Re: [GRASS-dev] r.geomorphon multiresolution mode

2021-02-16 Thread Ken Mankoff
Hi Michael,

On 2021-02-15 at 14:23 -08, Michael Barton  wrote...
> Can anyone explain how multiresolution model works in r.geomorphon? It
> does not seem to respond to any setting changes and seems to always
> produce blank maps (testing with NC demo set). There is nothing about
> multiresolution mode in the manual for 7.8 or 7.9

I'm getting core dumps if I set the 'step' keyword.

Looking through some old notes it seems I created my own multi-resolution 
implementation in parallel with:

parallel "r.geomorphon -m elevation=z_b search={} forms=forms_{} 
ternary=pattern_{}" ::: 450 1000 4500 1 45000

  -k.
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev


Re: [GRASS-dev] Bugs in r.stream.extract

2020-11-25 Thread Ken Mankoff


On 2020-11-25 at 04:17 -08, ming han  wrote...
> And another problem I got is that the flow accumulation I got from
> r.accumulate and r.watershed is different when r.accumulate using flow
> direction from r.watershed. Again is there anyway r.watershed supports
> using flow direction, so we can get the consistent result.

There may be reasons for these differences? For example, if SFD v. MFD, or the 
"-a" flag to r.watershed?

> We need this when we need to adjust the flow direction from
> r.watershed or r.stream.extract. and then we need to determine new
> flow accumulation with an adjusted flow direction dataset. If the
> result is inconsistent, not sure what is the solution is.

It isn't clear why you are adjusting the flow direction. Is this required?

>> But, If I only want to use flow direction to drive streams, which
>> function I should use?

https://grass.osgeo.org/grass78/manuals/r.water.outlet.html but this only works 
for 1 outlet.

  -k.
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev


Re: [GRASS-dev] Bugs in r.stream.extract

2020-11-24 Thread Ken Mankoff
Hi Ming,

On 2020-11-23 at 09:05 -08, ming han  wrote...
> Hope this email finds you well. I got a weird result when using
> r.stream.extract, as shown in the following figure. The back grids is
> the flow accumulation layer with a flow accumulation threshold larger
> than 1000. while the blue line is the stream generated by
> r.stream.extract. Why the stream from r.stream.extract did not follow
> flow accumulation results? And how to fix this problem?

Is there any chance you can share the raster that includes this region so I can 
examine it? And the exact command you ran?

  -k.

___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev


Re: [GRASS-dev] g.extension: still fetching from SVN?

2019-08-05 Thread Ken Mankoff

On 2019-08-05 at 16:26 -04, Martin Landa  wrote...
> Hi,
>
> po 5. 8. 2019 v 22:22 odesílatel Markus Neteler  napsal:
>> https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/milestone/7.6.2
>> -> 5th Aug 2019 was planned :-)
>
> yes, there is one blocker issue which should be solved before any
> release. How to deal with svn keyword propagation in the code ($DATE$,
> $REVISION$, ...). There is no straightforward replacement for git to
> my knowledge. Any suggestion very welcome!

It seems like this is not officially supported, can be done easily with some 
scripts [1], but is not recommended [2].

Why is it needed?

I regularly use the gitinfo LaTeX package that provides a git commit hook. This 
hook simply puts latest hash (and some other commit data such as author, 
branch, date, etc.) into a file, that the LaTeX package then uses to make nice 
headers or footers with the commit info.

Could a commit hook make a file that is then somehow included in the footer of 
each HTML file?

  -k.

[1] 
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11534655/git-keyword-substitution-like-those-in-subversion
[2] 
https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitFaq#Does_Git_have_keyword_expansion.3F
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Re: [GRASS-dev] dealing with null values in rasters only within mask

2019-06-28 Thread Ken Mankoff
Hi Moritz,

More generally from Stefan's answer:

1) MASK is a raster that you can use is your r.mapcalc expressions

2) A two-step process where everything is filled, and then the parts outside 
the mask are re-nulled?

  -k.

___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Re: [GRASS-dev] git howto get a single diff for a PR with multiple commits

2019-06-04 Thread Ken Mankoff

On 2019-06-04 at 23:12 +02, Markus Metz  wrote...
> I would like to speed up reviewing of a PR with multiple commits by
> reading a single diff file. How is this possible with git? [...] can
> git (on CLI on my local copies) also do this?

I think git can diff any two commits. Do this by providing two commit hashes 
instead of just one (which defaults to that v. the currently checked out hash + 
any local changes).

  -k.
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev