subject:"Re\: Using @UiChild with Elements not widgets, is this even possible\?"

Re: Using @UiChild with Elements not widgets, is this even possible?

2014-09-03 Thread stuckagain

Hi,
 
I would love seeing some improvements to UiBinder that it would allow 
String of SafeHtml for children. I don't want my templates to be full of 
HTMLPanel when just a String or SafeHtml would do. Specifying these 
"children" using attributes is not really a great idea since I don't want 
to escape html in an attribute in a UiBinder file.
 
David
 

On Saturday, October 5, 2013 11:48:17 PM UTC+2, Seth wrote:

> Hi Thomas,
>
> Just one last thing, are there still no plans for uibinder element parsing 
> functionality extension like the patch in this issue 
> ? 
> Would be preeetty awesome.
>
> On Saturday, October 5, 2013 10:54:36 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>>
>> Ah sorry, hadn't looked carefully at your code: with 
>> @UiChild(tagname="div"), UiBinder expects a  ("my" being the same 
>> as the containing widget):
>>
>> 
>>   
>> 
>>   foo
>> 
>>   
>> 
>>
>> That doesn't change the problem though: apparently (looking at the code), 
>> only widgets are allowed. With the above XML, the "my:div" only exists to 
>> call the @UiChild method, passing the HTMLPanel as argument.
>>
>> On Saturday, October 5, 2013 10:49:11 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>>>
>>> Looks like I was wrong and you can only use widgets (there's an explicit 
>>> "isImportedElement" test that checks the element is within a namespace 
>>> whose URI starts with “urn:import:”)
>>>
>>> BTW, isn't the error message rather “Expected child from a urn:import 
>>> namespace, found ” ?
>>>
>>> On Saturday, October 5, 2013 9:56:14 PM UTC+2, GWTter wrote:

 Hi all,

 Although the doc 
 
  does 
 say "...add a child widget to..." in my searching it seems as if you can 
 also use UiChild with DOM elements that extend 
 com.google.gwt.dom.client.Element class. Thomas Broyer gives a brief 
 description here 
 .
  
 Since it's Thomas I'm thinking this should indeed work, however for the 
 life of me I can't get it to. It always ends up in "found unexpected child 
 element: " when the child is a div element. 

 From the comments and the doc it seems that this is the setup you're 
 supposed to have:

 @UiChild(tagname = DivElement.TAG)
 public void addDiv(DivElement div) {  //note: I've even tried "adddiv" 
 just to be sure
   //do something 
 }

 and in uibinder:

 
   foo
 


 Do I just have code tunnel vision or is this not possible? Thanks in 
 advance.

 -Seth

>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Using @UiChild with Elements not widgets, is this even possible?

2013-10-05 Thread GWTter

Hi Thomas,

Just one last thing, are there still no plans for uibinder element parsing 
functionality extension like the patch in this 
issue? 
Would be preeetty awesome.

On Saturday, October 5, 2013 10:54:36 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
> Ah sorry, hadn't looked carefully at your code: with 
> @UiChild(tagname="div"), UiBinder expects a  ("my" being the same 
> as the containing widget):
>
> 
>   
> 
>   foo
> 
>   
> 
>
> That doesn't change the problem though: apparently (looking at the code), 
> only widgets are allowed. With the above XML, the "my:div" only exists to 
> call the @UiChild method, passing the HTMLPanel as argument.
>
> On Saturday, October 5, 2013 10:49:11 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>>
>> Looks like I was wrong and you can only use widgets (there's an explicit 
>> "isImportedElement" test that checks the element is within a namespace 
>> whose URI starts with “urn:import:”)
>>
>> BTW, isn't the error message rather “Expected child from a urn:import 
>> namespace, found ” ?
>>
>> On Saturday, October 5, 2013 9:56:14 PM UTC+2, GWTter wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Although the 
>>> doc
>>>  does 
>>> say "...add a child widget to..." in my searching it seems as if you can 
>>> also use UiChild with DOM elements that extend 
>>> com.google.gwt.dom.client.Element class. Thomas Broyer gives a brief 
>>> description 
>>> here.
>>>  
>>> Since it's Thomas I'm thinking this should indeed work, however for the 
>>> life of me I can't get it to. It always ends up in "found unexpected child 
>>> element: " when the child is a div element. 
>>>
>>> From the comments and the doc it seems that this is the setup you're 
>>> supposed to have:
>>>
>>> @UiChild(tagname = DivElement.TAG)
>>> public void addDiv(DivElement div) {  //note: I've even tried "adddiv" 
>>> just to be sure
>>>   //do something 
>>> }
>>>
>>> and in uibinder:
>>>
>>> 
>>>   foo
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>> Do I just have code tunnel vision or is this not possible? Thanks in 
>>> advance.
>>>
>>> -Seth
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Using @UiChild with Elements not widgets, is this even possible?

2013-10-05 Thread GWTter

I see. No problem though, thanks a lot for the explanation. I have a work 
around for this, I just wanted to make sure that I wasn't going that route 
if uichild on elements was possible. Thanks again Thomas.

On Saturday, October 5, 2013 10:54:36 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
> Ah sorry, hadn't looked carefully at your code: with 
> @UiChild(tagname="div"), UiBinder expects a  ("my" being the same 
> as the containing widget):
>
> 
>   
> 
>   foo
> 
>   
> 
>
> That doesn't change the problem though: apparently (looking at the code), 
> only widgets are allowed. With the above XML, the "my:div" only exists to 
> call the @UiChild method, passing the HTMLPanel as argument.
>
> On Saturday, October 5, 2013 10:49:11 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>>
>> Looks like I was wrong and you can only use widgets (there's an explicit 
>> "isImportedElement" test that checks the element is within a namespace 
>> whose URI starts with “urn:import:”)
>>
>> BTW, isn't the error message rather “Expected child from a urn:import 
>> namespace, found ” ?
>>
>> On Saturday, October 5, 2013 9:56:14 PM UTC+2, GWTter wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Although the 
>>> doc
>>>  does 
>>> say "...add a child widget to..." in my searching it seems as if you can 
>>> also use UiChild with DOM elements that extend 
>>> com.google.gwt.dom.client.Element class. Thomas Broyer gives a brief 
>>> description 
>>> here.
>>>  
>>> Since it's Thomas I'm thinking this should indeed work, however for the 
>>> life of me I can't get it to. It always ends up in "found unexpected child 
>>> element: " when the child is a div element. 
>>>
>>> From the comments and the doc it seems that this is the setup you're 
>>> supposed to have:
>>>
>>> @UiChild(tagname = DivElement.TAG)
>>> public void addDiv(DivElement div) {  //note: I've even tried "adddiv" 
>>> just to be sure
>>>   //do something 
>>> }
>>>
>>> and in uibinder:
>>>
>>> 
>>>   foo
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>> Do I just have code tunnel vision or is this not possible? Thanks in 
>>> advance.
>>>
>>> -Seth
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Using @UiChild with Elements not widgets, is this even possible?

2013-10-05 Thread Thomas Broyer

Ah sorry, hadn't looked carefully at your code: with 
@UiChild(tagname="div"), UiBinder expects a  ("my" being the same 
as the containing widget):


  

  foo

  


That doesn't change the problem though: apparently (looking at the code), 
only widgets are allowed. With the above XML, the "my:div" only exists to 
call the @UiChild method, passing the HTMLPanel as argument.

On Saturday, October 5, 2013 10:49:11 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
> Looks like I was wrong and you can only use widgets (there's an explicit 
> "isImportedElement" test that checks the element is within a namespace 
> whose URI starts with “urn:import:”)
>
> BTW, isn't the error message rather “Expected child from a urn:import 
> namespace, found ” ?
>
> On Saturday, October 5, 2013 9:56:14 PM UTC+2, GWTter wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Although the 
>> doc
>>  does 
>> say "...add a child widget to..." in my searching it seems as if you can 
>> also use UiChild with DOM elements that extend 
>> com.google.gwt.dom.client.Element class. Thomas Broyer gives a brief 
>> description 
>> here.
>>  
>> Since it's Thomas I'm thinking this should indeed work, however for the 
>> life of me I can't get it to. It always ends up in "found unexpected child 
>> element: " when the child is a div element. 
>>
>> From the comments and the doc it seems that this is the setup you're 
>> supposed to have:
>>
>> @UiChild(tagname = DivElement.TAG)
>> public void addDiv(DivElement div) {  //note: I've even tried "adddiv" 
>> just to be sure
>>   //do something 
>> }
>>
>> and in uibinder:
>>
>> 
>>   foo
>> 
>>
>>
>> Do I just have code tunnel vision or is this not possible? Thanks in 
>> advance.
>>
>> -Seth
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Using @UiChild with Elements not widgets, is this even possible?

2013-10-05 Thread Thomas Broyer

Looks like I was wrong and you can only use widgets (there's an explicit 
"isImportedElement" test that checks the element is within a namespace 
whose URI starts with “urn:import:”)

BTW, isn't the error message rather “Expected child from a urn:import 
namespace, found ” ?

On Saturday, October 5, 2013 9:56:14 PM UTC+2, GWTter wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Although the 
> doc
>  does 
> say "...add a child widget to..." in my searching it seems as if you can 
> also use UiChild with DOM elements that extend 
> com.google.gwt.dom.client.Element class. Thomas Broyer gives a brief 
> description 
> here.
>  
> Since it's Thomas I'm thinking this should indeed work, however for the 
> life of me I can't get it to. It always ends up in "found unexpected child 
> element: " when the child is a div element. 
>
> From the comments and the doc it seems that this is the setup you're 
> supposed to have:
>
> @UiChild(tagname = DivElement.TAG)
> public void addDiv(DivElement div) {  //note: I've even tried "adddiv" 
> just to be sure
>   //do something 
> }
>
> and in uibinder:
>
> 
>   foo
> 
>
>
> Do I just have code tunnel vision or is this not possible? Thanks in 
> advance.
>
> -Seth
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Using @UiChild with Elements not widgets, is this even possible?

Re: Using @UiChild with Elements not widgets, is this even possible?

Re: Using @UiChild with Elements not widgets, is this even possible?

Re: Using @UiChild with Elements not widgets, is this even possible?

Re: Using @UiChild with Elements not widgets, is this even possible?

5 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information