Re: [gwt-contrib] expenses sample POM file
Will you be able to use both RequestFactory and RPC at the same time? For example using some third party API's may still require RPC. On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote: It was probably a premature move, though the sample will likely require Roo trunk pretty soon. In the meantime, does it work okay if you bump the requirement down to Roo 1.1M3? rjrjr On Aug 28, 2010 7:45 AM, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote: Commit r8664 updated the expenses sample to use the Roo 1.1M4 annotations jar which does not exist in the maven repos. The only way to get that jar currently is to build roo and doing a manual import into a local maven repo? Is this the intent or should it be fixed? -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Re: [gwt-contrib] expenses sample POM file
They don't conflict. On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Travis Camechis camec...@gmail.com wrote: Will you be able to use both RequestFactory and RPC at the same time? For example using some third party API's may still require RPC. On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote: It was probably a premature move, though the sample will likely require Roo trunk pretty soon. In the meantime, does it work okay if you bump the requirement down to Roo 1.1M3? rjrjr On Aug 28, 2010 7:45 AM, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote: Commit r8664 updated the expenses sample to use the Roo 1.1M4 annotations jar which does not exist in the maven repos. The only way to get that jar currently is to build roo and doing a manual import into a local maven repo? Is this the intent or should it be fixed? -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Re: [gwt-contrib] expenses sample POM file
It was probably a premature move, though the sample will likely require Roo trunk pretty soon. In the meantime, does it work okay if you bump the requirement down to Roo 1.1M3? rjrjr On Aug 28, 2010 7:45 AM, tc camec...@gmail.com wrote: Commit r8664 updated the expenses sample to use the Roo 1.1M4 annotations jar which does not exist in the maven repos. The only way to get that jar currently is to build roo and doing a manual import into a local maven repo? Is this the intent or should it be fixed? -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
[gwt-contrib] expenses sample POM file
Commit r8664 updated the expenses sample to use the Roo 1.1M4 annotations jar which does not exist in the maven repos. The only way to get that jar currently is to build roo and doing a manual import into a local maven repo? Is this the intent or should it be fixed? -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
