementNode::execute () #4 0x312e61c4 in KJS::FunctionBodyNode::execute () #5 0x312e5bac in KJS::FunctionImp::callAsFunction () #6 0x31326ae8 in KJS::JSObject::call () #7 0x328296d4 in WebCore::ScheduledAction::execute () #8 0x32829350 in KJS::Window::timerFired () #9 0x32829208 in KJS::DOMWindowTimer::fired () #10 0x32824c84 in WebCore::TimerBase::fireTimers () #11 0x328249ac in WebCore::TimerBase::sharedTimerFired () #12 0x3282490c in WebCore::timerFired () #13 0x30269d8e in CFRunLoopRunSpecific () #14 0x30269326 in CFRunLoopRunInMode () #15 0x32bc0748 in RunWebThread () #16 0x3146178c in _pthread_body () #17 0x in ?? () if I can figure out how to override setTimeout() and setInterval(), I may be able to track what is going on. /dave On Jun 30, 5:12 am, Ian Bambury ianbamb...@gmail.com wrote: Surely when you close the browser window (or navigate away) the timers are gone. Ian http://examples.roughian.com 2009/6/30 davidroe roe.da...@gmail.com I have a situation where I need to ensure that _every_ timer launched is closed upon exit, meaning I track each timer I create and ensure that I cancel it when the application is about to close. is anyone aware of any timers that GWT launches that are, perhaps, allowed to self disintegrate, rather than actually being cancelled? thanks, /dave --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Using SOYC
I believe this was changed to -extra extradir On Jul 22, 9:23 am, kuvera bors...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have just built GWT from trunk, and I would like to inspect the component sizes in one of my modules with SOYC, using it for the first time. The only specification I found was in the wiki named CodeSplitting, so I set it up as specified there. I found that using GWTCompiler class the -aux folder gets created, but running SoycDashboard fails with Error creating html file. Unexpected end of ZLIB input stream. When I use the new Compiler class with the -soyc flag, no metadata is created at all. Any tips are welcome. thanks, kuvera --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
detecting images that fail to load using image.addLoadHandler
how can I determine that an image failed to load, due to perhaps a
network error?
I used to use image.addLoadListener(new LoadListener() {
public void onLoad(Widget sender) {
...
}
public void onError(Widget sender) {
...
}
}
and anything that arrived through onError() was deemed a problem.
how can I achieve the same thing with addLoadHandler(new LoadHandler
()) and the associated LoadEvent?
thanks,
/dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: detecting images that fail to load using image.addLoadHandler
thanks, Brett.
right after posting, I had stumbled upon addErrorHandler() while
browsing the GWT source and tried exactly this, without any joy.
however, with you re-iterating that this was the solution, I tried
again, forced a unique URL to avoid the image being loaded from cache,
and success.
On Jul 15, 12:04 am, brett.wooldridge brett.wooldri...@gmail.com
wrote:
Almost exactly the same way. If you are only interested in failure:
public void foo() {
image.addErrorHandler(new ErrorHander() {
public void onError(ErrorEvent event) {
...
}
});
}
Or if you are interested in both success and failure, your class can
implement both interfaces or you can to synthesize a third interface
that combines them:
public void foo() {
interface WinAndLose extends LoadHandler, ErrorHander { }
WinAndLose wal = new WinAndLose() {
public void onLoad(LoadEvent event) {
}
public void onError(ErrorEvent event) {
...
}
}
image.setErrorHandler(wal);
image.setLoadHandler(wal);
}
On Jul 15, 3:21 pm, davidroe roe.da...@gmail.com wrote:
how can I determine that an image failed to load, due to perhaps a
network error?
I used to use image.addLoadListener(new LoadListener() {
public void onLoad(Widget sender) {
...
}
public void onError(Widget sender) {
...
}
}
and anything that arrived through onError() was deemed a problem.
how can I achieve the same thing with addLoadHandler(new LoadHandler
()) and the associated LoadEvent?
thanks,
/dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: trying to track GWT timers
I had thought the same. I am running GWT code under MobileSafari on the iPhone and am seeing occasional program crashes on exit. the stack trace seems to indicate that a timer is being fired, and I believe that perhaps the UIWebView has disappeared by the time it runs code expecting it to be there. #0 0x312e5e60 in KJS::FunctionExecState::FunctionExecState () #1 0x312e5b98 in KJS::FunctionImp::callAsFunction () #2 0x312df0f4 in KJS::FunctionCallDotNode::evaluate () #3 0x312e5a78 in KJS::ExprStatementNode::execute () #4 0x312e61c4 in KJS::FunctionBodyNode::execute () #5 0x312e5bac in KJS::FunctionImp::callAsFunction () #6 0x31326ae8 in KJS::JSObject::call () #7 0x328296d4 in WebCore::ScheduledAction::execute () #8 0x32829350 in KJS::Window::timerFired () #9 0x32829208 in KJS::DOMWindowTimer::fired () #10 0x32824c84 in WebCore::TimerBase::fireTimers () #11 0x328249ac in WebCore::TimerBase::sharedTimerFired () #12 0x3282490c in WebCore::timerFired () #13 0x30269d8e in CFRunLoopRunSpecific () #14 0x30269326 in CFRunLoopRunInMode () #15 0x32bc0748 in RunWebThread () #16 0x3146178c in _pthread_body () #17 0x in ?? () if I can figure out how to override setTimeout() and setInterval(), I may be able to track what is going on. /dave On Jun 30, 5:12 am, Ian Bambury ianbamb...@gmail.com wrote: Surely when you close the browser window (or navigate away) the timers are gone. Ian http://examples.roughian.com 2009/6/30 davidroe roe.da...@gmail.com I have a situation where I need to ensure that _every_ timer launched is closed upon exit, meaning I track each timer I create and ensure that I cancel it when the application is about to close. is anyone aware of any timers that GWT launches that are, perhaps, allowed to self disintegrate, rather than actually being cancelled? thanks, /dave --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
trying to track GWT timers
I have a situation where I need to ensure that _every_ timer launched is closed upon exit, meaning I track each timer I create and ensure that I cancel it when the application is about to close. is anyone aware of any timers that GWT launches that are, perhaps, allowed to self disintegrate, rather than actually being cancelled? thanks, /dave --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
GWT + Safari (OS X) + Developer console = consistent crash
I have seen the problem ever since upgrading to 4.0 but today I am starting to think that somehow GWT is related to what is happening. the problem: open Safari, browse to site developed using GWT, open developer console, reload the site, watch Safari crash. I see this consistently on the GWT sites that I am developing, and also on any other GWT site that I have tried (the showcase, etc). other non-GWT pages do not seem to make the browser crash. - if you close the developer console before refreshing, Safari does not crash - if you try the same experiment on a non-GWT site, Safari does not crash I first thought it was Safari 4.0, but installing 4.0.1 still exhibits the same problem. I tried downgrading to 3.2.3 but the problem remains. perhaps it is OS X 10.5.7 (which is required for installing Safari 4.x). my co-worker can also reproduce the crash. can anyone verify that this is reproducible on their systems? does anyone still have OS X 10.5.7 installed? and I have not tried this under MS Windows. /dave --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to use java.lang.Thread in GWT
Timer t = new Timer() {
public void run() {
// do something after a delay
}
};
// delay running for 2 seconds
t.schedule(2000);
HTH,
/dave
On May 28, 10:05 am, Adil BENHAMID enst.de.breta...@gmail.com wrote:
as an example I want to display a button then wait two seconds before
displaying the next one.
2009/5/28 Adil BENHAMID enst.de.breta...@gmail.com
I would like to to make a temporization between two calls.
2009/5/28 Jason Essington jason.essing...@gmail.com
Thread is not part of java that is emulated in GWT. Javascript is
single threaded so thread.sleep() has no meaning, you might as well do
while(true); (I don't actually suggest doing that)
What is it that you are trying to accomplish with Thread.sleep()?
-jason
On May 28, 2009, at 10:37 AM, Adil Ben wrote:
Hello,
I need to call the method Thread.sleep() in my GWT code. But GWT does
not integrate this class.
How to solve this?
i get the following error
No source code is available for type java.lang.Thread; did you
forget to inherit a required module?
Regards.
--
¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°
Adil BENHAMID
º¤ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø
--
¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°
Adil BENHAMID
º¤ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to tell if an image is done loading (or failed) for sure, given LoadListener is broken on IE?
if you wanted to add the image to the DOM and make it visible (so that
IE will report the correct image size), you could probably hide it
by changing the opacity to 0. I use the following class which works
(at least) across IE/Moz/Safari.
.op0 { filter:alpha(opacity=0); -moz-opacity:0; opacity:0; }
IE will probably think the image is visible and should give you an
image size.
alternative, load the image into a div class=hiddenImages/div
and place it off-screen.
.hiddenImages {
position:absolute;
top:-1000px;
left:-1000px;
}
HTH,
/dave
On Apr 30, 6:19 am, dduck anders.johansen.a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 29, 7:01 pm, davidroe roe.da...@gmail.com wrote:
have you tried zero opacity? this usually does the trick for me as it
is interpreted as in the DOM and visible.
I'm not quite sure what you mean. Could you elaborate?
Anders
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to tell if an image is done loading (or failed) for sure, given LoadListener is broken on IE?
have you tried zero opacity? this usually does the trick for me as it
is interpreted as in the DOM and visible.
/dave
On Apr 29, 4:54 am, dduck anders.johansen.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway...
Using the tip from the issues list (set URL in deferred command) I can
get reliable execution of LoadListener on IE, as well as Safari and
FF.
Now I have a different problem.
In IE it seems that an image has dimensions 0 x 0 until visible, even
if it is loaded. Is there any way around that?
Here is my test program. On Safari and FF I get size 120,90 for the
image, even before it is made visible. In IE size is 0,0 until made
visible.
final RootPanel rootPanel = RootPanel.get(jobList);
final String url =
http://arstechnica.com/mt-static/plugins/ArsTheme/style/themes/
light/images/logo.png;
final Image image = new Image();
final Label l = new Label(Not loaded yet, size + image.getWidth
() + , + image.getHeight());
rootPanel.add(l);
image.setVisible(false);
LoadListener ll = new LoadListener() {
public void onError(Widget sender) {
l.setText(Failed);
}
public void onLoad(Widget sender) {
l.setText(Success, size + image.getWidth() + , +
image.getHeight());
rootPanel.add(new Button(Make visible, new
ClickListener() {
public void onClick(Widget sender) {
image.setVisible(true);
l.setText(Visible, size +
image.getWidth() + , +
image.getHeight());
}}));
}
};
image.addLoadListener(ll);
rootPanel.add(image);
DeferredCommand.addCommand(new Command(){
public void execute() {
image.setUrl(url);
}
});
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Debugger() was called!
sorry for posting such a short-on-details question. - the project is compiled using gwt-mac-1.4.61, perhaps the (non-) issue has already been resolved. I have a 1.5 project (which could/ should become a 1.6 project) that I'm playing with. I will see if the same thing happens there. - I am seeing this in the Eclipse console. - I ran a few samples in gwt-max-1.4.61/samples but did not see the message. - this particular project does not use public/Project.html as the HTML wrapper, but instead uses a Tomcat server, a .JSP wrapper, the - noserver flag (plus a -whitelist of external web servers). thanks for the follow-up, /dave On Apr 27, 10:45 am, Isaac Truett itru...@gmail.com wrote: What log are you seeing this in? A quick search turned up several references to a Flash build with some debug code left in producing this message. Any chance that's what you're seeing? On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:21 PM, davidroe roe.da...@gmail.com wrote: I use to see this message randomly, now I see it consistently, but am wondering what it is that I am doing to cause it. 2009-04-23 15:19:01.980 java[63492:80f] [Java CocoaComponent compatibility mode]: Enabled 2009-04-23 15:19:01.981 java[63492:80f] [Java CocoaComponent compatibility mode]: Setting timeout for SWT to 0.10 Debugger() was called! Any ideas? /dave --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ImageBundle + CSS
standard? not so sure. however, the incubator has an approach which does what you are after. this might be a good place to start: http://code.google.com/p/gwt-incubator-1-5-wiki/wiki/CssResource /dave On Apr 27, 2:37 pm, Hannson hann...@gmail.com wrote: Is there some standard way to let ImageBundle return a div with an image as an background using CSS instead of img? If not, any idea what classes I'll have to modify to get that functionality? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Debugger() was called!
I use to see this message randomly, now I see it consistently, but am wondering what it is that I am doing to cause it. 2009-04-23 15:19:01.980 java[63492:80f] [Java CocoaComponent compatibility mode]: Enabled 2009-04-23 15:19:01.981 java[63492:80f] [Java CocoaComponent compatibility mode]: Setting timeout for SWT to 0.10 Debugger() was called! Any ideas? /dave --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Facebook XFBML in GWT Hosted Mode?
I'm pretty sure this works for me without a problem.
protected Widget makeLoginButton() {
String s = fb:login-button
onlogin=\facebookConnectLogin()\/
fb:login-button;
HTML h = new HTML(s);
DeferredCommand.addCommand(new Command() {
public void execute() {
parseDomTree();
}
});
return h;
}
protected static native void parseDomTree() /*-{
$wnd.FB.XFBML.Host.parseDomTree();
}-*/;
/dave
On Apr 21, 8:45 am, shunjie shin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Friends,
I am trying to develop Facebook Connect application with GWT. I tried
to have XFBML like fb:name /fb:name in a HTML control. Works
perfect in a browser but does not render anything at all in Hosted
Mode.
Does anyone face the same problem when trying to develop GWT with
FBML. If so, any workarounds?
Thanks!
Shinchi
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: IE6 + history support
how can this be a security thing? is it also a security thing that,
when IE can't actually load a page because the network connection is
inactive, it silently hands back the old page from cache? my point is
that calling it security is laughable and after a few days working
with IE, I am ready to throw this HP laptop far, far away.
I had already taken the approach of changing all such links into a
clickable widget that traps the click but I posted this problem
because I am still trying to understand the behaviour. I have another
issue relating to history tokens but thought that this was a simpler
way of presenting what seems to be the same problem.
my other issue seems to be this: if I arrive at http://sitename.com/#token1
and I change the token using History.newItem(token2), this time
without responding to a link click, but rather performing this
programmatically before the user interacts in any way, I see the same
page reloading problem under IE (and not other browsers). I am still
yet to confirm that this is 100% accurate or whether something else is
causing the behaviour. of course, IE may be leading me on the
proverbial by not reporting an error.
On Apr 16, 2:22 am, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 avr, 21:21, davidroe roe.da...@gmail.com wrote:
usual problem with IE6 not behaving like any other browser. this one
is relatively blatant. I have included the code to a new project
created in 1.4 that has a history listener and not much else.
if I click on the link, which sets the history token to #link1, the
page reloads and onModuleLoad is called
if I click on the button, which calls History.newItem(link2),
everything works as expected and onHistoryChanged is called.
is there anything I can do to prevent IE6 reloading the entire page?
Hook a ClickListener in the link an call History.newItem from it.
That's what the Hyperlink widget does FWIW.
- 8 -
package com.mypackage.client;
import com.google.gwt.core.client.EntryPoint;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.History;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.HistoryListener;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.Window;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.Button;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.ClickListener;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.HTML;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.RootPanel;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.Widget;
public class IETest2 implements EntryPoint, HistoryListener {
public void onModuleLoad() {
Window.alert(onModuleLoad);
HTML h1 = new HTML(a href=\#link1\link1/a,true);
Button b2 = new Button(link2);
b2.addClickListener(new ClickListener() {
public void onClick(Widget sender) {
History.newItem(link2);
}
});
History.addHistoryListener(this);
RootPanel.get(slot1).add(h1);
RootPanel.get(slot2).add(b2);
}
public void onHistoryChanged(String token) {
Window.alert(onHistoryChanged);
}
}
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Issue With Single Origin Policy
you can perform GET requests without violating SOP by dynamically adding script elements that expect JSONP as a return value (JSON wrapped in a callback into your JS). search this group for more detail responses and other techniques. /dave On Mar 6, 9:35 pm, jagadesh jagadesh.manch...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, iam working on developing a sample application where i would make a call to an external Yahoo.com Money site from where i would get the current price of a stock in the form of xml. i want to construct a RequestBuilder and call from it.but my doubt according to SOP [Single Origin Policy] a java script executing in a currently loaded web site can communicate with the java script in web server that currently loaded the web site. so when i make a call to an external site from my gwt code[converts to java script in web mode] .is it violating the sop policy Are i was wrong . please can anyone have a right answer Thank u, jagadesh --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Compilation of a GWT project for firefox
gecko1_8 On Mar 4, 2:08 am, Chichone hicham.ass...@gmail.com wrote: i have the following compilation error : [ERROR] Unable to load module entry point class org.vnf.itineo.client.Main (see associated exception for details) com.google.gwt.core.client.JavaScriptException: (TypeError): Cet objet ne gère pas cette propriété ou cette méthode number: -2146827850 description: Cet objet ne gère pas cette propriété ou cette méthode at com.google.gwt.user.client.impl.DOMImplStandard.initEventSystem (Native Method) at com.google.gwt.user.client.impl.DOMImplMozilla.initEventSystem (DOMImplMozilla.java:45) at com.google.gwt.user.client.impl.DOMImpl.maybeInitializeEventSystem (DOMImpl.java:165) at com.google.gwt.user.client.impl.DOMImplStandard.sinkEvents (DOMImplStandard.java:160) at com.google.gwt.user.client.impl.DOMImplMozilla.sinkEvents (DOMImplMozilla.java:33) at com.google.gwt.user.client.DOM.sinkEvents(DOM.java:1214) at com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.UIObject.sinkEvents(UIObject.java: 713) at com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.Image$UnclippedState.init (Image.java:232) at com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.Image$UnclippedState.init (Image.java:237) at com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.Image.init(Image.java:354) i modify the module gwt.xml like follows !-- User Agent -- set-property name=user.agent value=gecko / P.S. no problem for ie compilation --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Know when the site is being viewed by hand held
examine the incoming user-agent in the HTTP headers, or in Javascript, examine navigator.userAgent to determine which browser is being used. /dave On Feb 25, 9:23 am, Sean slough...@gmail.com wrote: I was wondering how certain sites, ESPN.com for example know to go to the hand helds version of the site (Smaller, more compact, less pictures) when viewing it on the iPhone for example. I'd like to take a stab at making one, but I would like to know how to detect and then redirect the browser to the hand held site? Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Syntax errors viewing search results in google groups
good morning, I've browsed three threads this morning and all three had different questions with a similar recipe - this is the solution but it doesn't work on IE - how much longer are we going to suffer for our art? :-) anyway, the reason I am writing is that I am seeing syntax errors thrown when browsing search results in this (and other) groups. syntax error: , );\n the end result is that the expand all link, amongst other things, is not functioning. browsing the thread directly does not suffer the same problems, so removing the ?lnk= suffix works fine. tested under Firefox and Safari on OS X (I don't run IE unless I really, really have to as it causes me to curse out loud). /dave --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: is invalid or violates the same origin policy A problem with POST request to the Yahoo API.
it is a technique that Yahoo were one of the first to use and promote.
essentially, the return value of the script is a function callback
that wraps the data. as long as you have the function defined on your
side, everything is straight forward.
http://www.google.com/search?q=yahoo+dynamic+script+element
/dave
On Feb 20, 1:12 pm, scottland.yo...@googlemail.com
scottland.yo...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'll have a search on how to do that, is it simple enough to do? I
tried downgrading to 1.5.2 but it didn't change anything.
On Feb 20, 9:08 pm, davidroe roe.da...@gmail.com wrote:
perform the request by dynamically adding a script tag?
On Feb 20, 12:36 pm, scott young scottland.yo...@googlemail.com
wrote:
OK thanks, I'll try both suggestions, if anyone else has any other ideas,
it'd be appreciated, thanks.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Vish visheshs...@gmail.com wrote:
Try searching older posts for the problem with Same-origin policy
You can either degrade to use version 1.5.2 or use a proxy server to
forward your request to other domain. The call to the proxy server
will be as a RPC.
On Feb 20, 12:09 pm, scottland.yo...@googlemail.com
scottland.yo...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm working on a project for univeristy which involves sending a
post request to the yahoo term extractor service to recieve an XML
file of terms.
I'm using this code for the request as an example:
RequestBuilder yahooRequest = new RequestBuilder(RequestBuilder.POST,
http://api.search.yahoo.com/ContentAnalysisService/V1/termExtraction?
appid=YahooDemoquery=madonnacontext=Italian+sculptors+and+painters+of
+the+renaissance+favored+the+Virgin+Mary+for+inspiration);
try {
yahooRequest.sendRequest(null, new RequestCallback() {
public void onError(Request request, Throwable
exception1) {
requestFailed(exception1);
}
public void onResponseReceived(Request
request1,
Response
response1) {
renderXML(response1.getText());
}
});
} catch (RequestException ex1) {
requestFailed(ex1);
}
}
However I am recieving and error message stating: http://
api.search.yahoo.com/ContentAnalysisService/V1/termExtraction?
appid=YahooDemoquery=madonnacontext=Italian+sculptors+and+painters+of
+the+renaissance+favored+the+Virgin+Mary+for+inspiration is invalid
or violates the same origin policy.
How can I request this URL using google web toolkit, it's important I
intergrate it into my toolkti program, rather than use pHp or HTML to
do the same thing.
Any help would me much appreciated guys!
Thanks,
Scott.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Best image preloading practice?
I had thought the same, but I remember that there was a reason for using this technique. ISTR that at least one browser didn't load images from the server when attached to a parent whose display is none. I wouldn't stake my life on this being true, as something else may have been causing that behaviour, but there you go. On Feb 11, 2:29 pm, lukehashj bobwazn...@gmail.com wrote: You don't necessarily even need the image to be hidden off screen in that way. You could always just set it's display:none and have it exist anywhere on the DOM - the user won't see it but the browser will still go to fetch the image. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: XMLParser and Internet Explorer
having recently dealt with my own problem regarding IE parsing XML, I can offer you my sympathy but little else. my issue was caused by particular characters in the document not being properly encoded, causing the IE xml parser to barf. my recommendation is to strip down the document until you have something that IE _does_ parse and work your way back to the full document, bit by bit. /dave On Feb 10, 5:57 am, mfc_alpha mathieu.ma...@gmail.com wrote: Hello! I use GWT to parse response from a lighttpd server. The xml looks like : ( full xml athttp://pastebin.com/m63cd0ec8) ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8? !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN http://www.w3.org/ TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml11.dtd html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en ... body h2Index of /webdav//h2 div class=list table summary=Directory Listing cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 theadtrth class=nName/thth class=mLast Modified/thth class=sSize/thth class=tType/th/tr/thead tbody trtd class=na href=../Parent Directory/a//tdtd class=mnbsp;/tdtd class=s- nbsp;/tdtd class=tDirectory/td/tr trtd class=na href=web/web/a//tdtd class=m2009- Feb-10 14:46:51/tdtd class=s- nbsp;/tdtd class=tDirectory/td/tr /tbody /table /div div class=footlighttpd/1.4.20/div /body /html So I use the XMLParser.parse function to parse it. That's fine for Firefox and Safari but I get a DOMException for IE. This exception say: com.google.gwt.xml.clent.impl.DOMParseException: Failed to parse: ? xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8? !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN http://www.w3.org/ TR/xhtml Looks strange to me to failed on parsing the DOCTYPE ... It's there a workaround? Any help will be appreciate! Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Best image preloading practice?
.hiddenImagePanel {
position:absolute;
top:-1000px;
left:-1000px;
}
On Feb 9, 1:14 am, darkflame darkfl...@gmail.com wrote:
Thats not a bad idea, it didnt accore to me to simply load it by
positioning it off screena and attaching a listener.
When you hide it offscreen do you specify negative co-ordinates? Or do
you have to put it to the right and stop horizontal scrolling?
I assume checking offset width still works even if its offscreen?
Cheers,
Thomas
On Feb 9, 6:46 am, davidroe roe.da...@gmail.com wrote:
I have only skimmed this thread, and I've not looked at the game, but
here is my 2c.
my situation is a little different - I'm not pre-loading images per
se, but I am loading them in the background. I use a hidden panel
(hidden by being positioned off screen rather than display:none) which
I load images onto. each image has a load listener so that I can
process it when it arrives and move it to the appropriate part of the
DOM.
on to your problem.
could you maintain an array of image URLs, load the first image,
attach a load listener and attach it to a hidden panel? when the image
has loaded, repeat the process to load the next one. that way, you
ensure that they only load one at a time (less blocking behaviour in
the browser). once you know an image has been loaded, you are free to
use new Image(url) and know reliably that the image will be loaded
from cache.
HTH,
/dave
On Feb 8, 7:04 am, darkflame darkfl...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I know prefetch is working to some extent (at least, in Chrome
and Firefox), as I can watch it prefetching
rather large volumes of images that arnt used in the html at all.
All of those images must have been triggered by the prefetch loop.
Still, I'll read over the Mozzilla doc, maybe things have changed a
little since javascript has been more widely used.
On Feb 6, 3:12 pm, gregor greg.power...@googlemail.com wrote:
@Litty: yes, I think you are right, my ignorance. Image.prefetch()
will causes the image to be loaded into browser cache. You then use
the same URL to instantiate an Image object later in code, and
hopefully the image binary will be already downloaded. This old
Mozzilla doc describes the process:
http://devedge-temp.mozilla.org/viewsource/2003/link-prefetching/inde...
The doc suggests the behavior darkflame described in OP, namely,
browser is busy downloading all the prefetches it finds in the page.
@darkflame:
b) If I do have to load, say, upto 10 images that have to be seperate,
is it better to just loop over a list of them prefetching and leave it
upto the browseror should I put a timer and trigger a load every,
say, 5 seconds ?
(or dosnt it make much difference).
My reading of the Mozzilla doc is that the browser will notice all the
prefetch tags when it loads the page, and it will then get busy
downloading them. So I have doubts whether where you put the
Image.prefetch(url) in execution logic makes any difference, i.e. you
do not have fine tune programmatic control over prefetch so you can't
code to prefetch first 10, then later trigger prefetching next 10. For
example the Mozzilla doc states The link tag has to be inside the
head tag to make prefetching work etc.
On Feb 6, 9:14 am, Litty Preeth preeth.h...@gmail.com wrote:
You are thinking of loading 20MB of images into the DHTML DOM
of you
application
Am I? Does the DOM keep them there even when not displayed?
These images certainly wouldnt be displayed all at once. 1 or 2
at a
time at most.
I'm not absolutely sure, but I think if you load an image it is
basically attached to a document, whether the browser caches it or
not, and whether it is currently visible of not. You don't
control the
browser cache, I mean I don't think you can tell it to
conveniently
download all your images and store them neatly on disk until you
need
to display them for example.
ah, pig.
I thought that was exactly that prefetch was doing -sigh-
I thought it loaded it to ram first, then the browser keeps a copy
in
its cache for reloading if needed.
-sigh-
That does change things indeed then.
AFAIK the prefetch creates an IMG element but its not attached to
the DOM.
- Litty
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:03 PM, darkflame darkfl...@gmail.com
wrote:
You are thinking of loading 20MB of images into the DHTML
DOM of you
application
Am I? Does the DOM keep them there even when not displayed?
These images certainly wouldnt be displayed all at once. 1 or
2 at a
time at most.
I'm not absolutely sure, but I think if you load an image it is
basically attached
Re: Best image preloading practice?
I have only skimmed this thread, and I've not looked at the game, but here is my 2c. my situation is a little different - I'm not pre-loading images per se, but I am loading them in the background. I use a hidden panel (hidden by being positioned off screen rather than display:none) which I load images onto. each image has a load listener so that I can process it when it arrives and move it to the appropriate part of the DOM. on to your problem. could you maintain an array of image URLs, load the first image, attach a load listener and attach it to a hidden panel? when the image has loaded, repeat the process to load the next one. that way, you ensure that they only load one at a time (less blocking behaviour in the browser). once you know an image has been loaded, you are free to use new Image(url) and know reliably that the image will be loaded from cache. HTH, /dave On Feb 8, 7:04 am, darkflame darkfl...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I know prefetch is working to some extent (at least, in Chrome and Firefox), as I can watch it prefetching rather large volumes of images that arnt used in the html at all. All of those images must have been triggered by the prefetch loop. Still, I'll read over the Mozzilla doc, maybe things have changed a little since javascript has been more widely used. On Feb 6, 3:12 pm, gregor greg.power...@googlemail.com wrote: @Litty: yes, I think you are right, my ignorance. Image.prefetch() will causes the image to be loaded into browser cache. You then use the same URL to instantiate an Image object later in code, and hopefully the image binary will be already downloaded. This old Mozzilla doc describes the process: http://devedge-temp.mozilla.org/viewsource/2003/link-prefetching/inde... The doc suggests the behavior darkflame described in OP, namely, browser is busy downloading all the prefetches it finds in the page. @darkflame: b) If I do have to load, say, upto 10 images that have to be seperate, is it better to just loop over a list of them prefetching and leave it upto the browseror should I put a timer and trigger a load every, say, 5 seconds ? (or dosnt it make much difference). My reading of the Mozzilla doc is that the browser will notice all the prefetch tags when it loads the page, and it will then get busy downloading them. So I have doubts whether where you put the Image.prefetch(url) in execution logic makes any difference, i.e. you do not have fine tune programmatic control over prefetch so you can't code to prefetch first 10, then later trigger prefetching next 10. For example the Mozzilla doc states The link tag has to be inside the head tag to make prefetching work etc. On Feb 6, 9:14 am, Litty Preeth preeth.h...@gmail.com wrote: You are thinking of loading 20MB of images into the DHTML DOM of you application Am I? Does the DOM keep them there even when not displayed? These images certainly wouldnt be displayed all at once. 1 or 2 at a time at most. I'm not absolutely sure, but I think if you load an image it is basically attached to a document, whether the browser caches it or not, and whether it is currently visible of not. You don't control the browser cache, I mean I don't think you can tell it to conveniently download all your images and store them neatly on disk until you need to display them for example. ah, pig. I thought that was exactly that prefetch was doing -sigh- I thought it loaded it to ram first, then the browser keeps a copy in its cache for reloading if needed. -sigh- That does change things indeed then. AFAIK the prefetch creates an IMG element but its not attached to the DOM. - Litty On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:03 PM, darkflame darkfl...@gmail.com wrote: You are thinking of loading 20MB of images into the DHTML DOM of you application Am I? Does the DOM keep them there even when not displayed? These images certainly wouldnt be displayed all at once. 1 or 2 at a time at most. I'm not absolutely sure, but I think if you load an image it is basically attached to a document, whether the browser caches it or not, and whether it is currently visible of not. You don't control the browser cache, I mean I don't think you can tell it to conveniently download all your images and store them neatly on disk until you need to display them for example. ah, pig. I thought that was exactly that prefetch was doing -sigh- I thought it loaded it to ram first, then the browser keeps a copy in its cache for reloading if needed. -sigh- That does change things indeed then. Again, not at once. Surely a staggered download they wouldnt have a problem with? Emulating, say, what it would expect from a user browseing DeviantArt?
Re: What are you using for a backend??
I run a back-end using Apache/mod_perl using AxKit and XSL to convert XML into JSON. have you investigated a web host like slicehost.com? they provide you with a virtual machine which you can install any OS and back-end you choose. /dave On Jan 20, 5:24 am, sloughran slough...@gmail.com wrote: So, in my messing around with GWT for the past year or so, I have been using RPC's to communicate to the server. The thing is, my projects have never gotten past my Eclipse project, so my server has just been a folder on my computer. I am looking at web hosting companies and I just see things like PHP, RUBY, PERL and such being allowed. I am not seeing JAVA being allowed, which I would need for my RPC's. So, my question is, what do people use for server side code? Do you use a web host with JAVA allowed? Do you use PHP and talk to it through HTML gets? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
IE8 support
I am curious about current and future support for IE8. The list of browsers that GWT currently supports are: - Firefox 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 3.0 - Internet Explorer 6 and 7 - Safari 2 and 3 - Opera 9.0 (current as of May 2008) We can also add on Google Chrome, Android and iPhone to that list. what currently happens when IE8 requests to load GWT content? does it use the IE6/IE7 implementation? how does that pan out? with IE8 currently in beta, it is no surprise that there is little to read about how GWT will support it. nevertheless, are there any published documents that say how IE figures as part of the GWT roadmap? thanks, /dave --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT Spring Integration
perhaps one of these articles will help: http://delicious.com/davidroe/spring /dave On Dec 10, 8:43 pm, Sriram Iyengar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, We have been trying to get GWT and Spring to work, but unfortunately no luck as yet. Our application makes a simple call to the service side of GWT (on Spring MVC) and tries to render the response as a table (a list of items). If someone can post a working copy of a 'hello world' kind;a app, that will be really great. I have tried to read many documents (gwt-sl) etc., but no luck as yet. Thanks, Sriram --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT and Mobile Device
Your targeted mobile device will require a web browser. As that is the case, there is very little else to say until you get down to the nitty- gritty. This group has an article entitled GWT + iPhone == Pretty Tasty, you could read that for some ideas. As mobile devices are not as powerful as their desktop counterparts, my advice to you is keep it light. If this is to be your first GWT program, and you already know JS, I may advise you to stick to JS, you may otherwise end up with a solution that is not up to the task. You may also want to consider native (non-browsed-based) solutions for particular phones if speed is critical. /dave On Dec 3, 2:08 am, Giuseppe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello developers, I'm interesting in building a GWT based application on a mobile device but I cannot find any information about this topic and the mobile device's requirements. Might someone give me any information? Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: setWidgets where no one has gone before
this thread should be of interest to you:
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/thread/7fca5ad288a2a415/c6b352619dbc4e0e?q=davidroe+FastContainerlnk=ol;
/dave
On Nov 11, 2:56 pm, seven.reeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to do something that I'm sure breaks a million rules,
protocols, standards, covenants, agreements and pinky-swears.
Given the default TabPanel, I can get the embedded TabBar. That
TabBar
is a HorizontalPanel with at least two extra tds (on in the front
and the last one). The last table cell has a width of 100% set in
the widget code.
Now, I know I have broached this topic a couple of times over the
past two-ish years but all that empty real-estate in the last
cell is a tempting target in which to stuff text or a widget.
I have faked this behavior by rolling my own TabPanel-like class with
my own spin on the TabBar formatting. For various reasons though I am
revisiting the initial question.
Can I basically do a setWidget() on the last cell of the
TabPanel.TabBar?
My current answer is yes and no. Yes, in that i can crawl through the
DOM and find the last TD cell of the TabBar and I can appendChild()
into that element and stuff in a widget. However, the events
associated with the assigned widget are not happening.
For example
TabPanel tp = new TabPanel()
TabBar tb = tp.getTabBar();
tp.add(new HTML(one), 1);
tp.add(new HTML(two), 2);
tp.add(new HTML(three), 3);
Button test = new Button(text, new ClickListener() {
public void onClick(Widget sender) {
Window.alert(testing);
}
});
setLastTabBarElement((Widget) test);
public void setLastTabBarElement(Widget widget) {
Element e = tb.getElement();
int i = 0;
while ((i = DOM.getChildCount(e)) 0) {
e = DOM.getChild(e, i - 1);
}
DOM.appendChild(e, widget.getElement());
}
Now, I know I am prolly not using the correct CamelCase. I suspect
that there is a better way to find the last TD cell of the tabBar --
but I don't know what that might be -- I would like to know though.
I have way too much code to post all of it here but the example above
is very similar to what I am trying to do. The biggest difference
is that i am trying to plug in a Composite widget instead of a
simple button.
The end result is that my Widget appears in the correct place in the
tabBar but clicking on the elements does nothing.
ideas?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: published iphone apps written in GWT
not quite sure of your question, but languages used are Obj-C, HTML, Javascript, CSS (using GWT to create the Javascript). I wrote my code prior to learning about PhoneGap. I have also since found big5apps but have not really looked at it - it might be of interest to you. On Nov 3, 9:05 am, mike7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Dave. I did not know about the 25k limit on the iphone. That does propose some challenges for GWT. Out of curiosity, what languages are you using inside of your obj-C wrapper? Did you use PhoneGap as your starting place for this? Any hints / opinions on lessons learned thus far on the approach you are using? Many thanks. On Oct 29, 11:26 am, davidroe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: GWT is a processor-intensive way of building an interface and therefore not ideally suited to the iPhone's low power CPU. this made development harder than it should have been. an example is rendering a list of items using GWT to build panels and widgets where items may take 0.2s to render, leading to an application that lags for 2 seconds just to build a list of 10 items. you end up keeping widget objects and the DOM at a distance, which is obviously not ideal. as a pure web app, you also need to consider client side caching, and the iPhone will only cache objects under 25K. as the generated GWT code all resides in one big file, this results in a scenario where the device refuses to cache and always requests a new copy from the web. this in itself is a good reason to deploy the code locally, wrapped in a binary. I'm not a huge Obj-C fan, although I like it more now that I've picked it up and written some code. Nevertheless, I still prefer web technologies as they are cross-platform and generally more flexible. I therefore would choose embedded web apps in the future over pure native clients, but that is just the nature of the projects I am working on. WRT tohttp://riflethru.com/Ihad written code to investigate what was possible, but the project overall is still not feature complete. I need to enable bidding on the application before it will get released to the App Store. /dave On Oct 29, 6:50 am, mike7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Dave, This is interesting. I presume you built the riflethru app? I would like to hear a little more about this development method. Can you give me some highlights? For example, how long did it take? Any unexpected hiccups? I looked for it in the app store and did not find it... was it not published? Many thanks, Mike On Oct 28, 6:19 pm, davidroe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that being in the app store is likely to attract more users to your application as this is where people tend to look. Additionally, not all apps in the store cost money, so why not use it to organise web apps? That said, I think that the user expects to find applications that will run natively, rather than something that will just launch an instance of Safari pointing at your web app. If you are following PhoneGap, you will see that some developers are releasing hybrid applications that are written using web app techniques but have access to the phone's native functionality. This is done using UIWebView and a wrapper around your web app. As far as I am aware, such applications will not fail the Apple review process just because they were developed using this approach. There are definitely advantages to this approach, especially if you are a web developer with no experience using Obj-C. I played with something similar a while ago forhttp://riflethru.com/ to see what is possible. I ended up with a native application with embedded GWT, so all the HTML/CSS/JS sit as resources inside the binary and are loaded locally rather than over the wire. /dave On Oct 27, 11:55 am, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone list some iphone apps that were written in GWT and have been published in the app store? Maybe I'm being thick but... my first impression when I read this question was... why/how would want to sell it through the App Store? Since the GWT app is really just a 'web site' that works with the iPhone, there's no executable to sell. It could be that the obvious answer is that you want to sell your app on the App Store is to make money. But since your GWT app is just a web app, wouldn't it be better to just make sure your target audience knows about your GWT app and maybe you could charge for use of the app by forcing an authenticated login that was just restricted to 'paid' users. Maybe it's the jet lag kicking in but I'd never even thought about wanting to sell a 'web app' from the App Store. Am I missing something you're trying to accomplish? - John - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because
Re: published iphone apps written in GWT
GWT is a processor-intensive way of building an interface and therefore not ideally suited to the iPhone's low power CPU. this made development harder than it should have been. an example is rendering a list of items using GWT to build panels and widgets where items may take 0.2s to render, leading to an application that lags for 2 seconds just to build a list of 10 items. you end up keeping widget objects and the DOM at a distance, which is obviously not ideal. as a pure web app, you also need to consider client side caching, and the iPhone will only cache objects under 25K. as the generated GWT code all resides in one big file, this results in a scenario where the device refuses to cache and always requests a new copy from the web. this in itself is a good reason to deploy the code locally, wrapped in a binary. I'm not a huge Obj-C fan, although I like it more now that I've picked it up and written some code. Nevertheless, I still prefer web technologies as they are cross-platform and generally more flexible. I therefore would choose embedded web apps in the future over pure native clients, but that is just the nature of the projects I am working on. WRT to http://riflethru.com/ I had written code to investigate what was possible, but the project overall is still not feature complete. I need to enable bidding on the application before it will get released to the App Store. /dave On Oct 29, 6:50 am, mike7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Dave, This is interesting. I presume you built the riflethru app? I would like to hear a little more about this development method. Can you give me some highlights? For example, how long did it take? Any unexpected hiccups? I looked for it in the app store and did not find it... was it not published? Many thanks, Mike On Oct 28, 6:19 pm, davidroe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that being in the app store is likely to attract more users to your application as this is where people tend to look. Additionally, not all apps in the store cost money, so why not use it to organise web apps? That said, I think that the user expects to find applications that will run natively, rather than something that will just launch an instance of Safari pointing at your web app. If you are following PhoneGap, you will see that some developers are releasing hybrid applications that are written using web app techniques but have access to the phone's native functionality. This is done using UIWebView and a wrapper around your web app. As far as I am aware, such applications will not fail the Apple review process just because they were developed using this approach. There are definitely advantages to this approach, especially if you are a web developer with no experience using Obj-C. I played with something similar a while ago forhttp://riflethru.com/ to see what is possible. I ended up with a native application with embedded GWT, so all the HTML/CSS/JS sit as resources inside the binary and are loaded locally rather than over the wire. /dave On Oct 27, 11:55 am, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone list some iphone apps that were written in GWT and have been published in the app store? Maybe I'm being thick but... my first impression when I read this question was... why/how would want to sell it through the App Store? Since the GWT app is really just a 'web site' that works with the iPhone, there's no executable to sell. It could be that the obvious answer is that you want to sell your app on the App Store is to make money. But since your GWT app is just a web app, wouldn't it be better to just make sure your target audience knows about your GWT app and maybe you could charge for use of the app by forcing an authenticated login that was just restricted to 'paid' users. Maybe it's the jet lag kicking in but I'd never even thought about wanting to sell a 'web app' from the App Store. Am I missing something you're trying to accomplish? - John - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: published iphone apps written in GWT
I think that being in the app store is likely to attract more users to your application as this is where people tend to look. Additionally, not all apps in the store cost money, so why not use it to organise web apps? That said, I think that the user expects to find applications that will run natively, rather than something that will just launch an instance of Safari pointing at your web app. If you are following PhoneGap, you will see that some developers are releasing hybrid applications that are written using web app techniques but have access to the phone's native functionality. This is done using UIWebView and a wrapper around your web app. As far as I am aware, such applications will not fail the Apple review process just because they were developed using this approach. There are definitely advantages to this approach, especially if you are a web developer with no experience using Obj-C. I played with something similar a while ago for http://riflethru.com/ to see what is possible. I ended up with a native application with embedded GWT, so all the HTML/CSS/JS sit as resources inside the binary and are loaded locally rather than over the wire. /dave On Oct 27, 11:55 am, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone list some iphone apps that were written in GWT and have been published in the app store? Maybe I'm being thick but... my first impression when I read this question was... why/how would want to sell it through the App Store? Since the GWT app is really just a 'web site' that works with the iPhone, there's no executable to sell. It could be that the obvious answer is that you want to sell your app on the App Store is to make money. But since your GWT app is just a web app, wouldn't it be better to just make sure your target audience knows about your GWT app and maybe you could charge for use of the app by forcing an authenticated login that was just restricted to 'paid' users. Maybe it's the jet lag kicking in but I'd never even thought about wanting to sell a 'web app' from the App Store. Am I missing something you're trying to accomplish? - John - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT 1.5 Code Bloat ?
I haven't a clue myself, but the feeling I get is that the numerous changes and improvements from 1.4 to 1.5 are less focused on reducing the code size and more about improving code performance. If code size is of high importance to you, I suggest you look at what (else) you can streamline within your own code base. /dave On Sep 5, 6:00 am, Kurt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, so using OBF reveals that its much closer than I thought, but still disappointing that the code size didn't go DOWN: 1.5 647,568 C760DB4C26233F65E2579723CA7BE050.cache.html 1.4 634,399 EFB925C5F054962BC7951D976730A34A.cache.html So 2% growth is not my issue. I was expecting/hoping for maybe a 20% reduction since the linker should eliminate a bunch of unused/dead code. I'm betting the new types for LinkedHashMap and IdentityHashMap, etc. are being pulled in to cause some of the growth, but who knows? On Sep 4, 7:01 pm, Folke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 4, 3:42 pm, Kurt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [..] DETAILED [..] Use OBF(USCATED) for a real comparison and PRETTY to see what's going on. I'm thinking that method inlining is the culprit, but want to get a handle on it. Can anyone tell me what to look at in generating the compilation output to narrow down why the app is now 10% larger? Yes, inlining is the culprit, but there's also a lot of new code that adds more safety, like long emulation. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Chrome support
[1] IE6 downloads the ImageBundle and the clear.cache.gif for each and every image on the screen, even if you show 50x the same... could this be solved using this solution that I just copied from the internets? LoadModule expires_module libexec/mod_expires.so AddModule mod_expires.c IfModule mod_expires.c ExpiresActive On ExpiresByType image/jpg access plus 1 month ExpiresByType image/jpeg access plus 1 month ExpiresByType image/gif access plus 1 month ExpiresByType image/png access plus 1 month /IfModule assuming you are using Apache /dave --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
