[gwt-contrib] Re: Adds the -XdisableGflow flag. (issue260801)
Bob, can you review this little patch? It adds a flag -XdisableGflow that does exactly what it sounds like. This would provide a safety valve in case there are any problems that arise from the new gflow optimizer. In a month or so we could reevaluate whether we need to keep the flag or not. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/260801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words REMOVE ME as the subject.
[gwt-contrib] Re: Adds the -XdisableGflow flag. (issue260801)
Just a thought.. but instead of a new flag, what if we redefined aggressive optimizations to mean just GFlow, since all the other optimizations have a lot of miles on them now. What do you think? http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/260801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words REMOVE ME as the subject.
[gwt-contrib] Re: Adds the -XdisableGflow flag. (issue260801)
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:24 PM, sco...@google.com wrote: Just a thought.. but instead of a new flag, what if we redefined aggressive optimizations to mean just GFlow, since all the other optimizations have a lot of miles on them now. What do you think? I like the idea of updating the aggressive optimization flag, and started to suggest that instead. However, it would still probably include more than gflow. Potential examples would be function clustering, function deduping, and same parameter value substitution. So we'd likely end up wanting a separate flag, anyway. -Lex -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words REMOVE ME as the subject.