[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8.1 release testers required!

2017-04-13 Thread Colin Alworth 
We're about ready to release GWT 2.8.1, a bugfix release a variety of 
issues, including getting a stable release out that works with the new 
jsinterop.base and elemental2 beta jars. I will need some help in 
validating this release on our supported platforms, please contact me if 
you are available to spend a little time testing over the next few days, 
and I'll get the ball rolling.

Thanks,
Colin

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/350e53ba-2148-497c-8d58-eeb9528b7b6d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Elemental2 and JsInterop base beta releases available.

2017-04-13 Thread 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors 
jsinterop.base doesn't try to replace elemental, just provide methods that
would normally require special syntax in js. You can find Object.keys in
the related elemental class (JsObject)

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Ignacio Baca Moreno-Torres <
igna...@bacamt.com> wrote:

> Hi, a question about JsPropertyMap.
>
> It does not have a keys() method, ideally using Object.keys, this is on
> purpose?
> And, the unique method to obtain the keys is the forEach method, but
> current implementation iterates over all properties wich might be
> dangerous, why this method do not use Object.keys or isOwnProperty?
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 1:57:44 AM UTC+2, Roberto Lublinerman wrote:
>>
>> We relaxed restriction checking to allow void return type from getters.
>>
>> Cl is up for review:
>> https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/18020/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Jens  wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm, I have just built gwt head from source and used the above jars but
>>> SDM tells me:
>>>
>>>  Errors in jsinterop/base/Js.java
>>>  [ERROR] Line 56: JsProperty 'void Js.debugger()' should have a
>>> correct setter or getter signature.
>>>
>>>
>>> Can anyone confirm?
>>>
>>>
>>> -- J.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> .
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms
>>> gid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/d460f0fb-6519-4eab-869b-
>>> 4838e51077ad%40googlegroups.com
>>> 
>>> .
>>>
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "GWT Contributors" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/7aae33f9-32af-
> 4c40-9c15-81860a109fa6%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAN%3DyUA3vLMGtC6nogMtNGtQX2gv_juQoe0wgMs4aMK908s48WA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Elemental2 and JsInterop base beta releases available.

2017-04-13 Thread Ignacio Baca Moreno-Torres 
Hi, a question about JsPropertyMap.

It does not have a keys() method, ideally using Object.keys, this is on 
purpose?
And, the unique method to obtain the keys is the forEach method, but 
current implementation iterates over all properties wich might be 
dangerous, why this method do not use Object.keys or isOwnProperty? 

Thanks!

On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 1:57:44 AM UTC+2, Roberto Lublinerman wrote:
>
> We relaxed restriction checking to allow void return type from getters. 
>
> Cl is up for review:
> https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/18020/
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Jens > 
> wrote:
>
>> Hmm, I have just built gwt head from source and used the above jars but 
>> SDM tells me:
>>
>>  Errors in jsinterop/base/Js.java
>>  [ERROR] Line 56: JsProperty 'void Js.debugger()' should have a 
>> correct setter or getter signature.
>>
>>
>> Can anyone confirm?
>>
>>
>> -- J.
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "GWT Contributors" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/d460f0fb-6519-4eab-869b-4838e51077ad%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> 
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/7aae33f9-32af-4c40-9c15-81860a109fa6%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.