[gwt-contrib] Library Sources are not available in SuperDevMode
I created a demo project here: https://github.com/confile/Realtime-JSON-Test It compile with GWT compile without any problems from Eclipse. When I run the app in SuperDevMode the first compile failed with the following errors: Compiling 1 permutation Compiling permutation 0... [ERROR] An internal compiler exception occurred com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.InternalCompilerException: Unexpected error during visit. at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JVisitor.translateException(JVisitor.java:121) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JVisitor.accept(JVisitor.java:140) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JVisitor.accept(JVisitor.java:132) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.Devirtualizer.getStaticImpl(Devirtualizer.java:562) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.Devirtualizer.access$400(Devirtualizer.java:75) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.Devirtualizer$RewriteVirtualDispatches.ensureDevirtualVersionExists(Devirtualizer.java:184) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.Devirtualizer$RewriteVirtualDispatches.endVisit(Devirtualizer.java:101) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JMethod.traverse(JMethod.java:580) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor$ListContextImmutable.traverse(JModVisitor.java:183) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.acceptWithInsertRemoveImmutable(JModVisitor.java:355) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JInterfaceType.traverse(JInterfaceType.java:75) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.traverse(JModVisitor.java:380) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.accept(JModVisitor.java:292) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.accept(JModVisitor.java:284) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JProgram.visitModuleTypes(JProgram.java:1192) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JProgram.traverse(JProgram.java:1156) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.traverse(JModVisitor.java:380) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.accept(JModVisitor.java:292) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JModVisitor.accept(JModVisitor.java:284) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.Devirtualizer.execImpl(Devirtualizer.java:320) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.impl.Devirtualizer.exec(Devirtualizer.java:218) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.MonolithicJavaToJavaScriptCompiler$MonolithicPermutationCompiler.normalizeSemantics(MonolithicJavaToJavaScriptCompiler.java:95) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.JavaToJavaScriptCompiler$PermutationCompiler.compilePermutation(JavaToJavaScriptCompiler.java:290) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.MonolithicJavaToJavaScriptCompiler.compilePermutation(MonolithicJavaToJavaScriptCompiler.java:296) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.UnifiedAst.compilePermutation(UnifiedAst.java:143) at com.google.gwt.dev.CompilePerms.compile(CompilePerms.java:197) at com.google.gwt.dev.ThreadedPermutationWorkerFactory$ThreadedPermutationWorker.compile(ThreadedPermutationWorkerFactory.java:50) at com.google.gwt.dev.PermutationWorkerFactory$Manager$WorkerThread.run(PermutationWorkerFactory.java:74) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JVisitor.accept(JVisitor.java:137) ... 27 more [ERROR] no source info: source info not available [ERROR] at JsonElement.java(19): public abstract JsonElement clear(); com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JMethod [ERROR] at JsonElement.java(18): interface JsonElement extends Serializable com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JInterfaceType [ERROR] at Unknown(0): JProgram com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JProgram [ERROR] Unrecoverable exception, shutting down com.google.gwt.core.ext.UnableToCompleteException: (see previous log entries) at com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompilationProblemReporter.logAndTranslateException(CompilationProblemReporter.java:106) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.JavaToJavaScriptCompiler$PermutationCompiler.compilePermutation(JavaToJavaScriptCompiler.java:367) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.MonolithicJavaToJavaScriptCompiler.compilePermutation(MonolithicJavaToJavaScriptCompiler.java:296) at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.UnifiedAst.compilePermutation(UnifiedAst.java:143) at com.google.gwt.dev.CompilePerms.compile(CompilePerms.java:197) at com.google.gwt.dev.ThreadedPermutationWorkerFactory$ThreadedPermutationWorker.compile(ThreadedPermutationWorkerFactory.java:50) at com.google.gwt.dev.PermutationWorkerFactory$Manager$WorkerThread.run(PermutationWorkerFactory.java:74) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) [ERROR] Not all permutation were compiled , completed (0/1) [WARN] recompile failed [WARN] continuing to serve previous version The library uses the *super-source path=super /* tag. From the GWT documentation I found ( http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/DevGuideOrganizingProjects.html) In development mode, the native JRE classes always supercede classes
Re: [gwt-contrib] Javascript Exceptions in SDM about classes not being defined
Thanks a lot for the work around, Daniel. My sanity is saved.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:58 PM, 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors
google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com wrote:
This looks like the same compiler bug we are currently investigating, for
now you can clear your SDM cache (button on its page) and you should be
able to continue.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Ali Akhtar ali.rac...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT, from
https://github.com/manolo/gwt-snapshot/raw/master/
When I try to invoke the following method:
public ClerkD setEvents(HasValue?... fields)
{
for (HasValue? f : fields)
{
f.addValueChangeHandler( e - validate() );
}
return this;
}
I get the following exception:
com.google.gwt.core.client.JavaScriptException: (ReferenceError) :
Lcom_google_gwt_user_client_ui_HasValue_2_classLit_0_g$ is not defined
Any ideas what's going on here? The code compiles, I have the classes on
classpath, but I still see that exception.
In fact, lately I've been getting a lot of these 'xxx_classLit_0_g$ not
defined' exceptions in SDM. E.g:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-web-toolkit/RzsjqX2gGd4
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-web-toolkit/Uf3IUgeUdP8
It seems that using any random class in GWT can cause that exception to
come up. Which doesn't make sense as I'm writing valid code that compiles.
Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug in the compiler?
Would greatly appreciate if any light can be shed on this.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
GWT Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/83b0b1f8-f8a7-4997-8426-62804e286adf%40googlegroups.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/83b0b1f8-f8a7-4997-8426-62804e286adf%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Google Germany GmbH
*Dienerstr. 12*
*80331 München*
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Katherine Stephens
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups GWT Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/RWSov9AilF4/unsubscribe
.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CALLujirarjkVZiL-KXu735kWtSuiRQdMiQFVaWVwXgq75_AB5w%40mail.gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CALLujirarjkVZiL-KXu735kWtSuiRQdMiQFVaWVwXgq75_AB5w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAKiMtbc2oiVBPnRnKwKrL_Ra0MPX3wWrCMP1Z87rmsdjtLUCdA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT
Thanks Manuel, works great after refreshing cache. Thanks a bunch for providing this repo. On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino man...@apache.org wrote: It was updated yesterday with all the stuff in master, so those changes should be there. Today is going to be run in a couple of hours, although there are no changes in the repo. Try to force your maven cache to be updated: mvn -U On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Ali Akhtar ali.rac...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Manuel, I'm using your linked repo, but I'm not sure if its updating. Defender methods were added a few days ago, however when I try to use them within client code, I get an 'undefined' javascript error. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/e542c9ca-00ec-4466-826b-8f7ac5ef38af%40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/e542c9ca-00ec-4466-826b-8f7ac5ef38af%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/yttru2sA4vA/unsubscribe . To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAM28XAuECu0rMy7dZOsZVa83mtyfYYwk9wSttLsM9XHytc%3DGYw%40mail.gmail.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAM28XAuECu0rMy7dZOsZVa83mtyfYYwk9wSttLsM9XHytc%3DGYw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAKiMtbfq9VW8WwABT%3DBkV1dAv3wPRdCcf1CaeEm1Bo%2BA%3DvuCng%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: What constitutes an acceptable emulated String.format implementation?
I'd be strongly in favor of a StringFormat class - this could be library-ized easily, letting someone opt in to even having it in their project, or call it. Since we're changing the API (though I assume keeping the 'format string' language), you could take other steps to ensure small complied size and best runtime performance. Consider SafeHtmlTemplates or Messages, with their abilities to interpolate strings, but knowing the format string to use at compile-time, not runtime. This probably won't work in all cases (or be especially nice to use in the other cases), but will be faster and smaller when compiled to JS. On Tue Feb 10 2015 at 8:07:22 AM Benjamin DeLillo bpd9...@gmail.com wrote: If trying to provide a fairly complete duplicate of the JRE functionality is too much of a point of contention, would it be more acceptable to provide a simpler/lighter-weight string interpolation implementation behind e.g. GWT.format() or to follow the NumberFormat convention a StringFormat class? On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 11:31:32 PM UTC-5, Benjamin DeLillo wrote: For an implementation to be accepted would it have to conform to the entire Java Formater spec? http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/Formatter.html Would an implementation lacking the Date/Time conversions be acceptable? Would an implementation that wraps sprintf.js be acceptable (if the licensing is compatible)? https://github.com/alexei/sprintf.js What about a minimal positional substitution implementation and nothing more? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/9d1583ef-ae7b-41e2-9eca-207e8ef33062%40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/9d1583ef-ae7b-41e2-9eca-207e8ef33062%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CADcXZMw1W_q866X0R2h8eJGWzU2Wx%2B_u62i_MAVuthEGEbnWNA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[gwt-contrib] UiBinder changes don't get picked up in SDM (trunk)
I'm using 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT. If I add any new ui-field=.. to a ui.xml file, they aren't picked up either on refresh, or on clearing the SDM cache . Instead, I have to restart SDM in order for these changes to be picked up. Otherwise, I keep getting the error that there's no @UiField for the corresponding field in the ui.xml file. (To be clear, adding new fields to the Java file works, but when I assign those fields in the ui.xml template, that isn't picked up. So e.g if I add a @UiField Label foo to MyView.java, and assign that via g:Label ui-field=foo / in the ui.xml file, I still get the error that MyView#foo isn't assigned to a ui-field. Other ui.xml changes do get picked up, but not new ui-fields) On a related note,it seems that CellTable is using CssResource. The compiler fails to run if you use CellTable unless you set the css mode to lenient. (Also the error message asks to set it to strict in order to temporarily avoid the issue, which is confusing as it needs to be set to lenient) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/02ce9814-7640-4bf6-8772-0f300eab00f8%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[gwt-contrib] Re: What constitutes an acceptable emulated String.format implementation?
If trying to provide a fairly complete duplicate of the JRE functionality is too much of a point of contention, would it be more acceptable to provide a simpler/lighter-weight string interpolation implementation behind e.g. GWT.format() or to follow the NumberFormat convention a StringFormat class? On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 11:31:32 PM UTC-5, Benjamin DeLillo wrote: For an implementation to be accepted would it have to conform to the entire Java Formater spec? http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/Formatter.html Would an implementation lacking the Date/Time conversions be acceptable? Would an implementation that wraps sprintf.js be acceptable (if the licensing is compatible)? https://github.com/alexei/sprintf.js What about a minimal positional substitution implementation and nothing more? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/9d1583ef-ae7b-41e2-9eca-207e8ef33062%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
