Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #2103: Make SUBMITTING files more accessible

2014-07-21 Thread GRASS GIS
#2103: Make SUBMITTING files more accessible
--+-
  Reporter:  wenzeslaus   |   Owner:  grass-dev@…
  Type:  task |  Status:  closed 
  Priority:  normal   |   Milestone:  7.0.0  
 Component:  Docs | Version:  svn-trunk  
Resolution:  fixed|Keywords:  submitting, addons, doxygen
  Platform:  Unspecified  | Cpu:  Unspecified
--+-
Changes (by wenzeslaus):

  * status:  new = closed
  * resolution:  = fixed


Comment:

 * All `SUBMITTING` files were converted to Trac wiki:Submitting pages
 (r61014).
   - wiki:Submitting/General
   - wiki:Submitting/C
   - wiki:Submitting/Python
   - wiki:Submitting/wxGUI
   - wiki:Submitting/Docs
  * All RFC documents were also moved to Trac wiki:RFC pages (r60890).
  * `SUBMITTING` files in addons tracked in #2104.
  * The [source:grass/trunk/doc doc] directory remains unresolved.
  * Various files may stay in their plain text form and only in source
 code.
   - source:grass/trunk/AUTHORS
   - source:grass/trunk/COPYING
   - source:grass/trunk/GPL.TXT
   - source:grass/trunk/CHANGES (last change 8 year ago)
  * `README` files here and there in the source code probably don't need
 any markup or publication.

-- 
Ticket URL: http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2103#comment:3
GRASS GIS http://grass.osgeo.org

___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #2103: Make SUBMITTING files more accessible

2013-10-19 Thread GRASS GIS
#2103: Make SUBMITTING files more accessible
-+--
 Reporter:  wenzeslaus   |   Owner:  grass-dev@…
  
 Type:  task |  Status:  new
  
 Priority:  normal   |   Milestone:  7.0.0  
  
Component:  Docs | Version:  svn-trunk  
  
 Keywords:  submitting, addons, doxygen  |Platform:  Unspecified
  
  Cpu:  Unspecified  |  
-+--

Comment(by wenzeslaus):

 When looking at similar files, I completely over looked the whole ``doc``
 directory:

  * source:grass/trunk/doc

 I would like to have a look at this but I don't know when I will be able
 to do it, so I encourage others to think about it, too. Moreover, I want
 to avoid situation when I will explore, for example reStructuredText +
 Sphinx solution and than will realize that public opinion is to have
 everything in HTML only.

-- 
Ticket URL: https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2103#comment:2
GRASS GIS http://grass.osgeo.org

___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #2103: Make SUBMITTING files more accessible

2013-10-16 Thread GRASS GIS
#2103: Make SUBMITTING files more accessible
-+--
 Reporter:  wenzeslaus   |   Owner:  grass-dev@…
  
 Type:  task |  Status:  new
  
 Priority:  normal   |   Milestone:  7.0.0  
  
Component:  Docs | Version:  svn-trunk  
  
 Keywords:  submitting, addons, doxygen  |Platform:  Unspecified
  
  Cpu:  Unspecified  |  
-+--

Comment(by wenzeslaus):

 To make the list and currently used possibilities complete, here is a link
 to rfc diretcory which contains all the RFC/PSC documentes:
  * source:grass/trunk/rfc
 The documents are in half-Doxygen half-Markdown syntax which is processed
 by Doxygen and the result is here:
  * http://grass.osgeo.org/programming7/psc_motions.html
  * http://grass.osgeo.org/programming7/RFC.html

 And to make decision about syntax even harder: we are using also Media
 wiki and Trac wiki/tracker with their specific syntaxes. This was also
 discuss at grass-dev [http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-
 dev/2013-May/063625.html Using trac is difficult] ([http://osgeo-
 org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Using-quot-trac-quot-is-difficult-td5041757.html
 nabble], [http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.grass.devel/51981
 gmane]).

-- 
Ticket URL: https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2103#comment:1
GRASS GIS http://grass.osgeo.org

___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #2103: Make SUBMITTING files more accessible

2013-10-15 Thread GRASS GIS
#2103: Make SUBMITTING files more accessible
-+--
 Reporter:  wenzeslaus   |   Owner:  grass-dev@…
  
 Type:  task |  Status:  new
  
 Priority:  normal   |   Milestone:  7.0.0  
  
Component:  Docs | Version:  svn-trunk  
  
 Keywords:  submitting, addons, doxygen  |Platform:  Unspecified
  
  Cpu:  Unspecified  |  
-+--
 I think that people are not reading any of SUBMITTING files and the reason
 is that they are not available online as HTML or as a part of
 documentation. The fact that people don't read the documentation, makes
 this ticket some kind of critical.

 Currently SUBMITTING files are just plain text files in source code.
 Online availability is only Trac file view which displays them again as
 plain text file. They are available offline when you download source codes
 but not everybody is used to look at the traditional files in the source
 root directory such as SUBMITTING. The same applies to main source code
 and to addons.

 There are two highly connected sub-tickets: syntax and publishing.

 Files can become part of the main web site, part of Doxygen documentation
 (or potentially other programming documentation) or be stand alone (web)
 pages.

 I can see only three possibilities in the syntax. Complete HTML, HTML part
 (same as manual pages), Markdown, reStructuredText.

 Complete HTML is easy for publishing. HTML part can be integrated with
 Doxygen or processed using GRASS manual tools. Markdown can be integrated
 with Doxygen or processed using some 3rd party tools. reStructuredText
 cannot be integrated with anything which is in GRASS but it is a Python
 (almost) standard and it can by integrated with potential Sphinx
 documentation or processed using 3rd party tools just as Markdown would
 be.

 If I understand correctly (but somebody might want to check this), HTML,
 Markdown and reStructuredText can be rendered by Trac into HTML page just
 by setting the right properties, so this would take care of online
 publishing.

 Markdown and reStructuredText are close to the current plain text syntax
 (there are some headings and bullet list already) and of course, there is
 the advantage of these formats that they look nice by themselves.

 I was not diving deeply into various possibilities, I think we need to at
 least partially agree on approximate directions first.

 Note that there are also some other files similar in way that they a just
 plain text files in the source code:
  * source:grass/trunk/README
  * source:grass/trunk/INSTALL
  * source:grass/trunk/TODO (last change 5 year ago)
  * source:grass-addons/README
  * source:grass-addons/SVN_HOWTO.txt
 These might need the same changes too. Maybe also other files might be
 part of this category:
  * source:grass/trunk/AUTHORS
  * source:grass/trunk/COPYING
  * source:grass/trunk/GPL.TXT
  * source:grass/trunk/CHANGES (last change 8 year ago)
 For some files similar changes were already done:
  * source:grass/trunk/REQUIREMENTS.html
  * source:grass/trunk/translators.csv
  * source:grass-addons/contributors.csv

-- 
Ticket URL: http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2103
GRASS GIS http://grass.osgeo.org

___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev