Re: python gwt

2009-11-01 Thread Rodrigo Romero III

a python based GWT would be very nice, the pyjamas project is very
nice, but with google working on it, we would end up having a very
stable and tested framework.  Doing this would be very easy, I mean, i
support the Pyjamas project but, GWT had 80,000 lines of source code
in their current java version and when ported to python this same
usability was reduced to a 10% of it with only 8,000 lines.  Plus, if
it becomes a google product or project, it would be maintained and
updated in the same way the current GWT is.


On Oct 15, 8:01 am, Arthur Kalmenson arthur.k...@gmail.com wrote:
 You could always look at Pyjamas project as an 
 alternative:http://code.google.com/p/pyjamas/. I've never used it so I can't 
 say
 how good it is, but it has quite a few people on the project, if that
 says anything :P

 --
 Arthur Kalmenson



 On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 4:44 PM, alf alberto@gmail.com wrote:

  Why google team choose java to compile into javascript when create GWT
  I think best had beenpythoncompile into javascript this away server
  and client will be same and in my casepythonis better than java.

  thanks

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: python gwt

2009-10-16 Thread El Mentecato Mayor

I think the answer relies not only in the popularity of Java vs.
Python, but in the fact that Java is a static typed language, and one
with a lot of tools already in existence which can help you debug and
develop faster.  One of the reasons you want to avoid coding in a
scripting language (javascript to begin with) for the web, is the
inability to tell if there are some syntax/compiler errors before you
deploy and run on the browser.

On Oct 15, 9:01 am, Arthur Kalmenson arthur.k...@gmail.com wrote:
 You could always look at Pyjamas project as an 
 alternative:http://code.google.com/p/pyjamas/. I've never used it so I can't 
 say
 how good it is, but it has quite a few people on the project, if that
 says anything :P

 --
 Arthur Kalmenson

 On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 4:44 PM, alf alberto@gmail.com wrote:

  Why google team choose java to compile into javascript when create GWT
  I think best had been python compile into javascript this away server
  and client will be same and in my case python is better than java.

  thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: python gwt

2009-10-15 Thread Arthur Kalmenson

You could always look at Pyjamas project as an alternative:
http://code.google.com/p/pyjamas/. I've never used it so I can't say
how good it is, but it has quite a few people on the project, if that
says anything :P

--
Arthur Kalmenson



On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 4:44 PM, alf alberto@gmail.com wrote:

 Why google team choose java to compile into javascript when create GWT
 I think best had been python compile into javascript this away server
 and client will be same and in my case python is better than java.

 thanks

 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---