Re: Your opinion sought: Jetty or Tomcat?

2008-10-20 Thread matias_warrior 

I've been using -noserver since GWT 1.3

On Oct 13, 7:48 pm, "Bruce Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Hope you're enjoying 1.5.
>
> The GWT team has started putting together a 1.6 roadmap, which we'll publish
> as soon as we have it nailed down. Two of the areas we want to work on for
> 1.6 are some improvements to hosted mode startup time and a friendlier
> output directory structure (something that looks more .war-like).
>
> As part of this effort, we've all but decided to switch the hosted mode
> embedded HTTP server from Tomcat to Jetty. Would this break you? (And if so,
> how mad would you be if we did it anyway?) We figure most people who really
> care about the web.xml and so on are already using "-noserver" to have full
> control over their server config.
>
> Thanks,
> Bruce
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Google Chrome

2008-09-03 Thread matias_warrior 

What about a GWT DOM impl for Chrome?

On Sep 3, 7:24 am, Reinier Zwitserloot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> askar: Did you try to contribute to GWT?
>
> They accept anyone, and are willing to listen to any patch proposal
> you have, provided you of course do the work. It doesn't look like
> anyone cares if you actually work at google. This meritocracy system
> is essentially the same as any open source project, so what possible
> good would it do if google 'completely transfer it to open source
> community'.
>
> On Sep 2, 3:52 pm, askar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Recently I have been feeling pessimistic about GWT future, although we
> > are using GWT in our product. It seems like development slowed down
> > significantly during 1.5 release cycle and I'm anxious whether Google
> > guys can finally stop working on GWT and completely transfer it to
> > open source community. Undoubtedly, the choice of technology for
> > development of enterprise applications depends on technology's
> > perspectives and it's a pity we don't know how Google envisages GWT
> > roadmap. From that point of view, Adobe AIR and Microsoft Silverlight
> > seem to be better options as a platform to use for next several years.
> > I think we can be sure that both technologies will be there for a long
> > time; can you say the same about GWT? Should you invest in writing
> > tons of code for the platform that will be abandoned soon?
>
> > Having said that, I do think that GWT is a great technology that we
> > get for free. It has a great advantage over AIR and Silverlight - it
> > does not need any additional plugins for the browser. I hope that GWT
> > will be integrated somehow with Google Chrome because that would mean
> > longer life for GWT as a platform.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Google Chrome

2008-09-02 Thread matias_warrior 

Is there going to be any special support from Google Chrome to GWT?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---