Hi all, El vie, 6 ago 2021 a las 4:29, Vaclav Petras (<wenzesl...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> Are we ready to create the 8.0 release branch? > Seems we are!! Once we create it, we will need to backport (cherry-pick) updates from the > master branch when needed. > > Please see the following for the individual issues we still have and post > here if you see some priorities. > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 5:24 PM Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >>> Windows build & test is just bad (no bug or PR so far?), >> >> >> Can someone give an update on that, please? >> > > >> #1683 is not merged yet, but missing sh in the test environment is not a >> blocker in this case. >> > > https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/1683 > > Tests are running! > > >> CentOS is too >> >>> old (#1709) & needs auto tools update to fix it (or at least env >>> variable in build script as I just have done to enable testing in >>> #1501), >> >> >> ...or CentOS 8, CentOS Stream, or remove the CentOS test. >> >> https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/issues/1709#issuecomment-880215427 >> > > It would be better if Autotools are updated, but CentOS build works now. > Are there any pressing issues? > > >> I would also strongly advocate merging ctypes upgrade before 8.0 >>> >> >> Seems to be close to being finished too. >> > > ctypes update is closer everyday, but not finished yet. Maybe not needed > for 8.0? > > https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/1651 > Milestone was changed to 8.2 and Nicklas suggest to move forward with release branch 8 > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 4:28 AM Maris Nartiss <maris....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2021-07-27 18:26 GMT+03:00, Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com>: >> > >> > From what has the milestone 8.0 and is not mentioned below and is >> major, I >> > see only #1454 and #1501 which are related to band references. Maybe we >> > should again consider reverting the band references in order to get 8.0 >> out >> > or how do you see the status of #1454 and #1501, Martin and Maris? >> > >> > https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/milestone/4 >> > https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/1454 >> > https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/1501 >> >> For #1454 the main remaining (and unsolvable) issue is semantics of a >> mapset layout and its management functions. I just commited a more >> clean workaround and thus it should be ready for a merge. A proper >> solution will have to wait for GRASS 9 when we could reorganize mapset >> structure and thus also clean-up naming, handling functions etc. >> > > #1501 (Integrate band references into portable signature files) is close > to being merged. > this one was merged just after you posted this #1454 (TGIS DB v3 backward compatible with v2) has perhaps lower priority > since there is both upgrade and downgrade. > > As for issues linked to the milestone, please review what is there. See > what needs to stay there and what can be moved. For example, all issues > which are features and are not changing existing API can be moved to 8.2 > milestone. > > https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/milestone/4 > If no further objections I'd suggest to move forward with grass8 release branch creation Best, Vero
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev