Re: [GRASS-dev] closing tickets as wontfix because of "No activity"

2019-02-10 Thread Martin Landa 
Hi,

so 9. 2. 2019 v 22:42 odesílatel Markus Metz
 napsal:
> I don't think it is a good idea to close tickets as "wontfix" because of "No 
> activity". The issues might still be relevant. I suggest to ping the 
> appropriate maintainer(s) instead.
>
> "wontfix" should IMHO be used if a ticket can not be fixed for technical 
> reasons.

I tend to agree. To my experience, usually pinging the
reporter/"maintainer" does not work. So maybe closing ticket will have
another effect ;-) Feel free to reopen relevant issues.

Ma

-- 
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Re: [GRASS-dev] closing tickets as wontfix because of "No activity"

2019-02-09 Thread Luca Delucchi 
On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 at 22:42, Markus Metz 
wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>

Hi,

>
> I don't think it is a good idea to close tickets as "wontfix" because of
> "No activity". The issues might still be relevant. I suggest to ping the
> appropriate maintainer(s) instead.
>
>
I had same feeling...


> "wontfix" should IMHO be used if a ticket can not be fixed for technical
> reasons.
>
> my2c
>
> Markus M
>
>
-- 
ciao
Luca

www.lucadelu.org
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

[GRASS-dev] closing tickets as wontfix because of "No activity"

2019-02-09 Thread Markus Metz 
Hi Martin,

I don't think it is a good idea to close tickets as "wontfix" because of
"No activity". The issues might still be relevant. I suggest to ping the
appropriate maintainer(s) instead.

"wontfix" should IMHO be used if a ticket can not be fixed for technical
reasons.

my2c

Markus M
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev