Re: [GRASS-dev] G7 scripts: keywords versus keyword
Hi all,
2014-12-28 18:02 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org:
-#% keywords: general, projection, transformation
+#% keywords: general
+#% keywords: projection
+#% keywords: transformation
Shouldn't the name of the key be keyword rather than keywords since only
one is allowed? Or it is too heavy change?
Probably it should be changed. I would not mind to do the job. We
could, however, also accept the plural form.
The relevant line of code seems to be
line 87 in
general/g.parser/parse.c:if (G_strcasecmp(cmd, keywords) == 0) {
no objections to change it to 'keyword'. Martin
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.eu/mentors/landa
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] G7 scripts: keywords versus keyword
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
2014-12-28 18:02 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org:
-#% keywords: general, projection, transformation
+#% keywords: general
+#% keywords: projection
+#% keywords: transformation
Shouldn't the name of the key be keyword rather than keywords since only
one is allowed? Or it is too heavy change?
Probably it should be changed. I would not mind to do the job. We
could, however, also accept the plural form.
The relevant line of code seems to be
line 87 in
general/g.parser/parse.c:if (G_strcasecmp(cmd, keywords) == 0) {
no objections to change it to 'keyword'. Martin
Ok, done in r63871(trunk), r63872 (relbranch70), r63874 (Addons).
Markus
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
[GRASS-dev] G7 scripts: keywords versus keyword
Former subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS-SVN] r63785 - in
grass-addons/grass7: general/g.compare.md5 general/g.isis3mt
general/g.proj.all raster/r.mcda.ahp raster/r.shalstab
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Vaclav Petras wenzesl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 5:49 PM, svn_gr...@osgeo.org wrote:
-#% keywords: general, projection, transformation
+#% keywords: general
+#% keywords: projection
+#% keywords: transformation
Shouldn't the name of the key be keyword rather than keywords since only
one is allowed? Or it is too heavy change?
Probably it should be changed. I would not mind to do the job. We
could, however, also accept the plural form.
The relevant line of code seems to be
line 87 in
general/g.parser/parse.c:if (G_strcasecmp(cmd, keywords) == 0) {
Markus
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
