Re: GWT Confluence Plugin
There was one a nice article about this topic from the creators of the Confluence Taskdock Plugin (that is built using GWT) http://open.taskdock.com/display/confluence/Developing+a+GWT+Application+for+Confluence but the link is dead now. David Peterson from Customware has released a support library (GWT 1.4) perhaps this is a help for you: https://svn.atlassian.com/fisheye/browse/public/contrib/confluence/libraries/org.randombits.confluence/confluence-gwt/trunk On Jun 28, 9:27 pm, krude kirstr...@gmail.com wrote: Has anyone deployed a GWT app as an Atlassian plugin for Confluence and have an example of it? I have had a hard time finding anything but I believe it is possible. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Sync AJAX ( instead of async)
I understand that asynchronous is the way to go and sometimes we change UI design just to support async. But atleast in our project, there are functional requirements where sync is the only solution. (BTW: sync is not as bad. I understand that javascript in browser is single threaded but it's used by a single user to do a single task. And if sync response is required to meet functional need than we got to do sync. It does not effect scalability of whole app ) Anyway any body used any hack to support sync. (Is JSNI the only way to go?) On Jul 21, 9:10 am, Nathan Wells nwwe...@gmail.com wrote: There is only one case I know of where synchronous should be used: when you want to do a server call and get a response when the user is leaving the page. If you don't use synchronous here, you will fail to get the response from whatever asynchronous call you made when the page exits. On Jul 21, 8:14 am, Dimitrijeviæ Ivan dim...@gmail.com wrote: It is strongly recommended to avoid using AJAX on synchronous way! Remember that A in AJAX is for Asynchronous. So you should consider and use this as a feature not as a problem. Using AJAX on Synchronous way is a very common anti pattern in AJAX programming. On Jul 20, 9:09 pm, Prakash prakash.masilam...@gmail.com wrote: Its not possible with GWT. refer below link.http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/FAQ_Server.html Regards, Prakash M. On Jul 20, 10:06 am, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote: How to make an GWT AJAX call Sync (instead of async) billion years back we used to use a flag as below. how to do it from GWT. AJAX.open(GET, url, false); It's just that for a particular requirement we have to have call sync- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Sync AJAX ( instead of async)
Thanks cokol for A+ responses. On Jul 21, 10:10 am, cokol eplisc...@googlemail.com wrote: I see, i think google just did not want to make a tool which can be abused resulting in frustrated users :) but anyway, you can endeed get it simpler than just hacking JSNI from scratch - extend the XMLHttpRequest class and add a new method open() which flags the underlying connection as async (by simply provide 'false' instead of 'true'). Unfortunately you cannot override any methods since they are final :D but you can look into the source and grab the line from method body (actually just 2 lines) br On 21 Jul., 18:00, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote: I understand that asynchronous is the way to go and sometimes we change UI design just to support async. But atleast in our project, there are functional requirements where sync is the only solution. (BTW: sync is not as bad. I understand that javascript in browser is single threaded but it's used by a single user to do a single task. And if sync response is required to meet functional need than we got to do sync. It does not effect scalability of whole app ) Anyway any body used any hack to support sync. (Is JSNI the only way to go?) On Jul 21, 9:10 am, Nathan Wells nwwe...@gmail.com wrote: There is only one case I know of where synchronous should be used: when you want to do a server call and get a response when the user is leaving the page. If you don't use synchronous here, you will fail to get the response from whatever asynchronous call you made when the page exits. On Jul 21, 8:14 am, Dimitrijeviæ Ivan dim...@gmail.com wrote: It is strongly recommended to avoid using AJAX on synchronous way! Remember that A in AJAX is for Asynchronous. So you should consider and use this as a feature not as a problem. Using AJAX on Synchronous way is a very common anti pattern in AJAX programming. On Jul 20, 9:09 pm, Prakash prakash.masilam...@gmail.com wrote: Its not possible with GWT. refer below link.http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/FAQ_Server.html Regards, Prakash M. On Jul 20, 10:06 am, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote: How to make an GWT AJAX call Sync (instead of async) billion years back we used to use a flag as below. how to do it from GWT. AJAX.open(GET, url, false); It's just that for a particular requirement we have to have call sync- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: AJAX of type GET ( and not POST)?
Thanks cokol and Stefan I expect cache from GET On Jul 21, 8:07 am, Stefan Bachert stefanbach...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi, what do you expect from using GET instead of POST? Basically POST could definitely transfer many bytes, GET may have a limit. (In the past they talked about 2K limit for an url, which may no more apply) It is more effort necessary to do a CSRF/XSRF with POST, so I consider POST somewhat more secure. (However, I consider most recent GWT-RPC to be save against CSRF/XSRF) Stefan Bachert http::/gwtworld.de due to recent cases, I am sorry, I won't do free personal support. inquiries for professional GWT support are welcome. On 20 Jul., 18:51, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a way to make AJAX async call of type GET ( instead of POST). (RequestBuilder is ok but still is there a easier way)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Cache static data?
Thanks. However, I am looking for non-HTML5 solution. Is there a better solution to cache than recompiling whole app? Static data may be weekly tips, monthly discounts etc which are applicable for all users. (This is kind of data which changes infrequently) On Jul 20, 8:17 am, Stefan Bachert stefanbach...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi, Html5 supports caching and databases. However, only modern browsers support Html5 When this data changes for all users, consider to recompile your app bi-weekly with new datas. Stefan Bachert http::/gwtworld.de due to recent cases, I am sorry, I won't do free personal support. inquiries for professional GWT support are welcome. On 20 Jul., 04:52, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote: How to cache data in browser. I want to cache data which changes infrequently (thus static common data changing bi-weekly and NOT html, js, css etc).- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Cache static data?
hmm... we do have HTTP servers which set headers to cache forever. Do anybody uses solution to cache static data (like GWT uses for js files which cache forever and file name is equal to hashmap to prevent 304 calls). Again a solution wherein there is network call to load static data only when it's modifed at server. On Jul 20, 9:55 am, Arthur Kalmenson arthur.k...@gmail.com wrote: GWT is not responsible for setting cache headers, you have to set them through your HTTP server. -- Arthur Kalmenson On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:46 AM, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks. However, I am looking for non-HTML5 solution. Is there a better solution to cache than recompiling whole app? Static data may be weekly tips, monthly discounts etc which are applicable for all users. (This is kind of data which changes infrequently) On Jul 20, 8:17 am, Stefan Bachert stefanbach...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi, Html5 supports caching and databases. However, only modern browsers support Html5 When this data changes for all users, consider to recompile your app bi-weekly with new datas. Stefan Bachert http::/gwtworld.de due to recent cases, I am sorry, I won't do free personal support. inquiries for professional GWT support are welcome. On 20 Jul., 04:52, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote: How to cache data in browser. I want to cache data which changes infrequently (thus static common data changing bi-weekly and NOT html, js, css etc).- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Share user input data from + MVP + Lady_Gaga
Following is one of MVP sequence for TWO widgets 1) 1st VIEW has a simple textbox and submit button, wherein use enters her name Lady_Gaga and click submit. 2) 1st PRESENTER fires an event on submit_button_click. 3) 2nd PRESENTER catches that event and displays 2nd VIEW as dialog box with user entered name Lady_Gaga Question) How user entered name Lady_Gaga be passed from 1st VIEW to 2nd VIEW ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Share user input data within MVP + Lady_Gaga
How to share user input data within MVP. Following is one of MVP sequence for TWO widgets 1) 1st VIEW has a simple textbox and submit button, wherein use enters her name Lady_Gaga and click submit. 2) 1st PRESENTER fires an event ( cuz of button click). 3) 2nd PRESENTER catches that event and displays 2nd VIEW as dialog box with user entered name Lady_Gaga Question) How user entered name Lady_Gaga be passed from 1st VIEW to 2nd VIEW ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Share user input data within MVP + Lady_Gaga
Thanks a lot. Now if there are three DIFFERENT presenters (say 2a,2b,2c) listening event from 1st presenter. Than do 1st presenter has to create event with all the appro. values required by 2a,2b,2c presenters? Plz respond. On Jul 19, 3:59 pm, Arthur Kalmenson arthur.k...@gmail.com wrote: Isn't the second presenter setting the value in the second view based on the event it just caught? You're describing the interaction right there. -- Arthur Kalmenson On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:54 PM, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote: How to share user input data within MVP. Following is one of MVP sequence for TWO widgets 1) 1st VIEW has a simple textbox and submit button, wherein use enters her name Lady_Gaga and click submit. 2) 1st PRESENTER fires an event ( cuz of button click). 3) 2nd PRESENTER catches that event and displays 2nd VIEW as dialog box with user entered name Lady_Gaga Question) How user entered name Lady_Gaga be passed from 1st VIEW to 2nd VIEW ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Cache static data?
How to cache data in browser. I want to cache data which changes infrequently (thus static common data changing bi-weekly and NOT html, js, css etc). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: network data per second
IMHO, if our design to reduce network calls, facilitates our servers to handle growing amount of work gracefully. Than are not we improving scalability ?. For example if max server load = # of requests * load per request * CONSTANT = 1000 Before optimication with chatty software it is (1000 requests * 1 load per request *CONSTANT) = 1000 After optimization with reduced network calls it is ( 500 requests * 1.5 load per request * CONSTANT) = 750. Thus now server is available to handle more requests. But above is only possible if client had enough bandwidth to receive coarse grained data ( so that client's inital page load is not too slow. BTW: if applicable we will have background threads to load data in browser for upcoming screens) Plz correct me if above is wrong. BTW: web servers in cloud are idlely located with fiber channel in tier-1 network. (so not much of issue of bandwidth at server). And I wish we have all the data before we start software development but currently we just have to make wise ( or stupid) guesses On Jul 16, 8:00 am, David Vree david.h.v...@gmail.com wrote: Scalability is a function of many things such as statelessness, clustering, latency, connection pooling, etc. the list goes on and on. But scalability is NOT a function of network throughput on the client sideserver side yes, but not client side. I think the requirement you are trying to meet is performance...how fast the app will respond to users over a broadband connection. In this case, I think your assumption of 1Mbs is a reasonable one...I base this on years of personal experience, but no hard data collection. But again, this is about performance, not scalability. On Jul 15, 11:21 pm, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote: the requirement we are trying to meet is scalability... To get scalability in our app we have to reduce network calls by each user.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: network data per second
Unrelated to original question. how do you guys cache static data in browser. I am talking about static data which changes say once every month. ( I am not talking abt images, js, css etc). Our solution is bit complicated and I am sure there are easier solutions/patterns On Jul 16, 10:53 am, David Vree david.h.v...@gmail.com wrote: A great book to read on the subject is Scalable Internet Architectures. It shows why common sense applied to scalability is almost always wrong. A coarse grained conversation will decrease the number of calls, but will increase the load per call. So there may be some small gain in scalability, but not much. There will be a gain in client performance potentially. The way to increase scalability is to ensure statelessness so you can cluster, reduce calls to the database, push static content out to specialized servers, replicate the database backend when possible, use better/different switches/routers/web servers, etc., etc., etc. IMO -- Dave On Jul 16, 12:37 pm, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote: IMHO, if our design to reduce network calls, facilitates our servers to handle growing amount of work gracefully. Than are not we improving scalability ?. For example if max server load = # of requests * load per request * CONSTANT = 1000 Before optimication with chatty software it is (1000 requests * 1 load per request *CONSTANT) = 1000 After optimization with reduced network calls it is ( 500 requests * 1.5 load per request * CONSTANT) = 750. Thus now server is available to handle more requests. But above is only possible if client had enough bandwidth to receive coarse grained data ( so that client's inital page load is not too slow. BTW: if applicable we will have background threads to load data in browser for upcoming screens) Plz correct me if above is wrong. BTW: web servers in cloud are idlely located with fiber channel in tier-1 network. (so not much of issue of bandwidth at server). And I wish we have all the data before we start software development but currently we just have to make wise ( or stupid) guesses On Jul 16, 8:00 am, David Vree david.h.v...@gmail.com wrote: Scalability is a function of many things such as statelessness, clustering, latency, connection pooling, etc. the list goes on and on. But scalability is NOT a function of network throughput on the client sideserver side yes, but not client side. I think the requirement you are trying to meet is performance...how fast the app will respond to users over a broadband connection. In this case, I think your assumption of 1Mbs is a reasonable one...I base this on years of personal experience, but no hard data collection. But again, this is about performance, not scalability. On Jul 15, 11:21 pm, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote: the requirement we are trying to meet is scalability... To get scalability in our app we have to reduce network calls by each user.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: network data per second
Unrelated to original question. how do you guys cache static data in browser. I am talking about static data which changes say once every month for example monthly discount item. (I am not talking abt images, js, css etc.) Our solution is bit complicated and I am sure there are easier solutions/patterns On Jul 16, 10:53 am, David Vree david.h.v...@gmail.com wrote: A great book to read on the subject is Scalable Internet Architectures. It shows why common sense applied to scalability is almost always wrong. A coarse grained conversation will decrease the number of calls, but will increase the load per call. So there may be some small gain in scalability, but not much. There will be a gain in client performance potentially. The way to increase scalability is to ensure statelessness so you can cluster, reduce calls to the database, push static content out to specialized servers, replicate the database backend when possible, use better/different switches/routers/web servers, etc., etc., etc. IMO -- Dave On Jul 16, 12:37 pm, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote: IMHO, if our design to reduce network calls, facilitates our servers to handle growing amount of work gracefully. Than are not we improving scalability ?. For example if max server load = # of requests * load per request * CONSTANT = 1000 Before optimication with chatty software it is (1000 requests * 1 load per request *CONSTANT) = 1000 After optimization with reduced network calls it is ( 500 requests * 1.5 load per request * CONSTANT) = 750. Thus now server is available to handle more requests. But above is only possible if client had enough bandwidth to receive coarse grained data ( so that client's inital page load is not too slow. BTW: if applicable we will have background threads to load data in browser for upcoming screens) Plz correct me if above is wrong. BTW: web servers in cloud are idlely located with fiber channel in tier-1 network. (so not much of issue of bandwidth at server). And I wish we have all the data before we start software development but currently we just have to make wise ( or stupid) guesses On Jul 16, 8:00 am, David Vree david.h.v...@gmail.com wrote: Scalability is a function of many things such as statelessness, clustering, latency, connection pooling, etc. the list goes on and on. But scalability is NOT a function of network throughput on the client sideserver side yes, but not client side. I think the requirement you are trying to meet is performance...how fast the app will respond to users over a broadband connection. In this case, I think your assumption of 1Mbs is a reasonable one...I base this on years of personal experience, but no hard data collection. But again, this is about performance, not scalability. On Jul 15, 11:21 pm, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote: the requirement we are trying to meet is scalability... To get scalability in our app we have to reduce network calls by each user.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
network data per second
Any idea how much actual data we can send per second over boradband connection? Is this assumption true that a general internet user gets an average of 1Mbps ( after http,tcp,ethernet ovrehead ) ? Thus we can send 128KB of data (i.e.html, js, image, css) per second. There is no ocean hop of packets. Any corrections? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: network data per second
the requirement we are trying to meet is scalability... To get scalability in our app we have to reduce network calls by each user. Thus we are bundling data of 3-4 web pages in one webpage transfer. Or for autosuggestion box, we are transferring all possible suggestions (in hundreds) in one transfer. Or we are sending the heavy weight data model etc etc. Now above works for users with reasonably high speed broadband but for slow users this optimization may not work out .. (btw: we have whole professional survey going on to get user's broadband speed data but it will take 2 month before we get this number).. (thus we have to continue with wise guess instead of waiting) Thus the original question On Jul 15, 8:08 pm, Ian Petersen ispet...@gmail.com wrote: I don't personally have an answer for you. I'm not using GWT anymore these days--I've moved on to a new project and it's got nothing to do with the web. I stick around because I think it's cool tech and I'd like to come back one day. I think narrowing yourself to urban US and urban Europe, and assuming broadband means you might be able to get some useful numbers, but I don't feel qualified to tell you what they'll be. I'm still curious to know the reason that you care about these numbers, though. If, for the sake of argument, 1Mbps is a good average, what does that tell you? I've seen broadband for sale anywhere from 128Kbps to 50Mbps. That's a range of at least three orders of magnitude there. Do you really care what the arithmetic mean is? Ian On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:54 PM, munna kaka munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote: I was afraid that I will get the response you sent. If I can add more to the original question than it's that US urban broadband connected users will be served by servers in US and european urban broadband connected users will be served by servers in europe. thus what's your assumptions about speed and it's effect on web page speed. (Is 1Mbps speed assumption low or ?) On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Ian Petersen ispet...@gmail.com wrote: I think that question is impossible to answer in general. If you have a user base in mind, it might be possible to start generalizing, but the internet as a whole is too diverse for averages to have any utility. For example, the Canadian government has (had?) a mandate to make its online properties accessible to 100% of online Canadians. Some huge percentage of Canada, by population, is urban and has broadband, but there are a heck of a lot of connected farmers in the middle of rural Canada dialing into the web at speeds like 56k. In my experience, these facts combine to make the government's websites seem rather low-tech. They do load nice and quickly, though. :) Anyway, my point is just that you need to ask your users what their connection speed is like, not the-internet-at-large, because the answers will almost certainly be different. Ian On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:39 PM, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote: Any idea how much actual data we can send per second over boradband connection? Is this assumption true that a general internet user gets an average of 1Mbps ( after http,tcp,ethernet ovrehead ) ? Thus we can send 128KB of data (i.e.html, js, image, css) per second. There is no ocean hop of packets. Any corrections? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Caution: SmartGwt loadup size is big
We have a tiny widget from SmartClient's SmartGwt. And it had increased the intial loadup size between webserver and browser by 2.3MB +.( js, css) Thus be cautious if you think this can hamper performance. (If anybody has solution to above than plz share ). FYI: We do changed header of script to cache all SmartClient's scripts forever. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
clinet session something like httpsession
How to implement a client side session ( something like httpsession at server). Is it to just create a static variable ? How do two different MVP widgets share MODEL data (for example user entered data in one widget to be passed to second widget of table to show data for that date). How do two different MVP widgets share VIEW data ( for example if a widget (say help dialog box) is dependent on mouse click location of second widget, than how do two widgets share view information i.e. mouse click location). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Client side mapping between model objects
How do you maintain mapping between Model objects at client browser? Say for example, over the course of user conversation, there were three DIFFERENT ajax calls to load CUSTOMER, ORDERS and ITEMS. Now do you manually map CUSTOMER to ORDER and ORDER to ITEM in client to maintain mapping between Model objects.. ( or do you store CUSTOMER, ORDER, ITEM separatly with no mapping or there is a framework like hibernate mappings but for browser which maps model objects with configuration) thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Client OR mapping
How do you maintain rich OR mapping in client. For example CUSTOMER has many ORDERS and each ORDER has many ITEMS. Now GWT makes DIFFERENT ajax calls wherein CUSTOMER, ORDER, ITEM are loaded at separate times (eager fetching does not look good thus lazy fetching only). Thus do you manually map objects again in client ( or do you store CUSTOMER, ORDER, ITEM in separate shared variables or something else.). I am sure you experts out there must have some directions for us. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
GWT adoption
Do you guys think that GWT will the most widely used framework in future ( or there will be mix of other frameworks in future. If yes than which frameworks). I am little worried that why GWT is not adopted at a rate I would have thought for last 4 yrs. why why... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Client session
How to implement a client side session ( and any best practices to implement them). Is it to just create a static variable ? How do two different MVP widgets share MODEL data (i.e. user input data). How do two different MVP widgets share VIEW data ( for example if display of one widget is dependent on mouse click location of second widget, than how do two widgets share view information i.e. mouse click location). Again, all widgets are designed using MVP and send events using EventBus. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Dependency injection perf issues
I used DI i.e. used @Inject to inject (Presenter, EventBus) in all of Views. Now it seems that if I use DI than all views are generated at web app intial start time in browser. Thus start time becomes slow. Am I right? ( I think I heard something like this before also but just want to validate). So if above is true than using @Inject is no good .. right? ( or where can we use @Inject ). Can we use use @Inject to lazily create views instead of web app start time? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Client session
I am sure many experts out there had already found solution to below. Thus please respond to original question. On Jul 9, 11:48 am, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote: How to implement a client side session ( and any best practices to implement them). Is it to just create a static variable ? How do two different MVP widgets share MODEL data (i.e. user input data). How do two different MVP widgets share VIEW data ( for example if display of one widget is dependent on mouse click location of second widget, than how do two widgets share view information i.e. mouse click location). Again, all widgets are designed using MVP and send events using EventBus. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Client OR mapping
Thanks for response. However may be my question was misleading and thus I did not get the answer. My question is how do you maintain mapping between Model objects at client Say for example, over the course of user conversation, there were three DIFFERENT ajax calls to load CUSTOMER, ORDERS and ITEMS. Now do you manually map CUSTOMER to ORDER and ORDER to ITEM in client after data is received from server, to maintain mapping between Model objects ( or do you store CUSTOMER, ORDER, ITEM separatly with no mapping or there is a framework which maps obejcts with configuration like hibernate mappings in client) thanks On Jul 12, 12:34 pm, Stefan Bachert stefanbach...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi, the client does not know about OR at all. There is NO WAY to lazy load something. The client only know objects. In a real good client architecture a view/control works against a model proxy in the client (sometimes I call them client object cache) Either the model object is already in the cache or it will be requested. In such an architecture the use of comet/server-push techniques is essential. You could decide on server side which strategy regarding a certain model object is the best (eager supplying dependent object too, or not ) However, feeling well in the async world is a prerequisite Stefan Bacherthttp://gwtworld.de On 9 Jul., 20:22, mk munna.kaka.ch...@gmail.com wrote: How do you maintain rich OR mapping in client. For example CUSTOMER has many ORDERS and each ORDER has many ITEMS. Now GWT makes DIFFERENT ajax calls wherein CUSTOMER, ORDER, ITEM are loaded at separate times (eager fetching does not look good thus lazy fetching only). Thus do you manually map objects again in client ( or do you store CUSTOMER, ORDER, ITEM in separate shared variables or something else.). I am sure you experts out there must have some directions for us.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
GWT Session problem
I use the following method to get session ID in my
[RemoteServiceServlet] class:
protected String getSessionId()
{
return getThreadLocalRequest().getSession().getId() ;
}
It used to work nicely. Then all of a sudden, it started returning a
different ID with every call. I use tomcat 6. I have tried switching
to the latest version of tomcat, then tried both IE6 and Firefox 3
with the same result. Any idea what the issue could be?
I understand that I could get and return the ID on the first call and
pass it back to the server as a parameter with each subsequent
request, but that's a lot of extra work and also defeats the purpose
of session management.
Thank you.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
