Re: [gpgtools-users] Mail does not validate my own signatures

2011-02-03 Thread Bob Bishop
Hi,

I wrote:

> Nothing wrong with that (see RFC 2822). [etc]

RFC 2822 is obsolete and I should of course have referenced RFC 5322 which says 
exactly the same thing. Apologies

--
Bob Bishop
r...@gid.co.uk




___
gpgtools-users mailing list
gpgtools-users@lists.gpgtools.org
FAQ: http://www.gpgtools.org/faq.html
Changes: http://lists.gpgtools.org/mailman/listinfo/gpgtools-users
Unsubscribe: 
http://lists.gpgtools.org/mailman/options/gpgtools-users/arch...@mail-archive.com?unsub=Unsubscribe&unsubconfirm=1

This email sent to: arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [gpgtools-users] Mail does not validate my own signatures

2011-02-03 Thread Bob Bishop
Hi,

On 3 Feb 2011, at 02:37, Raphael 'kena' Poss wrote:

> Hi again,
> 
> I think I nailed this bug. Basically, Mail.app improperly changes the MIME 
> content headers upon receiving from the mail server. In particular, the 
> following in the signed message body:
> 
> """
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> """
> 
> gets changed to:
> 
> """
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>   charset=us-ascii
> """
> 
> i.e. "charset=..." gets moved to the next line, with a TAB character. [etc]

Nothing wrong with that (see RFC 2822). However, the RFC also says:
"Each header field should be treated in its unfolded form for further syntactic 
and semantic evaluation."

ie GPGMail should unfold headers before processing further.

--
Bob Bishop  +44 (0)118 940 1243
r...@gid.co.ukfax +44 (0)118 940 1295
 mobile +44 (0)783 626 4518





___
gpgtools-users mailing list
gpgtools-users@lists.gpgtools.org
FAQ: http://www.gpgtools.org/faq.html
Changes: http://lists.gpgtools.org/mailman/listinfo/gpgtools-users
Unsubscribe: 
http://lists.gpgtools.org/mailman/options/gpgtools-users/arch...@mail-archive.com?unsub=Unsubscribe&unsubconfirm=1

This email sent to: arch...@mail-archive.com