Re: Quick question about gwtc
Thanks, Matt. I was hoping so, especially because I expect better reliability from a source code compiler than from something working on bytecode. (There would however be some nice possibilities with the latter - especially it could work with programming languages like Scala...) One more quick question: Is there any documentation for gwtc (command line arguments etc.)? The javadoc of com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler is basically empty, and in the Developer's guide I didn't find much either... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Quick question about gwtc
The GWT compiler translates Java sources to JavaScript sources. This allows for things like JSNI, which would be lost in the bytecode, as well as allowing for greater optimization possibilities On Jan 8, 7:14 am, Chris Lercher cl_for_mail...@gmx.net wrote: Hi, quick question: What exactly does gwtc translate? Does it translate .class = .js or .java = .js? I thought I'd find the answer easily in the build.xml generated by webAppCreator - but target gwtc takes both the source and the classes as input, so I'm none the wiser... Thanks Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
