On 08/10/2009 01:20 PM, Jeff Chimene wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to implement an API that uses two JavaScript reserved words
in a JSON structure: public and private
Is there a clever JS technique to work-around this use of the reserved
word public?
Consider the following object
{addresses : {public: [],private:[]}
The following JSNI code fails missing name after . operator:
public final native ListString getPublicAddress() /*-{
return this.addresses.public;
}-*/;
public final native void setPublicAddress(String nextValue) /*-{
if (this.addresses.public.length = 0) {
this.addresses.public = new Array();
}
this.addresses.public.push(nextValue);
}-*/;
Looks like this may be a Rhino problem. Here's a sample Rhino session
js x = eval(({addresses:{'public':[], 'private':[],fred:[]}}))
[object Object]
js print (x.addresses.fred)
js print (x.addresses.public)
js: stdin, line 26: missing name after . operator
js: print (x.addresses.public)
js: .^
js print (x.addresses.'public')
js print (x.addresses.public)
js: stdin, line 28: missing name after . operator
js: print (x.addresses.public)
js: ..^
js
feh.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
