[jira] Commented: (GRFT-102) Accessibility of portal content produced by authoring tool (kupu)

2006-10-13 Thread Christophe Lombart (JIRA)
[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-102?page=comments#action_12442033 ] 

Christophe Lombart commented on GRFT-102:
-

I have to stop this issue for more urgent work.

I have migrated to kupu 1.3.5.
So now it is ready to work on the accessibility. 

Evangelos, 
Can you work on that ? 

> Accessibility of portal content produced by authoring tool (kupu)
> -
>
> Key: GRFT-102
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-102
> Project: Graffito
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Portlets
> Environment: Now running on ie and mozilla but for accessibility 
> should support all browsers (maybe consider an applet editor ??)
>Reporter: Evangelos Vlachogiannis
> Assigned To: Christophe Lombart
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> Current version of kupu html editor produces really very bad markup in terms 
> of accessibility but even for validity. For instance the font tag must really 
> be avoided - use css style instead (like new 1.3.5 ver does).  So a shift to 
> the new version is a step towards better accessibility.
> Further, these are other relating problems that should be solved:
> 1. currently the editor portlet page in jetspeed contains 2  tags which 
> is really unacceptable!!. 
> 2. Seeking for real xhtml (a base for accessibility) the editor should 
> provide only semantic markup. For example could provide strong instead of 
> bold and emphasis instead of underline or/and provide bold bolder etc using 
> css.
> 3. For a portal creating content it actually means creating a page fragment. 
> This means that the editor should allow for global markup and also provide 
> apropriate css classes for styling according to JSR-168. 
> Well, most of the issues are actually concern the editor and I might submit 
> also to kupu but I find important to sync such work. This subject is actually 
> one of my research interests and could find more information of this work 
> (Portal Accessibility Guidelines Extensions) at 
> http://www.syros.aegean.gr/users/evlach/page/

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] Commented: (GRFT-102) Accessibility of portal content produced by authoring tool (kupu)

2006-10-13 Thread Evangelos Vlachogiannis (JIRA)
[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-102?page=comments#action_12442060 ] 

Evangelos Vlachogiannis commented on GRFT-102:
--

Thanks a lot for that Christophe. I ll test that, try to understand changes and 
take it further asap.

> Accessibility of portal content produced by authoring tool (kupu)
> -
>
> Key: GRFT-102
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-102
> Project: Graffito
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Portlets
> Environment: Now running on ie and mozilla but for accessibility 
> should support all browsers (maybe consider an applet editor ??)
>Reporter: Evangelos Vlachogiannis
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> Current version of kupu html editor produces really very bad markup in terms 
> of accessibility but even for validity. For instance the font tag must really 
> be avoided - use css style instead (like new 1.3.5 ver does).  So a shift to 
> the new version is a step towards better accessibility.
> Further, these are other relating problems that should be solved:
> 1. currently the editor portlet page in jetspeed contains 2  tags which 
> is really unacceptable!!. 
> 2. Seeking for real xhtml (a base for accessibility) the editor should 
> provide only semantic markup. For example could provide strong instead of 
> bold and emphasis instead of underline or/and provide bold bolder etc using 
> css.
> 3. For a portal creating content it actually means creating a page fragment. 
> This means that the editor should allow for global markup and also provide 
> apropriate css classes for styling according to JSR-168. 
> Well, most of the issues are actually concern the editor and I might submit 
> also to kupu but I find important to sync such work. This subject is actually 
> one of my research interests and could find more information of this work 
> (Portal Accessibility Guidelines Extensions) at 
> http://www.syros.aegean.gr/users/evlach/page/

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




Re: [jira] Commented: (GRFT-102) Accessibility of portal content produced by authoring tool (kupu)

2006-10-13 Thread Christophe Lombart

Thanks you very much for your help
In order to support put method instead of post, there are a couple of
major changes.

On 10/13/06, Evangelos Vlachogiannis (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-102?page=comments#action_12442060 ]

Evangelos Vlachogiannis commented on GRFT-102:
--

Thanks a lot for that Christophe. I ll test that, try to understand changes and 
take it further asap.

> Accessibility of portal content produced by authoring tool (kupu)
> -
>
> Key: GRFT-102
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-102
> Project: Graffito
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Portlets
> Environment: Now running on ie and mozilla but for accessibility 
should support all browsers (maybe consider an applet editor ??)
>Reporter: Evangelos Vlachogiannis
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> Current version of kupu html editor produces really very bad markup in terms 
of accessibility but even for validity. For instance the font tag must really be 
avoided - use css style instead (like new 1.3.5 ver does).  So a shift to the new 
version is a step towards better accessibility.
> Further, these are other relating problems that should be solved:
> 1. currently the editor portlet page in jetspeed contains 2  tags which 
is really unacceptable!!.
> 2. Seeking for real xhtml (a base for accessibility) the editor should 
provide only semantic markup. For example could provide strong instead of bold and 
emphasis instead of underline or/and provide bold bolder etc using css.
> 3. For a portal creating content it actually means creating a page fragment. 
This means that the editor should allow for global markup and also provide 
apropriate css classes for styling according to JSR-168.
> Well, most of the issues are actually concern the editor and I might submit 
also to kupu but I find important to sync such work. This subject is actually one 
of my research interests and could find more information of this work (Portal 
Accessibility Guidelines Extensions) at 
http://www.syros.aegean.gr/users/evlach/page/

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira






--
Best regards,

Christophe


Re: [jira] Commented: (GRFT-102) Accessibility of portal content produced by authoring tool (kupu)

2006-10-14 Thread Evangelos Vlachogiannis

Hi Christophe,

should I config something before using it?

Graffito Content Browser on edit mode it says "No content found in this 
folder. Use the edit mode to add new content." and whatever tab I press 
nothing happens. I guess I miss something here...


regards,
Vangelis

Christophe Lombart wrote:

Thanks you very much for your help
In order to support put method instead of post, there are a couple of
major changes.

On 10/13/06, Evangelos Vlachogiannis (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-102?page=comments#action_12442060 
]


Evangelos Vlachogiannis commented on GRFT-102:
--

Thanks a lot for that Christophe. I ll test that, try to understand 
changes and take it further asap.


> Accessibility of portal content produced by authoring tool (kupu)
> -
>
> Key: GRFT-102
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-102
> Project: Graffito
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Portlets
> Environment: Now running on ie and mozilla but for 
accessibility should support all browsers (maybe consider an applet 
editor ??)

>Reporter: Evangelos Vlachogiannis
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> Current version of kupu html editor produces really very bad markup 
in terms of accessibility but even for validity. For instance the font 
tag must really be avoided - use css style instead (like new 1.3.5 ver 
does).  So a shift to the new version is a step towards better 
accessibility.

> Further, these are other relating problems that should be solved:
> 1. currently the editor portlet page in jetspeed contains 2  
tags which is really unacceptable!!.
> 2. Seeking for real xhtml (a base for accessibility) the editor 
should provide only semantic markup. For example could provide strong 
instead of bold and emphasis instead of underline or/and provide bold 
bolder etc using css.
> 3. For a portal creating content it actually means creating a page 
fragment. This means that the editor should allow for global markup 
and also provide apropriate css classes for styling according to JSR-168.
> Well, most of the issues are actually concern the editor and I might 
submit also to kupu but I find important to sync such work. This 
subject is actually one of my research interests and could find more 
information of this work (Portal Accessibility Guidelines Extensions) 
at http://www.syros.aegean.gr/users/evlach/page/


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the 
administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa

-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira








--
Evangelos Vlachogiannis
Researcher - University of the Aegean
Contact&More: http://www.syros.aegean.gr/users/evlach/contactme.php


Re: [jira] Commented: (GRFT-102) Accessibility of portal content produced by authoring tool (kupu)

2006-10-16 Thread Christophe Lombart

Hi,

That's strange.

Do you have the emptySessionPath="true" in the tomcat server.xml ? the
kupu editor is using a servlet which requires to share the session
with the portlet.



Christophe


On 10/14/06, Evangelos Vlachogiannis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Christophe,

should I config something before using it?

Graffito Content Browser on edit mode it says "No content found in this
folder. Use the edit mode to add new content." and whatever tab I press
nothing happens. I guess I miss something here...

regards,
Vangelis

Christophe Lombart wrote:
> Thanks you very much for your help
> In order to support put method instead of post, there are a couple of
> major changes.
>
> On 10/13/06, Evangelos Vlachogiannis (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-102?page=comments#action_12442060
>> ]
>>
>> Evangelos Vlachogiannis commented on GRFT-102:
>> --
>>
>> Thanks a lot for that Christophe. I ll test that, try to understand
>> changes and take it further asap.
>>
>> > Accessibility of portal content produced by authoring tool (kupu)
>> > -
>> >
>> > Key: GRFT-102
>> > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-102
>> > Project: Graffito
>> >  Issue Type: Improvement
>> >  Components: Portlets
>> > Environment: Now running on ie and mozilla but for
>> accessibility should support all browsers (maybe consider an applet
>> editor ??)
>> >Reporter: Evangelos Vlachogiannis
>> >Priority: Minor
>> > Attachments: patch.txt
>> >
>> >
>> > Current version of kupu html editor produces really very bad markup
>> in terms of accessibility but even for validity. For instance the font
>> tag must really be avoided - use css style instead (like new 1.3.5 ver
>> does).  So a shift to the new version is a step towards better
>> accessibility.
>> > Further, these are other relating problems that should be solved:
>> > 1. currently the editor portlet page in jetspeed contains 2 
>> tags which is really unacceptable!!.
>> > 2. Seeking for real xhtml (a base for accessibility) the editor
>> should provide only semantic markup. For example could provide strong
>> instead of bold and emphasis instead of underline or/and provide bold
>> bolder etc using css.
>> > 3. For a portal creating content it actually means creating a page
>> fragment. This means that the editor should allow for global markup
>> and also provide apropriate css classes for styling according to JSR-168.
>> > Well, most of the issues are actually concern the editor and I might
>> submit also to kupu but I find important to sync such work. This
>> subject is actually one of my research interests and could find more
>> information of this work (Portal Accessibility Guidelines Extensions)
>> at http://www.syros.aegean.gr/users/evlach/page/
>>
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> -
>> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
>> administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
>> -
>> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>
>>
>>
>
>

--
Evangelos Vlachogiannis
Researcher - University of the Aegean
Contact&More: http://www.syros.aegean.gr/users/evlach/contactme.php




--
Best regards,

Christophe


Re: [jira] Commented: (GRFT-102) Accessibility of portal content produced by authoring tool (kupu)

2006-10-16 Thread Evangelos Vlachogiannis

Hi Christophe,

I have just added that param but nothing changed. Here is my config:

maxThreads="150" minSpareThreads="25" maxSpareThreads="75" 
enableLookups="false" redirectPort="8443" acceptCount="100" 
 connectionTimeout="2" disableUploadTimeout="true" 
emptySessionPath="true"/>


Thanks,
Vangelis

Christophe Lombart wrote:

Hi,

That's strange.

Do you have the emptySessionPath="true" in the tomcat server.xml ? the
kupu editor is using a servlet which requires to share the session
with the portlet.



Christophe


On 10/14/06, Evangelos Vlachogiannis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Christophe,

should I config something before using it?

Graffito Content Browser on edit mode it says "No content found in this
folder. Use the edit mode to add new content." and whatever tab I press
nothing happens. I guess I miss something here...

regards,
Vangelis

Christophe Lombart wrote:
> Thanks you very much for your help
> In order to support put method instead of post, there are a couple of
> major changes.
>
> On 10/13/06, Evangelos Vlachogiannis (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [
>> 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-102?page=comments#action_12442060 


>> ]
>>
>> Evangelos Vlachogiannis commented on GRFT-102:
>> --
>>
>> Thanks a lot for that Christophe. I ll test that, try to understand
>> changes and take it further asap.
>>
>> > Accessibility of portal content produced by authoring tool (kupu)
>> > -
>> >
>> > Key: GRFT-102
>> > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-102
>> > Project: Graffito
>> >  Issue Type: Improvement
>> >  Components: Portlets
>> > Environment: Now running on ie and mozilla but for
>> accessibility should support all browsers (maybe consider an applet
>> editor ??)
>> >Reporter: Evangelos Vlachogiannis
>> >Priority: Minor
>> > Attachments: patch.txt
>> >
>> >
>> > Current version of kupu html editor produces really very bad markup
>> in terms of accessibility but even for validity. For instance the font
>> tag must really be avoided - use css style instead (like new 1.3.5 ver
>> does).  So a shift to the new version is a step towards better
>> accessibility.
>> > Further, these are other relating problems that should be solved:
>> > 1. currently the editor portlet page in jetspeed contains 2 
>> tags which is really unacceptable!!.
>> > 2. Seeking for real xhtml (a base for accessibility) the editor
>> should provide only semantic markup. For example could provide strong
>> instead of bold and emphasis instead of underline or/and provide bold
>> bolder etc using css.
>> > 3. For a portal creating content it actually means creating a page
>> fragment. This means that the editor should allow for global markup
>> and also provide apropriate css classes for styling according to 
JSR-168.

>> > Well, most of the issues are actually concern the editor and I might
>> submit also to kupu but I find important to sync such work. This
>> subject is actually one of my research interests and could find more
>> information of this work (Portal Accessibility Guidelines Extensions)
>> at http://www.syros.aegean.gr/users/evlach/page/
>>
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> -
>> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
>> administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa

>> -
>> For more information on JIRA, see: 
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

>>
>>
>>
>
>

--
Evangelos Vlachogiannis
Researcher - University of the Aegean
Contact&More: http://www.syros.aegean.gr/users/evlach/contactme.php






--
---
Evangelos Vlachogiannis
Researcher - PhD. Candidate
Contact: http://www.syros.aegean.gr/users/evlach/contactme.php
---