Re: [gwt-contrib] Preliminary testing for GWT 2.10 release

2022-04-30 Thread Freddy Boucher
@ManfredTremmel I had a similar issue because my project has some 
GWTTestCase, I had to add:

  

  
net.sourceforge.htmlunit
htmlunit
2.55.0
  

  

Le samedi 30 avril 2022 à 19:47:40 UTC+2, ManfredTremmel a écrit :

> I've tried to build my bean validators with gwt 2.10.0-new-groupid-4.
> Using the org.codehaus.mojo maven plugin my gwt-unit tests fail:
>
> [INFO] 
> testWrongUrlsAreWrong(de.knightsoftnet.validators.client.GwtTstHibernateAssertFalse)
>  
> Time elapsed: 0.834 sec <<< ERROR!
> [INFO] java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: FIREFOX
> [INFO] at 
> com.google.gwt.junit.RunStyleHtmlUnit.(RunStyleHtmlUnit.java:295)
> [INFO] at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
> [INFO] at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:315)
> [INFO] at 
> com.google.gwt.junit.JUnitShell.createRunStyle(JUnitShell.java:1215)
> [INFO] at com.google.gwt.junit.JUnitShell.doStartup(JUnitShell.java:943)
> [INFO] at com.google.gwt.dev.DevModeBase.startUp(DevModeBase.java:888)
> [INFO] at 
> com.google.gwt.junit.JUnitShell.getUnitTestShell(JUnitShell.java:707)
> [INFO] at com.google.gwt.junit.JUnitShell.runTest(JUnitShell.java:681)
> [INFO] at 
> com.google.gwt.junit.client.GWTTestCase.runTest(GWTTestCase.java:421)
> [INFO] at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:142)
> [INFO] at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:122)
> [INFO] at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:142)
> [INFO] at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:125)
> [INFO] at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:130)
> [INFO] at com.google.gwt.junit.client.GWTTestCase.run(GWTTestCase.java:247)
> [INFO] at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:241)
> [INFO] at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:236)
> [INFO] at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:241)
> [INFO] at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:236)
> [INFO] at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:241)
> [INFO] at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:236)
> [INFO] at 
> org.codehaus.mojo.gwt.test.MavenTestRunner.doRun(MavenTestRunner.java:105)
> [INFO] at junit.textui.TestRunner.start(TestRunner.java:183)
> [INFO] at 
> org.codehaus.mojo.gwt.test.MavenTestRunner.main(MavenTestRunner.java:63)
>
> Trying to switch to net.ltgt.gwt.maven Plugin, the compile fails with:
>
> [INFO] --- gwt-maven-plugin:1.0.1:compile (default) @ 
> gwt-bean-validators-engine ---
> [INFO] 
> /home/manfred/git/gwt-bean-validators/gwt-bean-validators-engine/src/main/java/
>  
> already added as a resource folder; skipping.
> [INFO] Compiling module de.knightsoftnet.validators.GwtBeanValidatorsEngine
> [INFO] [ERROR] Unexpected internal compiler error
> [INFO] java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
> [INFO] at 
> org.objectweb.asm.ClassReader.readBootstrapMethodsAttribute(ClassReader.java:3498)
> [INFO] at org.objectweb.asm.ClassReader.(ClassReader.java:275)
> [INFO] at org.objectweb.asm.ClassReader.(ClassReader.java:180)
> [INFO] at org.objectweb.asm.ClassReader.(ClassReader.java:166)
> [INFO] at 
> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.BytecodeSignatureMaker.visitCompileDependenciesInBytecode(BytecodeSignatureMaker.java:226)
> [INFO] at 
> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.BytecodeSignatureMaker.getCompileDependencySignature(BytecodeSignatureMaker.java:209)
> [INFO] at 
> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompiledClass.getSignatureHash(CompiledClass.java:166)
> [INFO] at 
> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.Dependencies$Ref.(Dependencies.java:41)
> [INFO] at 
> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.Dependencies$Ref.(Dependencies.java:36)
> [INFO] at 
> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.Dependencies.resolve(Dependencies.java:100)
> [INFO] at 
> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompilationStateBuilder$CompileMoreLater.compile(CompilationStateBuilder.java:349)
> [INFO] at 
> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompilationStateBuilder.doBuildFrom(CompilationStateBuilder.java:532)
> [INFO] at 
> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompilationStateBuilder.buildFrom(CompilationStateBuilder.java:464)
> [INFO] at 
> com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDef.getCompilationState(ModuleDef.java:423)
> [INFO] at com.google.gwt.dev.Precompile.precompile(Precompile.java:210)
> [INFO] at com.google.gwt.dev.Precompile.precompile(Precompile.java:190)
> [INFO] at com.google.gwt.dev.Precompile.precompile(Precompile.java:131)
> [INFO] at com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:192)
> [INFO] at com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:143)
> [INFO] at com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:132)
> [INFO] at com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler$1.run(Compiler.java:110)
> [INFO] at 
> com.google.gwt.dev.CompileTaskRunner.doRun(CompileTaskRunner.java:55)
> [INFO] at 
> com.google.gwt.dev.CompileTaskRunner.runWithAppropriateLogger(CompileTaskRunner.java:50)
> [INFO] at com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler.main(Compiler.java:113)
>
>
>
> Am Freitag, 22. April 2022, 01:56:35 CEST schrieb Colin Alworth:
> > TL;DR: If you have the capability to do so, now would be an excellent 
> time
> >

Re: [gwt-contrib] Preliminary testing for GWT 2.10 release

2022-04-25 Thread Freddy Boucher
2.10.0-new-groupid-3 works like a charm (in addition of 
net.ltgt.gwt.maven/gwt-maven-plugin 1.0.1)
Thanks

Le dimanche 24 avril 2022 à 21:34:23 UTC+2, juan_pablo_gardella a écrit :

> Tried with Maven 3.8.5 and still fails with same issue. Reported at 
> https://github.com/tbroyer/gwt-maven-plugin/issues/152
>
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 3:59 PM Colin Alworth  wrote:
>
>> I've pushed a new build with version 2.10.0-new-groupid-3 that has 
>> several @SuppressWarnings("deprecation")s added, and hopefully will solve 
>> the WARN logging issue.
>>
>> -- 
>>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "GWT Contributors" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to google-web-toolkit-co...@googlegroups.com.
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/28cff012-2206-48a8-8882-11b0ea945046n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> 
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/051780f4-fa98-45c2-ad36-1ebb40a38f7an%40googlegroups.com.


[gwt-contrib] Re: HashCode H$ property should be not enumerable

2020-06-13 Thread Freddy Boucher
Hi,
On our side, an enterprise GWT webapp, 14% of our Users still use IE11 (we 
already dropped prior IE versions).
And unfortunately we still have to support IE11 for some time.
Regards

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/8bb390c7-855e-455e-bb34-16b6d18f6452o%40googlegroups.com.


[gwt-contrib] Re: HashCode H$ property should be not enumerable

2020-06-13 Thread Freddy Boucher
Hi,
On our side, an enterprise GWT webapp, 14% of our Users still use IE11 (we 
already dropped prior IE versions).
And unfortunately we still have to support IE11 for some time.
Regards

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/f19cc9d0-8f67-4cd1-9b41-e8b9117ab92fo%40googlegroups.com.


[gwt-contrib] Re: Testing GWT 2.9.0 for release

2020-04-14 Thread Freddy Boucher
Hello,

Any chance to include the following patch in 2.9?
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/c/gwt/+/19800
It has been sitting in Gerrit for years and it's a shame that the core GWT 
code doesn't convert dates correctly in all timezones.

Thanks in advance.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/fdf4b583-f2bb-44fd-a8cb-5451decc8478%40googlegroups.com.


[gwt-contrib] Re: Last call for GWT 2.8.2 patches, and testers needed!

2017-10-11 Thread Freddy Boucher
I updated the fix for https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/issues/8259

Can someone review it https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/c/gwt/+/14430 ? 

Thanks so much

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/7262a0d8-4cf5-4b2f-bee4-31f4990b9b0a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[gwt-contrib] Re: Last call for GWT 2.8.2 patches, and testers needed!

2017-10-11 Thread Freddy Boucher
I posted a new rebased version of the 
fix https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/issues/8259

The original one is https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/c/gwt/+/14430
And the updated one is https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/c/gwt/+/19720

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/318c4397-3e54-4af2-93bd-929ae8a48010%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[gwt-contrib] Re: Last call for GWT 2.8.2 patches, and testers needed!

2017-10-04 Thread Freddy Boucher
Is there any chance to get DateTimeFormat change formatted date for 1 day 
 included in 2.8.2?

The bug has been reported more than 2 years ago and it's a core issue. 
Which GWT app doesn't use *DateTimeFormat*?

Thanks so much

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/da32790a-a234-4c6e-b0e5-e85f76ff413c%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Last call for 2.8.0-RC3

2016-09-19 Thread Freddy Boucher
+1 for https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/14430/
It's a big one!
I opened a GitHub ticket for 
it: https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/issues/9427

Thanks


On Monday, September 19, 2016 at 7:45:43 PM UTC+10, Jakob Jarosch wrote:
>
> Hi,
> even it is a bit late, but we where a bit surprised that a merge request, 
> opened half a year ago, was still not merged.
> The bug forces us to maintain our own GWT.
> https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/14430/
>
> And then some not so important things (but its really sad, that no one 
> cares about the merge requests...):
> https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/11520/
> https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/11470/
> https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/11414/
> https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/11460/
>
> Yes, I can see some of them are now in a merge conflict state, but a year 
> ago they were not.
> I can see that this looks for everyone as a Google only project when 
> nothing gets reviewed/merged. So it's no surprise that no one is motivated 
> to contribute.
>
> Regards,
> Jakob
>
> On Saturday, September 10, 2016 at 3:35:37 PM UTC+2, Arnaud TOURNIER wrote:
>>
>> Makes sense! So better to have a "nostrict" option for the special cases
>> Thanks
>>
>> Le sam. 10 sept. 2016 14:57, Jens  a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>> Thank you I will try that -strict option.

 My suggestion is that exported @JsType (when the -generateJsExport 
 option is turned on) should be considered as entrypoints and generate 
 compilation errors, what do you think ?

>>>
>>> I think that -strict should be the default everywhere. I don't really 
>>> see any value at all in not using -strict. Maybe some people do but then 
>>> they should disable -strict. I use it since I use GWT and never had a 
>>> reason to not use it.
>>>
>>> -- J.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>>> Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/33Zw3nP3q7o/unsubscribe
>>> .
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>>> google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/d28e825a-c095-4812-a1c8-99527ba88f06%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> 
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/b41c168e-9aae-42c6-a1cb-acf123acbbdc%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[gwt-contrib] Re: Bean Validation

2016-08-14 Thread Freddy Boucher
Thanks for your job!

I will take a look for sure in the next days!

On Monday, August 15, 2016 at 8:29:48 AM UTC+10, ManfredTremmel wrote:
>
> My vacation is over, three weeks of work on the gwt validation 
> implementation are done. All problems I've found are fixed, 
> gwt-bean-validators 
>  0.20.0 is 
> released and in central. The example project 
>  is also uploaded and 
> online in the new version.
> Enjoy bean validation with validation-api 1.1.0.Final, hibernate-validator 
> 5.2.4.Final and let me know, if you are interested in backporting it to gwt 
> project.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/0567456f-c665-4006-bd30-14c8aaf9b3ef%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.