Re: [GRASS-dev] Source code layout reorganization for G8
This is happening: https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/1348 https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/1350 On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 5:34 AM Maris Nartiss wrote: > Hello list, > as G8 release is a great opportunity to break things, we could > reorganize our source code directory layout. At the moment we have > docker together with documentation and library intermingled with > MS-Windows for MacOSX. Bringing to a separate thread from "where to > make compiling instructions available" > https://www.mail-archive.com/grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org/msg59974.html > > I have created an initial proposal page in Trac (linked to GRASS 8 > planning page): https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/G8SourceLayout > > Feel free to express your opinion — is it worth? How the new directory > layout should look like? Any technical restrictions? > > Yes, it would break history, scripts, Make files = no fun. But if we > don't do it now, we'll be stuck till G9 release. > > Waiting for feedback, > Māris. > ___ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] Need a mentor for GSoC parallelization topic
Anna, It sounds like an interesting topic and I'm open to mentoring him even though I have limited experience with OpenMP. If anyone else has more experience with it and is interested in mentoring, that will be even better. Best, Huidae On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 10:14 AM Anna Petrášová wrote: > Hi devs, > > would you consider being a GSoC mentor for this topic [1]? I suggested > this topic in hope this could be impactful for GRASS and fairly accessible > for students with CS background. > > We need somebody with C experience, ideally also OpenMP experience. I have > only limited experience, and I would probably be mentoring a different > project, so I can't be the main mentor here. > > There is already a student who would be interested in that, so we need to > make sure there is somebody who can mentor him. > > This is all theoretical so far, OSGeo is not even accepted yet. If you are > interested, please also fill this form [2]. > > Thank you for considering this, > > Anna > > [1] > https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/GSoC/2021#Parallelizationofexistingmodules > [2] https://forms.gle/9Na1vzGX3ESxqgpj9 > -- Huidae Cho, Ph.D., GISP, /hidɛ t͡ɕo/, 조희대, 曺喜大 GRASS GIS Developer https://idea.isnew.info ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
[GRASS-dev] Need a mentor for GSoC parallelization topic
Hi devs, would you consider being a GSoC mentor for this topic [1]? I suggested this topic in hope this could be impactful for GRASS and fairly accessible for students with CS background. We need somebody with C experience, ideally also OpenMP experience. I have only limited experience, and I would probably be mentoring a different project, so I can't be the main mentor here. There is already a student who would be interested in that, so we need to make sure there is somebody who can mentor him. This is all theoretical so far, OSGeo is not even accepted yet. If you are interested, please also fill this form [2]. Thank you for considering this, Anna [1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/GSoC/2021#Parallelizationofexistingmodules [2] https://forms.gle/9Na1vzGX3ESxqgpj9 ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] Min. req. of programming language standard support, GRASS GIS 8
I added the RFC draft to GRASS Wiki [1]. Well, it's only a draft, so any thoughts, modifications, additions are most welcome! Nicklas [1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/7_LanguageStandardsSupport On Thursday, 11 February 2021, 14:34:44 CET, Moritz Lennert wrote: Am 11. Februar 2021 13:29:10 MEZ schrieb Nicklas Larsson : > Moritz, > >I'd be honoured! >I will put it on GRASS Wiki [1] if you don't have another suggestion and >notify here when done. Great, thanks a lot ! Moritz > >[1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC > > > > On Thursday, 11 February 2021, 12:54:30 CET, Moritz Lennert > wrote: > > On 10/02/21 13:16, Nicklas Larsson wrote: >> It would be most favourable for all contributors and the project if the >> community could come to an agreement on this topic. I see no reason to >> postpone a decision on this much longer. >> >> The final word on this need to be that of the PSC's. Whether through >> simple vote or a RFC. However, a sounding of the opinion of the >> dev-community on this matter is of equal importance and can be of help >> for the PSC. > >Thanks a lot, Nicklas, for this very comprehensive summary ! > >A suggestion made at the first meeting of the new PSC was to use this >discussion as a use case for a more extensive usage of RFC's to put >important decisions into more permanent documents than mailing list >archives and to provoke a formal decision as you suggest. Would you be >willing to write a first draft of such an RFC ? > >Moritz > ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] r.geomorphon multiresolution mode
Hi Michael,
On 2021-02-15 at 14:23 -08, Michael Barton wrote...
> Can anyone explain how multiresolution model works in r.geomorphon? It
> does not seem to respond to any setting changes and seems to always
> produce blank maps (testing with NC demo set). There is nothing about
> multiresolution mode in the manual for 7.8 or 7.9
I'm getting core dumps if I set the 'step' keyword.
Looking through some old notes it seems I created my own multi-resolution
implementation in parallel with:
parallel "r.geomorphon -m elevation=z_b search={} forms=forms_{}
ternary=pattern_{}" ::: 450 1000 4500 1 45000
-k.
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
